PDF EndNote BibTex Cite

THE PRACTICABILITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IN TURKEY AND THE DISCUSSIONS OVER NEVER ENDING DREAMS OF DEMOCRACY

Year 2016, Volume 3, Issue 2, 0 - 0, 29.10.2016

Abstract

This paper chiefly examines the practicability of presidential system in Turkey by linking democracy to the system of government, namely the presidential system. To this aim, the study consists of three parts. While the first part of the paper is devoted to pointing out what presidential system is by underlining its differences from the parliamentary system, the second part disputes the JDP’s proposal of presidential system. Then, the paper concludes why presidential system is not feasible in Turkey within the context of the consolidation of democracy.

References

  • Akçalı, P. (2013). “Genel Özellikleri Yararları ve Sakıncaları Işığında Başkanlık Sistemleri”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 406-411
  • Ataay, F. (2013). “Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisinin Başkanlık Sistemi Önerisi Üzerine Değerlendirme”. Alternatif Politika, 5.3, pp. 266-294
  • Bağlı, M. (2013). “Hikmet-i Hükümet”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 185-189
  • Baskanliksistemi.com. (2016). Başkanlık Sistemi Nedir. Date of Access: 15 January 2016, from: http://www.baskanliksistemi.com/turk-tipi-baskanlik-sistemi-nedir.php
  • Bezci, B. (2005). “Demokrasi ve Başkanlık Sistemi”, Journal of Administrative Science, 3.2, pp. 77-91
  • Charlton, R. (1986). “Contemporary Legislatures”. in Comparative Government, USA: Longman, pp. 38-54
  • Derbyshire, J., Dennis, and Derbyshire, I. (1991). “Assemblies”. in World Political Systems: An Introduction to Comparative Government, Great Britain: Chambers, pp. 84-107
  • Fedayi, C. (2013). “Mazi, Hal ve İstikbal Boyutlarıyla Başkanlık Sistemi”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 679-691
  • Gözler, K. (2000). “Türkiye’de Hükümetlere Nasıl İstikrar ve Etkinlik Kazandırılabilir?bBaşkanlık sistemi ve rasyonelleştirilmiş Parlamentarizm Üzerine bir Deneme”. Türkiye Günlüğü, 62.3, pp. 25-47
  • Heper, M. (2011). Türkiyenin Siyasal Hayatı, İstanbul: Doğan Kitap
  • Horawitz, D. (1991). “Comparing Democratic Systems”. Journal of Democracy, 4.1, pp. 51-69
  • Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2013). “Türkiye’nin Yeni Siyasal Rejim Arayışı”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 214- 222
  • Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of Democracy, New York: Yale University Press
  • Linz, J. (1990). “The Perils of Presidentialism”. Journal of Democracy:, 1.1, pp. 51-69
  • Norton, P. (1990). Legislatures, Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Özbudun, E. (2013). “Hükümet sistemi Tartışmaları”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 205-213
  • Poguntke, T., Webb, P. (2005). “The Presidentialization of Politics in Democratic Societies: A Framework for Analysis”. The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Sartori, G. (1997) Comparative Constitutional Engineering, New York: Yale University Press
  • Siaroff, A. (2005). Comparing Political Regimes: A Thematic Introduction to Comparative Politics, Canada: Broadview Press
  • Slann, M. (2005). Introduction to Politics: Governments and Nations in the Twenty-First Century, USA: Atomic Dog Publishing
  • Sudestada.com. (2016). Democracy Index. Date of Access: 17 January 2016 from: http://www.sudestada.com.uy/Content/Articles/421a313a-d58f-462e-9b24-2504a37f6b56/Democracy-index-2014.pdf
  • Tosun T., Erdoğan G. (1999). Türkiyenin Siyasal İstikrar Arayışı Başkanlık ve Yarı-Başkanlık sistemleri, İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları
  • Turan, İ. (2013). “Başkanlık Sistemi ve Ülkemizde Başkanlık Sistemi Tartışmaları”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 525-529
  • Turhan, M. (1993). “Hükümet Sistemleri”. Ankara: Gündoğan Yayınları
  • Türk, R. (2011). “Practicability of Presidential System in Turkey”. Turkish Journal of Politics, 2.1, pp. 33-48
  • Yılmaz, C. (2013). “Başkanlık Sistemi ve Kalkınma”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 9-26

