Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Deconstructing the Politics of Linguistic Mutation in Tom Stoppard’s Dogg’s Hamlet, Cahoot’s Macbeth

Year 2024, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 96 - 104, 19.09.2024
https://doi.org/10.62425/theatreacademy.1488942

Abstract

Tom Stoppard’s theatrical works, Dogg’s Hamlet, Cahoot’s Macbeth, serve as a significant exemplification of linguistic and political power dynamics. These plays represent a transformative shift that depicts the workings of hegemony in Czechoslovakia during the Cold War era. Stoppard, a Czechoslovakian native, crafted these satirical works in response to the brutal persecution of critical intellectuals and censorship of their dissident works. The plays voice the intellectual restlessness of the time, resisting the status quo, and illustrating the tensions that led to the 1989 Velvet Revolution. Stoppard’s innovative linguistic experimentation transforms Shakespeare’s plays, Hamlet and Macbeth, into an entirely novel linguistic system, named “Doggspeak,” which derives inspiration from Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. This new linguistic transformation acts as a catalyst for social and political change, resisting surveillance and censorship of free speech. Stoppard’s plays, therefore, use language to alter power relations, creating space for political defiance. This paper delves into two key questions: How does Stoppard modify language in the dramatic setting, and how does this linguistic transformation shift power relations within the plays? By creating a new linguistic system, Stoppard outmanoeuvres oppressors and wittingly turns language into an instrument for political rebellion. He stages a truncated, mutant version of Shakespeare’s plays where they are banned, giving voice to the intellectual restlessness of Czechoslovakia in the 1970s. Stoppard’s plays posit that language is not merely a tool for communication, but also a vehicle for social and political transformation. Through linguistic mutation, Stoppard subverts the existing power structures and challenges the hegemony of the oppressors. This essay argues that Stoppard’s plays showcase the crucial significance of language in the struggle for political and social change, emphasizing the crucial role that language plays in shaping our perceptions and understanding of the world.

References

  • Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship, NY: Verso Books.
  • Chalupecký, J. (2002). “The Intellectual Under Socialism.” Primary Documents: A Sourcebook for Eastern and Central European Art Since the 1950s, edited by Laura J. Hoptman and Tomáš Pospiszyl, United Kingdom, Museum of Modern Art, pp. 30–37.
  • Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage.
  • Gussow, M. (1984). “The Real Tom Stoppard.” The New York Times, 1 Jan, pp.18-28, www.nytimes.com/1984/01/01/magazine/the-real-tom-stoppard.html.
  • Londré, F. (2001). “From Zurich To Brazil with Tom Stoppard”, Modern Dramatists: A Casebook of Major British, Irish, and American Playwrights, edited by Kimball King, NY: Routledge, pp. 311-324.
  • Procházka, M. (1996). “Shakespeare and the Czech Resistance”. Shakespeare: World Views. Heather Kerr, et al., eds. London: Associated University Presses, pp. 44-69.
  • Rank, S. (2010). Twentieth-Century Adaptations of Macbeth: writing between influence, intervention, and cultural transfer. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  • Roberts, P. (1978). Tom Stoppard: Serious Artist or Siren?, Critical Quarterly, 20, (3), pp.84-92.
  • Sammells, N. (1988). Tom Stoppard: The Artist as Critic, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Shakespeare, W. (2010). Macbeth, London: Harper Press.
  • Stoppard, T. (1981). Open letter to President Husák, Index on Censorship, 10, (6), 1 December, pp. 18-18. Sage Journals, www.journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/03064228108533281
  • Stoppard, T. (2011). The Real Inspector Hound and Other Plays, NY: Grove Press.
  • Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University.

Tom Stoppard’ın Dogg’s Hamlet ve Cahoot’s Macbeth Adlı Oyunlarında Dilsel Mutasyon Politikasının Yapısökümü

Year 2024, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 96 - 104, 19.09.2024
https://doi.org/10.62425/theatreacademy.1488942

