Environmentally Friendly Approach for Decolorization Textile Wastewater by Nanobubble Water Technology and Enzymes

Year 2024, Volume: 34 Issue: 3, 231 - 243, 30.09.2024

Pervin Aniş , Tuba Toprak-çavdur , Sibel Şardağ , Bilge İncekara

https://doi.org/10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.1221104

Abstract

One of the most important issues about textile industry is its negative environmental impacts because of the pollution produced. Herein, decolorization processes of different-colored reactive dyeing baths using eco-friendly ways; nanobubbles and enzymes, was discussed. Decolorizations were evaluated by examining the transmittance and chemical oxygen demands of the treated wastewater baths were measured. The results showed that nanobubbles could be used in decolorization while laccase and peroxidase enzymes increased the decolorization effect of nanobubbles. In addition to the decolorizing effect of nanobubbles, it was an important environmental advantage that the corresponding process provided lower chemical oxygen demand than that in the untreated wastewater. The results of the study reveal that it is possible to use nanobubble in decolorization and this technology is an important wastewater treatment technology in protecting the environment by reducing the chemical oxygen demand of wastewater.

Keywords

Sustainability, cleaner production, textile wastewater, transmittance, chemical oxygen demand

Supporting Institution

TÜBİTAK

Project Number

5180061

Thanks

This work was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under TEYDEB 1505 – 5180061 (Yeni ve Çevreci Teknolojilerin Reaktif Boyama Sonrası Yıkamada ve Atık Suyun Dekolorizasyonunda Kullanımı). The authors wish to thank to TUBITAK.

