Extended experimental investigation of a double-effect active solar still with a paraffin wax, in Owerri, Nigeria

Abstract

In this work, an experiment-based study of a double-effect, single-slope active solar still (SSASS) is presented. The system comprises an upper and a lower basin incorporated with a paraffin wax acting as a phase change material (PCM). The use of phase change materials is very important due to their high storage density and the isothermal nature of the storage pro-cess. Paraffin wax was selected based on its attractive thermo-physical properties. The thermal behaviours of the system during the diurnal and nocturnal phases in both compartments were explored. Experimental results showed that the upper basin’s yield contributed more to the overall distillate production over a 24-hour cycle while that of the lower basin predominated the diurnal production. Though the PCM served as an energy source during the nocturnal phase, it did not translate to significant improvement in the yield of the lower basin. The heat retention ability of the lower glazing retarded the condensation of the humid air in the lower compartment during the off-sunshine period. Thus, the nocturnal yield of the system was largely driven by the improved temperature difference between the upper saline water and the upper glazing, as well as the stored thermal energy in the saline water mass before sunset. The system achieved a maximum yield of 2,450 ml/day and a yield rate of 232.5 ml/h. A maximum monthly average yield of 1,787 ml/day was realized in May and a minimum of 692 ml/day in July. Nocturnal distillate production accounted for an average of 55% of the total distillate recovered from the still daily. The system achieved an efficiency range of 12.20 - 32.21%. The cost of freshwater production from the system is estimated at 0.0508 $/L with a payback period of 267 days. Thus, this system is economically viable and suitable particularly, for low-income earners.

Keywords

• Solar Distillation
• Double Effect
• Thermal Performance
• Productivity
• PCM

References

1. REFERENCES
2. [1] UNICEF. Nigerian children do not have enough water to meet their daily needs [Internet]. Available at: https://www.unicef.org/nigeria/press-releases/nearly-one-third-nigerian-children-do-not-have-enough-water-meet-their-daily-needs Last Accessed Date: 17.10.2021.

3. [2] Majcher K. How can desalination become cheaper? MIT Technology Review. 2014. Available at: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.technologyreview.com/2014/12/03/170231/how-can-desalination-become-cheaper/amp/ Last Accessed Date: 16/10/2021.

4. [3] Kedar SA, Raj KA, Bewoor AK. Performance analysis of hybrid solar desalination system using ETC and CPC. SN Appl Sci 2019;1:965. [CrossRef]
5. [4] Mouhsin N, Bouzaid M, Taha-Janan M. Experimental analysis of an improved cascade solar desalination still with modified absorber plate. E3S Web of Conferences 2022;336:15. [CrossRef]
6. [5] Diabil HAN. Experimental study to enhance the productivity of single-slope single-basin solar still. Open Eng 2022;12:157168. [CrossRef]
7. [6] Al-Karaghouli AA, Alnaser WE. Performances of single and double basin solar-stills. Appl Energy 2004;78:347354. [CrossRef]
8. [7] Agboola OP, Atikol U, Assefi H. Feasibility assessment of basin solar stills. Int J Green Energy 2015;12:139147. [CrossRef]

