Research Article

Mechanisms for Dealing With the Unexpected in Small-Scale Contracting Using Smart Contracts

Volume: 2 Number: 1 June 30, 2025

Mechanisms for Dealing With the Unexpected in Small-Scale Contracting Using Smart Contracts

An Erratum to this article was published on July 22, 2025. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tcsa/article/1745930

Abstract

We demonstrate proof-of-concept for an expanded blockchain smart contract based small-scale contracting process that includes an internally managed arbitration service to manage disputes. Using Ethereum smart contracts, we model a small-scale general contracting scenario with disruptions. Execution is demonstrated with the Remix Integrated Development Environment (IDE). We show the feasibility of managing general contracting disputes with an internal arbitration service, completely encompassed within blockchain smart contracts. This research continues an original effort to model the small-scale general contracting scenario on a blockchain network. Further work is required to expand the scope of dispute management and account for additional external factors. Also, full-scale decentralized application is not explored here. This process expands the scope of current practices and tools, such as Angi, in a decentralized manner with blockchain. Full-scale adoption at the small scale is likely difficult due to disbelief in technology, cost, and resistance to change.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. AAA (2023), ‘Costs of Arbitration’, American Arbitration Association. https://www.adr.org/sites/ default/files/document repository/AAA228-Costs of Arbitration.pdf (accessed 15 August 2023).
  2. Ahlemann, F., El Arbi, F., Kaiser, M. G. and Heck, A. (2013), ‘A process framework for theoretically grounded prescriptive research in the project management field’, International Journal of Project Management, 31(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.03.008.
  3. Ahmadisheykhsarmast, S. and Sonmez, R. (2020), ‘A smart contract system for security of payment of construction contracts’, Automation in Construction 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103401.
  4. Alair (2019), ‘Homeowners don’t trust contractors and we deserve it’, Alair Homes. https://www.alairhomes.com/scottsdale/blog/homeowners-dont-trust-contractors-and-we-deserve-it/.
  5. Angi (2021). https://www.legal.angi.com/ (accessed 20 February 2024).
  6. Angi (2024). https://www.angi.com/ (accessed 20 February 2024).
  7. Aouidef, Y., Ast, F. and Deffains, B. (2021), ‘Decentralized Justice: A Comparative Analysis of Blockchain Online Dispute Resolution Projects’, Frontiers in Blockchain 4, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2021.564551.
  8. Asgaonkar, A. and Krishnamachari, B. (2019), Solving the Buyer and Seller’s Dilemma: A Dual-Deposit Escrow Smart Contract for Provably Cheat-Proof Delivery and Payment for a Digital Good without a Trusted Mediator, in ‘2019 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC)’, IEEE, pp. 262–267. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8751482.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Management Information Systems , Information Systems (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

May 30, 2025

Publication Date

June 30, 2025

Submission Date

March 7, 2025

Acceptance Date

May 7, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 2 Number: 1

APA
Fukuzawa, M., Kay, M., Mcconnell, B., Thoney-barletta, K., & Warsing, D. (2025). Mechanisms for Dealing With the Unexpected in Small-Scale Contracting Using Smart Contracts. Transactions on Computer Science and Applications, 2(1), 19-39. https://izlik.org/JA48DA54SP