Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

HİNDİSTAN-TÜRKİYE İLİŞKİLERİ: STRATEJİK OTONOMİ POLİTİKALARI ÜZERİNDEN BİR İNCELEME

Year 2025, Volume: 12 Issue: 2, 647 - 674, 31.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.30626/tesamakademi.1542311

Abstract

Bu makale yakın dönem Hindistan-Türkiye ilişkilerini stratejik otonomi politikaları üzerinden ele almaktadır. 2010’lu yıllardan itibaren uluslararası sistemde çok-kutuplu düzen tartışmalarının başlaması Batı-dışı güçlerin manevra alanı bulmasına neden olmuştur. Bu güçlerden olan Hindistan ve Türkiye çıkarları açısından stratejik otonomi politikası izlemiştir. Bu politika ile Hindistan ve Türkiye, büyük güçler ile dengeli bir ilişki kurmayı ve bölgesel düzeyde etki alanı oluşturmayı amaçlamıştır. Hindistan dış politikasında riskleri minimize ederek siyasi ve ekonomik gücünü kaldıraç olarak kullanmaya çalışmıştır. Türkiye de 2010’lu yıllardan itibaren orta ölçekli bir güç olarak Orta Doğu, Afrika Boynuzu ve Kafkasya’da güç dengesinin önemli bir unsuru olma politikasını takip etmiştir. NATO üyesi olmasına rağmen Türkiye bazı meselelerde Batı ittifakından farklılaşmıştır. Stratejik otonomi politikası takip etmiş olmaları Hindistan ile Türkiye arasındaki ilişkileri etkilemektedir. Her iki güç jeopolitik ve ekonomik açıdan etkin olmaya çalışmaktadır. Bu nedenle farklı meselelerde çatışan ve örtüşen politikalarının olduğu görülmektedir. Orta Asya, Orta Doğu ve ticaret/enerji koridorlarında etkin olma konularında Hindistan ve Türkiye’nin çatışan ve örtüşen politikaları bulunmaktadır.

