Optimizing Non-Linear Granular Layer Coefficients of a Flexible Pavement for Mechanistic-Empirical Method
Abstract
In recent years, mechanistic-empirical (M-E) design methods are preferred in the design of flexible pavements instead of empirical methods using equations based on the road performance tests. However, the calibration of transfer equations that convert mechanical responses to pavement life and the definition of layer materials used in M-E methods have great importance for M-E methods.
In this study, mechanical analyzes of a cross-section designed with the AASHTO-93 method were performed, and service life values were calculated with different empirical transfer equations. The obtained M-E design results were compared with the results calculated with the AASHTO-93 method, and transfer equations compatible with the AASHTO-93 method were determined. Among the transfer equations examined, it was found that the rutting equation of the Asphalt Institute gave the most consistent results with the AASHTO-93 method. In the mechanical analysis of the selected cross-section, granular base and sub-base layers were defined as non-linear elastic reflecting the actual in-situ conditions. K-Ɵ model was preferred for non-linear elastic layer definition, and K1 and K2 parameters of this model were optimized.
Keywords
- Mechanistic-empirical design
- AASHTO-93 method
- non-linear layer coefficients
- pavement life
- rutting
- fatigue
Project Number
References
- [1] Huang, Y. H.,Pavement analysis and design. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 1993.
- [2] Mashayekhi, M., Amini, A.A., Behbahani, H., Nobakht, S., Comparison of mechanistic-empirical and empirical flexible pavement design procedures of AASHTO: A Case Study, 5th International Conference Bituminous Mixtures and Pavements, Thessaloniki, 2011.
- [3] Alhasan, A., Ali, A., Offenbacker, D., Smadi, O., Lewis-Beck, C., Incorporating spatial variability of pavement foundation layers stiffness in reliability-based mechanistic-empirical pavement performance prediction, Transportation Geotechnics, 17, 1-13, 2018.
- [4] Carvalho, R. L.,Schwartz, C. W., Comparisons of flexible pavement designs: AASHTO empirical versus NCHRP project 1–37A mechanistic–empirical, Transportation Research Record, 1947(1), 167-174, 2006.
- [5] Sağlık, A.,Güngör, A.G., Highways flexible pavement design guide, Ankara, 2008.
- [6] Çelik, O. N.,Eyada, S. O., Assessment of flexible pavement fatigue life of Turkish typical sections using mechanistic empirical pavement design approach for coastal region, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 10(1), 33-43, 2019.
- [7] Muniandy, R., Aburkaba, E., Thamer, N., Comparison of flexible pavement performance using Kenlayer and Chev PC software program, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(9), 112-119, 2013.
- [8] Behiry, A. E. A. E. M., Fatigue and rutting lives in flexible pavement, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 3(4), 367-374, 2012.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Civil Engineering
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
November 1, 2021
Submission Date
October 23, 2019
Acceptance Date
May 23, 2020
Published in Issue
Year 2021 Volume: 32 Number: 6