BibTex RIS Cite

COMPARISON OF VIEWPOINTS TOWARDS FASHION AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES

Year 2008, Volume: 18 Issue: 3, 174 - 184, 01.12.2008

Abstract

Sampling of the research conducted in order to determine behaviors of following fashion and points of view among university
students in different countries was managed by randomly selected 389 students from the cities Ankara in Turkey, Nicosia in Turkish
Republic of Northern Cyprus (T.R.N.C.), Liverpool in England and the students from Turkic Republics who are currently in Ankara for
their university educations.
Data used within the research was collected by the data collection device, which is composed of three parts and designed by a
researcher. The data had been analyzed by using Statistics Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). The correlation between fashion
descriptions and behaviors of following fashion of students and their countries, income levels, genders and education status had been
evaluated by using chi square (χ2) test and significance level of p<0,05. Averages of the grades for points of view of students towards
fashion are calculated and in accordance with fashion view point, hypothesis test is conducted by using gender, education, economic
situation and country group variables.
According to results of the research, it is observed that the students are aware of the concept of fashion, their points of view
towards fashion is “positive”, the majority show behavioral pattern of “trying to follow fashion” whereas there exists a student group
showing behavioral pattern of “falling behind of fashion”. As classified with respect to the countries, Turkish Republic of Northern
Cyprus students’ points of view is found to be “quite positive” whereas the Turkish and students of Turkic Republics show “positive”
and students of England show “negative” views. Behaviors of following fashion and points of view towards fashion among students are
determined to have variety in accordance with level incomes of countries and families.

References

  • 1. Miller, M., Shelby, H. M., Muralı, K.M., 1993, “Toward Formalizing Fashion Theory”, Journal of Marketing Research,, May, pp.142-157.
  • 2. Barbarosoğlu, F., 2004, “Modernleşme Zaman-Zihniyet İlişkilerine Genel Bir Yaklaşım”, Moda Ve Zihniyet, Iz Publishing, Istanbul, pp. 15-47.
  • 3. Edgü, F., 1998, “Moda ve Sanat”, Sanat Kültür Antika P Dergisi, Vol. 12, pp. 8-13.
  • 4. Blumer, H., 1968, “Fashion. In D.L. Sills”, International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 5, pp. 341-345.
  • 5. Sproles, G. B., 1981, “Analyzing Fashion Life Cycles: Principles and Perspectives”, Journal of Marketing, Autumn, Vol. 45, Issue 4, pp.116-124.
  • 6. Rüling, C. C., 2000, “ Theories of (management?) fashion: The contributions of Veblen, Simmel, Blumer, and Bourdieu”, http://www.hec.unige.ch/recherches
  • 7. Baudot, F. 1997, Modanın Yüzyılı, (Çev. Noyan Akatlı), Güncel Publishing, İstanbul, pp. 8-11.
  • 8. Crane, D., 2003, “Moda Kimlik Toplumsal Değişim”, Moda ve Gündemleri, Ayrıntı Publications, İstanbul, pp. 11- 42.
  • 9. Simmel, G., 1997, “Simmel on culture”, The philosophy of fashion In D. Frisby, & M. Featherstone (Eds.), Sage Publication, London, pp.187-206.
  • 10. Tolan,B., 1983, Toplum Bilimlerine Giriş, Savaş Publications, Ankara, pp. 27-29.
  • 11. Gümüş, Ü. B., 1995, “Uluslar arası Pazarlar İçin Üretim Yapan Türk Hazır Giyim İşletmelerinde Moda Tasarımı Çalışmalarının Sektörel Olarak İncelenmesine İlişkin Bir Araştırma”, Not Published Master Thesis, Ankara.
  • 12. Sezgin, Ş., 1992, “Tekstilde Tasarım Olgusu”, Tekstil ve Mühendis Dergisi, Vol.32, pp.84-89
  • 13. Mardin, Ş., 1992, Türk Modernleşmesi, İletişim Publications, İstanbul, pp. 69.
  • 14. Anderson, G., 1990, Fundamentals of Education Research, London et al, The Farmer Press, London, pp. 202.
  • 15. Givry, D. V., 1998, “Sanatın Yakın Dostu Moda”, P Sanat Kültür Antika Dergisi, Vol.12, pp.14-33.
  • 16. Ağaç, S., Çeğindir, N., 2006, “Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Giyim İhtiyaçlarını Karşılama ve Moda Konusundaki Gö- rüş ve Davranışları”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyolojik Araştırmalar Dergisi (http://www.sdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr).
  • 17. Gladwell, M.,1997, “Annals of style”, New Yorker, Vol. 73, pp.78-88.
  • 18. Onur, N., 2004, “Moda Nedir”, Moda Bulaşıcıdır, Epsilon Publishing, İstanbul, pp.15-24.
  • 19. Perrot, M., 1982, Le Mode De Vie Des Familles Bourgeoises,1873-1953, Presses De La Fondation Nationale Dessciences Politiques, Paris . 20. Winakor, G., 1969, “The Process of Clothing Consumption”, Journal of Home Economics ,Vol. 61, No.8, pp. 629-634.
  • 21. Bahadır, Z., 1998, “Moda ve Marka”, Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, Vol.6, pp.401- 404.
  • 22. Smith, D. S., 1994, “A Higher Quality of Life For Whom? Mouths To Feed And Clothes To Wear in The Families of Late Nineteenth-Century American Workers”, Journal of Family History, Vol.19, pp. 1-33.