References

  • Akder, D. G. and Altunışık, M. B. (2018). Locating agency in global connections: the case of India and Turkey as ‘rising powers’. In S. T. Jassal and H. Turan (Eds.), New perspectives on India and Turkey. Routledge.
  • Alam, M. (2024). Türkiye-India relations in the 21st century. Insight Turkey, 26(1), 91-116.
  • Altunışık, M. B., and Martin, L. G. (2023). Turkey and the Middle East and North Africa under the AKP. Uluslararası İlişkiler/International Relations, 20(78), 79-96.
  • Anadolu Ajansı. (2023). Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan: Hindistan-Orta Doğu-Avrupa Ekonomi Koridoru Türkiyesiz olmaz. Erişim tarihi: 28.07.2024, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-hindistan-orta-dogu-avrupa-ekonomi-koridoru-turkiyesiz-olmaz/2989082#:~:text=Cumhurbaşkanı%20Erdoğan%2C%20%22(Hindistan%2D,üzerinden%20geçmek%20durumunda.%22%20dedi.
  • Anadolu Ajansı. (2024). Savunma ve havacılıktan 2023'te ihracat rekoru. Erişim tarihi: 24.07.2024, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/ekonomi/savunma-ve-havaciliktan-2023te-ihracat-rekoru/3098418.
  • Aran, A. and Kutlay, M. (2024). Turkey’s quest for strategic autonomy in an era of multipolarity. İstanbul Policy Center.
  • Aryal, S. K. and Pulami, M. J. (2023). India’s "strategic autonomy" and strengthening its ties with the US. Przegląd Geopolityczny, 44, 116-128.
  • Baabood, A. (2024). The geopolitics of economic development in the Middle East. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  • Bekkevold, J. I. and Kalyanaraman, S. (2020). India’s great power politics: a framework for analysis. In J. I. Bekkevold and S. Kalyanaraman (Eds.), India’s great power politics. Oxfordshire: Routledge Press.
  • Bento, V. (2022). Strategic autonomy and economic Power: the economy as a strategic theater. Oxfordshire: Routledge Press.
  • Chaulia, S. (2019). Trumped: emerging powers in a post-American world. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Chikermane, G. (2023). A rising India in the crossfire of competing grand strategies. In S. Beretta, A. Berkofsky and G. Iannini (Eds.), India’s foreign policy and economic challenges: friends, enemies and controversies. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Das, D. (2024). Revisiting the contours of the evolving Middle Eastern order through the India-Middle East-EU corridor: mapping India’s scopes and limitations. Asian Journal of Political Science, 32(1), 35-56.
  • Fouskas, V. (2023). Economic drivers of Turkey’s foreign policy and the issue of “strategic autonomy” (sub-imperialism). Yaşar University Centre for Mediterranean Studies Policy Paper 3.
  • Ganguly, S. (2015). India’s national security. In D. M. Malone, C. R. Mohan and S. Raghavan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Indian foreign policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gasparetto, A. (2021). Transition and middle power: Turkey’s strategic autonomy on the Atlantic area border with the Middle East, the Mediterranean and the Horn of Africa. In F. Attina (Ed.), World order transition and the Atlantic area: theoretical perspectives and empirical analysis, 183-203.
  • Haugom, L. (2019). Turkish foreign policy under Erdogan: A change in international orientation?. Comparative Strategy, 38(3), 206-223.
  • IMF. (2024). India. Erişim tarihi: 01.08.2024, https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/IND. Kalyanaraman, S. (2015). Aravind Devanathan asked: what is ‘strategic autonomy’? how does it help India’s security?. Erişim tarihi: 08.06.2024, https://idsa.in/askanexp ert/strategicautonomy_indiasecurity.
  • Kalyanaraman, S. (2020). India’s response to the China threat since 1949. In C. Ogden (Ed.), India’s great power politics. Routledge.
  • Kayalı, Y. (2022). Yeniden Asya Açılımı bağlamında geçmişten günümüze Türkiye-Hindistan ilişkileri. İçinde Asya-Pasifik Çalıştayı: Yeniden Asya Açılımı çerçevesinde fırsatlar ve zorluklar bildiriler kitabı. Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Kutlay, M. and Öniş, Z. (2021). Turkish foreign policy in a post-western order: strategic autonomy or new forms of dependence?. International Affairs, 97(4), 1085-1104.
  • Malkoç, E. (2022). 20. yüzyılın ikinci yarısında siyasi, ekonomik ve kültürel boyutlarıyla Türkiye-Hindistan ilişkileri. İçinde Geçmişten Günümüze Türkiye-Hindistan İlişkileri Uluslararası Sempozyumu. Ankara: TTK Yayınları.
  • Mazzucotelli, F. (2023). India and the Gulf: The Indo-Pacific strategy goes West. In S. Beretta, A. Berkofsky and G. Iannini (Eds.), India’s foreign policy and economic challenges: friends, enemies and controversies. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Ministry of Defence. (2007). Indian navy, freedom to use the seas: India’s maritime military strategy. New Delhi.
  • Mohan, C. R. (2013). India: between "strategic autonomy" and "geopolitical opportunity”. Asia Policy, 15(1), 21-25.
