Abstract
Projects are laden with variety of uncertainties depending on their unique characteristics. Construction projects have their own
distinctive qualifications and technology. Thereby, unspecialized legal
professionals on the subjects of construction related cases would lead the
judicial process to settle on unhealthy basis. In this study, it is aimed to classify
disputes related to construction sector to distinguish the most frequent
dispute sources and to identify the competency level and qualification of
concerned judicial actors. Correspondingly, 282 cases between 2007 and
2017 in Turkey have been classified to relevant contents and analysed. In
conclusion, contract contents, civil projects, contracts between employers and
contractors, debits and credits related disputes have been detected as the most
frequent dispute sources under the main contents. Secondly, in majority of the
cases, reassessment has been given by Court of Cassation due to inadequate
competency level of Courts of First Instance and expert witnesses.
Keywords
Disputes in Construction Competency Levels of Legal Actors Legal Process in Construction Content Analysis
References
- PMI, Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK), 5 ed., Pennsylvania. PMI Publications, 2013.
- Sanghera, P., PMP In Depth Project Management Professional Study Guide for the PMP Exam, 4 ed., Boston. Course Technology PTR, 2010.
- lter, D., Dikbaş, A., Less, M., Alternative Dispute Resolution: Suggestions for Application in the Turkish Construction Industry, Construction Management and Economics Conference (CME25), Reading, 2007.
- Oxfordbusinessgroup, Oxford Business Group, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.oxfordbusinessgroup.com/overview/turkeys-construction-sector-maintain-its-significant-role-economy-several-large-projects-under-way. [Accessed 05 05 2017].
- İlter, D., Dikbaş, A., An analysis of the key challenges to the widespread use, International Journal of Law in the Built Environment of mediation in the Turkish construction industry, 1, 2, 143-155, 2009.
- Cheung, S., Suen, H. C. H., Lam, T., Fundamentals of Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes in Construction, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128, 5, 409-417, 2002.
- Harmon, K. M. J., Resolution Of Construction Disputes: A Review of Current Methodologies, Leadership and Management in Engineering, 3, 4, 187-201, 2003.
- İlter, D., Dikbaş, A., An investigation of the factors influencing dispute frequency in construction projects, RICS COBRA Research Conference, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 2009.
- İlter, D., Bakioglu, G., Modeling the Relationship between Risk and Dispute in Subcontractor Contracts, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10, 1, 04517022-1-9, 2018.
- Apanoğlu, E. C., Türkiye’de inşaat sektöründe yargiya intikal eden süre ve özen borcu kaynaklı anlaşmazlıkların analizi, Yüksek Lisans, Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2007.
- Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., Demirel, F., Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri, 17th ed., Ankara. Pegem Akademi, 2014.
- Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H., Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, 9. ed., Ankara. Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2013.
- İlter, D., Opinions of Legal Professionals Regarding the Selection of Appropriate Resolution Method in Construction Disputes, RICS & CIB International Research Conference (COBRA 2010), Paris, 2010.
- Mevzuat.gov.tr, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu, 04 02 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.6100.pdf. [Accessed 13 02 2017].
- Gözler, K., Hukukun Temel Kavramları, 12 ed., Bursa. Ekin Basım Yayın Dağıtım, 2014.
- TC-Yargıtay-Başkanlığı. [Online]. Available: http://www.yargitay.gov.tr/sayfa/organization-chart/673. [Accessed 16 05 2017].
- TBMM, Türk Borçlar Kanunu, 11 01 2011. [Online]. Available: https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/kanunlar/k6098.html. [Accessed 10 02 2017].
- C. Bvumbwe and D. Thwala, An Exploratory Study of Dispute Resolution Methods in the South African Construction Industry, International Conference on Information and Finance, Singapore, 2011.
