Evaluation of the thermal efficiency of nanofluid flows in flat plate solar collector

Abstract

In this research, flat plate solar collectors (FPSC) were studied due to their simplicity, low maintenance, and cost-effectiveness. The study focused on comparing FPSC thermal performance using CuO/H2O nanofluids. Experiments were conducted over three months during the Iraqi weather conditions (January, February, and March) with carefully selected nanoparticle concentrations. Data was collected from 9 A.M. to 3 P.M., using various mass flow rates (ranging from 0.003 to 0.076 kg/s). Results showed a direct correlation between temperature and nanoparticle concentrations, with the highest outlet temperature (50°C) observed at 3 P.M. for 1% CuO-water nanofluid. Notably, at 1 P.M. in March, the 1% CuO-water nanofluid exhibited a 32% increase in collector thermal efficiency, surpassing pure water by 11.3%. This would improve the performance of FPSC by achieving higher efficiency increments. These improvements were attributed to the unique physical properties of nanoparticles, their increased surface area, and higher thermal conductivity. The study determined that the optimum nanofluid concentration for superior collector efficiency was 1%.

Keywords

• Copper Oxide Nanoparticles
• Efficiency
• Experimental Study
• Nanofluid
• Thermal Performance

References

1. [1] Danook SH, Jassim KJ, Hussein AM. Efficiency analysis of TiO2/water nanofluid in trough solar collector. J Adv Res Fluid Mech Ther Sci 2020;67:178185.
2. [2] Hussein AM, Kadirgama K, Noor MM. Nanoparticles Suspended in ethylene glycol thermal properties and applications: an overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017;69:13241330. [CrossRef]
3. [3] Elghamry R, Hamdy H, Hawwash AA. A parametric study on the impact of integrating solar cell panel at building envelope on its power, energy consumption, comfort conditions, and Co2 emissions. J Clean Prod 2020;249:119374. [CrossRef]
4. [4] Selvakumar N, Barshilia HC, Rajam KS. Review of sputter deposited mid-to high-temperature solar selective coatings for flat plate/evacuated tube collectors and solar thermal power generation applications. NAL Project Document SE; 1025; 2010.
5. [5] Said Z. Performance enhancement of a flat plate solar collector using titanium dioxide nanofluid and polyethylene glycol dispersant. J Clean Prod 2015;92:343353. [CrossRef]
6. [6] Duffie JA, William AB. Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2013. [CrossRef]
7. [7] Awad MM, Rout A, Thomas S, Sahoo SS. Techno-economic analysis of solar photovoltaic-thermal system viability. Sol Energy Harvest Convers Storage 2023:319362. [CrossRef]
8. [8] Choi SUS, Eastman A. Enhancing Thermal Conductivity of Fluids with Nanoparticles. Argonne, IL: Argonne National Lab. (ANL); 1995.

