ABRASION RESISTANCE AND TENSILE STRENGTH OF CHENILLE AND MACARONI UPHOLSTERY FABRICS

Year 2011, Volume: 21 Issue: 4, 336 - 342, 30.12.2011

Onur Tekoğlu Yasemin Kavuşturan

Abstract

In this study, an experimental work is presented to determine the effects of two different fancy yarn structures (chenille and macaroni)
and four different raw materials (acrilic, cotton, polyester and viscose) on the abrasion and tensile propertries of woven upholstery fabrics.
Results were evaluated by SPSS statistical program. All test results were assessed at a confidence level of at least 95% (at most 5%
significance level). The abrasion resistance and tenacity values of chenille and macaroni yarns were measured too. Abrasion resistance and
tenacity values of chenille and macaroni yarns are affected significantly by material type and fancy yarn structure. Macaroni yarns show
higher weight loss (%) ratio and tenacity values than chenille yarns. Thickness values of chenille fabrics are higher than macaroni fabrics.
Weight loss (%) values of chenille fabrics are higher than macaroni fabrics. The macaroni fabrics show higher stress values at max. load than
chenille fabrics. The cotton and polyester yarns are abraded less than others. Polyester yarns and fabrics show the highest tensile strength
values. Viscose yarns and fabrics less resistant to abrasion.

Keywords

Chenille yarn, Macaroni yarn, Abrasion resistance, Tenacity, Upholstery woven fabric.

References

• 1. Turay A., Özdil N., Süpüren G., Özçelik G., 2009, “Örülmüş Fantazi İpliklerde Üretim Parametrelerinin Kumaşların Termofizyolojik Özelliklerine Etkisi”, Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, Vol: 19(4), pp: 280-285.
• 2. Gong R.H. & Wright R M., 2002, “Their Manufacture and Application”, Fancy Yarns Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Cambridge, England, 481.
• 3. Lawrence C. A., 2003, “Fundamentals of Spun Yarn Technology”, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 481.
• 4. Ülkü, Ş., Örtlek, H., G., Ömeroğlu, S., 2003, “The Effect of Chenille Yarn Properties on the Abrasion Resistance of Upholstery Fabrics”, Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 11(3), 38-44.
• 5. Babaarslan, O., İlhan, İ., 2005, “An Experimental Study on the Effect of Pile Length on the Abrasion Resistance of Chenille Fabric”, The Textile Institute, 96(3), 193-197.
• 6. Kalaoğlu, F. Demir, E., 2001, “The Effect of Chenille Yarn Properties on the Performance of Chenille Upholstery Fabrics”, Textile Asia, March, 37-40.
• 7. Özdemir, Ö., Çeven, E.K., 2002, “The Effect of Chenille Yarn Manufacturing Parameters on the Abrasion Resistance of Upholstery Fabrics”, Proceedings of 12th Textile and Leather Romanian Conference, 17-19 October, Iasi, Romania, 23-34.
• 8. Özdemir, Ö., Çeven, E., K., 2004, “Influence of Chenille Yarn Manufacturing Parameters on Yarn and Upholstery Fabric Abrasion Resistance”, Textile Research Journal, 74(6), 515-520.
• 9. Örtlek, H., G., Ülkü, Ş., 2004, “Factors Influencing the Abrasion Properties of Chenille Yarns”, Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research, 29(9), 353-356.
• 10. Ulcay, Y., Eren, S., 2004, “Comparison of Chenille and Air-Texture Yarns for Upholstery Fabrics”, Proceedings of 2nd. International İstanbul Textile Congress, İstanbul, 22-24 April.
• 11. Baoyu, Z., Oxenham, W., 1994, “Influence of Production Speed on the Characteristics of Hollow Spindle Fancy Yarns”, Textile Research Journal, 64(7), 380-387.
• 12. Petrulyte, S. Petrulis D., 2003, “Forecasting of Structural Parameters of Hollow Spindle Yarns”, Material Science, Vol 9, No 3, 293-296.
• 13. Tekoğlu, O., Kavuşturan Y., 2007, “Şenil ve Makarna İpliklerden Üretilen Düz Örme Kumaşların Aşınma, Patlama ve Eğilme Özellikleri”, Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2), 109-122.
• 14. Tekoğlu, O. 2007, “Fantazi İplik Kullanımının Örme Kumaş Performansına Etkileri”, MSc Thesis, Uludağ University, Bursa, 38-50.