A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF SOLAR ENERGY-TECHNO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FROM AKSARAY CITY, TURKEY

Abstract

This study posed a feasibility study of solar energy-techno economic analysis that was investigated for 20,000 m² area of Aksaray city from Turkey. The result of a solar energy radiation production was found to be 1.65 million [kWh/m² year]. The profit of solar energy plant was determined about 501,825 [$/y]. A simple payback period time was found to be 4.5 [y]. The aim of the study is to indicate building solar energy plant that can be efficiently for Aksaray city. Since a solar energy plant can be a feasible plant for Yapilcan village, Aksaray city that is near the power line local area network. These results figure out very efficient result for building solar energy plant to Yapilcan village, Aksaray city from Turkey.

Keywords

• Renewable Energy,Solar Energy,Techno Economic Analysis,Energy

References

1. [1] Çetin, M., Eğrican, N. (2011). Employment impacts of solar energy in Turkey. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7184-7190.
2. [2] Toklu, E. (2017). Biomass energy potential and utilization in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 107, 235-244.
3. [3] Melikoglu, M. (2016). The role of renewables and nuclear energy in Turkey׳ s Vision 2023 energy targets: Economic and technical scrutiny. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 1-12.
4. [4] Devrim, Y., Bilir, L. (2016). Performance investigation of a wind turbine–solar photovoltaic panels–fuel cell hybrid system installed at İncek region–Ankara, Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management, 126, 759-766.
5. [5] Eksi, G., Karaosmanoglu, F. (2017). Combined bioheat and biopower: A technology review and an assessment for Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73, 1313-1332.
6. [6] Ozden, E., Tari, I. (2016). Energy–exergy and economic analyses of a hybrid solar–hydrogen renewable energy system in Ankara, Turkey. Applied Thermal Engineering, 99, 169-178.
7. [7] Badea, G., Naghiu, G. S., Giurca, I., Aşchilean, I., Megyesi, E. (2017). Hydrogen production using solar energy-technical analysis. Energy Procedia, 112, 418-425.
8. [8] Morcillo-Herrera, C., Hernández-Sánchez, F., Flota-Bañuelos, M. (2015). Method to calculate the electricity generated by a photovoltaic cell, based on its mathematical model simulations in MATLAB. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2015.

9. [9] The Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources (2017). General Directorate of Renewable Energy. Available from: http://www.eie.gov.tr
10. [10] Lazard's Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis, Version 8.0, 2016.
11. [11] International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2012). Renewable energy technologies: cost analysis series: Solar Photovoltaics, Volume 1: Power Sector Issue 4/5: 1-56.
12. [12] International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Renewable power generation costs in 2014, 2015.
13. [13] Photovoltaic & Solar Electricity Design Tools. Available from: www.photovoltaic-software.com, Access date: 14/06/2017.
14. [14] Koppelaar, R. H. E. M. (2017). Solar-PV energy payback and net energy: Meta-assessment of study quality, reproducibility, and results harmonization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 1241-1255.
15. [15] Thakur, J., Chakraborty, B. (2015). A study of feasible smart tariff alternatives for smart grid integrated solar panels in India. Energy, 93, 963-975.