BibTex RIS Cite

Çiğ süt ve peynir örneklerinden Staphylococcus aureus ve koagülaz negatif stafilokokların identifikasyonu ve antibiyotik duyarlılığı

Year 2011, Volume: 68 Issue: 2, 73 - 78, 01.06.2011

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada Ankara İlinde çeşitli firma ve mandıralardan temin edilen çiğ süt ve peynir örneklerinde koagülaz pozitif stafilokok KPS , koagülaz negatif stafilokok KNS ’lerin bulunma sıklığı ve bu suşların antimikrobiyal dirençliliklerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır.Yöntem: İncelenen 190 çiğ süt ve 90 peynir örneğinden izole edilen KPS ve KNS’lerin standart biokimyasal yöntemler kullanılarak cins ve tür düzeyinde identifikasyonları yapılmıştır. İzolatların antimikrobiyal direnç özellikleri disk difüzyon metodu ile Klinik ve Laboratuvar Standartları Enstitüsü CLSI rehberine göre değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: İncelenen çiğ süt ve peynir örneklerinden 236’sı KPS, 94’ü KNS olmak üzere toplam 330 stafilokok izolatı elde edilmiştir. KPS türleri içinde çiğ süt ve peynir örneklerinde sırasıyla en fazla Staphylococcus intermedius % 40,0 - % 44,3 ve Staphylococcus aureus % 35,0 % 20,2 ; KNS türleri içinde de en fazla Staphylococcus saprophyticus % 26,4 - % 43,0 ve Staphylococcus caseolyticus % 9,2 - % 14,3 tespit edilmiştir. Çiğ sütten izole edilen KPS izolatları en fazla ampisilin % 62,4 ve penisiline % 47,0, KNS izolatları da metisilin ve penisiline %39,0 peynirden izole edilen KNS izolatları ampisiline % 42,8; metisilin, penisilin ve eritromisine ise % 28,5 dirençli bulunmuştur.Sonuç: Değerlendirilen gıda örneklerinden izole edilen stafilokok türlerinin bu gıdaların hazırlanması sırasındaki zayıf sanitasyon ve çapraz kontaminasyonun göstergesi olabileceği düşünülmektedir. Ayrıca KNS izolatlarının KPS izolatlarına göre uygulanan antibiyotiklere daha yüksek oranda dirençli olduğu saptanmıştır.

References

  • Bergdoll MS. Staphylococcus aureus. In, Doyle MP (Ed): Foodborne bacterial pathogens. Pp. 463-523, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1989.
  • Gundogan N, Citak S, Turan E. Slime production, DNase activity and antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from raw milk, pasteurized milk and ice cream samples. Food Control, 2006; 17: 389-92.
  • Pereira V, Lopes C, Castro A, Silva J, Gibbs P, and Teixeira P. Characterization for enterotoxin production, virulence factors, and antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from various foods in Portugal. Food Microbiol, 2009; 26: 278-82.
  • Güven K, Mutlu M B, Gulbandılar A, Cakır P. Occurence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from meat and dairy products consumed in Turkey. J Food Safety, 2010; 30: 196-212.
  • Sawant AA, Gillespie BE, Oliver SP. Antimicrobial susceptibility of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species isolated from bovine milk. Vet Microbiol, 2009; 134: 73-81.
  • Barton D. Antibiotic use in animal feed and its impact on human health. Nut Res Rev, 2000; 13: 279-99.
  • Enright MC. The evolution of resistant pathogen- the case of MRSA. Curr Opin Pharmacol , 2003; 3: 474-79.
  • Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PHA, Stanley JT, Willams TS. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriolo- gy, 9th ed. William & Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,1994; 532.
  • Winn JrW, Allen S, Janda W, Koneman E, Procop G, Schreckenberger P, Woods G. Koneman’s Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 6th ed. Lippincott Willams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2006; 623-71.
  • Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol, 1966; 45: 493.
  • Anonim. CLSI. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Fifteenth informational supplement. Approved Standard MS100-S16, 2005, Wayne, PA, USA.
  • Normannoa G, Firinu A, Virgillio S, Mula G, Dambrosio A, Poggiu A, et al. Coagulase-positive Staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus in food products marketed in Italy. Int J Food Microbiol, 2005; 98: 73-9.
  • De Luca G, Zanetti F, Stampi S. Staphylococcus au- reus in dairy products in the Bologna area Int J Food Microbiol, 1997; 35: 267-70.
  • Smith KL. World perspectives on mastitis. In: Proceeding of the Second International Mastitis and Milk Quality Symposium, National Mastitis Council, Madison (WI), 2001.
  • Kırkan Ş, Göksoy EÖ, Kaya O. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphyloococcus aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci from bovine mastitis in the Aydın region of Turkey. Turk J Vet Animal Sci, 2005; 29: 791-96.
  • Ünal N, Yıldırım M. İneklerin süt, meme başı derisi ve burun mukozalarından izole edilen stafilokok türlerinin antibiyotik direnç profilleri. Kafkas Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 2010; 16 (3): 389-96.
  • Aslim B, Yucel N. In vitro antimicrobial activity of essential oil from endemic Origanum minutiflorum on ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter spp. Food Chem, 2008; 107: 602-6.

Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Raw Milk and Cheese Samples

Year 2011, Volume: 68 Issue: 2, 73 - 78, 01.06.2011

Abstract

Objective: In this study, it was aimed to evaluate raw milk and cheese samples obtained from various markets and dairies in Ankara, Turkey for the presence of coagulase positive staphylococci CPS and coagulase negative staphylococci CNS and to determine of antimicrobial resistance in these strains. Method: CPS and CNS, isolated from 190 raw milk and 90 cheese samples, were analyzed by conventional biochemical tests to identify for genus and species of these strains. Antimicrobial susceptibility features of these isolates were evaluated by disc diffusion method according to the guidelines of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute CLSI . Results: Total of 330 isolates of Staphylococcus spp. which consist of 236 CPS and 94 CNS were found from raw milk and cheese samples. The predominant species of the CPS in raw milk and cheese samples were Staphylococcus intermedius 40.0 - 44.3 % and Staphylococcus aureus 35.0 - 20.2 % ; while the CNS were identified as Staphylococcus saprophyticus 26.4 - 43.0 % and Staphylococcus caseolyticus 9.2 - 14.3 % . CPS strains isolated from raw milk more resistant to ampicillin 62.4 % and penicillin 47.0 % ; while CNS strains were more resistant to methicillin 39.0 % and penicillin 39.0 % . Besides this, CNS strains isolated from cheese samples were resistant to ampicillin 42.8 % , methicillin 28.5 % penicillin 28.5 % and erythromycine 28.5 % .Conclusion: These results suggests the contamination of raw milk and cheese samples by Staphylococci spp. indicates poor personel hygiene and cross contamination during the production process. In addition, the strains of CNS were much more resistant than the strains of CPS to antibiotics.

