KOMPAKT VE SİRO İPLİKLERİNİN DİNAMİK SÜRTÜNME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Year 2016, Volume: 26 Issue: 1, 55 - 63, 01.06.2016

Tuba Bedez Ute

Abstract

Bu çalışma, düşük iplik tüylülüğüne sahip (kompakt, siro, kompakt siro) iplikler ile konvansiyonel ring ipliklerinin dinamik sürtünme özelliklerini kıyaslamak amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Farklı eğirme sistemleriyle üretilen ipliklerin sürtünme özellikleri, farklı yüzey özelliklerine bağlı olarak değişiklik göstermektedir. Hammaddenin etkisini bertaraf etmek için, aynı pamuk fitilleri kullanılarak iplik tipi, iplik numarası ve fitiller arası mesafe (siro iplikler için) gibi çeşitli eğirme parametreleriyle özdeş iplikler üretilmiştir. İplikiplik sürtünme katsayısı (μYY),, iplik-metal sürtünme katsayısı (μYM) ve ipliklerin aşınma özellikleri CTT cihazı ile test edilmiştir. Sonuçlar incelendiğinde, eğirme yönteminin ve iplik inceliğinin ipliklerin sürtünme özellikleri ve döküntü oluşturma özellikleri üzerinde önemli etkisi olduğu ancak fitiller arası mesafenin iplik özelliklerini sınırlı düzeyde etkilediği tespit edilmiştir

Keywords

İplik-iplik sürtünmesi, iplik-metal sürtünmesi, dinamik mukavemet testleri, kompakt iplikler, toz oluşumu, iplik aşınması

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE DYNAMIC FRICTION CHARACTERISTICS OF COMPACT AND SIRO YARNS

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare the dynamic frictional properties of less-hairy yarns (compact, compact-siro and sirospun yarns) to conventional ring-spun yarns. Due to different surface characteristics affecting the frictional behavior, yarns spun by various spinning technologies differ from each other. Identical yarns of varying parameters including yarn type, yarn count, and strand spacing (for sirospun yarns) were produced from the same cotton roving to eliminate variability in raw material. Yarn-to-yarn friction (μYY), yarn-to-metal friction (μYM) and yarn abrasion characteristics of these yarns were determined by CTT instrument. The results have revealed that spinning method and yarn linear density have significant effects on the frictional and lint shedding features of the yarns whereas strand spacing has a limited influence on the yarn frictional properties

Keywords

Yarn-to-yarn friction, yarn-to-metal friction, dynamic tensile testing, compact yarns, lint generation, yarn abrasion

