AERODYNAMICS ASSESSMENT USING CFD FOR A LOW DRAG SHELL ECO-MARATHON CAR

Abstract

Having a small car running with low power can be achieved by reducing the aerodynamics drag, rolling resistance and mechanical frictions between the moving parts. The Shell Eco-Marathon competition held around the world with events in Europe, USA and Asia shows every year new techniques and ideas to reduce the power needed to drive the car. The record of over 3400 km on the equivalent of a single litre of fuel is an indication of how car can run efficiently. The problem with these low drag cars is the driver perception about the shape of the car. Although the tear drop shape is known as having the minimum drag, practically this shape cannot be used due to size and packaging limitations in addition to the safety issue. In this work, a low drag concept car is proposed using initial CAD design. The concept car is examined using a commercial CFD software by simulating the airflow around car. The spatial distribution of the pressure and velocity vectors are utilized to improve the car shape and to achieve a low drag force coefficient while keeping the down force at its minimum value.  By changing the car front, underneath and rear shapes, it was possible to reduce the drag coefficient from 0.430 for the baseline to 0.127 for the final design, while meeting the competition regulations.

Keywords

• Vehicle Aerodynamics,Shell Eco-marathon Car,Low Drag Car,Vehicle CFD

References

1. [1] Carello, M., Airale, A., Ferraris, A. and Messana, A., 2014. XAM 2.0: from Student Competition to Professional Challenge. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 11(sup1), pp.561-567.
2. [2] Barnard, R.H., 2001. Road vehicle aerodynamic design-an introduction. Mechaero Publishing; 2nd Revised edition.
3. [3] Lu, W.F., Lim, H.W. and Goh, K.H., 2011, January. Engineering Design and Education: A Case Study on Designing A Competition Fuel Efficient Vehicle Through Experiential Learning. ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 741-750). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
4. [4] Joseph Katz, 1995. Race Car Aerodynamics. Designing for Speed. Bentley Publishers.
5. [5] Abo-Serie, E., Sherif, M., Pompei, D., and Gaylard, A., 2014. CFD Simulation of External Distribution of Tail-Pipe Emissions Around a Stationary Vehicle Under Light Tail-Wind Conditions, SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0586.
6. [6] Brunn, A., Wassen, E., Sperber, D., Nitsche, W. and Thiele, F., 2007. Active drag control for a generic car model. In Active Flow Control (pp. 247-259). Springer Berlin Heidelberg
7. [7] Bideaux E, Bobillier P, Fournier E, Gillieron P, El Hajem M, Champagne JY, Gilotte P, Kourta A. 2011. Drag Reduction by Pulsed Jets on Strongly Unstructured Wake: Towards The Square Back Control. Int J Aerodynamics,1(3/4):282–298. [8] Heinemann T, Springer M, Lienhart H, Kniesburges S, Becker S., 2012. Active Flow Control on A 1:4 Car Model. Proceedings of the 16th Int. Symp. on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal.
8. [9] Wąsik, M. and Skarka, W., 2015. Influence of The Windscreens Inclination Angle on The Aerodynamic Drag Coefficient of The Cars Designed For The Race Shell Eco-Marathon Based on Numerical Simulations. Proceedings of The Institute of Vehicles 3(103).

9. [10] Danek, W., 2014. Determination of The Drag Coefficient High Performance Electric Vehicle. Modelowanie Inżynierskie, no. 21.
10. [11] Ahmed, E., Abo-Serie, E.. and Gaylard, A. , 2010. Mesh Optimization For Ground Vehicle Aerodynamics, Journal of CFD Letters, Vol. 2 No1.
11. [12] Eikeland, H. A., 2010. Aerodynamic Development and Construction of a Car for Participation in the Eco-Marathon Competition, EPT Master of Science in Product Design and Manufacturing, Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige University NTNU, Norway.
12. [13] Altinisik, A., Kutukceken, E. and Umur, H., 2015. Experimental and numerical aerodynamic analysis of a passenger car: Influence of the blockage ratio on drag coefficient. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 137(8), p.081104.
13. [14] Dumas, L., 2008. CFD-based optimization for automotive aerodynamics. In Optimization and Computational Fluid Dynamics (pp. 191-215). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
14. [15] Lundberg, A., Hamlin, P., Shankar, D., Broniewicz, A. et al., "Automated Aerodynamic Vehicle Shape Optimization Using Neural Networks and Evolutionary Optimization," SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 8(1):242-251, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1548.