References

  • Bergdoll MS. Staphylococcus aureus. In, Doyle MP (Ed): Foodborne bacterial pathogens. Pp. 463-523, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1989.
  • Gundogan N, Citak S, Turan E. Slime production, DNase activity and antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from raw milk, pasteurized milk and ice cream samples. Food Control, 2006; 17: 389-92.
  • Pereira V, Lopes C, Castro A, Silva J, Gibbs P, and Teixeira P. Characterization for enterotoxin production, virulence factors, and antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from various foods in Portugal. Food Microbiol, 2009; 26: 278-82.
  • Güven K, Mutlu M B, Gulbandılar A, Cakır P. Occurence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from meat and dairy products consumed in Turkey. J Food Safety, 2010; 30: 196-212.
  • Sawant AA, Gillespie BE, Oliver SP. Antimicrobial susceptibility of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species isolated from bovine milk. Vet Microbiol, 2009; 134: 73-81.
  • Barton D. Antibiotic use in animal feed and its impact on human health. Nut Res Rev, 2000; 13: 279-99.
  • Enright MC. The evolution of resistant pathogen- the case of MRSA. Curr Opin Pharmacol , 2003; 3: 474-79.
  • Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PHA, Stanley JT, Willams TS. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriolo- gy, 9th ed. William & Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,1994; 532.
  • Winn JrW, Allen S, Janda W, Koneman E, Procop G, Schreckenberger P, Woods G. Koneman’s Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 6th ed. Lippincott Willams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2006; 623-71.
  • Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol, 1966; 45: 493.
  • Anonim. CLSI. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Fifteenth informational supplement. Approved Standard MS100-S16, 2005, Wayne, PA, USA.
  • Normannoa G, Firinu A, Virgillio S, Mula G, Dambrosio A, Poggiu A, et al. Coagulase-positive Staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus in food products marketed in Italy. Int J Food Microbiol, 2005; 98: 73-9.
  • De Luca G, Zanetti F, Stampi S. Staphylococcus au- reus in dairy products in the Bologna area Int J Food Microbiol, 1997; 35: 267-70.
  • Smith KL. World perspectives on mastitis. In: Proceeding of the Second International Mastitis and Milk Quality Symposium, National Mastitis Council, Madison (WI), 2001.
  • Kırkan Ş, Göksoy EÖ, Kaya O. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphyloococcus aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci from bovine mastitis in the Aydın region of Turkey. Turk J Vet Animal Sci, 2005; 29: 791-96.
  • Ünal N, Yıldırım M. İneklerin süt, meme başı derisi ve burun mukozalarından izole edilen stafilokok türlerinin antibiyotik direnç profilleri. Kafkas Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 2010; 16 (3): 389-96.
  • Aslim B, Yucel N. In vitro antimicrobial activity of essential oil from endemic Origanum minutiflorum on ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter spp. Food Chem, 2008; 107: 602-6.
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Nihal Yücel This is me

Yeliz Anıl This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2011
Published in Issue Year 2011 Volume: 68 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Yücel, N., & Anıl, Y. (2011). Çiğ süt ve peynir örneklerinden Staphylococcus aureus ve koagülaz negatif stafilokokların identifikasyonu ve antibiyotik duyarlılığı. Türk Hijyen Ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi, 68(2), 73-78.
AMA Yücel N, Anıl Y. Çiğ süt ve peynir örneklerinden Staphylococcus aureus ve koagülaz negatif stafilokokların identifikasyonu ve antibiyotik duyarlılığı. Turk Hij Den Biyol Derg. June 2011;68(2):73-78.
Chicago Yücel, Nihal, and Yeliz Anıl. “Çiğ süt Ve Peynir örneklerinden Staphylococcus Aureus Ve koagülaz Negatif stafilokokların Identifikasyonu Ve Antibiyotik duyarlılığı”. Türk Hijyen Ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi 68, no. 2 (June 2011): 73-78.
EndNote Yücel N, Anıl Y (June 1, 2011) Çiğ süt ve peynir örneklerinden Staphylococcus aureus ve koagülaz negatif stafilokokların identifikasyonu ve antibiyotik duyarlılığı. Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi 68 2 73–78.
IEEE N. Yücel and Y. Anıl, “Çiğ süt ve peynir örneklerinden Staphylococcus aureus ve koagülaz negatif stafilokokların identifikasyonu ve antibiyotik duyarlılığı”, Turk Hij Den Biyol Derg, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 73–78, 2011.
ISNAD Yücel, Nihal - Anıl, Yeliz. “Çiğ süt Ve Peynir örneklerinden Staphylococcus Aureus Ve koagülaz Negatif stafilokokların Identifikasyonu Ve Antibiyotik duyarlılığı”. Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi 68/2 (June 2011), 73-78.
JAMA Yücel N, Anıl Y. Çiğ süt ve peynir örneklerinden Staphylococcus aureus ve koagülaz negatif stafilokokların identifikasyonu ve antibiyotik duyarlılığı. Turk Hij Den Biyol Derg. 2011;68:73–78.
MLA Yücel, Nihal and Yeliz Anıl. “Çiğ süt Ve Peynir örneklerinden Staphylococcus Aureus Ve koagülaz Negatif stafilokokların Identifikasyonu Ve Antibiyotik duyarlılığı”. Türk Hijyen Ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi, vol. 68, no. 2, 2011, pp. 73-78.
Vancouver Yücel N, Anıl Y. Çiğ süt ve peynir örneklerinden Staphylococcus aureus ve koagülaz negatif stafilokokların identifikasyonu ve antibiyotik duyarlılığı. Turk Hij Den Biyol Derg. 2011;68(2):73-8.