Optimizing Hybrid Photovoltaic–Hydropower Operation under Grid Capacity Constraints: A Percentile-Based Approach for Türkiye

Hasan Huseyin Coban

doi:10.67047/tepes.1883993

Optimizing Hybrid Photovoltaic–Hydropower Operation under Grid Capacity Constraints: A Percentile-Based Approach for Türkiye

Abstract

The increasing penetration of variable renewable energy sources requires efficient strategies for utilizing existing grid infrastructure. This study proposes a percentile-based methodology for integrating photovoltaic (PV) generation with existing hydropower plants under grid capacity constraints, using Turkey as a case study. Long-term hourly hydropower data are analyzed to characterize availability patterns and to determine suitable PV installation capacities based on selected percentiles of hydropower output. The resulting hybrid configurations are evaluated in terms of energy balance, curtailment behavior, grid utilization, and economic performance. The results indicate that a substantial share of the grid connection capacity remains unused during large portions of the year, enabling the integration of additional PV capacity without network reinforcement. Depending on the selected percentile, the hybrid system achieves grid utilization levels exceeding 70%, while PV curtailment remains below 15% for moderate sizing choices. The analysis shows that increasing the percentile leads to higher installed PV capacity but also results in a rapid rise in curtailment beyond a certain threshold. Economic evaluation yields levelized cost of electricity values in the range of approximately 0.04–0.07 USD/kWh, with corresponding simple payback periods between 6 and 12 years under baseline electricity price assumptions. Sensitivity analysis confirms that electricity price variations have the strongest influence on economic performance. The proposed framework provides a transparent and data-driven approach for evaluating hybrid hydropower–photovoltaic systems using publicly available data. It can be readily extended to other regions and expanded to include storage technologies, market-based dispatch strategies, and uncertainty analysis, thereby supporting informed planning of renewable energy integration in power systems with significant hydropower capacity.

Keywords

References

K. Huang et al., “Improving complementarity of a hybrid renewable energy system to meet load demand by using hydropower regulation ability,” *Energy*, vol. 248, p. 123535, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123535.
O. Gulaydin and M. Mourshed, “Net-zero Turkey: Renewable energy potential and implementation challenges,” *Energy for Sustainable Development*, vol. 87, p. 101744, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2025.101744.
TEIAS, “YTBS-Load Dispatcher Information System,” 2024. Accessed: Dec. 28, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ytbsbilgi.teias.gov.tr/ytbsbilgi/frm_istatistikler.jsf
Ö. Akduran Erol, “Regulation of Natural Monopoly: The Turkish Electricity Market,” *Sosyoekonomi*, vol. 32, no. 60, pp. 11–32, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2024.02.01.
H. B. Sakal, “Turkey’s energy trade relations with Europe: The role of institutions and energy market,” *Energy & Environment*, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1243–1274, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1177/0958305X20977298.
İ. Gürer, “Hydropower Outlook of Turkey in 2021,” 2022, pp. 56–65, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-04375-8_7.
I. Dincer and M. Temiz, *Renewable Energy Options for Power Generation and Desalination*. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2024, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-53437-9.
M. E. Umcu, U. Acar, and Ö. Kaşka, “Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic systems of various sizes: An environmental and economic perspective on an educational building in a hot climate,” *International Journal of Energy Studies*, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 997–1042, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.58559/ijes.1573447.