9. [9] Gupta M, Singh V, Kumar R, Said Z. A review on thermophysical properties of nanofluids and heat transfer applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017;74:638670. [CrossRef]
10. [10] Sundar LS, Ramana EV, Said Z, Punnaiah V. Properties, heat transfer, energy efficiency and environmental emissions analysis of flat plate solar collector using nanodiamond nanofluids. Diamond Relat Mater 2020;110:108115. [CrossRef]
11. [11] Said Z, Sajid MH, Alim MA, Saidur R. Experimental investigation of the thermophysical properties of Al2O3-nanofluid and its effect on a flat plate solar collector. Int Comm Heat Mass Transf 2013;48:99107. [CrossRef]
12. [12] Zhang X, Gu H, Fujii M. Effective thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity of nanofluids containing spherical and cylindrical nanoparticles. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2007;31:593599. [CrossRef]
13. [13] Xie H, Lee H, Youn W, Choi M. Nanofluids containing multiwalled carbon nanotubes and their enhanced thermal conductivities. J Appl Physics 2003;94:49674971. [CrossRef]
14. [14] Trisaksri V, Wongwises S. Critical review of heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2007;11:512523. [CrossRef]
15. [15] Murshed SMS, Leong KC, Yang C. Thermophysical and electrokinetic properties of nanofluids–A critical review. Appl Therm Engineer 2008;28:21092125. [CrossRef]
16. [16] Wen D, Lin G, Vafaei S, Zhang K. Review of nanofluids for heat transfer applications. Particuology 2009;7:141150. [CrossRef]
17. [17] Keblinski P, Eastman JA, Cahill DG. Nanofluids for thermal transport. Mater Today 2005;8:3644. [CrossRef]
18. [18] Hwang KS, Jang SP, Choi SUS. Flow and convective heat transfer characteristics of water-based Al2o3 nanofluids in fully developed laminar flow regime. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2009;52:193199. [CrossRef]
19. [19] Terekhov VI, Kalinina SV, Lemanov VV. The mechanism of heat transfer in nanofluids: State of the art (review). Part 2. Convective heat transfer. Thermophys Aeromech 2010;17:157–171. [CrossRef]
20. [20] Maı̈ga SEB, Nguyen CT, Galanis N, Roy G. Heat transfer behaviours of nanofluids in a uniformly heated tube. Superlattices Microstruct 2004;35:543557. [CrossRef]
21. [21] Yu W, Xie H. A review on nanofluids: Preparation, stability mechanisms, and applications. J Nanomater 2012:435873. [CrossRef]
22. [22] Yousefi T, Veysi F, Shojaeizadeh E, Zinadini S. An experimental investigation on the effect of Al2o3–H2o nanofluid on the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors. Renew Energy 2012;39:293298. [CrossRef]
23. [23] Sarangi A, Sarangi A, Sahoo SS, Mallik RK, Ray S, Varghese SM. A review of different working fluids used in the receiver tube of parabolic trough solar collector. J Therm Anal Calorim 2023;148:39293954. [CrossRef]
24. [24] Panda RC, Panigrahi L, Nayak MK, Chamkha AJ, Sahoo SS, Barik AK. Nanofluid based pipe flow analysis in absorber pipe of flat plate solar collector: Effects of inclination and porosity. J Nanofluids 2023;12:458464. [CrossRef]
25. [25] Panda RC, Sahoo SS, Barik AK, Mohapatra T, Rout A. Thermal performance analysis of flat plate solar collector using nanofluid: A theoretical approach. JP J Heat Mass Transf 2022;30:7588. [CrossRef]
26. [26] Panda RC, Panigrahi L, Sahoo SS, Barik AK. Nanofluid effect in the vertical pipe with heat input concerning flat plate solar collector: An analytical analysis. JP J Heat Mass Transf 2022;28:7184. [CrossRef]
27. [27] Lazarus G, Siddharth ROY, Kunhappa D, Cephas E, Wongwises S. Heat transfer performance of silver/water nanofluid in a solar flat-plate collector. J Therm Engineer 2015;1:104112. [CrossRef]
28. [28] Tonekaboni N, Salarian H, Nimvari ME, Khaleghinia J. Energy and exergy analysis of an enhanced solar CCHP system with a collector embedded by porous media and nano fluid. J Therm Engineer 2021;7:14891505. [CrossRef]
29. [29] Javadi FS, Sadeghipour S, Saidur R, BoroumandJazi G, Rahmati B, Elias MM, et al. The effects of nanofluid on thermophysical properties and heat transfer characteristics of a plate heat exchanger. Int Comm Heat Mass Transf 2013;44:58–63. [CrossRef]
30. [30] Ramachandran K, Hussein AM, Kadirgama K, Ramasamy D, Azmi WH, Tarlochan F, et al. Thermophysical properties measurement of nano cellulose in ethylene glycol/water. Appl Therm Eng 2017;123:1158–1165. [CrossRef]
31. [31] Lazarus G, Siddharth ROY, Kunhappan D, Cephas E, Wongwises S. Heat transfer performance of silver/water nanofluid in a solar flat-plate collector. J Therm Engineer 2015;1:104112. [CrossRef]