Giriş ve Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, nüks etmiş inguinal herni nedeniyle operasyon gerektiren çocuklarda laparoskopik herni onarımı tekniğini tanımlamak ve konvansiyonel cerrahi yöntemlere göre farklılığını ve sonuçlarını tartışmaktır.Gereç ve Yöntemler: 1 Ocak 2011-10 Ağustos 2011 tarihleri arasında 5 çocuk hastaya nüks inguinal herni nedeniyle laparoskopik herni onarımı yapılmıştır. Hastaların yaşı, önceki ameliyat tarihi ve bilgileri, operasyon süresi, postop takip bulguları ve süresi retrospektif olarak hasta dosyalarından alınarak kayıt edildi. Tüm hastalar ilk ameliyatlarını standart inguinal yaklaşımla olmuşlardı. Hastaların tümü erkek ve 1-11 yaş arasındaydılar. İnfraumblikal bölgeye yapılan curvilinear insizyondan Veress iğnesi peritoneal boşluğa yerleştirildikten sonra hastanın yaşına göre 7-12mm Hg basınç ile pnömoperitoneum oluşturuldu. Beş veya on mm, sıfır derece teleskop, bu insizyondan yerleştirilen trokar içinden kullanıldı. Üç veya beş mmlik iki çalışma portu ise sağ ve sol alt kadranlardan yerleştirildiler. İnternal ringdeki açıklık 3/0 ipek dikiş materyali ile atılan purse string sütur tekniği ile kapatıldı. 1 hastada laparoskopik nüks herni onarımı esnasında daha önce klinik olarak bulgu vermemiş kontrlateral herni saptandı ve aynı seansta onarıldı.Bulgular: Ameliyat süreleri 28-52 dk arasında değişmekteydi. Tüm hastalar postoperatif 3. saat beslenmiş ve 6. saatte taburcu edilmişlerdir. Postoperatif ağrı için 2 hastaya tek doz iv parasetamol infüzyonu gerekli olmuş diğer 3 hastaya ise analjezik gerekmemiştir. Ortalama takip süremiz henüz 4.8 ay (1-7 ay) olup bu dönemde nüks inguinal herni, hidrosel ve testis atrofisi gibi komplikasyonlar görülmemiştir.Sonuç: Laparoskopik onarım, nüks inguinal herni onarımında hem operatif teknik olarak daha kolaydır, hem de inguinal kanal içerisindeki yapıları koruduğundan daha güvenlidir. Ancak daha büyük seriler ve daha uzun takip sürelerine sahip çalışmalar tekniğin üstünlüklerini daha net gösterecektir.
Introduction and Purpose: The aim of this study is to define and discuss the diversity of the tecnique, to determine the results of laparoscopic repair, and to compare with conventional surgical methods in children with recurrent inguinal hernia.Material and Method: Between 1 January 2011 and 10 August 2011, 5 pediatric patients underwent laparoscopic hernia repair due to recurrent inguinal hernia. The age of patients, data of previous operation, operative time, duration of post-op follow up, and the findings during follow up were recorded from hospital data retrospectively. All the patients have been operated with standard inguinal approach in previous operation. All the patients were male between 1 and 11 years old. After a Veress needle was inserted via a curvilenear incision in the infraumblical region, pneumoperitoneum was created and maintained with 7-12 mm Hg intraabdominal pressure according to the patient’s age. Five or ten mm, zero degree telescope was used via a trocar that was inserted through the first incision. Two working ports; 3 or 5 mm in size inserted on the left and right lower quadrant; respectively. Opening on the internal ring was closed by purse string suture technique using 3.0 silk suture materials. In one of the patients, contralateral hernia did not cause any clinical findings previously was noticed during operation and repaired at the same time. Results: Operation times ranged 28-52 minutes. Oral feeding was begun 3 hours after the surgery and all patients were discharged after 6 hours from surgery. Two patients were required single dose iv paracetamol for the relief of postoperative pain, others were not required any medication. Mean follow-up duration was 4.8 months (1-7 months) and no complication suc as recurrent inguinal hernia, hydrosel, and testiculer atrophy did not occured during the follow up duration.Conclusion: In recurrent hernia; laparoscopic repair is easier and safer technique for operation. Additionally, this technique is safer than others, because it protects the structures within the inguinal canal. However, studies with larger series and longer follow-up periods will show the advantage of this technique more clearly
Other ID | JA77HU27DB |
---|---|
Journal Section | Research Article |
Authors | |
Publication Date | June 1, 2011 |
Submission Date | June 1, 2011 |
Published in Issue | Year 2011 Volume: 5 Issue: 3 |
The publication language of Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease is English.
Manuscripts submitted to the Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease will go through a double-blind peer-review process. Each submission will be reviewed by at least two external, independent peer reviewers who are experts in the field, in order to ensure an unbiased evaluation process. The editorial board will invite an external and independent editor to manage the evaluation processes of manuscripts submitted by editors or by the editorial board members of the journal. The Editor in Chief is the final authority in the decision-making process for all submissions. Articles accepted for publication in the Turkish Journal of Pediatrics are put in the order of publication, with at least 6 original articles in each issue, taking into account the acceptance dates. If the articles sent to the reviewers for evaluation are assessed as a senior for publication by the reviewers, the section editor and the editor considering all aspects (originality, high scientific quality and citation potential), it receives publication priority in addition to the articles assigned for the next issue.
The aim of the Turkish Journal of Pediatrics is to publish high-quality original research articles that will contribute to the international literature in the field of general pediatric health and diseases and its sub-branches. It also publishes editorial opinions, letters to the editor, reviews, case reports, book reviews, comments on previously published articles, meeting and conference proceedings, announcements, and biography. In addition to the field of child health and diseases, the journal also includes articles prepared in fields such as surgery, dentistry, public health, nutrition and dietetics, social services, human genetics, basic sciences, psychology, psychiatry, educational sciences, sociology and nursing, provided that they are related to this field. can be published.