References

• 1. Haris S, Qiu X, Klammler H, Mohamed MMA. 2020. The Use of Micro-Nano Bubbles in Groundwater Remediation: A Comprehensive Review. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 11, 100463.
• 2. Zhou L, Wang S, Zhang L, Hu J. 2021. Generation and Stability of Bulk Nanobubbles: A Review and Perspective. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 53, 101439.
• 3. Yasui K, Tuziuti T, Kanematsu W, Kato K. 2016. Dynamic Equilibrium Model for a Bulk Nanobubble and a Microbubble Partly Covered with Hydrophobic Material. Langmuir, 32(43), 11101–11110.
• 4. Weijs JH, Seddon JRT, Lohse D. 2012. Diffusive Shielding Stabilizes Bulk Nanobubble Clusters. ChemPhysChem, 13(8), 2197–2204.
• 5. Yasui K, Tuziuti T, Kanematsu W. 2018. Mysteries of Bulk Nanobubbles (Ultrafine Bubbles); Stability and Radical Formation. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 48, 259–266.
• 6. Meegoda JN, Hewage SA, Batagoda JH. 2019. Application of the Diffused Double Layer Theory to Nanobubbles. Langmuir, 35 (37), 12100–12112.
• 7. Epstein PS, Plesset MS. 1950. On the Stability of Gas Bubbles in Liquid‐gas Solutions. J Chem Phys 18, 1505–1509.
• 8. Parker JL, Claesson PM, Attard P. 1994. Bubbles, Cavities, and The Long-ranged Attraction between Hydrophobic Surfaces. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 98, 8468–8480.
• 9. Lou S-T, Ouyang Z-Q, Zhang Y, Li X-J, Hu J, Li M-Q, Yang F-J. 2000. Nanobubbles on Solid Surface Imaged by Atomic Force Microscopy. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena, 18, 2573–2575.
• 10. Ishida N, Inoue T, Miyahara M, Higashitani K. 2000. Nano bubbles on a Hydrophobic Surface in Water Observed by Tapping-Mode Atomic Force Microscopy. Langmuir, 16, 6377–6380.
• 11. Borkent BM, Dammer SM, Schönherr H, Vancso GJ, Lohse D. 2007. Superstability of Surface Nanobubbles. Physical Review Letters, 98, 204502.
• 12. Alheshibri M, Qian J, Jehannin M, Craig VSJ. 2016. A History of Nanobubbles. Langmuir, 32, 11086–11100.
• 13. Lohse D, Zhang X. 2015. Surface Nanobubbles and Nanodroplets. Reviews of Modern Physics, 87, 981–1035.
• 14. Qian J, Craig VSJ, Jehannin M. 2019. Long-Term Stability of Surface Nanobubbles in Undersaturated Aqueous Solution. Langmuir, 35(3), 718–728.
• 15. Takahashi M, Chiba K, Li P. 2007. Free-radical Generation from Collapsing Microbubbles in the Absence of A Dynamic Stimulus. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 111 (6), 1343–1347.
• 16. Ma P, Han C, He Q, Miao Z, Gao M, Wan K, Xu E. 2022. Oxidation of Congo Red by Fenton Coupled with Micro and Nanobubbles. Environmental Technology, 44(17), 2539-2548.
• 17. Azevedo A, Oliveira H, Rubio J. 2019. Bulk Nanobubbles in the Mineral and Environmental Areas: Updating Research and Applications. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 271, 101992.
• 18. Minamikawa K, Makino T. 2020. Oxidation of Flooded Paddy Soil through Irrigation with Water Containing Bulk Oxygen Nanobubbles. Science of The Total Environment, 709, 136323.
• 19. Zhou Y, Li Y, Liu X, Wang K, Muhammad T. 2019. Synergistic Improvement in Spring Maize Yield and Quality with Micro/Nanobubbles Water Oxygation. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 5226.
• 20. Endo-Takahashi Y, Negishi Y. 2020. Microbubbles and Nanobubbles with Ultrasound for Systemic Gene Delivery. Pharmaceutics, 12 (964), 1–14.
• 21. Bui TT, Han M. 2020. Decolorization of Dark Green Rit Dye Using Positively Charged Nanobubbles Technologies. Separation and Purification Technology, 233, 116034.
• 22. Anis P, Toprak-Cavdur T, Çalışkan N. 2022. Oxygen-enriched Nanobubbles for a Green Reactive Washing Process. AATCC Journal of Research, 9 (3), 152–160.
• 23. Wu J, Zhang K, Cen C, Wu X, Mao R, Zheng Y. 2021. Role of Bulk Nanobubbles in Removing Organic Pollutants in Wastewater Treatment. AMB Express, 11 (96), 1–13.
• 24. Rojviroon O, Rojviroon T. 2022. Photocatalytic Process Augmented with Micro/Nano Bubble Aeration for Enhanced Degradation of Synthetic Dyes in Wastewater. Water Resources and Industry, 27, 100169.
• 25. Sakr M, Mohamed MM, Maraqa MA, Hamouda MA, Aly Hassan A, Ali J, Jung J. 2022. A Critical Review of the Recent Developments in Micro–nano Bubbles Applications for Domestic and Industrial Wastewater Treatment. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61 (8), 6591–6612.
