Time-distance parameters and plantar pressure distribution of gait during pregnancy period

Year 2013, Volume: 24 Issue: 1, 71 - 79, 01.04.2013

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the time-distance gait parameters and the dynamic plantar pressure distribution during pregnancy period. Methods: Thirty eight pregnant women with a mean age 30.07±6.14 years (1st trimester: N=7, 2nd trimester: N=12, and 3rdtrimester: N=19) participated in this study. The gait analysis was assessed using 3D movement analyses system and dynamic plantar pressure distribution during walking was measured using electronic pedobarograph system. Results: Thirty-two subjects’ plantar pressure measurements and 22 subjects’ gait analyses were assessed among a total of 38 participants. There was no significant difference in time-distance gait parameters between the 1st-2nd and 3rdtrimesters (p>0.05). There was a significant difference in maximum force of plantar pressure parameters between the 1st-2nd and 3rd trimesters during walking (p<0.05). The maximum force in total and the 3rd-4th metatarsal head of dominant side; and total, hindfoot and 3rd-4th metatarsal head of non-dominant side were greater in 3rd trimester compared to 1st trimester (p<0.05). Peak pressure was significantly greater in last trimester than 2nd trimester (p<0.05) while there was no significant difference in contact time among trimesters (p>0.05). Conclusion: Pregnancy period did not affect the mechanics of gait while it did change the plantar pressure distribution during walking especially at the 3rd trimester of pregnancy. It can be said that pregnant women adapt to maintain locomotor functions through pregnancy via changing their plantar pressure distribution

Keywords

Pregnancy , Pregnancy trimesters , Gait

Gebelik sürecinde zaman mesafe parametreleri ve plantar basınç dağılımı

Abstract

Amaç: Gebelik sürecinde yürümenin zaman-mesafe parametrelerini ve yürümedeki dinamik plantar basınç dağılımını incelemekti. Yöntem: Çalışmaya, yaş ortalaması 30.07±6.14 olan 38 gebe kadın (1. trimester: N=7, 2. trimester: N=12 ve 3. trimester: N=19) katıldı. Katılımcıların yürüme analizi üç boyutlu hareket analiz sistemi, yürüme sırasındaki dinamik plantar basınç dağılımları ise elektronik pedobarografi cihazı ile değerlendirildi. Sonuçlar: Çalışmaya katılan 38 gebeden 32’sinin plantar basınç ölçümleri, 22’sinin yürüme analizi yapıldı. 1.-2.-3. trimesterler arasında yürümenin zaman-mesafe parametreleri açısından anlamlı fark bulunmadı (p>0.05). Yürüme sırasındaki plantar basınç parametreleri karşılaştırıldığında maksimum kuvvette 1.-2.-3. trimester arasında anlamlı fark bulundu (p<0.05). Dominant tarafa ait total, 3.-4. metatars başı; dominant olmayan tarafa ait ise total, arka ayak ve 3.-4. metatars başı maksimum kuvveti 3. trimesterde, 1. trimestere göre anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti (p<0.05). Trimesterler arasında temas süresi açısından anlamlı fark bulunmazken (p>0.05), son trimesterdaki pik basınç 2. trimestere göre anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti (p<0.05). Tartışma: Gebelik süreci yürüyüş mekaniklerini değiştirmezken, yürüme sırasındaki plantar basınç dağılımının özellikle 3. trimesterde farklılık göstermesine neden olmuştur. Gebelerin bu süreçte lokomotor fonksiyonlarının devamlılığı için plantar basınç dağılımlarını değiştirerek uyum sağladığı söylenebilir

Keywords

Gebelik , Gebelik trimesterleri , Yürüme

References

• Foti T, Davids J, Bagley A. A biomechanical analysis of gait during pregnancy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:625-632.
• Sade A, Algun C, Otman S. M. Rektus abdominis, m. oblikus internus, eksternus ve sırt ekstansörlerinin kas testi ile değerlendirilerek, doğum yapmış ve yapmamış kadınlarda, çeşitli yaş gruplarında karşılaştırılması. Fizyoter Rehabil. 1984;4:481-489.
• Kara F, Akarcalı İ, Akbayrak T, et al. Gebelikte diastatis recti abdominis insidansı. Fizyoter Rehabil. 1996;8:24-29.
• Fries E, Hellebrandt F. The influence of pregnancy on the location of the center of gravity, postural stability, and body alignment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1943;46:374-380.
• Marnach M, Ramin K, Ramsey P, et al. Characterization of the relationship between joint laxity and maternal hormones in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:331-335.
• Stephenson R, O’Connor L. Obstetric and gynecologic care in physical therapy. Second edition. 2000; Slack Inc, New Jersey, USA
• Oliveira LF, Vieira TMM, Macedo AR, et al. Postural sway changes during pregnancy: a descriptive study using stabilometry. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;147:25-28.
• Jang J, Hsiao K T, Hsiao-Wecksler E. Balance (perceived and actual) and preferred stance width during pregnancy. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008;23:468-476. Dynamic postural stability during advancing pregnancy. J Biomech. 2010;26;43:2434-2439.
• Franklin M, Conner-Kerr T. An analysis of posture and back pain in the first and third trimesters of pregnancy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.1998;28:133- 138.
• Nyska M, Sofer D, Porat A, et al. Plantar foot pressures in pregnant women. Isr J Med Sci. 1997;33:139-146.
• Lymbery JK, Gilleard W. The stance phase of walking during late pregnancy: temporospatial and ground reaction force variables. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95:247-253.
• Albino MA, Moccellin AS, Firmento Bda S, et al. Gait force propulsion modifications during pregnancy: effects of changes in feet's dimensions. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2011;33:164-169. reaction forces during gait in pregnant fallers and non-fallers. Gait Posture. 2011;34:524-528.
• Wu W, Meijer OG, Lamoth CJ, et al. Gait coordination in pregnancy: transverse pelvic and thoracic rotations and their relative phase. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004;19:480-488.
• Bird AR, Menz HB, Hyde CC. The effect of pregnancy on footprint parameters. A prospective investigation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1999;89:405- 409.
• Cote K, Brunet M, Gansneder B, et al. Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability. J Athl Train. 2005;40:41- 46.
• Block RA, Hess LA, Timpano EV, et al. Physiologic changes in the foot during pregnancy. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1985;75:297-299.
• Gaymer C, Whalley H, Achten J, et al. Midfoot plantar pressure significantly increases during late gestation. Foot (Edinb). 2009;19:114-116.
• Karadag SE, Unlu OF, Basgul A. Plantar pressure and foot pain in the last trimester of pregnancy. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:153-157.
• Ribeiro AP, Trombini-Souza F, de Camargo Neves Sacco I, et al. Changes in the plantar pressure distribution during gait throughout gestation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2011;101:415-423.
• Dunning K, LeMasters G, Levin L, et al. Falls in workers during pregnancy: risk factors, job hazards, and high risk occupations. Am J Ind Med. 2003;44:664-672.
• Butler E, Colon I, Druzin M, et al. Postural equilibrium during pregnancy: decreased stability with an increased reliance on visual cues. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1104-1108.
• Wu WH, Meijer OG, Bruijn SM, et al. Gait in Pregnancy-related Pelvic girdle Pain: amplitudes, timing, and coordination of horizontal trunk rotations. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:1160-1169.
• Wu W, Meijer OG, Jutte PC, et al. Gait in patients with pregnancy-related pain in the pelvis: an emphasis on the coordination of transverse pelvic and thoracic rotations. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2002;17:678-686.