Enhancement of Transmission System Security with Archimedes Optimization Algorithm

Year 2022, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 115 - 123, 31.10.2022

Erdi Doğan , Nuran Yörükeren

https://doi.org/10.5152/tepes.2022.22015

https://izlik.org/JA46FH87WL

Abstract

The reliability of the transmission system is crucial in terms of both economic and social welfare. On one hand, the transmission lines getting overloaded because of a single outage situation may give rise to even a blackout. On the other hand, the excessive short-circuit current might cause distortion of valuable system devices. Therefore, the static security of the transmission system should be provided so as to protect consumers and system components. The bus split- ting optimization (BSO) is a tool that maintains system security by distributing transmission feeders to the suitable busbars. The BSO is a non-convex, combina- torial, and binary problem due to AC power flow equations, short-circuit calculations, and the nature of the representation of the feeder position. Hence, the novel Archimedes optimization algorithm (AOA) is utilized in order to solve the BSO problem instead of the deterministic approaches in this study. Analyses we implemented show that the AOA algorithm has the efficacy and robustness to solve the BSO problem in the Istanbul Anatolian Region of the Turkish Electricity Transmission System and to enhance the power system security.

Keywords

Meta-heuristics , N-1 security , optimization in transmission network , restriction of short-circuit current.

References

• 1. P. Dehghanian, and M. Kezunovic, “Probabilistic impact of transmission line switching on power system operating states,” IEEE Publications/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition (T&D), Dallas, TX, USA, 3–5 May 2016, pp. 1–5.
• 2. S. Namchoat, and N. Hoonchareon, “Optimal bus splitting for short-circuit current limitation in metropolitan area,” 10th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology, ECTI-CON 2013, Krabi, Thailand, 15–17 May 2013, pp. 1–5.
• 3. E. Doğan, and N. Yörükeren, “Binary pathfinder algorithm for bus splitting optimisation problem,” IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 14, no. 26, pp. 6613–6623, 2020.
• 4. E. Doğan, and N. Yörükeren, “Optimal bus layout in transmission system by using meta-heuristic approaches,” Electr. Power Compon. Syst., vol. 48, no. 12–13, pp. 1390–1400, 2020.
• 5. Z. Yang, H. Zhong, Q. Xia, and C. Kang, “Optimal transmission switching with short-circuit current limitation constraints,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 1278–1288, 2016.
• 6. E. Doğan, and N. Yörükeren, “Optimal bus layout in electricity transmission system by using binary particle swarm optimization: Turkey case study,” SEERC Colloq., vol. 2021, 2021, Austria-online.
• 7. M. Heidarifar, and H. Ghasemi, “A network topology optimization model based on substation and node-breaker modeling,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 247–255, 2016.
• 8. M. Heidarifar, M. Doostizadeh, and H. Ghasemi, “Optimal transmission reconfiguration through line switching and bus splitting,” IEEE PES Gen. Meeting | Conference & Exposition, National Harbor, MD, USA, 27–31 July 2014, 2014, pp. 1–5.
• 9. M. Heidarifar, P. Andrianesis, P. Ruiz, M. C. Caramanis, and I. C. Pascha- lidis, “An optimal transmission line switching and bus splitting heuristic incorporating AC and N-1 contingency constraints” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 133, p. 107278, 2021.
• 10. Y. Zhou, A. S. Zamzam, A. Bernstein, and H. Zhu, “Substation-level grid topology optimization using bus splitting,” Am. Control. Con- ference (ACC), New Orleans, LA, USA, 25–28 May 2021, pp. 2868–2874.
• 11. T. Ding, K. Sun, Q. Yang, A. W. Khan, and Z. Bie, “Mixed integer second order cone relaxation with dynamic simulation for proper power system islanding operations,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Circuits Syst., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 295–306, 2017.
• 12. N. Z. Saharuddin, I. Z. Abidin, H. Mokhlis, A. R. Abdullah, and K. Naidu, “A power system network splitting strategy based on contingency analysis,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 2, 2018.
• 13. P. Fernández-Porras, M. Panteli, and J. Quirós-Tortós, “Intentional controlled islanding: When to island for power system blackout prevention,” IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 12, no. 14, pp. 3542–3549, 2018.
• 14. P. Demetriou, A. Kyriacou, E. Kyriakides, and C. Panayiotou, “System splitting strategy considering power system restoration,” IEEE Manchester PowerTech, vol. 2017, pp. 1–6, 2017.
• 15. S. Mirjalili, S. M. Mirjalili, and A. Lewis, “Grey wolf optimizer,” Adv. Eng. Softw., vol. 69, pp. 46–61, 2014.
• 16. D. H. Wolpert, and W. G. Macready, “No free lunch theorems for optimization,” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 67–82, 1997.
• 17. J. H. Holland, “Genetic algorithms,” Sci. Am., Scientific American, vol. 267, no. 1, pp. 66–72, 1992.
• 18. R. Eberhart, and J. Kennedy, “A new optimizer using particle swarm theory,” Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, Nagoya, Japan, 4–6 October 1999, pp. 39–43.
• 19. E. Rashedi, H. Nezamabadi-pour, and S. Saryazdi, “GSA: A Gravitational Search Algorithm” Inf. Sci., vol. 179, no. 13, pp. 2232–2248, 2009.
• 20. M. Dorigo, M. Birattari, and T. Stutzle, “Ant colony Optimatization,” IEEE Comp. Intell. Mag., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 28–39, 2006.
• 21. F. A. Hashim, K. Hussain, E. H. Houssein, M. S. Mabrouk, and W. Al- Atabany, “Archimedes optimization algorithm: A new metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems,” Appl. Intell., vol. 51, no.3, pp. 1531–1551, 2021.
• 22. N. van Thieu, and D. Molina, “Meta-heuristic algorithms using Python (MEALPY-software),” Zenodo, 2021.
• 23. E. Rashedi, H. Nezamabadi-Pour, and S. Saryazdi, “BGSA: binary gravitational search algorithm,” Nat. Comput., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 727–745, 2010.
• 24. S. Mirjalili, and A. Lewis, “S-shaped versus V-shaped transfer functions for binary Particle Swarm Optimization,” Swarm Evol. Comput., vol. 9, pp. 1–14, 2013.
• 25. R. A. Romero, A. Monticelli, and R. Romero, “Transmision system expansion planning by an extended genetic algorithm,” IEE Proc. Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 329 – 335, 1998.