9. [8] Panchal HN. Enhancement of distillate output of double basin solar still with vacuum tubes. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci 2015;27:170175. [CrossRef]
10. [9] El-Sebaey MS, Ellman A, Hegazy A, Panchal H. Experimental study and mathematical model development for the effect of water depth on water production of a modified basin solar still. Case Stud Therm Eng 2022;33:113. [CrossRef]
11. [10] Zurigat YH, Abu-Arabi MK. Modelling and performance analysis of a regenerative solar desalination unit. Applied Therm Eng 2004;24:10611072. [CrossRef]
12. [11] Madhlopa A, Johnstone C. Numerical study of a passive solar still with separate condenser. Renew Energy 2009;34:16681677. [CrossRef]
13. [12] Elsharif N, Mahkamov K. Multi-effect solar water still with evaporation pressure self-reduction capability. J Clean Energy Technol 2018;6:139142. [CrossRef]
14. [13] Sonker VK, Chakraborty JP, Sarkar A, Singh RK. Solar distillation using three different phase change materials stored in a copper cylinder. Energy Rep 2019;5:15321542. [CrossRef]
15. [14] El-Sebaii AA, Al-Ghamdi AA, Al-Hazmi FS, Faidah AS. Thermal performance of a single basin solar still with PCM as a storage medium. Appl Energy 2009;86:11871195. [CrossRef]
16. [15] Kabeel AE, Abdelgaied M, Mahgoub M. The performance of a modified solar still using hot air injection and PCM. Desalination 2016;379:102107. [CrossRef]
17. [16] Ramasamy S, Sivaraman B. Heat transfer enhancement of solar still using phase change materials (PCMs). Int J Eng AdvTechnol 2013;2:597-600.
18. [17] Safaei MR, Goshayeshi HR, Chaer I. Solar still efficiency enhancement by using graphene oxide/paraffin Nano-PCM. Energies 2019;12:113. [CrossRef]
19. [18] Sharshir SW, Peng G, Wu L, Essa FA, Kabeel AE, Yang N. The effect of flake graphite nanoparticles, phase change material, and film cooling on the solar still performance. Appl Energy 2017;191:358366. [CrossRef]
20. [19] Boubekri M, Chaker A. Yield of an improved solar still: numerical approach. Energy Proced 2011;6:610617. [CrossRef]
21. [20] Egarievwe SU, Animalu AOE, Okeke CE. Harmattan performance of a solar still in the guinea savannah. Renew Energ 1991;1:799801. [CrossRef]
22. [21] Ogunseye OD, Oladepo KT. Performance analysis of a basin-type solar still during harmattan. Drinking Water Eng Sci 2022. [Preprint]. doi: 10.5194/dwes-2021-19, 2022. [CrossRef]
23. [22] Agrawal A, Rana RS. Theoretical and experimental performance evaluation of single-slope single-basin solar still with multiple V-shaped floating wicks. Heliyon 2019;5:138. [CrossRef]
24. [23] Khaparde SA, Bhuibhar AG, Pande PP. Design and performance of solar still. Int J Eng Sci Res Technol 2018;7:291306.
25. [24] Prasad AR, Sathyamurthy R, Sudhakar M, Madhu B, Mageshbabu D, Manokar AM, et al. Effect of design parameters on fresh water produced from triangular basin and conventional basin solar still. Int J Photoenergy 2021;2021:6619138. [CrossRef]
26. [25] Gaur MK, Tiwari GN, Singh P, Kushwah A. Heat transfer analysis of hybrid active solar still with water flowing over glass cover. J Therm Eng 2021;7:13291343. [CrossRef]
27. [26] Nwosu EC, Nwaji GN, Ononogbo C, Ofong I, Nwadinobi PC, Ogueke NV, et al. Numerical and Experimental study of a single-slope double-effect solar still integrated with paraffin wax. Energy Nexus 2022;8:100155. [CrossRef]
28. [27] Bao N. The Mathematical Model of Basin-Type Solar Distillation Systems. London: Intechopen; 2019. [CrossRef]
29. [28] Ogunseye O, Omole-Adebomi A, Salami S. Performance analysis of a basin-type solar still during harmattan– raw data. Amsterdam: Mendeley Data, Elseiver; 2021. [CrossRef]
30. [29] Pareshi PR, Dhande KK, Bhagat G, Suvarnkar V, Javanjal V. Solar water distillation system by using inclined double basin. Int Res J Eng Technol 2019;6:13101313.
31. [30] Modi KV, Ankoliya DB, Shukla DL. An approach to optimization of double basin single slope solar still water depth for maximum distilled water output. J Renew Sustain Energy 2018;10:043708. [CrossRef]
32. [31] Shukla D, Modi K. Hybrid solar still as a co-generative system and desalination system – an experimental performance evaluation. Clean Eng Technol 2021;2:112. [CrossRef]
33. [32] El-Sebaey MS, Hegazy A, Ellman A, Ghonim T. Experimental and CFD study on single slope double basin solar still. Eng Res J 2021;44:2132. [CrossRef]
34. [33] Onyegegbu SO. Nocturnal distillation in basin-type solar stills. Appl Energy 1986;24:2942. [CrossRef]
35. [34] Hamdan MA, Al Momani AM, Ayadi O, Sakhrieh AH, Manzano-Agugliaro F. Enhancement of solar water desalination using copper and aluminum oxide nanoparticles. Water 2021;13:1914. [CrossRef]
36. [35] Edeoja AO, Ibrahim JS, Adaba S. Contribution of night time yield to the overall water production capacity of a simple basin solar still under Makurdi climate. Am J Eng Res 2013;2:3243.
37. [36] Karthikeyan J, Selvaraj P, Nagaraj G. Day and night yield performance analysis of solar still for saline water using energetic materials with thermocol insulation. Mater Today Proc 2020;33:48484851. [CrossRef] [37] Johnson A, Mu L, Park YH, Valles DJ, Wang H, Xu P, Kota K, Kuravi S. A thermal model for predicting the performance of a solar still with Fresnel lens. Water 2019;11:120. [CrossRef]
38. [38] Abdullah AS, Omara ZM, Alarjani A, Essa FA. Experimental investigation of a new design of drum solar still with reflectors under different conditions. Case Stud Therm Eng 2021;24:100850. [CrossRef]
39. [39] Fu H, Dai M, Song H, Hou X, Riaz F, Li S, et al. Updates on evaporation and condensation methods for the performance improvement of solar stills. Energies 2021;14:7050. [CrossRef]
40. [40] Saxena A, Cuce E, Kabeel AE, Abdelgaied M, Goel V. A thermodynamic review on solar stills. Sol Energy 2022;237:377413. [CrossRef]
41. [41] Duffie JA, Beckman WA. Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2013. [CrossRef]