Trafik Yönetiminde Şerit Kontrol Sistemlerinin Etkinliğinin İncelenmesi

Abstract

Trafik kaza-olayları otoyollardaki trafik sıkışıklığının önemli nedenlerindendir ve esnek trafik kontrol yöntemleri gerektirmektedir. Şerit kontrol sistemleri (ŞKS), otoyollardaki şerit kullanımını yönetmek için kullanılan trafik yönetim teknolojisidir. Bu teknolojide, her şerit üzerinde şerite özel bir elektronik tanıtı ile sürücülere Değişken Hız Sınırı (DHS) veya şerit kapatılması bilgisi iletilerek trafik yönetimi yapılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, D100 Karayolu´nda bulunan bir yol ağında tek bir şeridin kaza sonucu kapanması durumunda, 141 senaryoda, farklı uyum, talep ve konumlarda ayrı ayrı ve birlikte ŞKS ve DHS uygulamalarının mikroskobik olarak etkinliği ölçülmüştür. ŞKS´nin tek başına uygulandığı en iyi senaryoda ortalama seyahat süresi %16.76 azalırken, ortalama seyahat hızı %20.19 artmıştır.

Keywords

• Şerit kontrol sistemleri,akıllı ulaşım sistemleri,kaza-olay yönetimi

The Investigation of The Effect of Lane Control Systems on Traffic Management

Abstract

Traffic incidents are one of the major causes of traffic congestion requiring flexible traffic control methods. Lane control sistems (LCSs) are a form of traffic management technology for managing lane use on freeways. This is accomplished by posting speed limits or notices to vacate/change a lane on an electronic sign above each lane. In this study, the effectiveness of LCS and speed limit implementations is tested using 141 scenarios including different compliance rates, traffic demands and LCS locations in a single-blocked-lane incident case on a microsimulation model of a network in D100 Highway in Istanbul. The best scenario (LCS implementation only) decreased the average travel time by 16.76%, and increased the average speed by 20.19%.

Keywords

• Lane control systems,intelligent transportation systems,incident management

References

1. Collier, T., Goodin, G., Managed Lanes:A Cross-Cutting Study, HWA-HOP-05-037, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington, DC., ABD, 2004
2. Department of Transport and Main Roads, Traffic and Road Use Management Manual (TRUM), Queensland, Avustralya, 2013
3. Coleman, J. A., Paniati, J. F., Cotton, R. D., Parker Jr, M. R., Covey, R., Pena Jr, H., Graham, D., Robinson, M. L., McCauley, J., Taylor, W. C., Morford, G., FHWA Study Tour for Speed Management and Enforcement Technology, özet raporu, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington, DC., ABD, 1995
4. Richard, T., Jaisung, C., Evaluation of pictograms in dynamic lane control systems in the Republic of Korea, Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 9, 2, 56-61, 2009
5. Smulders, S., Control of freeway traffic flow by variable speed signs, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 24, 2, 111-132, 1990
6. Van den Hoogen, E., Smulders, S. Control by variable speed signs: Results of the Dutch experiment, Seventh International Conference on `Road Traffic Monitoring and Control', Londra, İngiltere, 1994
7. Carlson, G. C., Lari, A. Z., Evaluation of the Use of Downward Yellow Arrows in the I-94 Lane Control Signal System, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Minnesota, ABD, 1982
8. Schaefer, L., Upchurch, J., Ashur, S. A., An evaluation of freeway lane control signing using computer simulation, Mathematical and computer modelling, 27, 9, 177-187, 1998

9. Ben-Akiva, M., Cuneo, D., Hasan, M., Jha, M., Yang, Q. Evaluation of freeway control using a microscopic simulation laboratory, Transportation research Part C: emerging technologies, 11, 1, 29-50, 2003
10. Lin, P. W., Kang, K. P., Chang, G. L., Exploring the effectiveness of variable speed limit controls on highway work-zone operations, Intelligent transportation systems, 8, 3, 155-168, 2004
11. İstanbul Ulaşım Haberleşme ve Güvenlik Teknolojileri A.Ş., Şerit yönetim sistemi senaryo ve analiz çalışmaları, 2009
12. Jha, M., Cuneo, D., Ben-Akiva, M. Evaluation of freeway lane control for incident management, Journal of transportation engineering, 125, 6, 495-501, 1999
13. Neudorff, L. G., Randall, J. E., Reiss, R., Gordon, R, Freeway Management and Operations Handbook, Sonuç raporu, FHWA-OP-04-003, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington, DC., ABD, 2003
14. Ullman, G.L., Parma, K.D., Peoples, M. D., Trout, N.D., Tallamraju, S.S., Visibility, spacing, and operation of freeway lane control signals, Araştırma raporu, FHWA/TX-97/1498-3F, Texas Department of Transportation, Texas, ABD, 1996.
15. Zhicai J., Xiaoxiong, Z., Hongwei Y., Simulation research and implemented effect analysis of variable speed limits on freeway, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, Washington D.C., USA, Ekim 3-6, 2004.
16. Pesti, G., Wiles, P., Cheu, R.L., Songchitruksa, P., Shelton, J., Cooner, S., Traffic control strategies for congested freeways and work zones, FHWA/TX-08/0-5326-2, Ekim 2008.
17. Kathmann, T. Assessment of the Effectiveness of Active Speed Warning Signs – Use of Inductive Loop Data or Empirical Data?, Proceedings of International Conference: Traffic Safety on Three Continents, Moscow, 2001.
18. Pesti, G. Alternative Way of Using Speed Trailers: Evaluation of the D-25 Speed Advisory Sign System, Compendium of Papers CD-ROM, Paper 05-2735, 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., January 9-13, 2005.
19. McCoy, P.T., and G. Pesti. Effectiveness of Condition-Responsive Advisory Speed Messages in Rural Freeway Work Zones, Transportation Research Record, No. 1794, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 11-18.
20. Mousa, R.M., N.M. Rouphail, and F. Azadivar. “Integrating Microscopic Simulation and Optimization: Application to Freeway Work Zone Traffic Control.” Transportation Research Record, No. 1254, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990.
21. Nemeth Z.A., and N.M. Rouphail. “Lane Closures at Freeway Work Zones: Simulation Study.” Transportation Research Record, No. 869, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1982.
22. McCoy, P.T., G. Pesti, and P. Byrd. Alternative Driver Information to Alleviate Work-Zone-Related Delays. Final Report. NDOR SPR-PL-1(35)P513. Transportation Research Studies, Şubat 1999.
23. PARAMICS Kullanım kılavuzu.