BibTex RIS Cite

Validation of the Yoruba version Modified Borg Scale for assessing dyspnea in asthma

Year 2006, Volume: 17 Issue: 3, 108 - 112, 01.12.2006

Abstract

References

  • American Thoracic Society (ATS). DeŞnitions and classification of chronic bronchitis, asthma ' and pulmonary emphysema. Am Rev Resp Dis. l992;85:?62—768. Sofowora BO. Bronchial asthma in the tropics: a study of Nigerian patients. East Afr Med J. 1970;47:434—439.
  • McFadden ER, Gilbert IA. Exercise—induced asthma. N Eng. Med. 1994;330:1362-1367.
  • Erhabor GE. Exercise and asthma. Postgraduate Doctor. ;18:458~463. Mador MJ. Rodis A, Magalang UJ. Reproducibility of Borg scale measurements of dyspnca during exercise in patients with CUFF), Chest. 1995,1075] 590—1597.
  • Mahler DA, Wells CK. Evaluation of clinical methods for rating dyspnea. Chest. l988; 93:580—586. Bordon JGW, Juniper BF, Killian K], et al, The perception of breathlessness in asthma. Am Rev Respir H'zyoterapr‘ Rehabtîitasyon 17(3) 2005 Dis, 19823267825-928.
  • Simon PM, Schwartzstein RM, Weiss IW, et at. Distinguishahle sensation of hreathlessaess induced in normal volunteers. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989;140:1021— ?.
  • Aitken E.Ü. Consecutive Measurement ot‘Brcathlessness intensity and Distress. London: Department of Physiological Medicine, SL Georges” Hospital Medical School; 199411442—1443.
  • Clark CT. Asthma and exercise: a suitable case for rehabilitation. Thorax. 19924736536?
  • Ozalevli S, Ucan ES. The comparison of different dyspnoca scales in patients with COPD. J F.val Clin Pract. 2006;12:532—538.
  • Cullen DL, Rodak B. Clinical utility of measures of breathlessness. Respir Care. 2002;47:986-993.
  • Kendrick KR, Baxi SC, Smith RM. Usefulness of the Adedoyrh modiŞed 0—10 Borg scale in assessing the degree oF dyspnea patients with CO PD and asthma. ] E-merg Nurs. ;26:216-222, Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention 2002. wwwginasthmaorg. October 2006.
  • Turner SE, Eastwood PR. Cccins NM, et al. Physiologic responses to incremental and self—paced exercise in COPD: a comparison of three tests. Chest. ;126:766—773. Olaogun MOB, Adedoyin RA, _lkem IC, et al. Reliability of rating low back pain with visual analogue scale and a semantic differential scale. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 2004; 20:135—142.
  • Mishoe SC, Maclican JR. Assessment of health-related quality of life. Respir Care, 2001;46:1236-1257.
  • Appendix. ModiŞed Borg Scale [English Translated Version (Yoruba)19]. Nothing at all Very slight Slight Moderate Somewhat severe I Severe Olagbéra Severe Olégbéra Very severe Very, very Severe Kikan Kikan Almost maximal Maximal nira rârâ Niwöntunwönsî Oré iâgbâra die Ölâgbâra gan I: SIZDE DEBBIE H'zyot‘erapr' RehabrŞtasyon 17(3) 2006

Astmada dispneyi değerlendirmede Yoruba versiyonu Modifiye Borg skalasının geçerliği

Year 2006, Volume: 17 Issue: 3, 108 - 112, 01.12.2006

Abstract

Amaç: Modifiye Borg skalasının (MBS) kardiyorespiratuar disfonksiyonu olan hastalarda fiziksel zorlanmayı belirlemede geçerli bir ölçüm yöntemi olduğunu gösteren yeterli kanıt olmakla birlikte, bunun anadilleri İngilizce olmayan Nijeryalı olgular için çevirisi yapılmış versiyonunun da geçerli olduğunu gösterir bir çalışma bulunmamaktadır. Bu çalışma, Yoruba MBS’yi astmalı hastalardaki zorlanmanın ölçümü amacıyla görsel analog skalası (VAS) ile karşılaştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Gereç ve yöntem: Çalışma grupları 50 astmalı ve 50 sağlıklı bireyden oluştu. Astmalı hastaların yaş ortalaması 21.5±2.53 yıl, kontrol grubu bireylerinin 21.4±2.2 yıldı. Her olgu 6 dakika süreyle bisiklet ergometresinde egzersiz yaptı. Egzersiz düzeyi egzersizin hemen ardından VAS ve Yoruba MBS ile değerlendirildi. Sonuçlar: Korelasyon analizi gerek astmalı bireyler (r=0.835; p < 0.01) ve gerekse sağlıklı bireylerde (r=0.932; p < 0.01) VAS ile Yoruba MBS arasında anlamlı ilişki gösterdi. Tartışma: Bu sonuçlar Yoruba modifiye Borg skalasının Nijeryalı astmalı hastaların zorlanma düzeyini belirlemede geçerli bir ölçüm olduğunu gösterdi.

