COMPARATIVE ENERGY AND EXERGY ANALYSIS OF A POWER PLANT WITH SUPER-CRITICAL AND SUB-CRITICAL
Abstract
The aim of this
study that how to effect live steam parameters reheat and feed water preheater
numbers on efficiencies of energy and exergy at coal-fired power plants.
Moreover, two desuperheaters and a regenerative turbine are added USCPP (Case
3) to approach best results. Soma Power Plant (Case 1) consists of one reheat
stage, two HPRHs and four LPRHs with one DEA. It is operated sub-critic and
coal is used for a fuel. Live steam conditions of Soma Power Plant set at 13,92
MPa and 540 °C, and the reheat steam is reheated to
540 °C. Supercritical Power Plant (Case 2)
consists of the same main components of Case 1. However, steam parameters of
Case 2 are increased to 262.5 Bar and 600 °C to determine impact of the steam parameters on power plant
efficiencies. USCPP which consists of two reheat stages, four HPRHs, six LPRHs
with one DEA is designed to generate live steam under nominal conditions of 30
Bar and 600 °C. Besides, reheat steam are heated to
620 °C. Simulations have been carried out
Ebsilon Professional software and pressure drops at preheaters and reheats are
also considered. Some assumptions are made in the analysis. The thermal and
exergy efficiencies of USCPP increase by 9.241 and 8.06 percentage points
compared with Soma power plant, respectively. The results of this study that
live steam parameters which are increased from sub-critical values to
super-critical values have enormous influence on energy and exergy
efficiencies. Secondly, adding second reheat stage has positive impact to
improve power plant efficiencies. Finally, augmenting feed water preheater
number, adding two desuperheater and one regenerative turbine increase power
plant efficiencies. However, optimum numbers of feed water preheaters are
determined considering economic parameters.
Keywords
References
- [1] Sayin, C., Nisa Mencet, M., Ozkan, B. (2005). Assessing of Energy Policies Based on Turkish Agriculture:Current Status and Some Implications, Energy Policy, 332361-2373.
- [2] International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook. (2014).
- [3] Adibhatla, S., Kaushik, S.C. (2014). Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Super Critical Thermal Power Plant at Various Load Conditions Under Constant and Pure Sliding Pressure Operation. Applied Thermal Engineering, 73, 51-65.
- [4] Utlu, Z. Hepbasli, A. (2007). Assessment of the Turkish Utility Sector Through Energy and Exergy Analyses. Energy Policy 35, 5012-5020.
- [5] Erdem, H.H., Akkaya, A.V., Cetin, B., Dagdaş, A., Sevilgen, S.H., Sahin, B., Teke, I., Gungor, C., Atas, S. (2009). Comparative Energetic and Exergetic Performance Analyses for Coal-Fired Thermal Power Plants in Turkey. International Journal of Thermal Sciences 48, 2179-2186.
- [6] Xu, G., Zhou, L., Zhao, S., Liang, F., Xu, C., Yang, Y. (2015). Optimum Superheat Utilization of Extraction Steam in Double Reheat Ultra-Supercritical Power Plants. Applied Energy 160, 863-872.
- [7] Rashidi, M.M., Aghagoli, A., Ali, M. E. (2014). Thermodynamic Analysis of a Steam Power Plant with Double Reheat and Feed Water Heaters. Advances in Mechanical Engineering.
- [8] Aljundi, I.H. (2009). Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Steam Power Plant in Jordan. Applied Thermal Engineering 29, 324-328.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
September 29, 2018
Submission Date
May 24, 2017
Acceptance Date
October 6, 2017
Published in Issue
Year 2018 Volume: 4 Number: 6
Cited By
Analysis of the dual-fuel combined cycle power plants with a parallel operating scheme efficiency
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1089/1/012001Energy and exergy analysis of the steam power plants: A comprehensive review on the Classification, Development, Improvements, and configurations
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.11.009