NUMERICAL ANALYSES ON THE PREDICTION OF NUSSELT NUMBERS FOR UPWARD AND DOWNWARD FLOWS OF WATER IN A SMOOTH PIPE: EFFECTS OF BUOYANCY AND PROPERTY VARIATIONS
Abstract
This paper includes the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) solution as
one of the numerical analyses to investigate the buoyancy and property
variation effects calculating Nusselt numbers during the upward and downward
flow of water in a smooth pipe. Available data in the literature (Parlatan et
al.) has been used in the analyses to show ANN’s success ratio of
predictability on the measured pipe length’s averaged Nusselt numbers (Nuavg)
and forced convection’s Nusselt numbers (Nuo). Mixed convective flow
conditions were valid for Reynolds numbers ranging from 4000 to 9000 with Bond
numbers smaller than 1.3. Dimensionless values of Reynolds number, Grashof
number, Prandtl number, Bond number, Darcy friction factor, isothermal friction
factor in forced convection, ratio of dynamic viscosities, and a Parlatan et
al.’s friction factor were the inputs while Nuavg and Nuo were
the outputs of ANN analyses. All data was properly separated for test/training/validation processes. The ANNs
performances were determined by way of relative error criteria with the practice
of unknown test sets. As a result of analyses, outputs were predicted within
the deviation of ±5% accurately, new correlations were proposed using the
inputs, and importance of inputs on the outputs were emphasized according to
dependency analyses showing the importance of buoyancy influence (GrT)
and the effects of temperature-dependent viscosity variations under mixed
convection conditions in aiding and opposing transition and turbulent flow of
water in a test tube.
Keywords
References
- [1] Hiroaki, T., Ayao, T., Masaru, H., Nuchi, N. (1973). Effects of buoyancy and of acceleration owing to thermal expansion on forced turbulent convection in vertical circular tubes—criteria of the effects, velocity and temperature profiles, and reverse transition from turbulent to laminar flow. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 16(6), 1267-1288.
- [2] Easby, J. P. (1978). The effect of buoyancy on flow and heat transfer for a gas passing down a vertical pipe at low turbulent Reynolds numbers. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 21(6), 791-801.
- [3] Saylor, P. E., & Joye, D. D. (1991). Hydrostatic correction and pressure drop measurement in mixed convection heat transfer in a vertical tube. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 30(4), 784-788.
- [4] Parlatan, Y., Todreas, N. E., Driscoll, M. J. (1996). Buoyancy and property variation effects in turbulent mixed convection of water in vertical tubes. Journal of heat transfer, 118(2), 381-387.
- [5] You, J., Yoo, J. Y., Choi, H. (2003). Direct numerical simulation of heated vertical air flows in fully developed turbulent mixed convection. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 46(9), 1613-1627.
- [6] Joye, D. D. (2003). Pressure drop correlation for laminar, mixed convection, aiding flow heat transfer in a vertical tube. International journal of heat and fluid flow, 24(2), 260-266.
- [7] Busedra, A. A., Soliman, H. M. (1999). Analysis of laminar mixed convection in inclined semicircular ducts under buoyancy-assisted and-opposed conditions. Numerical Heat Transfer: Part A: Applications, 36(5), 527-544.
- [8] Voicu, I., Maré, T., Galanis, N., Miriel, J., Colda, I. (2007). Mixed convection in a vertical double pipe heat exchanger. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 46(6), 540-550.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
March 14, 2019
Submission Date
August 27, 2017
Acceptance Date
January 28, 2018
Published in Issue
Year 2019 Volume: 5 Number: 3
Cited By
CFD MODELING OF SLURRY PIPELINE AT DIFFERENT PRANDTL NUMBERS
Journal of Thermal Engineering
https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.930932