FARKLI ÜLKELERDEKİ ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN MODAYA BAKIŞ AÇILARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Year 2008, Volume: 18 Issue: 3, 174 - 184, 01.12.2008

Abstract

Farklı kültürlerde yetişen üniversite öğrencilerinin modayı izleme davranışları ve modaya bakış açılarını belirlemek amacıyla planlanıp
yürütülen araştırmanın örneklemini Türkiye’de Ankara, Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyetinde (K.K.T.C.) Lefkoşa, İngiltere’de Liverpool
şehirlerinde ve Türk Cumhuriyetlerinden gelerek Ankara’da üniversite öğrenimi gören üniversite öğrencileri arasından rastlantısal
olarak seçilen 389 öğrenci oluşturmuştur.
Araştırmada kullanılan veriler araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilen ve üç bölümden oluşan veri toplama aracı ile toplanmıştır. Toplanan
veriler Sosyal Bilimler İstatistik Paketi (SPSS) kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Öğrencilerin moda tanımları ve modayı izleme davranışları
ile ülke, gelir düzeyi, cinsiyet ve eğitim düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki ki-kare (χ2) testi uygulanarak p

References

  • 1. Miller, M., Shelby, H. M., Muralı, K.M., 1993, “Toward Formalizing Fashion Theory”, Journal of Marketing Research,, May, pp.142-157.
  • 2. Barbarosoğlu, F., 2004, “Modernleşme Zaman-Zihniyet İlişkilerine Genel Bir Yaklaşım”, Moda Ve Zihniyet, Iz Publishing, Istanbul, pp. 15-47.
  • 3. Edgü, F., 1998, “Moda ve Sanat”, Sanat Kültür Antika P Dergisi, Vol. 12, pp. 8-13.
  • 4. Blumer, H., 1968, “Fashion. In D.L. Sills”, International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 5, pp. 341-345.
  • 5. Sproles, G. B., 1981, “Analyzing Fashion Life Cycles: Principles and Perspectives”, Journal of Marketing, Autumn, Vol. 45, Issue 4, pp.116-124.
  • 6. Rüling, C. C., 2000, “ Theories of (management?) fashion: The contributions of Veblen, Simmel, Blumer, and Bourdieu”, http://www.hec.unige.ch/recherches
  • 7. Baudot, F. 1997, Modanın Yüzyılı, (Çev. Noyan Akatlı), Güncel Publishing, İstanbul, pp. 8-11.
  • 8. Crane, D., 2003, “Moda Kimlik Toplumsal Değişim”, Moda ve Gündemleri, Ayrıntı Publications, İstanbul, pp. 11- 42.
  • 9. Simmel, G., 1997, “Simmel on culture”, The philosophy of fashion In D. Frisby, & M. Featherstone (Eds.), Sage Publication, London, pp.187-206.
  • 10. Tolan,B., 1983, Toplum Bilimlerine Giriş, Savaş Publications, Ankara, pp. 27-29.
  • 11. Gümüş, Ü. B., 1995, “Uluslar arası Pazarlar İçin Üretim Yapan Türk Hazır Giyim İşletmelerinde Moda Tasarımı Çalışmalarının Sektörel Olarak İncelenmesine İlişkin Bir Araştırma”, Not Published Master Thesis, Ankara.
  • 12. Sezgin, Ş., 1992, “Tekstilde Tasarım Olgusu”, Tekstil ve Mühendis Dergisi, Vol.32, pp.84-89
  • 13. Mardin, Ş., 1992, Türk Modernleşmesi, İletişim Publications, İstanbul, pp. 69.
  • 14. Anderson, G., 1990, Fundamentals of Education Research, London et al, The Farmer Press, London, pp. 202.
  • 15. Givry, D. V., 1998, “Sanatın Yakın Dostu Moda”, P Sanat Kültür Antika Dergisi, Vol.12, pp.14-33.
  • 16. Ağaç, S., Çeğindir, N., 2006, “Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Giyim İhtiyaçlarını Karşılama ve Moda Konusundaki Gö- rüş ve Davranışları”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyolojik Araştırmalar Dergisi (http://www.sdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr).
  • 17. Gladwell, M.,1997, “Annals of style”, New Yorker, Vol. 73, pp.78-88.
  • 18. Onur, N., 2004, “Moda Nedir”, Moda Bulaşıcıdır, Epsilon Publishing, İstanbul, pp.15-24.
  • 19. Perrot, M., 1982, Le Mode De Vie Des Familles Bourgeoises,1873-1953, Presses De La Fondation Nationale Dessciences Politiques, Paris . 20. Winakor, G., 1969, “The Process of Clothing Consumption”, Journal of Home Economics ,Vol. 61, No.8, pp. 629-634.
  • 21. Bahadır, Z., 1998, “Moda ve Marka”, Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, Vol.6, pp.401- 404.
  • 22. Smith, D. S., 1994, “A Higher Quality of Life For Whom? Mouths To Feed And Clothes To Wear in The Families of Late Nineteenth-Century American Workers”, Journal of Family History, Vol.19, pp. 1-33.
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA87SA28BF
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Emine Koca This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2008
Submission Date December 1, 2008
Published in Issue Year 2008 Volume: 18 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Koca, E. (2008). COMPARISON OF VIEWPOINTS TOWARDS FASHION AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES. Textile and Apparel, 18(3), 174-184.

No part of this journal may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated in any forms or by any means without prior written permission of the Editorial Board. The views and opinions expressed here in the articles are those of the authors and are not the views of Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon and Textile and Apparel Research-Application Center.