THE PRACTICABILITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IN TURKEY AND THE DISCUSSIONS OVER NEVER ENDING DREAMS OF DEMOCRACY

Year 2016, Volume 3, Issue 2, 0 - 0, 29.10.2016

Abstract

This paper chiefly examines the practicability of presidential system in Turkey by linking democracy to the system of government, namely the presidential system. To this aim, the study consists of three parts. While the first part of the paper is devoted to pointing out what presidential system is by underlining its differences from the parliamentary system, the second part disputes the JDP’s proposal of presidential system. Then, the paper concludes why presidential system is not feasible in Turkey within the context of the consolidation of democracy.

References

  • Akçalı, P. (2013). “Genel Özellikleri Yararları ve Sakıncaları Işığında Başkanlık Sistemleri”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 406-411
  • Ataay, F. (2013). “Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisinin Başkanlık Sistemi Önerisi Üzerine Değerlendirme”. Alternatif Politika, 5.3, pp. 266-294
  • Bağlı, M. (2013). “Hikmet-i Hükümet”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 185-189
  • Baskanliksistemi.com. (2016). Başkanlık Sistemi Nedir. Date of Access: 15 January 2016, from: http://www.baskanliksistemi.com/turk-tipi-baskanlik-sistemi-nedir.php
  • Bezci, B. (2005). “Demokrasi ve Başkanlık Sistemi”, Journal of Administrative Science, 3.2, pp. 77-91
  • Charlton, R. (1986). “Contemporary Legislatures”. in Comparative Government, USA: Longman, pp. 38-54
  • Derbyshire, J., Dennis, and Derbyshire, I. (1991). “Assemblies”. in World Political Systems: An Introduction to Comparative Government, Great Britain: Chambers, pp. 84-107
  • Fedayi, C. (2013). “Mazi, Hal ve İstikbal Boyutlarıyla Başkanlık Sistemi”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 679-691
  • Gözler, K. (2000). “Türkiye’de Hükümetlere Nasıl İstikrar ve Etkinlik Kazandırılabilir?bBaşkanlık sistemi ve rasyonelleştirilmiş Parlamentarizm Üzerine bir Deneme”. Türkiye Günlüğü, 62.3, pp. 25-47
  • Heper, M. (2011). Türkiyenin Siyasal Hayatı, İstanbul: Doğan Kitap
  • Horawitz, D. (1991). “Comparing Democratic Systems”. Journal of Democracy, 4.1, pp. 51-69
  • Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2013). “Türkiye’nin Yeni Siyasal Rejim Arayışı”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 214- 222
  • Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of Democracy, New York: Yale University Press
  • Linz, J. (1990). “The Perils of Presidentialism”. Journal of Democracy:, 1.1, pp. 51-69
  • Norton, P. (1990). Legislatures, Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Özbudun, E. (2013). “Hükümet sistemi Tartışmaları”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 205-213
  • Poguntke, T., Webb, P. (2005). “The Presidentialization of Politics in Democratic Societies: A Framework for Analysis”. The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Sartori, G. (1997) Comparative Constitutional Engineering, New York: Yale University Press
  • Siaroff, A. (2005). Comparing Political Regimes: A Thematic Introduction to Comparative Politics, Canada: Broadview Press
  • Slann, M. (2005). Introduction to Politics: Governments and Nations in the Twenty-First Century, USA: Atomic Dog Publishing
  • Sudestada.com. (2016). Democracy Index. Date of Access: 17 January 2016 from: http://www.sudestada.com.uy/Content/Articles/421a313a-d58f-462e-9b24-2504a37f6b56/Democracy-index-2014.pdf
  • Tosun T., Erdoğan G. (1999). Türkiyenin Siyasal İstikrar Arayışı Başkanlık ve Yarı-Başkanlık sistemleri, İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları
  • Turan, İ. (2013). “Başkanlık Sistemi ve Ülkemizde Başkanlık Sistemi Tartışmaları”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 525-529
  • Turhan, M. (1993). “Hükümet Sistemleri”. Ankara: Gündoğan Yayınları
  • Türk, R. (2011). “Practicability of Presidential System in Turkey”. Turkish Journal of Politics, 2.1, pp. 33-48
  • Yılmaz, C. (2013). “Başkanlık Sistemi ve Kalkınma”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 9-26

