Theoretical exploration of low GWP refrigerant mixtures as replacement to HFC-134A in a vapour compression refrigeration system

Abstract

Hydro-fluorocarbons (HFCs) that are not harmful to ozone layer and are used in many appli-cations, including as refrigerants, aerosols, solvents and blowing agents for insulating foams replace chlorofluorocarbons and hydro chlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs). However, some HFCs have a high GWP, which stands for “Global Warming Potential(GWP).” Because of the grow-ing concern over global climate change, researchers are paying closer attention for alternatives to these HFCs. The main focus of this work was on the theoretical analysis of the refrigerant mixtures namely AC5, R430A, and R440A as direct replacements for HFC-134a in a refriger-ator. The performance of the refrigerator may be enhanced using heat exchanger. The com-pressor discharge temperature, COP, VCC, refrigerant mass flow rate, power consumption of a compressor and pressure ratio were used to measure the performance of a home refrigerator. The typical COP of R440A and R430A was about 2.5% and 1.4% higher than that of HFC-134, while the average COP of AC5 was 6.1% lesser than that of HFC-134a. R430A almost has the same VCC (Volumetric Cooling Capacity) as HFC-134a. The results also show that HFC-134a uses more power than AC5, R440A, and R430A. R440A and AC5 have higher compressor outlet temperatures than HFC-134a, which affects the life span of the compressor. In com-parison with all the above refrigerants, R430A gives the best overall performance and used as replacement to HFC-134a in a VCR.

Keywords

• R430A
• GWP
• Heat Exchanger
• Household Refrigerator Volumetric Heat Generation

References

1. REFERENCES
2. [1] Kim MS, Mulroy WJ, Didion DA. Performance evaluation of two azeotropic refrigerant mixtures of HFC–134a with R–290 (propane) and R–600a (isobutane). J Energy Resour Technol 1994;116:148–154. [CrossRef]
3. [2] Halimic E, Ross D, Agnew B, Anderson A, Potts I. A comparison of the operating performance of alternative refrigerants. Appl Therm Eng 2003;23:1441–1451. [CrossRef]
4. [3] Dalkilic AS, Wongwises S. A performance comparison of vapour compression refrigeration system using various alternatives refrigerants. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 2010;37:1340–1349. [CrossRef]
5. [4] Mohanraj M, Jayaraj S, Muraleedharan C. Comparative assessment of environment–friendly alternatives to R134a in domestic refrigerators. Energy Effic 2008;1:189–198. [CrossRef]
6. [5] Lee Y, Kang DG, Jung D. Performance of virtually non–flammable azeotropic HFO1234yf/HFC134a mixture for HFC134a applications. Int J Refrig 2013;36:1203–1207. [CrossRef]
7. [6] Meng Z, Zhang H, Qiu J, Lei M. Theoretical analysis of R1234ze (E), R152a, and R1234ze (E)/R152a mixtures as replacements of R134a in vapor compression system. Adv Mech Eng 2016;8:1687814016676945. [CrossRef]
8. [7] Sánchez D, Cabello R, Llopis R, Arauzo I, Catalán–Gil J, Torrella E. Energy performance evaluation of R1234yf, R1234ze (E), R600a, R290 and R152a as low–GWP R134a alternatives. Int J Refrig 2017;74:269–282. [CrossRef]