  • Mohan, C. R. (2015). Foreign policy after 1990. In D. M. Malone, C. R. Mohan and S. Raghavan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Indian foreign policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Monsonis, G. (2010). India's strategic autonomy and rapprochement with the US. Strategic Analysis, 34(4), 611-624.
  • Muraviev, A. D., Ahlawat, D. and Hughes, L. (2022). India’s security dilemma: engaging big powers while retaining strategic autonomy. International Politics (The Hague), 59(6), 119-1138.
  • Ogden, C. (2011). International ‘aspirations’ of a rising power. In D. Scott (Ed.), Handbook of India's international relations. Routledge.
  • Ogden, C. (2023a). Conclusions: India's global reconfiguration. In C. Ogden (Ed.), Global India. Routledge.
  • Ogden, C. (2023b). Introduction: a rising and assertive India. In C. Ogden (Ed.), Global India. Routledge.
  • Oğuzlu, T. (2019). Turkey and the West: geopolitical shifts in the AK Party era. In E. Erşen and S. Kösten (Eds.), Turkey’s pivot to Eurasia. Routledge.
  • Oğuzlu, T. (2023) Turkey as a restrained middle power. Turkish Studies, 24(3-4), 673-690.
  • Oğuzlu, T. and Han, A. K. (2023). Making sense of Turkey’s foreign policy from the perspective of neorealism. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 20(78), 59-77.
  • Pant, H. V. and Mehta, K. (2019). Turkey and India: A relationship in progress. In E. Erşen and S. Kösten (Eds.), Turkey’s pivot to Eurasia. New Delhi: Routledge India.
  • Pant, H. V. (2020). India’s US policy under Modi: Alignment and strategic autonomy redefined. In J. I. Bekkevold and S. Kalyanaraman (Eds.), India’s great power politics. New Delhi: Routledge India.
  • Pant, H. V. (2022). Rising India and its global governance imperatives. In H. V. Pant (Ed.), India and global governance. New Delhi: Routledge India.
  • Parlar Dal, E. (2018). Profiling middle powers in global governance and the Turkish case: An introduction. In E. Parlar Dal (Ed.), Middle powers in global governance: The rise of Turkey. Palgrave Macmillan
  • Parpiani, K. (2019). Correlation between American policy schizophrenia with China, and Indian funambulism on Integrating with the US-led Liberal Order. Rising Powers Quarterly, 3(1), 41-55.
  • Prayer, M. (2023). The Indian State and its foreign relations. In S. Beretta, A. Berkofsky and G. Iannini (Eds.), India’s foreign policy and economic challenges: friends, enemies and controversies. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Rieker, P. and Giske, M. T. (2024). European actorness in a shifting geopolitical order: European strategic autonomy through differentiated integration. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Rubagotti, G. (2023). India and international trade. In S. Beretta, A. Berkofsky and G. Iannini (Eds.), India’s foreign policy and economic challenges: friends, enemies and controversies. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Sachdeva, G. (2011). Geoeconomics and energy for india. In D. Scott (Ed.), Handbook of India's international relations. New Delhi: Routledge India.
  • Schaffer, T. C. and Schaffer, H. B. (2016). India at the global high table: the quest for regional primacy and strategic autonomy. New York: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Sharma, M. S. and Bhogal, P. (2022). India and global trade governance: a saga of missed opportunities. In H. V. Pant (Ed.), India and global governance. New Delhi: Routledge India.
  • Siddiqa, A. (2023). Corridor Politics IMEC vs. BRI: another geopolitical face-off in US-China rivalry. Journal of Pakistan-China Studies (JPCS), 4(1), 1-22.
  • Sridharan, E. (2015). Rising or constrained power? In D. M. Malone, C. R. Mohan and S. Raghavan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Indian foreign policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Stewart-Ingersoll, R. and Frazier, D. V. (2011). Geopolitics for India. In D. Scott (Ed.), Handbook of India's international relations. New Delhi: Routledge India.
  • Subbarayan, B. (2024). IMEC corridor: how India can counter China’s clout and boost its trade potential. Erişim tarihi: 03.08.2024, https://medium.com/@baranidharanphd/imec-corridor-how-india-can-counter-chinas-clout-and-boost-its-trade-potential-8226e61e51c8.
  • Ticaret Bakanlığı. (2024). Hindistan ülke profili. Erişim tarihi: 18.07.2024, https://ticaret.gov.tr/data/5f58be6a13b8763344b7b62c/HİNDİSTAN_Ülke_Profili_2024.pdf.
  • Tikerpuu, M. (2019). Making India’s idea of strategic autonomy simple. Non-aligned movement revisited. East-West Studies, (9), 6-16.
  • Tourangbam, M. (2014). Indo-Pacific and the practice of strategic autonomy. Indian Foreign Affairs Journal, 9(12), 119-124.
  • TRT Haber. (2022). Hindistan Başbakanından Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan'la görüşmesi hakkında Türkçe paylaşım. Erişim tarihi: 18.04.2025, https://www.trthaber.com/haber/gundem/hindistan-basbakanindan-cumhurbaskani-erdoganla-gorusmesi-hakkinda-turkce-paylasim-709255.html