B. A. Akgül, M. S. Özyazıcı, M. F. Hasoğlu, and B. Haznedar, “Investigation and Determination of Optimal Tilt Angles and Solar Radiation Gains for Fixed and Tracked South-Facing Solar Photovoltaic Surfaces in Provinces of Türkiye,” *Environmental Modeling & Assessment*, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 101–123, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10666-023-09933-x.
J. Pascual, F. Martinez‐Moreno, M. García, J. Marcos, L. Marroyo, and E. Lorenzo, “Long‐term degradation rate of crystalline silicon PV modules at commercial PV plants: An 82‐MWp assessment over 10 years,” *Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications*, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1294–1302, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1002/pip.3456.
J. Kim, M. Rabelo, S. P. Padi, H. Yousuf, E.-C. Cho, and J. Yi, “A Review of the Degradation of Photovoltaic Modules for Life Expectancy,” *Energies*, vol. 14, no. 14, p. 4278, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14144278.
M. Çeçen, C. Yavuz, C. A. Tırmıkçı, S. Sarıkaya, and E. Yanıkoğlu, “Analysis and evaluation of distributed photovoltaic generation in electrical energy production and related regulations of Turkey,” *Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy*, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1321–1336, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10098-021-02247-0.
H. Wang, Y. Li, F. Wu, S. He, and R. Ding, “Capacity Optimization of Pumped–Hydro–Wind–Photovoltaic Hybrid System Based on Normal Boundary Intersection Method,” *Sustainability*, vol. 16, no. 17, p. 7244, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16177244.
W. Yuan, Z. Liu, C. Su, and X. Wang, “Photovoltaic capacity optimization of small and medium-sized hydro-photovoltaic hybrid energy systems considering multiple uncertainties,” *Journal of Cleaner Production*, vol. 276, p. 124170, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124170.
C. Zhang et al., “Operational characteristics and optimization of Hydro-PV power hybrid electricity system,” *Renewable Energy*, vol. 200, pp. 601–613, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.10.005.
B. Ming, J. Chen, W. Fang, P. Liu, W. Zhang, and J. Jiang, “Evaluation of stochastic optimal operation models for hydro–photovoltaic hybrid generation systems,” *Energy*, vol. 267, p. 126500, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126500.
Z. Yang, P. Liu, L. Cheng, H. Wang, B. Ming, and W. Gong, “Deriving operating rules for a large-scale hydro-photovoltaic power system using implicit stochastic optimization,” *Journal of Cleaner Production*, vol. 195, pp. 562–572, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.154.
B. Ming, P. Liu, and L. Cheng, “An integrated framework for optimizing large hydro–photovoltaic hybrid energy systems: Capacity planning and operations management,” *Journal of Cleaner Production*, vol. 306, p. 127253, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127253.
E. B. Ssekulima and A. H. Etemadi, “Stochastic optimization framework for capacity planning of hybrid solar PV–small hydropower systems using metaheuristic algorithms,” *Complex & Intelligent Systems*, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 32, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1007/s40747-025-02151-w.
X. Li, J. Song, Y. Ma, Z. Zhu, H. Liu, and C. Wei, “Capacity planning for hydro-wind-photovoltaic-storage systems considering high-dimensional uncertainties,” *Energy Informatics*, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 3, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1186/s42162-024-00462-9.
W. Yuan and Z. Sun, “Long-Term Optimal Scheduling of Hydro-Photovoltaic Hybrid Systems Considering Short-Term Operation Performance,” *Energies*, vol. 17, no. 21, p. 5388, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.3390/en17215388.
N. Blair et al., “System Advisor Model (SAM) General Description (Version 2017.9.5),” Golden, CO, USA, May 2018, doi: 10.2172/1440404.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Electrical Engineering (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Hasan Huseyin Coban ^*
0000-0002-5284-0568
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 24, 2026

Submission Date

February 7, 2026

Acceptance Date

March 25, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 6 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.67047/tepes.1883993

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA87AF26GY

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Coban, H. H. (2026). Optimizing Hybrid Photovoltaic–Hydropower Operation under Grid Capacity Constraints: A Percentile-Based Approach for Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 6(2), 88-101. https://doi.org/10.67047/tepes.1883993

AMA

1.Coban HH. Optimizing Hybrid Photovoltaic–Hydropower Operation under Grid Capacity Constraints: A Percentile-Based Approach for Türkiye. TEPES. 2026;6(2):88-101. doi:10.67047/tepes.1883993

Chicago

Coban, Hasan Huseyin. 2026. “Optimizing Hybrid Photovoltaic–Hydropower Operation under Grid Capacity Constraints: A Percentile-Based Approach for Türkiye”. Turkish Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems 6 (2): 88-101. https://doi.org/10.67047/tepes.1883993.

EndNote

Coban HH (June 1, 2026) Optimizing Hybrid Photovoltaic–Hydropower Operation under Grid Capacity Constraints: A Percentile-Based Approach for Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems 6 2 88–101.

IEEE

[1]H. H. Coban, “Optimizing Hybrid Photovoltaic–Hydropower Operation under Grid Capacity Constraints: A Percentile-Based Approach for Türkiye”, TEPES, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 88–101, June 2026, doi: 10.67047/tepes.1883993.

ISNAD

Coban, Hasan Huseyin. “Optimizing Hybrid Photovoltaic–Hydropower Operation under Grid Capacity Constraints: A Percentile-Based Approach for Türkiye”. Turkish Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems 6/2 (June 1, 2026): 88-101. https://doi.org/10.67047/tepes.1883993.

JAMA

1.Coban HH. Optimizing Hybrid Photovoltaic–Hydropower Operation under Grid Capacity Constraints: A Percentile-Based Approach for Türkiye. TEPES. 2026;6:88–101.

MLA

Coban, Hasan Huseyin. “Optimizing Hybrid Photovoltaic–Hydropower Operation under Grid Capacity Constraints: A Percentile-Based Approach for Türkiye”. Turkish Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 6, no. 2, June 2026, pp. 88-101, doi:10.67047/tepes.1883993.

Vancouver

1.Hasan Huseyin Coban. Optimizing Hybrid Photovoltaic–Hydropower Operation under Grid Capacity Constraints: A Percentile-Based Approach for Türkiye. TEPES. 2026 Jun. 1;6(2):88-101. doi:10.67047/tepes.1883993