Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging findings of cervical region in patients with neck and arm pain

Abstract

Keywords

• -

Boyun ve kol ağrıları hastalarda servikal bölge manyetik rezonans görüntüleme bulgularının karşılaştırılması

Abstract

Keywords

• Boyun ağrısı, Servikal vertebra, İntervertebral disk, Manyetik rezonans görüntüleme

References

1. Croft PR. Lewis M. Papageorgiou AC, et al. Risk factors for neck pain: a longitudinal study in the general population. Pain. 2001 ;93:3 I 7—325.
2. Palmer KT. Walker-Bone K. GrifŞn MI, et al. Prevalence and occupational associations of neck pain in the British population. Scand J Work Environ Health. l:27:49—56. Akgüder A. Boyun ağrısı nedenleri. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi Boyun Ağrısı Özel Sayısı. ;3:21-28. Beden SD, McCowin PR, Davis OD, et al. Abnormal magnetic resonance seans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; Szl 1784184.
3. Paulus W, Sehöps P. Baş ve Boyun Ağrısı Sendromları. Ceviri, Ertan S, ed. lstanbul: Yüce Yayınları; 2000:163
4. Matstıınato M. Fujimura Y. Suzuki N. et al. MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Br. l998;80:19—24. Dvorak J. Epidemiology, physical examination. and ncurodiagnestics. Spine. l998;23:2663-26?3.
5. Cote- P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L. The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey. The prevalence of low back pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults. Spine. |998:23:1689-1698.
6. Ariens GA. van Mechelen W, Bangers PM, et al. Psychosocial risk factors for neck pain: a systematic review. Am] Ind Med. 2001;39:180—183.
7. 'l't'izün F. Disk herniasyonları. In: Tüzün F, Eryavuz M. Akarırınak Ü. eds. Hareket Sistemi l-lastalıkları, lstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; I99îıl49-158. Hastalıklar. 3. Baskı. Ankara: Hacettepe Taş Kitapçılık; :566-575. of the cervical spine: MR imaging. Radiology. ;164:83-88. l-lumphrcys SC. Hodges SD, Patvvardhan A, et al. The natural history ot" the cervical foramen in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals aged 20-60 years as measured by magnetic resonance imaging: a descriptive approach. Spine. 1998;2312 180-21 84.
8. Friedenberg ZB, Miller WT. Degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine. .l Bone Joint Surg Am. ı45:ll?l—1178.

9. Fejer R, Kyvik KO, llartvigscıı J. The prevaleııce of neck pain in the world population: a systemic critical review ofthe literature. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:834- Hafefoğiu
10. Arieııs GAM. Borghouts 3A.]. Koes BW. Neck pain. hı: Crombie 1K, Cwi-“t PR, Linton SJ, LeRescIıc L, von Siivoin SM ._ Levoska S. Terveııen (.), ct al. MRI changes of cervical spine in asymptomatic and symptomatic young adults. Eur Spine J. 2002:] 1:358—363.
11. Arama E, Marti- Bonmati L, Montijano R, et al. Relationship between Northwick Park neck pain questiomiaire and cervical spine MR imaging Şndings. Eur Spine J. 2005;26:1-6.
12. Gore DR. Roontgertogmphic Şndings in the eewical spine in asymptomatic persons: a ten-year follow—up. Gur-37 M, Hildingsson C, Slegmayr B. or al. Chronic neck pain of traumatic and non—traumatic origin: a. population study. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74:5T6-579.
13. Peterson CK, Bolton JE, Wood AR, et 31. A cross— sectional study correlating degeneration of the cervical spine with disability and pain in United Kingdom patients. Spine. 2003;28: 129— l 33.
14. HZyoterapf Rehabiltasyon 17(1) 2006