Analysis of a Prefabricated Vertical Drain (PVD) Soil Improvement Project

Abstract

A settlement analysis has been carried out for several sectors of a rail station yard improved with prefabricated vertical drains (PVD) in Istanbul, Turkey, that exhibited prolonged consolidation beyond the predicted values in certain sectors of the treated zone. Final settlement and End of Primary (EOP) settlement times have been estimated theoretically as well as using the Asaoka graphical procedure. The compliance of settlement-time curves with in-situ measurements and Asaoka solution has been investigated. A geotechnical model was developed for finite element and three-dimensional consolidation analyses. The settlement curves obtained by varying horizontal-vertical permeability coefficient ratio (k_h/k_v) and in-situ measurements have been compared, and k_h/k_v values corresponding to 90% degree of consolidation has been computed for all sectors. The effect of drain spacing (s_drain) as well as drain length (L_drain) on the rate of consolidation have been examined for each sector, keeping the specified ratios constant. The times corresponding to 95% degree of consolidation (t₉₅) have been calculated using the theoretical solution and compared to in-situ measurements. Calculated t₉₅‘s have also been compared to their estimated values by varying the spacing (s_drain) and the length (L_drain). Additionally, the required intervals of s_drain and L_drain have been obtained corresponding to the calculated t₉₅ times.

Keywords

• Prefabricated Vertical Drain (PVD)
• Radial consolidation
• 3D consolidation
• Acceleration of consolidation
• Consolidation settlement
• Coefficient of permeability
• Degree of consolidation
• Consolidation rate
• Asaoka procedure
• Numerical analysis

Analysis of a Prefabricated Vertical Drain (PVD) Soil Improvement Project

Abstract

A settlement analysis has been carried out for several sectors of a rail station yard improved with prefabricated vertical drains (PVD) in Istanbul, Turkey, that exhibited prolonged consolidation beyond the predicted values in certain sectors of the treated zone. Final settlement and End of Primary (EOP) settlement times have been estimated theoretically as well as using the Asaoka graphical procedure. The compliance of settlement-time curves with in-situ measurements and Asaoka solution has been investigated. A geotechnical model was developed for finite element and three-dimensional consolidation analyses. The settlement curves obtained by varying horizontal-vertical permeability coefficient ratio (k_h/k_v) and in-situ measurements have been compared, and k_h/k_v values corresponding to 90% degree of consolidation has been computed for all sectors. The effect of drain spacing (s_drain) as well as drain length (L_drain) on the rate of consolidation have been examined for each sector, keeping the specified ratios constant. The times corresponding to 95% degree of consolidation (t₉₅) have been calculated using the theoretical solution and compared to in-situ measurements. Calculated t₉₅‘s have also been compared to their estimated values by varying the spacing (s_drain) and the length (L_drain). Additionally, the required intervals of s_drain and L_drain have been obtained corresponding to the calculated t₉₅ times.

Keywords

• Prefabricated Vertical Drain (PVD)
• Radial consolidation
• 3D consolidation
• Acceleration of consolidation
• Consolidation settlement
• Coefficient of permeability
• Degree of consolidation
• Consolidation rate
• Asaoka procedure
• Numerical analysis

References

1. [1] Terzaghi K (1925) Erdbaumechanik. Franz Deuticke, Leipzig and Vienna
2. [2] Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical Soil Mechanics. Wiley, New York
3. [3] Biot MA (1941) General Theory of Three-Dimensional Consolidation. Journal of Applied Physics 12: 155-164
4. [4] Carillo N (1942) Simple two and three dimensional cases in the theory of consolidation of soils. Journal of Mathematics and Physics 21: 1-5
5. [5] Rendulic L (1935) Der hydrodynamische Spannungsausgleich in zentral entwasserten Tonzylindern. Wasserwirtschaft und Technik 2: 250-253, 269-273
6. [6] Barron RA (1948) Consolidation of fine-grained soils by drain wells. Transactions of ASCE 113: 718-754
7. [7] Richart FE (1959) Review of the theories for sand drains. Transactions of ASCE 124: 709-736
8. [8] Kjellman W (1948) Consolidation of fine-grained soils by drain wells. Transactions of ASCE 113, Contribution to the discussion

9. [9] Budhu B (2010) Soil Mechanics and Foundations.3rd Ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York
10. [10] ASTM D2487 (2017) Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org
11. [11] Hansbo S, Jamiolkowski M, Kok L (1981) Consolidation by vertical drains. Géotechnique 31: 45-66
12. [12] Asaoka A (1978) Observational Procedure of Settlement Prediction. Soils and Foundations 18: 87-101
13. [13] Hausmann MR (1990) Engineering Principles of Ground Modification. McGraw-Hill, Singapore
14. [14] Hansbo S (1983) How to evaluate the properties of prefabricated drains. Proc. 8th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Helsinki, pp. 621-626
15. [15] Miura N, Chai JC, Toyota K (1998) Investigation on some factors affecting discharge capacity of prefabricated vertical drains. Proc. 6th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 845-850
16. [16] Hansbo S (1987) Design aspects of vertical drains and lime column installation. Proc. 9th Southeast Asian Geotechnical Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 8-12
17. [17] Bergado DT, Asakami H, Alfaro MC, Balasubramaniam AS (1991) Smear effects of vertical drains on soft Bangkok clay. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 117: 1509-1530