THE EFFECT OF DUAL TASK ON CLINICAL BALANCE PERFORMANCE IN ATAXIA PATIENTS
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of concurrent cognitive
and motor tasks on clinical balance performance of ataxic and healthy subjects.
Methods: A total of 50 subjects with and without ataxia were included. Timed performances
during Single Leg Stance (OLS), Tandem Stance (TS), 360 degrees of Rotation, Timed Up &
Go (TUG) and Four Square Step (FSS) tests were recorded without task, and with concurrent
cognitive and motor tasks.
Results: Ataxic and healthy subjects had similar SLS and TS test performances, applied with
cognitive tasks. Motor task negatively affected the performances of the ataxic patients.
Motor and cognitive tasks during 360 DR and cognitive task during TUG tests reduced the
performances of both groups. During FSS test, motor task reduced the performances of
ataxic patients, while both tasks reduced the performances of the healthy subjects.
Discussion: The results point out the effects of cognitive and motor tasks during static
and dynamic balance tests in ataxic and healthy subjects. These findings are considered
to be useful while evaluating the balance function of the ataxic patients, and focus on the
necessity of including concurrent tasks during the balance tests.
Keywords
References
- 1. Bradley WG. Neurology in Clinical Practice: The neurological disorders. 6th ed. Taylor & Francis; 2004.
- 2. Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A. Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture. 2002;16(1):1-14.
- 3. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice 2th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
- 4. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M. Attentional demands and postural control: the effect of sensory context. J Gerontol A Bio Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(1):M10.
- 5. Horak FB. Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age Ageing. 2006;35(suppl 2):ii7-ii11.
- 6. Sala SD, Baddeley A, Papagno C, Spinnler H. Dual‐task paradigm: a means to examine the central executive. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995;769(1):161-72.
- 7. O’Shea S, Morris ME, Iansek R. Dual task interference during gait in people with Parkinson disease: effects of motor versus cognitive secondary tasks. Phys Ther. 2002;82(9):888-97.
- 8. Huang H-J, Mercer VS. Dual-task methodology: applications in studies of cognitive and motor performance in adults and children. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2001;13(3):133-40.
Details
Primary Language
Turkish
Subjects
Health Care Administration
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Cevher Demirci
HACETTEPE UNIV
Türkiye
Muhammed Kılınç
HACETTEPE UNIV
Türkiye
Sibel Aksu Yıldırım
HACETTEPE UNIV
Türkiye
Publication Date
April 15, 2016
Submission Date
June 7, 2015
Acceptance Date
March 4, 2016
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 27 Number: 1
Cited By
Investigation of postural control and spatiotemporal parameters of gait during dual tasks in ataxic individuals
Neurological Sciences
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06248-9Effectiveness and cost of integrated cognitive and balance training for balance and falls in cerebellar ataxia: a blinded two-arm parallel group RCT
Frontiers in Neurology
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1267099Comparison of Dual Task Performance, Cadence, and Walking Speed in Healthy Geriatric Individuals with Alzheimer's Dementia
International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences
https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.1816297