References

  • American Thoracic Society (ATS). DeŞnitions and classification of chronic bronchitis, asthma ' and pulmonary emphysema. Am Rev Resp Dis. l992;85:?62—768. Sofowora BO. Bronchial asthma in the tropics: a study of Nigerian patients. East Afr Med J. 1970;47:434—439.
  • McFadden ER, Gilbert IA. Exercise—induced asthma. N Eng. Med. 1994;330:1362-1367.
  • Erhabor GE. Exercise and asthma. Postgraduate Doctor. ;18:458~463. Mador MJ. Rodis A, Magalang UJ. Reproducibility of Borg scale measurements of dyspnca during exercise in patients with CUFF), Chest. 1995,1075] 590—1597.
  • Mahler DA, Wells CK. Evaluation of clinical methods for rating dyspnea. Chest. l988; 93:580—586. Bordon JGW, Juniper BF, Killian K], et al, The perception of breathlessness in asthma. Am Rev Respir H'zyoterapr‘ Rehabtîitasyon 17(3) 2005 Dis, 19823267825-928.
  • Simon PM, Schwartzstein RM, Weiss IW, et at. Distinguishahle sensation of hreathlessaess induced in normal volunteers. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989;140:1021— ?.
  • Aitken E.Ü. Consecutive Measurement ot‘Brcathlessness intensity and Distress. London: Department of Physiological Medicine, SL Georges” Hospital Medical School; 199411442—1443.
  • Clark CT. Asthma and exercise: a suitable case for rehabilitation. Thorax. 19924736536?
  • Ozalevli S, Ucan ES. The comparison of different dyspnoca scales in patients with COPD. J F.val Clin Pract. 2006;12:532—538.
  • Cullen DL, Rodak B. Clinical utility of measures of breathlessness. Respir Care. 2002;47:986-993.
  • Kendrick KR, Baxi SC, Smith RM. Usefulness of the Adedoyrh modiŞed 0—10 Borg scale in assessing the degree oF dyspnea patients with CO PD and asthma. ] E-merg Nurs. ;26:216-222, Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention 2002. wwwginasthmaorg. October 2006.
  • Turner SE, Eastwood PR. Cccins NM, et al. Physiologic responses to incremental and self—paced exercise in COPD: a comparison of three tests. Chest. ;126:766—773. Olaogun MOB, Adedoyin RA, _lkem IC, et al. Reliability of rating low back pain with visual analogue scale and a semantic differential scale. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 2004; 20:135—142.
  • Mishoe SC, Maclican JR. Assessment of health-related quality of life. Respir Care, 2001;46:1236-1257.
  • Appendix. ModiŞed Borg Scale [English Translated Version (Yoruba)19]. Nothing at all Very slight Slight Moderate Somewhat severe I Severe Olagbéra Severe Olégbéra Very severe Very, very Severe Kikan Kikan Almost maximal Maximal nira rârâ Niwöntunwönsî Oré iâgbâra die Ölâgbâra gan I: SIZDE DEBBIE H'zyot‘erapr' RehabrŞtasyon 17(3) 2006
There are 13 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Authors

This is me

Rufus Adesoji Adedoyin This is me

Gregory Efosa Erhabor This is me

Tolulope Abiola Aikomo This is me

Matthew Olatokunbo Olaogun This is me

Luqman Adekele Bisiriyu This is me

Olubusola Esther Johnson This is me

Mukadas Oyeniran Akindele This is me

Theresa Odunayo Akinola This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2006
Published in Issue Year 2006 Volume: 17 Issue: 3