Abstract
Projeler benzersiz
karakteristik özelliklerinden kaynaklanan belirsizliklerle doludurlar. İnşaat
projelerinin kendine özgü nitelikleri ve teknolojileri vardır. Böylece,
inşaatla ilgili davalar konusunda uzman olmayan yasal uzmanlar adli sürecin
sağlıksız bir şekilde işlemesine yol açmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, en sık
karşılaşılan anlaşmazlık kaynaklarını ayırt etmek için inşaat sektörüyle ilgili
uyuşmazlıkları sınıflandırmak ve ilgili yargı aktörlerin yeterlik düzeyini ve
niteliğini belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Buna paralel olarak, 2007-2017 yılları
arasında Türkiye'de bulunan 282 vaka ilgili içeriklerine göre sınıflandırılarak
analiz edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, sözleşme içerikleri, inşaat projeleri,
işverenler ile yükleniciler arasındaki sözleşmeler, alacak verecek ilişkileri,
belirlenen ana içeriklerin altındaki en sık uyuşmazlık kaynakları olarak tespit
edilmiştir. İkinci olarak, ilk derece mahkemelerin ve bilirkişilerin yetersiz
donanımda olmaları nedeniyle yargıtayca davaların çoğunun yeniden değerlendirilmesi
istenmiştir.
Keywords
Yapımda Uyuşmazlıklar Yasal Aktörlerin Yeterlilik Düzeyleri Yapımda Yasal Süreç İçerik Analizi
References
- PMI, Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK), 5 ed., Pennsylvania. PMI Publications, 2013.
- Sanghera, P., PMP In Depth Project Management Professional Study Guide for the PMP Exam, 4 ed., Boston. Course Technology PTR, 2010.
- lter, D., Dikbaş, A., Less, M., Alternative Dispute Resolution: Suggestions for Application in the Turkish Construction Industry, Construction Management and Economics Conference (CME25), Reading, 2007.
- Oxfordbusinessgroup, Oxford Business Group, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.oxfordbusinessgroup.com/overview/turkeys-construction-sector-maintain-its-significant-role-economy-several-large-projects-under-way. [Accessed 05 05 2017].
- İlter, D., Dikbaş, A., An analysis of the key challenges to the widespread use, International Journal of Law in the Built Environment of mediation in the Turkish construction industry, 1, 2, 143-155, 2009.
- Cheung, S., Suen, H. C. H., Lam, T., Fundamentals of Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes in Construction, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128, 5, 409-417, 2002.
- Harmon, K. M. J., Resolution Of Construction Disputes: A Review of Current Methodologies, Leadership and Management in Engineering, 3, 4, 187-201, 2003.
- İlter, D., Dikbaş, A., An investigation of the factors influencing dispute frequency in construction projects, RICS COBRA Research Conference, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 2009.
- İlter, D., Bakioglu, G., Modeling the Relationship between Risk and Dispute in Subcontractor Contracts, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10, 1, 04517022-1-9, 2018.
- Apanoğlu, E. C., Türkiye’de inşaat sektöründe yargiya intikal eden süre ve özen borcu kaynaklı anlaşmazlıkların analizi, Yüksek Lisans, Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2007.
- Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., Demirel, F., Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri, 17th ed., Ankara. Pegem Akademi, 2014.
- Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H., Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, 9. ed., Ankara. Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2013.
- İlter, D., Opinions of Legal Professionals Regarding the Selection of Appropriate Resolution Method in Construction Disputes, RICS & CIB International Research Conference (COBRA 2010), Paris, 2010.
- Mevzuat.gov.tr, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu, 04 02 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.6100.pdf. [Accessed 13 02 2017].
- Gözler, K., Hukukun Temel Kavramları, 12 ed., Bursa. Ekin Basım Yayın Dağıtım, 2014.
- TC-Yargıtay-Başkanlığı. [Online]. Available: http://www.yargitay.gov.tr/sayfa/organization-chart/673. [Accessed 16 05 2017].
- TBMM, Türk Borçlar Kanunu, 11 01 2011. [Online]. Available: https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/kanunlar/k6098.html. [Accessed 10 02 2017].
- C. Bvumbwe and D. Thwala, An Exploratory Study of Dispute Resolution Methods in the South African Construction Industry, International Conference on Information and Finance, Singapore, 2011.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Civil Engineering |
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | November 1, 2018 |
| Submission Date | February 3, 2018 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2018 Volume: 29 Issue: 6 |
