The Production and Physical and Thermal Characterization of Polybutylene Succinate Multifilament Yarns

Year 2023, Volume: 33 Issue: 3, 262 - 268, 30.09.2023

Kerim Kılınç , Esra Karaca

https://doi.org/10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.1071447

Abstract

There are significant problems in the production, use and waste management of petroleum-based polymers due to the increasing plastic waste problem, exceeding limit of the greenhouse gas emissions and decreasing fossil resources. The textile sector is the second sector that causes the plastic waste problem after the packaging sector. About 65% of the total yarn produced in the textile industry consists of yarns obtained from petroleum-based polymers. Biopolymers come to the fore in studies carried out within the scope of sustainability philosophies such as using of renewable raw materials, recycling at the end of their life and decomposition without harming the nature. In this study, it is aimed to produce biobased and biodegradable polybutylene succinate (PBS) polymer into multifilament yarn by melt spinning method and examine the effect of different winder speeds on the textile values of PBS yarns. In this context, multifilament yarns with round cross-sections were produced at 4 various winder speeds. The linear density, elongation (at Fmax) and tenacity of the produced yarns were obtained by performing analyzes, and also cross-sectional images of the filaments were also taken. The results suggested that the elongation (at Fmax) and dtex values decrease, and the tenacity value increases due to increasing winder speed. Additionally, the cross-section properties of the PBS multifilament yarn are smooth round sections and that the filaments in a yarn have similar diameters to each other.

Keywords

Biopolymers, polybutylene succinate (PBS), melt spinning, physical characterization

Project Number

TÜBİTAK 2244 (No. 1189B441800972)

