TEKSTİL PERAKENDE ORGANİZASYONLARINA YÖNELİK TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİM, DEĞERLENDİRME VE YENİDEN DEĞERLENDİRME MODELİ

Year 2010, Volume: 20 Issue: 3, 181 - 187, 01.12.2010

Aşkıner Güngör Semih Coşkun Güngör Durur Hacer Güner Gören

Abstract

Genel olarak, tedarikçi seçimi birçok nitel ve nicel faktörü bünyesinde barındıran çok-kriterli bir karar problemidir. Bu çalışma, tekstil sektöründe faaliyet gösteren bir perakendeci için sözkonusu faktörleri belirleyerek üç aşamalı bir tedarikçi seçim modeli içinde değerlendirmektedir. Modelin ilk aşaması geniş bir aday tedarikçi havuzundan daha az sayıda nitelikli tedarikçilerin belirlenmesinde etkili olan faktörlerin göreli önem derecelerini belirlenmesi amacını taşımaktadır. İkinci aşamada ise birinci aşamada belirlenmiş tedarikçilerin ürettiği fiziki ürünlerden beklentileri karşılama düzeyini sorgulamakta önemli olan kriterler ve bu kriterlerin önem derecelerinin ortaya çıkarılması amacı ile tasarlanmıştır. Son aşama ise bir gözden geçirme aşaması olup birlikte çalışılan tedarikçilerin sistem performanslarını irdelemekle ilgili faktörlerini ve bu faktörlerin önem derecelerini tespit etmeye yöneliktir. Modelde, Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHS) ve Analitik Serim Süreci (ASS) karar verme araçları kullanılmıştır. Geliştirilen model ve elde edilen faktör ağırlıkları perakende zincir firmalarından üreticilere kadar geniş bir yelpazede yer alan firmalara fayda sağlayacak niteliktedir

Keywords

Tedarikçi seçimi, Tekstil endüstrisi, Perakende kuruluşları, AHS, ASS

A SUPPLIER SELECTION, EVALUATION AND RE-EVALUATION MODEL FOR TEXTILE RETAIL ORGANIZATIONS

Abstract

In general, supplier selection is a multi-criteria decision problem that contains tangible and intangible factors. This paper identifies and organizes these factors into a three-phase supplier selection model for a textile retail organization. The first phase of the model is designed to identify the relative importance of the factors associated with the identification of a portfolio of suppliers from rather a large set of candidate suppliers. In the second phase of the model, factors required for the evaluation of the suppliers, selected in the first phase, depending on their ability to meet the product requirements are identified and their weights are suggested. In the last phase, the factors related to system performance of the certified suppliers determined in the second phase of the model are identified and their relative importance values are suggested. The model utilizes Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) as decision-making tools. Both model and the weights of the factors determined present a valuable insight on supply processes of a wide range of textile products supplying departments of all retail chain companies

