THE PRACTICABILITY OF THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IN TURKEY AND THE DISCUSSIONS OVER NEVER ENDING DREAMS OF DEMOCRACY

Year 2016, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 0 - 0, 29.10.2016

MEHMET Kanatlı

Abstract

This paper chiefly examines the practicability of presidential system in Turkey by linking democracy to the system of government, namely the presidential system. To this aim, the study consists of three parts. While the first part of the paper is devoted to pointing out what presidential system is by underlining its differences from the parliamentary system, the second part disputes the JDP’s proposal of presidential system. Then, the paper concludes why presidential system is not feasible in Turkey within the context of the consolidation of democracy.

References

• Akçalı, P. (2013). “Genel Özellikleri Yararları ve Sakıncaları Işığında Başkanlık Sistemleri”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 406-411
• Ataay, F. (2013). “Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisinin Başkanlık Sistemi Önerisi Üzerine Değerlendirme”. Alternatif Politika, 5.3, pp. 266-294
• Bağlı, M. (2013). “Hikmet-i Hükümet”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 185-189
• Baskanliksistemi.com. (2016). Başkanlık Sistemi Nedir. Date of Access: 15 January 2016, from: http://www.baskanliksistemi.com/turk-tipi-baskanlik-sistemi-nedir.php
• Bezci, B. (2005). “Demokrasi ve Başkanlık Sistemi”, Journal of Administrative Science, 3.2, pp. 77-91
• Charlton, R. (1986). “Contemporary Legislatures”. in Comparative Government, USA: Longman, pp. 38-54
• Derbyshire, J., Dennis, and Derbyshire, I. (1991). “Assemblies”. in World Political Systems: An Introduction to Comparative Government, Great Britain: Chambers, pp. 84-107
• Fedayi, C. (2013). “Mazi, Hal ve İstikbal Boyutlarıyla Başkanlık Sistemi”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 679-691
• Gözler, K. (2000). “Türkiye’de Hükümetlere Nasıl İstikrar ve Etkinlik Kazandırılabilir?bBaşkanlık sistemi ve rasyonelleştirilmiş Parlamentarizm Üzerine bir Deneme”. Türkiye Günlüğü, 62.3, pp. 25-47
• Heper, M. (2011). Türkiyenin Siyasal Hayatı, İstanbul: Doğan Kitap
• Horawitz, D. (1991). “Comparing Democratic Systems”. Journal of Democracy, 4.1, pp. 51-69
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2013). “Türkiye’nin Yeni Siyasal Rejim Arayışı”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 214- 222
• Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of Democracy, New York: Yale University Press
• Linz, J. (1990). “The Perils of Presidentialism”. Journal of Democracy:, 1.1, pp. 51-69
• Norton, P. (1990). Legislatures, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Özbudun, E. (2013). “Hükümet sistemi Tartışmaları”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 205-213
• Poguntke, T., Webb, P. (2005). “The Presidentialization of Politics in Democratic Societies: A Framework for Analysis”. The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Sartori, G. (1997) Comparative Constitutional Engineering, New York: Yale University Press
• Siaroff, A. (2005). Comparing Political Regimes: A Thematic Introduction to Comparative Politics, Canada: Broadview Press
• Slann, M. (2005). Introduction to Politics: Governments and Nations in the Twenty-First Century, USA: Atomic Dog Publishing
• Sudestada.com. (2016). Democracy Index. Date of Access: 17 January 2016 from: http://www.sudestada.com.uy/Content/Articles/421a313a-d58f-462e-9b24-2504a37f6b56/Democracy-index-2014.pdf
• Tosun T., Erdoğan G. (1999). Türkiyenin Siyasal İstikrar Arayışı Başkanlık ve Yarı-Başkanlık sistemleri, İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları
• Turan, İ. (2013). “Başkanlık Sistemi ve Ülkemizde Başkanlık Sistemi Tartışmaları”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 525-529
• Turhan, M. (1993). “Hükümet Sistemleri”. Ankara: Gündoğan Yayınları
• Türk, R. (2011). “Practicability of Presidential System in Turkey”. Turkish Journal of Politics, 2.1, pp. 33-48
• Yılmaz, C. (2013). “Başkanlık Sistemi ve Kalkınma”. Yeni Türkiye, 51, pp. 9-26