Research Article

COMPARATIVE ENERGY AND EXERGY ANALYSIS OF A POWER PLANT WITH SUPER-CRITICAL AND SUB-CRITICAL

Volume: 4 Number: 6 September 29, 2018
EN

COMPARATIVE ENERGY AND EXERGY ANALYSIS OF A POWER PLANT WITH SUPER-CRITICAL AND SUB-CRITICAL

Abstract

The aim of this study that how to effect live steam parameters reheat and feed water preheater numbers on efficiencies of energy and exergy at coal-fired power plants. Moreover, two desuperheaters and a regenerative turbine are added USCPP (Case 3) to approach best results. Soma Power Plant (Case 1) consists of one reheat stage, two HPRHs and four LPRHs with one DEA. It is operated sub-critic and coal is used for a fuel. Live steam conditions of Soma Power Plant set at 13,92 MPa and 540 °C, and the reheat steam is reheated to 540 °C. Supercritical Power Plant (Case 2) consists of the same main components of Case 1. However, steam parameters of Case 2 are increased to 262.5 Bar and 600 °C to determine impact of the steam parameters on power plant efficiencies. USCPP which consists of two reheat stages, four HPRHs, six LPRHs with one DEA is designed to generate live steam under nominal conditions of 30 Bar and 600 °C. Besides, reheat steam are heated to 620 °C. Simulations have been carried out Ebsilon Professional software and pressure drops at preheaters and reheats are also considered. Some assumptions are made in the analysis. The thermal and exergy efficiencies of USCPP increase by 9.241 and 8.06 percentage points compared with Soma power plant, respectively. The results of this study that live steam parameters which are increased from sub-critical values to super-critical values have enormous influence on energy and exergy efficiencies. Secondly, adding second reheat stage has positive impact to improve power plant efficiencies. Finally, augmenting feed water preheater number, adding two desuperheater and one regenerative turbine increase power plant efficiencies. However, optimum numbers of feed water preheaters are determined considering economic parameters.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Sayin, C., Nisa Mencet, M., Ozkan, B. (2005). Assessing of Energy Policies Based on Turkish Agriculture:Current Status and Some Implications, Energy Policy, 332361-2373.
  2. [2] International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook. (2014).
  3. [3] Adibhatla, S., Kaushik, S.C. (2014). Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Super Critical Thermal Power Plant at Various Load Conditions Under Constant and Pure Sliding Pressure Operation. Applied Thermal Engineering, 73, 51-65.
  4. [4] Utlu, Z. Hepbasli, A. (2007). Assessment of the Turkish Utility Sector Through Energy and Exergy Analyses. Energy Policy 35, 5012-5020.
  5. [5] Erdem, H.H., Akkaya, A.V., Cetin, B., Dagdaş, A., Sevilgen, S.H., Sahin, B., Teke, I., Gungor, C., Atas, S. (2009). Comparative Energetic and Exergetic Performance Analyses for Coal-Fired Thermal Power Plants in Turkey. International Journal of Thermal Sciences 48, 2179-2186.
  6. [6] Xu, G., Zhou, L., Zhao, S., Liang, F., Xu, C., Yang, Y. (2015). Optimum Superheat Utilization of Extraction Steam in Double Reheat Ultra-Supercritical Power Plants. Applied Energy 160, 863-872.
  7. [7] Rashidi, M.M., Aghagoli, A., Ali, M. E. (2014). Thermodynamic Analysis of a Steam Power Plant with Double Reheat and Feed Water Heaters. Advances in Mechanical Engineering.
  8. [8] Aljundi, I.H. (2009). Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Steam Power Plant in Jordan. Applied Thermal Engineering 29, 324-328.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 29, 2018

Submission Date

May 24, 2017

Acceptance Date

October 6, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 4 Number: 6

APA
Çetin, B. (2018). COMPARATIVE ENERGY AND EXERGY ANALYSIS OF A POWER PLANT WITH SUPER-CRITICAL AND SUB-CRITICAL. Journal of Thermal Engineering, 4(6), 2423-2431. https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.465644
AMA
1.Çetin B. COMPARATIVE ENERGY AND EXERGY ANALYSIS OF A POWER PLANT WITH SUPER-CRITICAL AND SUB-CRITICAL. Journal of Thermal Engineering. 2018;4(6):2423-2431. doi:10.18186/thermal.465644
Chicago
Çetin, Burhanettin. 2018. “COMPARATIVE ENERGY AND EXERGY ANALYSIS OF A POWER PLANT WITH SUPER-CRITICAL AND SUB-CRITICAL”. Journal of Thermal Engineering 4 (6): 2423-31. https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.465644.
EndNote
Çetin B (September 1, 2018) COMPARATIVE ENERGY AND EXERGY ANALYSIS OF A POWER PLANT WITH SUPER-CRITICAL AND SUB-CRITICAL. Journal of Thermal Engineering 4 6 2423–2431.
IEEE
[1]B. Çetin, “COMPARATIVE ENERGY AND EXERGY ANALYSIS OF A POWER PLANT WITH SUPER-CRITICAL AND SUB-CRITICAL”, Journal of Thermal Engineering, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 2423–2431, Sept. 2018, doi: 10.18186/thermal.465644.
ISNAD
Çetin, Burhanettin. “COMPARATIVE ENERGY AND EXERGY ANALYSIS OF A POWER PLANT WITH SUPER-CRITICAL AND SUB-CRITICAL”. Journal of Thermal Engineering 4/6 (September 1, 2018): 2423-2431. https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.465644.
JAMA
1.Çetin B. COMPARATIVE ENERGY AND EXERGY ANALYSIS OF A POWER PLANT WITH SUPER-CRITICAL AND SUB-CRITICAL. Journal of Thermal Engineering. 2018;4:2423–2431.
MLA
Çetin, Burhanettin. “COMPARATIVE ENERGY AND EXERGY ANALYSIS OF A POWER PLANT WITH SUPER-CRITICAL AND SUB-CRITICAL”. Journal of Thermal Engineering, vol. 4, no. 6, Sept. 2018, pp. 2423-31, doi:10.18186/thermal.465644.
Vancouver
1.Burhanettin Çetin. COMPARATIVE ENERGY AND EXERGY ANALYSIS OF A POWER PLANT WITH SUPER-CRITICAL AND SUB-CRITICAL. Journal of Thermal Engineering. 2018 Sep. 1;4(6):2423-31. doi:10.18186/thermal.465644

Cited By

IMPORTANT NOTE: JOURNAL SUBMISSION LINK http://eds.yildiz.edu.tr/journal-of-thermal-engineering