Francisella tularensis antikorları ile Brucella çapraz reaksiyonlarının araştırılması

Year 2013, Volume: 70 Issue: 2, 65 - 70, 01.06.2013

Selçuk Kılıç Bekir Çelebi Yasemin Bayram Burak Çitil

Abstract

Amaç: Francisella tularensis antikorları ile Brucella, Legionella, Yersinia ve Mycoplasma türleri arasında çapraz reaksiyonlar bildirilmiştir. F.tularensis liposakkarit yapısında bulunan Brucella O-polisakkaritindeki benzer antijenik yapılar serolojik testlerde çapraz reaksiyonlara neden olabilmektedir. Aglütinasyon testlerinde F.tularensis ve Brucella abortus arasındaki çapraz reaksiyonlar sonuçların yorumlanmasını güçleştirebilir. Yöntem: Brucella ve F.tularensis arasındaki çapraz reaksiyonların sıklığı ve bu reaksiyonlardan sorumlu olan antikorlar mikroaglütinasyon, Brucella ELISA ve 2-merkaptoetanol mikroaglütinasyon testleri ile araştırılmıştır. Bulgular: 260 tularemi pozitif örneğin 49 %18.8 ’unda B.abortus antijeniyle çapraz reaksiyonlar saptanırken, bruselloz pozitif 252 örneğin 23 %9.1 ’ünde F.tularensis antijeni ile çapraz reaksiyon gözlenmiştir. Otuzaltı tularemi %73.5 pozitif serumda Brucella çapraz reaksiyon titreleri 1:20-1:80 iken, 13 örnekte %26.5 ise ≥1:160 titrelerde çapraz reaksiyon gözlenmiştir. 2-ME testi ile

Keywords

Tularemi, Brucella, Çapraz reaksiyon, Aglütinasyon, 2-Merkaptoetanol

Investigation of cross-reactions with Francisella tularensis antibodies to Brucella

Abstract

Objective: Cross-reactions with Francisella tularensis antibodies to Brucella, Legionella, Yersinia, and Mycoplasma species have been described. F.tularensis LPS is able to induce serological crossreactions indistinguishable from brucellosis due to a similar immunodominant epitope in the Brucella O-polysaccharide. In agglutination tests, cross-reaction occurred only between F.tularensis and Brucella abortus, cross reactivity with Brucella can confuse interpretation of the results. Method: The aim of this study was to assess cross reactions and whether IgM or IgG antibodies are responsible for Brucella and F.tularensis crossreactions, by the use of microagglutination, Brucella ELISA and 2-mercaptoethanol microagglutination test. Results: Cross-reaction agglutinin titers to B.abortus antigen were found in 49 of 260 18.8% tularemia positive serum specimens, and cross-reaction titers to F.tularensis antigen were found in 23 of 252 9.1% Brucella positive serum specimens. While thirty six 73.5% tularemia positive serum titers had Brucella cross reactivity at the titers of 1:20-1:80, cross-reaction with ≥1:160 titers was found in 13 samples 26.5% . The cross-reaction titers to B.abortus antigen were reduced to equal or less 1:40 titers by 2-ME. Cross- reactivity at the titers of 1:20-1:80 was determined in 22 of 23 Brucella positive samples

Keywords

Tularemia, Brucella, Cross reaction, Agglutination, 2-Mercaptoethanol

References

• Kılıç S. A General Overview of Francisella tularensis and the Epidemiology of Tularemia in Turkey. Flora, 2010; 15(2): 37-58.
• Kılıç S, Yeşilyurt M. Tularemi: Güncel Tedavi Seçeneklerine Genel Bir Bakış. Klimik Dergisi, ; 24(1): 2-10. Yüce A, Çavuş SA. Türkiye'de Bruselloz: Genel Bakış. Klimik Dergisi, 2011; 19(3): 87-97.
• Francis E, Evans AC. Agglutination, cross agglutination, and agglutin absorption in tularemia. Public Health Rep, 1926; 41: 1273-95.
• Ransmeier JC, Ewing CL. The agglutination reaction in tularemia. J Infect Dis, 1941;69: 193–205.
• Sjoested A. Genus I. Francisella. In: George MG, eds. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Vol 2, 2005: 200-9.
• Corbel MJ. Recent advances in brucellosis. J Med Microbiol, 1997; 46(2): 101-3.
• Stanfield CA, Taylor PW, Morgan HR. Some important antigenic relationships in the serological diagnosis of brucellosis. Am J Clin Pathol, 1952; 22: 211-7.
• Behan KA, Klein GC. Reduction of Brucella species and Francisella tularensis cross-reacting agglutinins by dithiothreitol. J Clin Microbiol, 1982; 16(4): 756–7.
• Saslaw S, Carlisle HN. Studies with tularemia vaccines in volunteers. IV. Brucella agglutinins in vaccinated and non-vaccinated volunteers challenged with Pasteurella tularensis. Am J Med Sci, 1961; 242: 166–72.
• Hornick RB. Tularemia. In: Evans AS, Brachman PS, eds. Bacterial Infections of Humans- Epidemiology and Control. New York. Plenum Medical Book Company, 1998: 823-37.
• WHO guidelines on Tularaemia. Geneva: WHO Press, 2007.
• Koskela P, Salminen A. Humoral immunity against Francisella tularensis after natural infection. J Clin Microbiol, 1985; 22(6): 973–9.
• Lindquist D, Chu MC, Probert WS. Francisella and Brucella. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, eds. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 9th ed. Washington. American Society for Microbiology Press, 2007: 815-34.
• Tarnvik A, Berglund L. Tularemia. Eur Respir J. ; 21: 361-73.
• Ulu Kılıç A, Kılıç S, Şencan I et al. İç Anadolu Bölgesinde Francisella tularensis alt tür halorctica’ya bağlı su kaynaklı bir Tularemi salgını. Mikrobiyol Bul, 2011; 45 (2): 234-47.
• Marrodan T, Nenova-Poliakova R, Rubio M, Ariza J, Clavijo E, Smits HL, Diaz R. Evaluation of three methods to measure anti-Brucella IgM antibodies and interference of IgA in the interpretation of mercaptan-based tests. J Med Microbiol, 2001; 50: 6.
• Ericsson M, Sandstrom G, Sjostedt A,Tarnvik A. Persistence of cell-mediated immunity and decline of humoral immunity to the intracellular bacterium Francisella tularensis 25 years after natural infection. J Infect Dis, 1994; 170: 110-4.
• Kirimanjeswara GS, Olmos S, Bakshi CS, Metzger DW. Humoral and cell-mediated immunity to the intracellular pathogen Francisella tularensis. Immunol Rev, 2008; 225: 244-55.
• Bulaşıcı hastalıkların ihbarı ve bildirim sistemi. Standart tanı, sürveyans ve laboratuvar rehberi. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı, 2004, Ankara.