• 26. Liu C, Tang Y. 2019. November. Application Research of Micro and Nano Bubbles in Water Pollution Control. In T.Y. Fang, V. Khaletski (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Building Energy Conservation, Thermal Safety and Environmental Pollution Control (ICBTE 2019) (1-3), Hefei, China
• 27. Mohsin M, Rasheed A, Farooq A, Ashraf M, Shah A. 2013. Environment Friendly Finishing of Sulphur, Vat, Direct and Reactive Dyed Cotton Fabric. Journal of Cleaner Production, 53, 341–347.
• 28. Mohsin M, Sardar S, Hassan M, Akhtar N, Hassan A, Sufyan M. 2020. Novel, Sustainable and Water Efficient Nano Bubble Dyeing of Cotton Fabric. Cellulose, 27 (10), 6055–6064.
• 29. Mohsin M, Sardar S, Hasan M, Akhtar KS, Anam W, Ijaz S, Hassan A. 2022. Water Efficient, Eco-friendly and Effluent Free Nano bubble Finishing of Cotton Fabric. Journal of Natural Fibers, 19(6), 12586-12595.
• 30. Slama H Ben, Bouket AC, Pourhassan Z, Alenezi FN, Silini A, Cherif-Silini H, Oszako T, Luptakova L, Golinska P, Belbahri L. 2021. Diversity of Synthetic Dyes from Textile Industries, Discharge Impacts and Treatment Methods. Applied Sciences, 11(14), 6255.
• 31. Bhatia D, Sharma NR, Singh J, Kanwar RS. 2017. Biological Methods for Textile Dye Removal from Wastewater: A Review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 47 (19), 1836–1876.
• 32. Jamee R, Siddique R. 2019. Biodegradation of Synthetic Dyes of Textile Effluent by Microorganisms: An Environmentally and Economically Sustainable Approach. European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology, 9 (4), 114–118.
• 33. Thakur S, Chauhan MS. 2018. Treatment of Dye Wastewater from Textile Industry by Electrocoagulation and Fenton Oxidation: A Review. In V. Singh, S. Yadav, R. Yadava (Ed.), Water Qual. Manag. Singapore:Springer, 117–129.
• 34. Gopalakrishnan M, Punitha V, Saravanan D. 2019. Water Conservation in Textile Wet Processing. In S.S. Muthu (Ed.), Water Text. Fash. Consum. Footprint, Life Cycle Assess. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 35–53.
• 35. Dong X, Gu Z, Hang C, Ke G, Jiang L, He J. 2019. Study on the Salt-free low-Alkaline Reactive Cotton Dyeing in High Concentration of Ethanol in Volume. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 316–323.
• 36. Ma W, Meng M, Yan S, Zhang S. 2016. Salt-free Reactive Dyeing of Betaine-modified Cationic Cotton Fabrics with Enhanced Dye Fixation. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 24 (1), 175–179.
• 37. Siddiqua UH, Ali S, Iqbal M, Hussain T. 2017. Relationship Between Structure and Dyeing Properties of Reactive Dyes for Cotton Dyeing. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 241, 839–844.
• 38. Grancarić AM, Ristić N, Tarbuk A, Ristić I. 2013. Electrokinetic Phenomena of Cationised Cotton and Its Dyeability with Reactive Dyes. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 21 (6), 106–110.
• 39. Varadarajan G, Venkatachalam P. 2016. Sustainable Textile Dyeing Processes. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 14 (1), 113–122.
• 40. Arivithamani N, Giri Dev VR. 2018. Characterization and Comparison of Salt-free Reactive Dyed Cationized Cotton Hosiery Fabrics with that of Conventional Dyed Cotton Fabrics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 579–589.
• 41. Khatri A, Peerzada MH, Mohsin M, White M. 2015. A Review on Developments in Dyeing Cotton Fabrics with Reactive Dyes for Reducing Effluent Pollution. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87 (1), 50–57.
• 42. Khattab TA, Abdelrahman MS, Rehan M. 2020. Textile Dyeing Industry: Environmental Impacts and Remediation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27 (4), 3803–3818.
• 43. Klančnik M. 2000. The Influence of Temperature on the Kinetics of Concurrent Hydrolysis and Methanolysis Reactions of a Monochlorotriazine Reactive Dye. Dyes and Pigment 46 (1), 9–15.
• 44. Amin MN, Blackburn RS. 2015. Sustainable Chemistry Method to Improve the Wash-off Process of Reactive Dyes on Cotton. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 3 (4), 725–732.
• 45. Chattopadhyay DP. 2011. Chemistry of Dyeing. In M. Clark (Ed.), Handb. Text. Ind. Dye. Vol. 1 Princ. Process. Types Dye. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 150–183.
• 46. Zhang Y, Shahid-ul-Islam, Rather LJ, Li Q. 2022. Recent Advances in the Surface Modification Strategies to Improve Functional Finishing of Cotton with Natural Colourants - A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 335, 130313.
• 47. Khatri A, Padhye R, White M. 2013. The Use of Trisodium Nitrilo Triacetate in the Pad-steam Dyeing of Cotton with Reactive Dyes. Coloration Technology, 129 (1), 76–81.
