Comparison of physical performance of elderly people living at home and in institution

Abstract

Keywords

• -

Evde ve bakım evinde yaşayan yaşlıların fiziksel performanslarının karşılaştırılması

Abstract

Keywords

• Yaşlı, Fiziksel performans, Mobilite limitasyonu, Postüral denge

References

1. l. Frantz RA, Ferrell-Torry A. Physical impairments in the elderly population. Nuts Clin North Am. 1993381363- 37l.
2. Wilmore .lll, Costill DL. Physiology of Sport and Exercise. Human Kinetics. 2. ed. Philadelphia, 1999: 186-193.
3. Simonsick EM, Gardner AW, l’oehlman ET. Assessment of physical function and exercise tolerance in older adults: reproducibility and comparability of Şve measures. Aging (Milano) 2000;12:l702-l707.
4. Lord SR. Murray SM, Chapman K, ct al. Sit—to—stand performance depends on sensation, speed. balance, and psychological status in addition to strength in elderly people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57:539- 543.
5. McCarthy EK, ilorvat MA, Holtshcrg PA, et al. Repeated chair stands as a measure of lower limb strength in sexagenarian women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sei. 2004;59:1207—1212.
6. (ı. Jones (LI. Rikli RE, Beam WC. A 30—5 chair—stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Res Q Excrc Sport. 1999;70:113—119.
7. Pajala S, Era I’, Koskenvuo M, et al. Contribution of genetic and environmental effects to postural balance in older female twins. JAppl Physiol. 2004; 96:308-315.
8. Cho BL, Scarpaee D, Alexander NB. 'l‘ests of stepping as indicators of mobility. balance. and fall risk in balance-impaired older adults. .I Am Geriatr Soc. 2004; 52:1168-1173.

9. Bean .lF, Kicly DK, Levcillc Cı, etal. The 6—tninute walk test in mobility-limited elders: What is being measured? The Journal ofGerontology. 20025131356.
10. liarada ND, (Shui V, Stewart Al.. Mobility-related function in older adults: assessment with [“>-minute walk test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:837'-867.
11. ll. Borowiak E, Kostka 'l“. Predictors of quality of life in elderly people living at home and in institutions. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2004:16:212—220.
12. Bite S, Fukuhara S. Validation of interviewer administration ofthe Short—form 36 health survey, and comparisons of health-related quality of life between conununity—dwelling and institutionalized elderly people. Nippon Rouen Igakkai Zasshi. 1998;35:458—463.
13. Bischoff HA, Mensch AU, lvcrsen MD, et n|. Identifying cut—off point for normal mobility: a comparison of the timed “up and go" test in community- dwelling and institutionalized elderly women. Age Ageing. 20033213 | 5-320.
14. Konu A, Kanagawa K, Ban M, el al. Evaluation of a community-based preventive care program for elderly living at home. Nippon Kosliu Eisei Zasshi. 2002;49:983-991. Gere-n l6. SlefTen TM, Hacker "I'A. Mollingcr L. Age-aml gender— related tes-t performance in community—dwelling elderly people: Six—minute walk test, Berg balance, Timed up and go test. and gait speeds. Phys Thor. 2002;82:128- 1'37.
15. Lord SR, Menz HB. Physiologic, psycho logic. and
16. health predictors of 6-minute walk performance in
17. elderly people. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:907— 9H.
18. Benn I F, Kiely DK, Het—matt S. et' al. The relationship
19. between log power and physical performance in
20. mobility-limited elderly people. .] Am Geriatric Soc. 2001: 50:461—467'.
21. Hatch .I. Gill—Body KM, Portney LG. Determinants of
22. balance conŞdence in community-dwelling elderly
23. people. Phys Ther. 2003;33:1llT2—ID79.
24. anlmer LM. Handbook of balance function testing. ST
25. Louis, Mosby Year Book; |993:261—279.
26. llinman JE, Cunningham BA, Reelmitmr PA, et al. Age
27. relatcd changes in speed of walking. Med Sci Sports
28. Exeı'c.l988;20:161-166
29. Salaman CL, Nawoezcnski DA. Complexitios of foot
30. architecture as at base of support. I Orthop Sports
31. ’hsyother. 1995;21:354-360.
32. Mecagni C. Smith JP, Roberts [(l-_". et al. Balance and
33. ankle range of motion in community-dwelling woman
34. aged 64 to 87 years: & etmelational study. Phys: Ther.
35. :80:1004-lt)l l.
36. H'zyorerap Rehabıîrrasyon 17(1) 2006