INDIA-TURKIYE RELATIONS: A STUDY THROUGH STRATEGIC AUTONOMY POLICIES

Year 2025, Volume: 12 Issue: 2, 647 - 674, 31.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.30626/tesamakademi.1542311

Abstract

This article deals the recent relationship between India and Turkiye through the policies of strategic autonomy. In the international system, since the early 2010s, the debates about the emergence of a multipolar order have created room for manoeuvre for non-Western powers. Among these powers, India and Turkey have pursued a policy of strategic autonomy in regard to their interests. The policy pursued by India and Turkiye was designed with the aim of establishing a balanced relationship with the great powers and of creating a regional sphere of influence. India has sought to utilize its political and economic leverage by minimizing the potential risks in its foreign policy. Since the 2010s, Turkiye, as a middle power, has pursued a policy of becoming an important actor in the balance of power in the Middle East, the Horn of Africa and the Caucasus. Despite being a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Turkey has diverged from the Western alliance on some issues. Moreover, India and Turkey have pursued a policy of strategic autonomy affecting the bilateral relations. Both powers seek to increase their geopolitical and economic influence, which has results in conflicting and overlapping policies on different issues. These include policies on Central Asia, the Middle East, and the involvement in trade and energy corridors.

References

  • Akder, D. G. and Altunışık, M. B. (2018). Locating agency in global connections: the case of India and Turkey as ‘rising powers’. In S. T. Jassal and H. Turan (Eds.), New perspectives on India and Turkey. Routledge.
  • Alam, M. (2024). Türkiye-India relations in the 21st century. Insight Turkey, 26(1), 91-116.
  • Altunışık, M. B., and Martin, L. G. (2023). Turkey and the Middle East and North Africa under the AKP. Uluslararası İlişkiler/International Relations, 20(78), 79-96.
  • Anadolu Ajansı. (2023). Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan: Hindistan-Orta Doğu-Avrupa Ekonomi Koridoru Türkiyesiz olmaz. Erişim tarihi: 28.07.2024, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-hindistan-orta-dogu-avrupa-ekonomi-koridoru-turkiyesiz-olmaz/2989082#:~:text=Cumhurbaşkanı%20Erdoğan%2C%20%22(Hindistan%2D,üzerinden%20geçmek%20durumunda.%22%20dedi.
  • Anadolu Ajansı. (2024). Savunma ve havacılıktan 2023'te ihracat rekoru. Erişim tarihi: 24.07.2024, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/ekonomi/savunma-ve-havaciliktan-2023te-ihracat-rekoru/3098418.
  • Aran, A. and Kutlay, M. (2024). Turkey’s quest for strategic autonomy in an era of multipolarity. İstanbul Policy Center.
  • Aryal, S. K. and Pulami, M. J. (2023). India’s "strategic autonomy" and strengthening its ties with the US. Przegląd Geopolityczny, 44, 116-128.
  • Baabood, A. (2024). The geopolitics of economic development in the Middle East. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  • Bekkevold, J. I. and Kalyanaraman, S. (2020). India’s great power politics: a framework for analysis. In J. I. Bekkevold and S. Kalyanaraman (Eds.), India’s great power politics. Oxfordshire: Routledge Press.
  • Bento, V. (2022). Strategic autonomy and economic Power: the economy as a strategic theater. Oxfordshire: Routledge Press.
  • Chaulia, S. (2019). Trumped: emerging powers in a post-American world. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Chikermane, G. (2023). A rising India in the crossfire of competing grand strategies. In S. Beretta, A. Berkofsky and G. Iannini (Eds.), India’s foreign policy and economic challenges: friends, enemies and controversies. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Das, D. (2024). Revisiting the contours of the evolving Middle Eastern order through the India-Middle East-EU corridor: mapping India’s scopes and limitations. Asian Journal of Political Science, 32(1), 35-56.