Keywords

Supplier selection, Textile industry, Retail organizations, AHP, ANP

References

• 1. Teng, S.G. and Jaramillo, H., 2005, "A model for evaluation and selection of suppliers in global textile and apparel supply chains" International Journal of Physical Distribution & logistic Management, 35(7), pp 503-523.
• 2. Tokatli, N., 2003, "Globalization and the changing clothing industry in Turkey", Environment and Planning, 35, pp. 1877-1894.
• 3. Bruce, M., Daly, L. and Towers, N., 2004, “Lean or Agile: A Solution for supply chain management in textiles and clothing industry?”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 24(2) pp. 151-170.
• 4. Nordas H. K., 2004, The Global Textile and Clothing Industry post the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing, World Trade Organization Geneva Switzzerland, WTO Publications.
• 5. Dickson, G. W., 1966, "An Analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions." Journal of Purchasing, 2, pp. 5-17.
• 6. Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., et al., 2003, "Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP." Logistics Information Management, 16(6), pp. 382-394.
• 7. Boer de, L., Wegen van der, L., et al., 1998, "Outranking methods in support of supplier selection." European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 4, pp.109-118.
• 8. Muralidharan, C., Anantharaman, N., et al., 2001, "Vendor rating in purchasing scenario: a confidence interval approach." International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(10), pp. 1305-1325.
• 9. Agarwal, A. and Shankar, R., 2002, "Analyzing alternatives for improvement in supply chain performance." Work Study, 51(1), pp. 32-37.
• 10. Bhutta, K. S. and Huq, F., 2002, "Supplier selection problem: a comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approaches." Supply Chain Management, 7(3), pp. 126-135.
• 11. Handfield, R., Walton, S. V. et al., 2002, "Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process." European Journal of Operational Research, 141, pp. 70-87.
• 12. Ünal, C. and Atılgan, T., 2007, “Konfeksiyonda Karar Verme Teknikleri”, Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, 17(4), pp. 256-263. (In Turkish)
• 13. Boer de, L., Labro, E. et al., 2001, "A review of methods supporting supplier selection." European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 7, pp. 75-89.
• 14. Kokangul, A. and Susuz Z., 2009, “Integrated analytical hierarchy process and mathematical programming to supplier selection problem with quantity discount”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33, pp. 1417–1429.
• 15. Chan F.T.S. and Kumar N., 2007, “Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach”, Omega, 35, pp. 417 – 431.
• 16. Cebeci U., Fuzzy AHP-based decision support system for selecting ERP systems in textile industry by using balanced scorecard, Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36, pp. 8900–8909.
• 17. Gencer, C. and Gürpinar D., 2007, "Analytic network process in supplier selection: A case study in an electronic firm." Applied Mathematical Modelling, 31, pp. 2475–2486.
• 18. Lin R.H., 2009, “An integrated FANP–MOLP for supplier evaluation and order allocation”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33, pp. 2730–2736.
• 19. Önüt S., Kara S. S., Işık E., 2009, “Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: A case study for a telecommunication company”, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, pp. 3887-3895.
• 20. Razmi, J., Rafiei H., Hashemi M., 2009, “Designing a decision support system to evaluate and select suppliers using fuzzy analytic network process”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, doi:10.1016/j.cie.2009.06.008.
• 21. Amid, A., Ghodsypour, S.H., O’Brien, C., 2006, “Fuzzy multi-objective linear model for supplier selection in a supply chain”, International Journal of Production Economics, 104 (2), pp. 394-407.
• 22. Çebi, F. and Bayraktar, D., 2003, "An Integrated Approach for Supplier Selection." Logistics Information Management, 16(6), pp. 395-400.
• 23. Wang, G., Huangb, S. H., et al., 2004, "Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology." International Journal of Production Economics, 91(1), pp. 1-15.
• 24. Ghodsypour, S. H. and O'Brien, C., 1998, "A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming." International Journal of Production Economics, 56-57, pp. 199-212.
• 25. Xia, W. and Wu, Z., 2007, "Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments." Omega, 35(5), pp. 494-504.
• 26. Ho W., Xu X., Dey P. K., 2009, “Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review”, European Journal of Operational Research, Article In Press.
• 27. Jones, R., 1997, “Stock changes in UK manufacturing with reference to the clothing manufacturing sector”, Journal of Fashion and Marketing Management, 1(3), pp. 201-15.
• 28. Bruce, M. and Moger, S., 1999, “Dangerous liaisons: an application of supply chain modelling for studying innovation within the UK clothing industry”, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 11(1).
• 29. Chandra, C. and Kumar, S., 2000, “An application of a system analysis methodology to manage logistics in a textile supply chain”, Supply Chain Management, 5(5), pp. 234-44.
• 30. Hines, T., 2001, “From analogue to digital supply chains: implications for fashion marketing”, in Hines, T. and Bruce, M., Eds), Fashion Marketing, Contemporary Issues, Butterworth and Heinemann, Oxford, Chapter 2, pp. 34-6.
• 31. Teng, S.G. and Jaramillo, H., 2003a, “The potential role of South American companies in the US textile/apparel supply chain”, Proceedings of ASEM 2003 National Conference, St Louis, MO, 15-18 October.
• 32. Teng, S.G. and Jaramillo, H., 2003b, “Quality management issues in current US textile and apparel supply chains”, Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering Theory, Applications and Practice, Las Vegas, NV, 10-12 November.
• 33. Güner, M., 2006, “Analitik Hiyerarşi Yönteminin Fason İşletme Seçiminde Kullanılması”, Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, 16(3), pp. 1-6. (In Turkish)
• 34. Saaty, T. L., 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York, McGraw-Hill.
• 35. Winston, W. L., 1994, Operations Research Applications and Algorithms. California, Wadsworth Inc.
• 36. Saaty, T. L., 1996, Decision making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, RWS Publications.
• 37. Meade, L. and Sarkis, J., 1998, "Strategic Analysis Of Logistics And Supply Chain Management Systems Using The Analytical Network Process." Logistics and Transportation Review, 34(3), pp. 201-215.
• 38. Luo, X., Wu, C., Rosenberg, D. and Barnes, D., 2009, “Supplier selection in agile supply chains: An information-processing model and an illustration”, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, In Press.
• 39. Kaya, S. and Erdoğan, Ç., 2008, “Konfeksiyon İşletmelerinde Dikim Bölümündeki Kalite Hatalarına Neden Olan Faktörlerin Araştırılması”, Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, 18(1), pp. 135-141.