Abstract

Tom Stoppard’ın tiyatro eserleri, Dogg’s Hamlet ve Cahoot’s Macbeth, dilsel ve politik güç dinamiklerinin önemli bir örneğini sunar. Bu oyunlar, Soğuk Savaş döneminde Çekoslovakya’daki hegemonyanın işleyişini tasvir eden dönüştürücü bir değişimi temsil eder. Çekoslovakyalı olan Stoppard, bu hicivsel eserleri, eleştirel entelektüellerin acımasız bir şekilde zulme, muhalif eserlerinin ise sansüre uğradığı bir döneme yanıt olarak kaleme almıştır. Oyunlar, dönemin entelektüel huzursuzluğunu dile getirmekte, statükoya direnmekte ve 1989 Kadife Devrimi’ne yol açan gerilimleri göstermektedir. Stoppard’ın dilde yenilikçi deneyselliği, Shakespeare’in Hamlet ve Macbeth oyunlarını, Ludwig Wittgenstein’ın Felsefi Soruşturmalar’ından esinlenen “Doggspeak” adlı tamamen yeni bir dilsel sisteme dönüştürür. Bu yeni dilsel dönüşüm, sosyal ve politik değişim için bir katalizör görevi görür, gözetime ve ifade özgürlüğünün sansürlenmesine direnir. Stoppard’ın oyunları, bu nedenle, dili güç ilişkilerini değiştirmek için kullanır ve politik meydan okuma için alan yaratır. Bu makale iki temel soruyu araştırmaktadır: Stoppard dramatik ortamda dili nasıl değiştirir ve bu dilsel dönüşüm oyunlardaki güç ilişkilerini nasıl değiştirir? Stoppard yeni bir dilsel sistem yaratarak baskıcıları alt eder ve dili bilinçli bir şekilde politik bir başkaldırı aracına dönüştürür. Shakespeare’in oyunlarının kısıtlanmış, mutant bir versiyonunu yasaklandıkları yerde sahneleyerek 1970’lerde Çekoslovakya’nın entelektüel huzursuzluğuna ses verir. Stoppard’ın oyunları, dilin yalnızca bir iletişim aracı değil, aynı zamanda sosyal ve politik dönüşüm için de bir araç olduğunu ortaya koyar. O, dilsel mutasyon yoluyla mevcut iktidar yapılarını altüst eder ve ezenlerin hegemonyasına meydan okur. Bu makale, Stoppard’ın oyunlarının politik ve sosyal değişim mücadelesinde dilin hayati önemini sergilediğini, dilin dünyayı algılayışımızı ve kavrayışımızı şekillendirmede oynadığı hayati rolü vurguladığını savunmaktadır.

References

  • Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship, NY: Verso Books.
  • Chalupecký, J. (2002). “The Intellectual Under Socialism.” Primary Documents: A Sourcebook for Eastern and Central European Art Since the 1950s, edited by Laura J. Hoptman and Tomáš Pospiszyl, United Kingdom, Museum of Modern Art, pp. 30–37.
  • Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage.
  • Gussow, M. (1984). “The Real Tom Stoppard.” The New York Times, 1 Jan, pp.18-28, www.nytimes.com/1984/01/01/magazine/the-real-tom-stoppard.html.
  • Londré, F. (2001). “From Zurich To Brazil with Tom Stoppard”, Modern Dramatists: A Casebook of Major British, Irish, and American Playwrights, edited by Kimball King, NY: Routledge, pp. 311-324.
  • Procházka, M. (1996). “Shakespeare and the Czech Resistance”. Shakespeare: World Views. Heather Kerr, et al., eds. London: Associated University Presses, pp. 44-69.
  • Rank, S. (2010). Twentieth-Century Adaptations of Macbeth: writing between influence, intervention, and cultural transfer. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  • Roberts, P. (1978). Tom Stoppard: Serious Artist or Siren?, Critical Quarterly, 20, (3), pp.84-92.
  • Sammells, N. (1988). Tom Stoppard: The Artist as Critic, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Shakespeare, W. (2010). Macbeth, London: Harper Press.
  • Stoppard, T. (1981). Open letter to President Husák, Index on Censorship, 10, (6), 1 December, pp. 18-18. Sage Journals, www.journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/03064228108533281
  • Stoppard, T. (2011). The Real Inspector Hound and Other Plays, NY: Grove Press.
  • Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University.
There are 13 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Contemporary Drama Studies
Journal Section Araştırma Makaleleri/Research Articles
Authors

Sarra Jouini 0000-0001-9338-8072

Early Pub Date September 19, 2024
Publication Date September 19, 2024
Submission Date May 23, 2024
Acceptance Date September 4, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Jouini, S. (2024). Deconstructing the Politics of Linguistic Mutation in Tom Stoppard’s Dogg’s Hamlet, Cahoot’s Macbeth. Theatre Academy, 2(2), 96-104. https://doi.org/10.62425/theatreacademy.1488942

Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License
30622