  • Fouskas, V. (2023). Economic drivers of Turkey’s foreign policy and the issue of “strategic autonomy” (sub-imperialism). Yaşar University Centre for Mediterranean Studies Policy Paper 3.
  • Ganguly, S. (2015). India’s national security. In D. M. Malone, C. R. Mohan and S. Raghavan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Indian foreign policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gasparetto, A. (2021). Transition and middle power: Turkey’s strategic autonomy on the Atlantic area border with the Middle East, the Mediterranean and the Horn of Africa. In F. Attina (Ed.), World order transition and the Atlantic area: theoretical perspectives and empirical analysis, 183-203.
  • Haugom, L. (2019). Turkish foreign policy under Erdogan: A change in international orientation?. Comparative Strategy, 38(3), 206-223.
  • IMF. (2024). India. Erişim tarihi: 01.08.2024, https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/IND. Kalyanaraman, S. (2015). Aravind Devanathan asked: what is ‘strategic autonomy’? how does it help India’s security?. Erişim tarihi: 08.06.2024, https://idsa.in/askanexp ert/strategicautonomy_indiasecurity.
  • Kalyanaraman, S. (2020). India’s response to the China threat since 1949. In C. Ogden (Ed.), India’s great power politics. Routledge.
  • Kayalı, Y. (2022). Yeniden Asya Açılımı bağlamında geçmişten günümüze Türkiye-Hindistan ilişkileri. İçinde Asya-Pasifik Çalıştayı: Yeniden Asya Açılımı çerçevesinde fırsatlar ve zorluklar bildiriler kitabı. Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Kutlay, M. and Öniş, Z. (2021). Turkish foreign policy in a post-western order: strategic autonomy or new forms of dependence?. International Affairs, 97(4), 1085-1104.
  • Malkoç, E. (2022). 20. yüzyılın ikinci yarısında siyasi, ekonomik ve kültürel boyutlarıyla Türkiye-Hindistan ilişkileri. İçinde Geçmişten Günümüze Türkiye-Hindistan İlişkileri Uluslararası Sempozyumu. Ankara: TTK Yayınları.
  • Mazzucotelli, F. (2023). India and the Gulf: The Indo-Pacific strategy goes West. In S. Beretta, A. Berkofsky and G. Iannini (Eds.), India’s foreign policy and economic challenges: friends, enemies and controversies. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Ministry of Defence. (2007). Indian navy, freedom to use the seas: India’s maritime military strategy. New Delhi.
  • Mohan, C. R. (2013). India: between "strategic autonomy" and "geopolitical opportunity”. Asia Policy, 15(1), 21-25.
  • Mohan, C. R. (2015). Foreign policy after 1990. In D. M. Malone, C. R. Mohan and S. Raghavan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Indian foreign policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Monsonis, G. (2010). India's strategic autonomy and rapprochement with the US. Strategic Analysis, 34(4), 611-624.
  • Muraviev, A. D., Ahlawat, D. and Hughes, L. (2022). India’s security dilemma: engaging big powers while retaining strategic autonomy. International Politics (The Hague), 59(6), 119-1138.
  • Ogden, C. (2011). International ‘aspirations’ of a rising power. In D. Scott (Ed.), Handbook of India's international relations. Routledge.
  • Ogden, C. (2023a). Conclusions: India's global reconfiguration. In C. Ogden (Ed.), Global India. Routledge.
  • Ogden, C. (2023b). Introduction: a rising and assertive India. In C. Ogden (Ed.), Global India. Routledge.
  • Oğuzlu, T. (2019). Turkey and the West: geopolitical shifts in the AK Party era. In E. Erşen and S. Kösten (Eds.), Turkey’s pivot to Eurasia. Routledge.
  • Oğuzlu, T. (2023) Turkey as a restrained middle power. Turkish Studies, 24(3-4), 673-690.
  • Oğuzlu, T. and Han, A. K. (2023). Making sense of Turkey’s foreign policy from the perspective of neorealism. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 20(78), 59-77.