9. [8] Makhnatch P, Mota–Babiloni A, Khodabandeh R. Experimental study of R450A drop–in performance in an R134a small capacity refrigeration unit. Int J Refrig 2017;84:26–35. [CrossRef]
10. [9] Rasti M, Aghamiri S, Hatamipour MS. Energy efficiency enhancement of a domestic refrigerator using R436A and R600a as alternative refrigerants to R134a. Int J Therm Sci 2013;74:86–94. [CrossRef]
11. [10] Joybari MM, Hatamipour MS, Rahimi A, Modarres FG. Exergy analysis and optimization of R600a as a replacement of R134a in a domestic refrigerator system. Int J Refrig 2013;36:1233–1242. [CrossRef]
12. [11] Bilen K, Kalkisim AT, Solmus I. The performance of alternative refrigerant gas R152a as mobile air conditioning refrigerant. Chem Eng 2014;39:1801–1806.
13. [12] Meng Z, Zhang H, Lei M, Qin Y, Qiu J. Performance of low GWP R1234yf/R134a mixture as a replacement for R134a in automotive air conditioning systems. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2018;116:362–370. [CrossRef]
14. [13] Aprea C, Greco A, Maiorino A. An experimental investigation of the energetic performances of HFO1234yf and its binary mixtures with HFC134a in a household refrigerator. Int J Refrig 2017;76:109–117. [CrossRef]
15. [14] Golzari S, Kasaeian A, Daviran S, Mahian O, Wongwises S, Sahin AZ. Second law analysis of an automotive air conditioning system using HFO–1234yf, an environmentally friendly refrigerant. Int J Refrig 2017;73:134–143. [CrossRef]
16. [15] Hasheer SM, Srinivas K. Thermodynamic analysis of low GWP refrigerant mixtures in a refrigerator as replacement to R–134A. Strojnícky Časopis 2019;69:147–158. [CrossRef]
17. [16] Agarwal S. Thermodynamic performance analysis of dedicated mechanically subcooled vapour compression refrigeration system. J Therm Eng 2019;5:222–236. [CrossRef]
18. [17] Shaik MH, Kolla S, Prasad Katuru B. Exergy and energy analysis of low GWP refrigerants in the perspective of replacement of HFC–134a in a home refrigerator. Int J Ambient Energy 2022;43:2339–2350. [CrossRef]
19. [18] Agarwal S, Arora A, Arora B. Energy and exergy investigations of R1234yf and R1234ze as R134a replacements in mechanically subcooled vapour compression refrigeration cycle. J Therm Eng 2021;7:109–132. [CrossRef]
20. [19] Schultz, K., and S. Kujak. Low GWP AREP R134a W/C screw chiller test summary—final report, air–conditioning, heating, and refrigeration institute (AHRI) Low–GWP alternative refrigerants evaluation program (Low–GWP AREP). Vol. 7. Test report, 2012.
21. [20] Sethi A, Motta SY. Low GWP refrigerants for air conditioning and chiller applications. In: Groll EA, Braun JE, editors. International Refrigeration And Air Conditioning Conference; 2016 Jul 11-14; West Lafayette, USA: Purdue University; 2016.
22. [21] Fukuda S, Kondou C, Takata N, Koyama S. Low GWP refrigerants R1234ze (E) and R1234ze (Z) for high temperature heat pumps. Int J Refrig 2014;40:161–173. [CrossRef]
23. [22] McLinden MO, Kazakov AF, Brown JS, Domanski PA. A thermodynamic analysis of refrigerants: Possibilities and tradeoffs for Low–GWP refrigerants. Int J Refrig 2014;38:80–92. [CrossRef]
24. [23] Molés F, Navarro–Esbrí J, Peris B, Mota–Babiloni A, Barragán–Cervera Á. Theoretical energy performance evaluation of different single stage vapour compression refrigeration configurations using R1234yf and R1234ze (E) as working fluids. Int J Refrig 2014;44:141–150. [CrossRef]
25. [24] de Paula CH, Duarte WM, Rocha TTM, de Oliveira RN, Maia AAT. Optimal design and environmental, energy and exergy analysis of a vapor compression refrigeration system using R290, R1234yf, and R744 as alternatives to replace R134a. Int J Refrig 2020;113:10–20. [CrossRef]
26. [25] Heredia–Aricapa Y, Belman–Flores JM, Mota–Babiloni A, Serrano–Arellano J, García–Pabón JJ. Overview of low GWP mixtures for the replacement of HFC refrigerants: R134a, R404A and R410A. Int J Refrig 2020;111:113–123. [CrossRef]
27. [26] Yang M, Zhang H, Meng Z, Qin Y. Experimental study on R1234yf/R134a mixture (R513A) as R134a replacement in a domestic refrigerator. Appl Therm Eng 2019;146:540–547. [CrossRef]
28. [27] Mota–Babiloni A, Navarro–Esbrí J, Barragán–Cervera Á, Molés F, Peris B. Analysis based on EU Regulation No 517/2014 of new HFC/HFO mixtures as alternatives of high GWP refrigerants in refrigeration and HVAC systems. Int J Refrig 2015;52:21–31.
29. [28] Bolaji BO, Adeleke AE, Adu MR, Olanipekun MU, Akinnibosun E. Theoretical investigation of energy–saving potential of eco–friendly R430A, R440A and R450A refrigerants in a domestic refrigerator. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng 2019;43:103–112. [CrossRef]