References

• Niaounakis M. 2015. Definitions of Terms and Types of Biopolymers. Biopolymers: Applications and Trends, 1–90.
• I. Paris Agreement. 2015. United Nations Climate Change Conference. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/FCCC_CP_2015_10_Add.1.pdf, 27.10.2021.
• Koncar V. 2019. Composites and hybrid structures. Smart Textiles for in SituMonitoring of Composites, 153–215.
• Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT. 2002. Sustainable bio-composites from renewable resources: opportunities and challenges in the green materials World, Journal of Polymer Environment, 10, 19–26.
• Verma D, Fortunati E. 2019. Biopolymer processing and its composites: an introduction, Biomass, Biopolymer-Based Materials, and Bioenergy, 3–23.
• George A., Sanjay MR, Srisuk R, Parameswaranpillai J, Siengchin S. 2020. A Comprehensive Review On Chemical Properties And Applications Of Biopolymers And Their Composites, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 154, 329-338.
• Ashter SA. 2016. Overview of biodegradable polymers, Introduction to Bioplastics Engineering, 19–30.
• Zhu Y, Romain C, Williams C. 2016. Sustainable Polymers From Renewable Resources, Nature, 540, 354–362.
• Thoen J, Busch R, 2006. Industrial Chemicals from Biomass – Industrial Concepts, Biorefineries‐Industrial Processes and Products: Status Quo and Future Directions, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 347-365.
• European bioplastics conference, 2020. Bioplastics market developement update 2020, https://docs.european-bioplastics.org/conference/Report_Bioplastics_Market_Data_2020_short_version.pdf, 07.05.2021.
• Ritchie H, Roser M. 2018. Plastic Pollution. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved from: 'https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution', 02.03.2021.
• Iwata T. 2015. Biodegradable and bio-based polymers: Future prospects of eco-friendly plastics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 54, 3210-3215.
• Sajn N. 2019. Environmental Impact of the Textile and Clothing Industry:What Consumers Need to Know, EPRS - European Parliamentary Research Service: European Union, 1-11.
• Mülhaupt R. 2013. Green polymer chemistry and bio-based plastics: dreams and reality, Macromol. Chem. Phys., 214, 159-174.
• Ziabicki A. 1976. Fundamentals of Fibre Formation: The Science of Fibre Spinning and Drawing. JohnWiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA.
• Fourné F. 1999. Synthetic Fibers: Machines and Equipment, Manufacture, Properties, Hanser, Munich, Germany.
• Reese G. 2003. Polyester Fibers: Fiber Formation and End-Use Applications. In Modern Polyesters: Chemistry and Technology of Polyesters and Copolyesters. JohnWiley & Sons Ltd: Hoboken, NJ, USA.
• Sharma R. 2005. Guar gum grafting and its application in textile, Asian J. Exp. Sci., 19, 77-81.
• Lv F, Zhu P, Wang C, Zheng L. 2012. Preparation, characterization, and dyeing properties of calcium alginate fibers, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 126, 383-388.
• Sisti L, Totaro G, Marchese P. 2016. PBS Makes its Entrance into the Family of Biobased Plastics. Biodegradable and Biobased Polymers for Environmental and Biomedical Applications. Scrivener Publishing, Wiley. 7, 225-273.
• Adamopoulou E. 2012. Poly (butylene succinate): A promising biopolymer. Department of Industrial Management and Technology. School of Chemical Engineering.
• Ihn KJ, Yoo ES, Im SS. 1995. Structure and Morphology of Poly(tetramethylene succinate) Crystals. Macromolecules, 28(7), 2460–2464.
• Liu YP, Zheng P, Sun ZH, Ni Y, Dong JJ, Zhu LL. 2008. Economical succinic acid production from cane molasses by Actinobacillus succinogenes. Bioresour Technol., 99(6):1736-1742.
• Erlandsson B, Karlsson S, Albertsson AC. 1997. The mode of action of corn starch and a pro-oxidant system in LDPE: influence of thermo-oxidation and UV-irradiation on the molecular weight changes. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 55(2), 237–245.
• Xu J, Guo BH. 2010. Microbial Succinic Acid, Its Polymer Poly(butylene succinate), and Applications. Plastics from Bacteria: Natural Functions and Applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 14, 347-388.
• Azim H, Dekhterman A, Jiang Z, Gross RA. 2006. Candida antarctica Lipase B-Catalyzed Synthesis of Poly(butylene succinate): Shorter Chain Building Blocks Also Work. Biomacromolecules, 7, 3093–3097
• Bautista M, de Ilarduya AM, Alla A, Vives M, Morató J, Muñoz-Guerra S. 2016. Cationic poly(butylene succinate) copolyesters. Eur. Polym. J., 75, 329–342.
• Ramos M, Jiménez A, Peltzer M, Garrigós MC. 2014. Development of novel nano-biocomposite antioxidant films based on poly(lactic acid) and thymol for active packaging. Food Chem., 162, 149-155.
• Li H, Chang J, Cao A, Wang J. 2005. In vitro evaluation of biodegradable poly(butylene succinate) as a novel biomaterial. Macromol. Biosci., 5, 433–440.
• Causa F, Netti P, Ambrosio L, Ciapetti G, Baldini N, Pagani S, Martini D, Giunti A. 2006. Poly--caprolactone/hydroxyapatite composites for bone regeneration: In vitro characterization and human osteoblast response. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A Off. J. Soc. Biomater. Jpn. Soc. Biomater. Aust. Soc. Biomater. Korean Soc. Biomater., 76, 151–162.
• Diaz A, Katsarava R, Puiggalì J. 2014. Synthesis, Properties and Applications of Biodegradable Polymers Derived from Diols and Dicarboxylic Acids: From Polyesters to Poly(ester amide)s. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 15(5), 7064–7123.
• Shen L, Haufe J, Patel MK. 2009. Product overview and market projection of emerging bio-based plastics, PRO-BIP 2009, Final report, Group Science, Technology and Society (STS) Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and Innovation, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.
• Park SW, Bae JH, Lim JH, Cha B, Park CD, Yang YS, An HC. 2007. Development and physical properties on the monofilament for gill nets and traps using biodegradable aliphatic polybutylene succinate resin. Bulletin of The Korean Society of Fisheries Technology. 43, 281-290.
• Park SW, Kim SH, Lim JH, Choi HS. 2013. The Durability of Polybutylene Succinate Monofilament for Fishing Net Twines by Outdoor Exposure Test, Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education. The Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, 25, 766–774.
• Huysman S. 2018. The potential of bio-based PBS for the textile industry. Unitex. 4-5.
• Shuangxi X, Guojun Y, Yueping C. 2013. WO2014173055A1. WIPO (PCT).
• Jompang L, Thumsorn S, On JW, Surin P, Apawet C, Chaichalermwong T, Srisawat N. 2013. Poly(Lactic Acid) and Poly(Butylene Succinate) Blend Fibers Prepared by Melt Spinning Technique. Energy Procedia, 34, 493–499.
• Panichsombat K, Panbangpong W, Poompiew N, Potiyaraj P. 2019. Biodegradable fibers from poly (lactic acid)/poly (butylene succinate) blends. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 600, 012004.