  • Pant, H. V. and Mehta, K. (2019). Turkey and India: A relationship in progress. In E. Erşen and S. Kösten (Eds.), Turkey’s pivot to Eurasia. New Delhi: Routledge India.
  • Pant, H. V. (2020). India’s US policy under Modi: Alignment and strategic autonomy redefined. In J. I. Bekkevold and S. Kalyanaraman (Eds.), India’s great power politics. New Delhi: Routledge India.
  • Pant, H. V. (2022). Rising India and its global governance imperatives. In H. V. Pant (Ed.), India and global governance. New Delhi: Routledge India.
  • Parlar Dal, E. (2018). Profiling middle powers in global governance and the Turkish case: An introduction. In E. Parlar Dal (Ed.), Middle powers in global governance: The rise of Turkey. Palgrave Macmillan
  • Parpiani, K. (2019). Correlation between American policy schizophrenia with China, and Indian funambulism on Integrating with the US-led Liberal Order. Rising Powers Quarterly, 3(1), 41-55.
  • Prayer, M. (2023). The Indian State and its foreign relations. In S. Beretta, A. Berkofsky and G. Iannini (Eds.), India’s foreign policy and economic challenges: friends, enemies and controversies. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Rieker, P. and Giske, M. T. (2024). European actorness in a shifting geopolitical order: European strategic autonomy through differentiated integration. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Rubagotti, G. (2023). India and international trade. In S. Beretta, A. Berkofsky and G. Iannini (Eds.), India’s foreign policy and economic challenges: friends, enemies and controversies. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Sachdeva, G. (2011). Geoeconomics and energy for india. In D. Scott (Ed.), Handbook of India's international relations. New Delhi: Routledge India.
  • Schaffer, T. C. and Schaffer, H. B. (2016). India at the global high table: the quest for regional primacy and strategic autonomy. New York: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Sharma, M. S. and Bhogal, P. (2022). India and global trade governance: a saga of missed opportunities. In H. V. Pant (Ed.), India and global governance. New Delhi: Routledge India.
  • Siddiqa, A. (2023). Corridor Politics IMEC vs. BRI: another geopolitical face-off in US-China rivalry. Journal of Pakistan-China Studies (JPCS), 4(1), 1-22.
  • Sridharan, E. (2015). Rising or constrained power? In D. M. Malone, C. R. Mohan and S. Raghavan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Indian foreign policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Stewart-Ingersoll, R. and Frazier, D. V. (2011). Geopolitics for India. In D. Scott (Ed.), Handbook of India's international relations. New Delhi: Routledge India.
  • Subbarayan, B. (2024). IMEC corridor: how India can counter China’s clout and boost its trade potential. Erişim tarihi: 03.08.2024, https://medium.com/@baranidharanphd/imec-corridor-how-india-can-counter-chinas-clout-and-boost-its-trade-potential-8226e61e51c8.
  • Ticaret Bakanlığı. (2024). Hindistan ülke profili. Erişim tarihi: 18.07.2024, https://ticaret.gov.tr/data/5f58be6a13b8763344b7b62c/HİNDİSTAN_Ülke_Profili_2024.pdf.
  • Tikerpuu, M. (2019). Making India’s idea of strategic autonomy simple. Non-aligned movement revisited. East-West Studies, (9), 6-16.
  • Tourangbam, M. (2014). Indo-Pacific and the practice of strategic autonomy. Indian Foreign Affairs Journal, 9(12), 119-124.
  • TRT Haber. (2022). Hindistan Başbakanından Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan'la görüşmesi hakkında Türkçe paylaşım. Erişim tarihi: 18.04.2025, https://www.trthaber.com/haber/gundem/hindistan-basbakanindan-cumhurbaskani-erdoganla-gorusmesi-hakkinda-turkce-paylasim-709255.html
There are 53 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Politics in International Relations
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mehmet Alkış 0000-0001-6521-0701