References

• 1. Wu, H., Chen, M., Wang, W., Lai, K., & Ma, B. (2009). The structure of compact yarn. Textile Research Journal, 79(9), 810-814.
• 2. Basal, G., & Oxenham, W. (2006). Comparison of properties and structures of compact and conventional spun yarns. Textile Research Journal, 76(7), 567-575.
• 3. Hearle, J. W., & Morton, W. E. (2008). Physical properties of textile fibres. Elsevier.
• 4. Başer, G., 2008, Tekstil Mekaniğinin Temelleri, Cilt 1: Lif ve İplik Mekaniği, DEÜ Müh. Fak. Yayınları No:326.
• 5. Barella, A., Vega, P. A., & Castro, L. (1989). Yarn Attrition by Abrasion: A Comparison of Polyester-fibre/Cotton Blended-fibre Yarns Spun by Different Spinning Processes. DOI: 10.1080/00405008908658313
• 6. Meslek hastalıkları ve İş ile İlgili Hastalıklar Tanı Rehberi, http://www.isgum.gov.tr/rsm/file /isgdoc/isgip/isgip_saglik_tani_rehberi.pdf
• 7. 2010, Tekstil Sektöründe İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Riskleri, İşte Sağlık Dergisi, Ekim, http://www.istesaglikdergisi.com.tr/index.php/ekim-2010/85-tekstil-sektorunde-issagligi-ve-guvenligi-riskleri
• 8. Jeddi, A. A. A., & Sheikhzade, M. (1994). Factors in yarn abrasion. Textile Asia, 7, 54-55.
• 9. Oxenham, W., Brzan, E. and Yu, C.: The abrasive properties of yarn. Department of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, College of Textiles, North Carolina State University web site.
• 10. Svetnickienė, V., & Čiukas, R. (2009). Investigation of friction properties of yarns from natural fibres. Cell, 19, 75.
• 11. Kayseri, G. Ö. (2014). The frictional and lint shedding characteristics of regenerated cellulosic yarns. DE REDACTIE, 263.
• 12. Liu, L., Chen, J., Zhu, B., Yu, T. X., Tao, X. M., & Cao, J. (2006). The yarn-to-yarn friction of woven fabrics. In Proceedings of the 9th ESAFORM conference, April, Glasgow.
• 13. Rengasamy, R. S., Guruprasad, R., & Asis, P. (2005). Dynamic friction of polyester air-jet textured yarns. Fibers and Polymers, 6(2), 146-150.
• 14. Süpüren, G., Çelik, P., Özdil, N., (2009). Effect of productıon parameters on frıctıon propertı-ies of textured polyester yarns, In Proceedings of the Autex 2009 World Textile Conference.
• 15. Ramkumar, S. S., Shastri, L., Tock, R. W., Shelly, D. C., Smith, M. L., & Padmanabhan, S. (2003). Experimental study of the frictional properties of friction spun yarns. Journal of applied polymer science, 88(10), 2450-2454.
• 16. Ghosh, A., Patanaik, A., Anandjiwala, R. D., & Rengasamy, R. S. (2008). A study on dynamic friction of different spun yarns. Journal of applied polymer science, 108(5), 3233-3238.
• 17. Kilic, G. B., & Sülar, V. (2012). Frictional properties of cotton-Tencel yarns spun in different spinning systems. Textile Research Journal, 82(8), 755-765.
• 18. Koo, Y. S., & Kim, H. D. (2002). Friction of cotton yarn in relation to fluff formation on circular knitting machines. Textile research journal, 72(1), 17-20.
• 19. Döonmez, S., & Marmarali, A. (2004). A model for predicting a yarn's knittability. Textile research journal, 74(12), 1049-1054.
• 20. Kothari, V. K., Ishtiaque, S. M., & Ogale, V. G. (2002). Tensile properties of polyester/cotton blended yarns. INDIAN JOURNAL OF FIBRE AND TEXTILE RESEARCH, 27(1), 48-51.
• 21. Celik, P., Ozdil, N., & Supure, G. (2011). Experimental investigation on the static and dynamic strength of false twist textured polyester yarns. INDUSTRIA TEXTILA, 62(1), 38-43.
• 22. Ishtiaque, S.,M., Das, B.D., Kumar, A., Ramamoorthy, M., (2008), Static and dynamic failure mechanism of cotton yarns, Indian Journal of Fibre &Textile Research, vol.33, 111-118.
• 23. Altaş, S., Kadoğlu, H. (2009). İplik-iplik ve iplik-metal sürtünme katsayısı ile bazı iplik özellikleri arasındaki ilişki. 2009 (Cilt: 16), 73. 24. Chattopadhyay, R., & Banerjee, S. (1996). The frictional behaviour of ring-, rotor-, and friction-spun yarn. Journal of The Textile Institute, 87(1), 59-67.
• 25. Lawson-Hempfill, CTT User Manuel & Technical Documents, http://www.lawsonhemphill.com/assets/lh-401-series-ctt.pdf 26. ASTM D 3412-13. (2013). Standard Test Method for Coefficient of Friction, Yarn to Yarn.
• 27. ASTM D 3108–13. (2013). Standard Test Method for Coefficient of Friction, Yarn to Solid.
• 28. Abou-Nassif, G. A. (2014). A Comparative Study between Physical Properties of Compact and Ring Yarn Fabrics Produced from Medium and Coarser Yarn Counts. Journal of Textiles.
• 29. Das, A., Kothari, V. K., & Sadachar, A. (2007). Study on characteristics of compact yarns under dynamic state. Fibers and Polymers, 8(1), 111-115.
• 30. Çelik, P., Üte, T. B., & Kadoğlu, H. (2012). Comparative Analysis of the Physical Properties of the Fabrics Knitted with Sirospun and Ring Spun Yarns Produced by Short And Long Staple Fibers. Journal of Textile & Apparel/Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, 22(4).