• 48. Ramasamy M, Kandasaamy P V. 2005. Effect of Cationization of Cotton on It’s Dyeability. Indian J Fibre Text Res 30 (3), 315–323.
• 49. Burkinshaw SM, Mignanelli M, Froehling PE, Bide MJ. 2000. The Use of Dendrimers to Modify the Dyeing Behaviour of Reactive Dyes on Cotton. Dyes and Pigments 47, 259–267.
• 50. Khatri A, White M. 2016. Sustainable Dyeing Technologies. In R. Blackburn R (Ed.), Sustain. Appar. Prod. Process. Recycl. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 135–160.
• 51. Holkar CR, Jadhav AJ, Pinjari D V., Mahamuni NM, Pandit AB. 2016. A Critical Review on Textile Wastewater Treatments: Possible Approaches. Journal of Environmental Management, 182, 351–366.
• 52. Benkhaya S, M’rabet S, Lgaz H, El-Bachiri A, El-Harf A. 2022. Dyes: Classification, Pollution, and Environmental Effects. In S.S. Muthu, A. Khadir (Ed), Dye Biodegrad. Mech. Tech. Recent Adv. Singapore: Springer, 1–50.
• 53. Madhav S, Ahamad A, Singh P, Mishra PK. 2018. A Review of Textile Industry: Wet Processing, Environmental Impacts, and Effluent Treatment Methods. Environmental Quality Management, 27 (3), 31–41.
• 54. Labiadh L, Barbucci A, Carpanese MP, Gadri A, Ammar S, Panizza M. 2017. Direct and Indirect Electrochemical Oxidation of Indigo Carmine using PbO2 and TiRuSnO2. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, 21 (8), 2167–2175.
• 55. Gita S, Hussan A, Choudhury TG. 2017. Impact of Textile Dyes Waste on Aquatic Environments and its Treatment. Environment & Ecology, 35 (3C), 2349–2353.
• 56. Eslami H, Shariatifa A, Rafiee E, Shiranian M, Salehi F, Hosseini SS, Eslami G, Ghanbari R, Ebrahimi A A. 2019. Decolorization and Biodegradation of Reactive Red 198 Azo Dye by A New Enterococcus faecalis–Klebsiella variicola Bacterial Consortium Isolated From Textile Wastewater Sludge. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 35 (3), 1–10.
• 57. Singh P, Jain R, Srivastava N, Borthakur A, Pal DB, Singh R, Madhav S, Srivastava P, Tiwary D, Mishra P K. 2017. Current and Emerging Trends in Bioremediation of Petrochemical Waste: A Review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 47 (3), 155–201.
• 58. Toprak T, Anis P. 2018. Enzymatic Decolorization of Reactive Dyeing Baths. Journal of Textile Engineering & Fashion Technology, 4 (4), 308–311.
• 59. Champagne PP, Ramsay JA. 2005. Contribution of Manganese Peroxidase and Laccase to Dye Decoloration by Trametes versicolor. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 69, 276–285.
• 60. Arnao MB, Acosta M, del Rio JA, García-Cánovas F. 1990. Inactivation of Peroxidase by Hydrogen Peroxide and Its Protection by A Reductant Agent. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology, 1038 (1), 85–89.
• 61. Nicell JA, Wright H. 1997. A Model of Peroxidase Activity with Inhibition by Hydrogen Peroxide. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 21 (4), 302–310.
• 62. Kokol V, Doliška A, Eichlerová I, Baldrian P, Nerud F. 2007. Decolorization of Textile Dyes by Whole Cultures of Ischnoderma resinosum and by Purified Laccase and Mn-Peroxidase. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 40 (7), 1673–1677.
• 63. Patel AK, Singhania RR, Chen CW, Tseng YS, Kuo CH, Wu CH, Dong C D. 2021. Advances in Micro- and Nano Bubbles Technology for Application in Biochemical Processes. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 23, 101729.
• 64. Selihin NM, Tay MG. 2022. A review on Future Wastewater Treatment Technologies: Micro-Nanobubbles, Hybrid Electro-Fenton Processes, Photocatalytic Fuel Cells, and Microbial Fuel Cells. Water Science and Technology, 85 (1), 319–341.
• 65. Han G, Chen S, Su S, Huang Y, Liu B, Sun H. 2022. A Review and Perspective on Micro and Nanobubbles: What They Are and Why They Matter. Minerals Engineering, 189, 107906.
• 66. Temesgen T, Bui TT, Han M, Kim T il, Park H. 2017. Micro and Nanobubble Technologies as A New Horizon for Water-treatment Techniques: A Review. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 246, 40–51.
• 67. Bui TT, Nguyen DC, Han M. 2019. Average Size and Zeta Potential of Nanobubbles in Different Reagent Solutions. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 21, 1–11.
• 68. Imran M, Crowley DE, Khalid A, Hussain S, Mumtaz MW, Arshad M. 2015. Microbial Biotechnology for Decolorization of Textile Wastewaters. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 14 (1), 73–92.