Publication Date July 31, 2025
Submission Date September 2, 2024
Acceptance Date May 29, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 12 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Alkış, M. (2025). HİNDİSTAN-TÜRKİYE İLİŞKİLERİ: STRATEJİK OTONOMİ POLİTİKALARI ÜZERİNDEN BİR İNCELEME. TESAM Akademi Dergisi, 12(2), 647-674. https://doi.org/10.30626/tesamakademi.1542311
AMA Alkış M. HİNDİSTAN-TÜRKİYE İLİŞKİLERİ: STRATEJİK OTONOMİ POLİTİKALARI ÜZERİNDEN BİR İNCELEME. TESAM Akademi Dergisi. July 2025;12(2):647-674. doi:10.30626/tesamakademi.1542311
Chicago Alkış, Mehmet. “HİNDİSTAN-TÜRKİYE İLİŞKİLERİ: STRATEJİK OTONOMİ POLİTİKALARI ÜZERİNDEN BİR İNCELEME”. TESAM Akademi Dergisi 12, no. 2 (July 2025): 647-74. https://doi.org/10.30626/tesamakademi.1542311.
EndNote Alkış M (July 1, 2025) HİNDİSTAN-TÜRKİYE İLİŞKİLERİ: STRATEJİK OTONOMİ POLİTİKALARI ÜZERİNDEN BİR İNCELEME. TESAM Akademi Dergisi 12 2 647–674.
IEEE M. Alkış, “HİNDİSTAN-TÜRKİYE İLİŞKİLERİ: STRATEJİK OTONOMİ POLİTİKALARI ÜZERİNDEN BİR İNCELEME”, TESAM Akademi Dergisi, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 647–674, 2025, doi: 10.30626/tesamakademi.1542311.
ISNAD Alkış, Mehmet. “HİNDİSTAN-TÜRKİYE İLİŞKİLERİ: STRATEJİK OTONOMİ POLİTİKALARI ÜZERİNDEN BİR İNCELEME”. TESAM Akademi Dergisi 12/2 (July2025), 647-674. https://doi.org/10.30626/tesamakademi.1542311.
JAMA Alkış M. HİNDİSTAN-TÜRKİYE İLİŞKİLERİ: STRATEJİK OTONOMİ POLİTİKALARI ÜZERİNDEN BİR İNCELEME. TESAM Akademi Dergisi. 2025;12:647–674.
MLA Alkış, Mehmet. “HİNDİSTAN-TÜRKİYE İLİŞKİLERİ: STRATEJİK OTONOMİ POLİTİKALARI ÜZERİNDEN BİR İNCELEME”. TESAM Akademi Dergisi, vol. 12, no. 2, 2025, pp. 647-74, doi:10.30626/tesamakademi.1542311.
Vancouver Alkış M. HİNDİSTAN-TÜRKİYE İLİŞKİLERİ: STRATEJİK OTONOMİ POLİTİKALARI ÜZERİNDEN BİR İNCELEME. TESAM Akademi Dergisi. 2025;12(2):647-74.