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

MEHMET KANATLI This is me

Publication Date October 29, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016, Volume 3, Issue 2

Cite

Bibtex @ { tesamakademi261449, journal = {TESAM Akademi Dergisi}, issn = {2148-2462}, eissn = {2458-9217}, address = {}, publisher = {TESAM Ekonomik Siyasal ve Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi Derneği}, year = {2016}, volume = {3}, number = {2}, pages = {0 - 0}, title = {THE PRACTICABILITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IN TURKEY AND THE DISCUSSIONS OVER NEVER ENDING DREAMS OF DEMOCRACY}, key = {cite}, author = {Kanatlı, MEHMET} }
APA Kanatlı, M. (2016). THE PRACTICABILITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IN TURKEY AND THE DISCUSSIONS OVER NEVER ENDING DREAMS OF DEMOCRACY . TESAM Akademi Dergisi , 3 (2) , 0-0 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tesamakademi/issue/24719/261449
MLA Kanatlı, M. "THE PRACTICABILITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IN TURKEY AND THE DISCUSSIONS OVER NEVER ENDING DREAMS OF DEMOCRACY" . TESAM Akademi Dergisi 3 (2016 ): 0-0 <https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tesamakademi/issue/24719/261449>
Chicago Kanatlı, M. "THE PRACTICABILITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IN TURKEY AND THE DISCUSSIONS OVER NEVER ENDING DREAMS OF DEMOCRACY". TESAM Akademi Dergisi 3 (2016 ): 0-0
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - THE PRACTICABILITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IN TURKEY AND THE DISCUSSIONS OVER NEVER ENDING DREAMS OF DEMOCRACY AU - MEHMET Kanatlı Y1 - 2016 PY - 2016 N1 - DO - T2 - TESAM Akademi Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 0 EP - 0 VL - 3 IS - 2 SN - 2148-2462-2458-9217 M3 - UR - Y2 - 2022 ER -
EndNote %0 Journal of TESAM Akademy THE PRACTICABILITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IN TURKEY AND THE DISCUSSIONS OVER NEVER ENDING DREAMS OF DEMOCRACY %A MEHMET Kanatlı %T THE PRACTICABILITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IN TURKEY AND THE DISCUSSIONS OVER NEVER ENDING DREAMS OF DEMOCRACY %D 2016 %J TESAM Akademi Dergisi %P 2148-2462-2458-9217 %V 3 %N 2 %R %U
ISNAD Kanatlı, MEHMET . "THE PRACTICABILITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IN TURKEY AND THE DISCUSSIONS OVER NEVER ENDING DREAMS OF DEMOCRACY". TESAM Akademi Dergisi 3 / 2 (October 2016): 0-0 .
AMA Kanatlı M. THE PRACTICABILITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IN TURKEY AND THE DISCUSSIONS OVER NEVER ENDING DREAMS OF DEMOCRACY. TESAM Akademi Dergisi. 2016; 3(2): 0-0.
Vancouver Kanatlı M. THE PRACTICABILITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IN TURKEY AND THE DISCUSSIONS OVER NEVER ENDING DREAMS OF DEMOCRACY. TESAM Akademi Dergisi. 2016; 3(2): 0-0.
IEEE M. Kanatlı , "THE PRACTICABILITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IN TURKEY AND THE DISCUSSIONS OVER NEVER ENDING DREAMS OF DEMOCRACY", TESAM Akademi Dergisi, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 0-0, Oct. 2016