ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THERMAL INSULATION USED IN DIFFERENT DUCT SIZES

Abstract

In this study, the economic and environmental impacts of insulation material are determined for different sizes of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) duct. The optimum insulation thickness (OIT), energy-saving (ES) and payback period (PP) for HVAC duct are estimated using Life cycle cost (LCC) analysis. The analysis considers coal, natural gas (NG), liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), fuel oil (FO), bagasse, rice husk (RH) and geothermal as an energy source and the fiberglass as an insulation material. The results indicate the OIT and PP for an HVAC duct increase with the size of the duct while ES decreases. The maximum value of OIT, ES and minimum value of PP for different sizes and energy sources are determined as 48.27 mm in size A (300 mm) and NG, 84.91% in size E (500 mm) and LPG, and 0.2035 years in size A and NG, respectively. Additionally, the environmental analysis results indicate emission of CO2, CO and SO2 decreases with insulation thickness. The maximum value of CO2 and CO emission is determined for size E and NG i.e. 81.8% and SO2 emission for size E and FO i.e. 76.66%, respectively.

Keywords

• Optimum Insulation Thickness,Energy Saving,Life Cycle Cost Analysis,Environmental Analysis

References

1. [1] Holdren JP. Population and the Energy Problem. Population and Environment: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 1991;12:231-155.
2. [2] Kumar D, Memon RA, Memon AG, Tunio IA, Junejo A. Impact of Auxiliary Equipments’ Consumption on Electricity Generation Cost in Selected Power Plants of Pakistan. Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering & Technology, 2017;36(2):419-36.
3. [3] Mohsen MS, Akash BA. Some Prospects of Energy Savings in Building. Energy conversion and management. 2001;42:1307-15.
4. [4] Pe´rez-Lombard L, Ortiz J, Pout C. A review on buildings energy consumption information. Energy and Buildings 2008 40 394–8.
5. [5] Shaikh PH, Nor NBM, Nallagownden P, Elamvazuthi I, Ibrahim T. A review on optimized control systems for building energy and comfort management of smart sustainable buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014;34:409–29.
6. [6] Sahin AZ, Kalyon M. Maintaining uniform surface temperature along pipes by insulation. Energy 2005;30:637–47.
7. [7] Kaynakli O. Economic thermal insulation thickness for pipes and ducts: A review study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2014;30:184-94.
8. [8] Zaki GM, Al-Turki AM. Optimization of Multilayer Thermal Insulation for Pipelines. Heat Transfer Engineering. 2000;21:63–70.

9. [9] Li YF, Chow WK. Optimum insulation-thickness for thermal and freezing protection Applied Energy 2005;80:23–33.
10. [10] Soponpongpipat N, Jaruyanon P, Nanetoe S. The Thermo-Economics Analysis of the Optimum Thickness of Double-Layer Insulation for Air Conditioning Duct. Energy Research Journal 2010;1(2):146-51.
11. [11] Keçebas A, Kayfeci M, Gedik E. Performance investigation of the Afyon geothermal district heating system for building applications: Exergy analysis. Applied Thermal Engineering 2011;31:1229-37.
12. [12] Keçebas A. Performance and thermo-economic assessments of geothermal district heating system: A case study in Afyon, Turkey. Renewable Energy. 2011;36:77-83.
13. [13] Yildiz A, Ersöz MA. The effect of wind speed on the economical optimum insulation thickness for HVAC duct applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016;55:1289–300.
14. [14] Comaklı K, Yuksel B. Environmental impact of thermal insulation thickness in buildings. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2004;24:933–40.
15. [15] Dombaycı OA. The environmental impact of optimum insulation thickness for external walls of buildings. Building and Environment. 2007;42:3855–9.
16. [16] Yildiz A, Gürlek G, Erkek M, Özbalta N. Economical and environmental analyses of thermal insulation thickness in buildings. Journal of Thermal Science and Technology. 2008;28(2):25-34.
17. [17] Basogul Y, Keçebas A. Economic and environmental impacts of insulation in district heating pipelines. Energy 2011;36:6156-64.
18. [18] Abdallah AM, Krameldin A. Optimum Thermal Design of Steam Pipelines and its Impact on Environment Pollution. HEB; Cairo, Egypt, 1999. p. 57-74.
19. [19] Kumar D, Memon AG, Memon RA, Ali I, Nord N. Parametric study of condensation at heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning duct’s external surface. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology. 2018;39(3):328–42.
20. [20] Baloch MH, Kaloi GS, Memon ZA. Current scenario of the wind energy in Pakistan challenges and future perspectives: A case study. Energy Reports. 2016;2:201-10.
21. [21] Kumar D, Memon RA, Memon AG. Energy Analysis of selected air distribution system of Heating, Ventilation and Air conditioning system: A case study of pharmaceutical company. Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering & Technology. 2017;36(3):746-56.
22. [22] Memon AG, Memon RA. Parametric based economic analysis of a trigeneration system proposed for residential buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2017;34:144-58.
23. [23] Keçebas A, Alkan MA, Bayhan M. Thermo-economic analysis of pipe insulation for district heating piping systems. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2011;31:3929-37.
24. [24] Barzegarian R, Moraveji MK, Aloueyan A. Experimental investigation on heat transfer characteristics and pressure drop of BPHE (brazed plate heat exchanger) using TiO 2 –water nanofluid. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science. 2016;74:11-8.
25. [25] Cengel YA. Heat Transfer: A Practical Approach. 2 ed. USA: McGraw-Hill; 2003.
26. [26] Holman JP. Heat Transfer 10 ed. NewYork, Americas: McGraw-Hill; 2010.
27. [27] Kumar D, Memon RA, Memon AG, Ali I, Junejo A. Critical analysis of the condensation of water vapor at external surface of the duct. Heat and Mass Transfer. 2018;54:1937–50.
28. [28] Kim M, Kim D, Esfahani IJ, Lee S, Kim M, Yoo C. Performance assessment and system optimization of a combined cycle power plant (CCPP) based on exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2016;34(1):6-19.
29. [29] Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority. 2016. Available: http://www.ogra.org.pk/ [assessed on 09.03.2017]
30. [30] Repoter S. Coal prices rise to $81/ton, Dawn Newspaper, Pakistan. 2016. [assessed on 09.03.2017].
31. [31] Pakistan Sugar Mills Association: Chairman's Annual Review (2016). Available: http://www.psmacentre.com/aboutus.php?id=6&type=annual_review&status=1 [assessed on 09.03.2017].
32. [32] Suramaythangkoor T, Gheewala SH. Potential alternatives of heat and power technology application using rice straw in Thailand. Applied Energy 2010;87:128–33.
33. [33] Munir A, Tahir AR, Sabir MS, Ejaz K. Efficiency calculations of bagasse fired boiler on the basis of flue gases temperature and total heat values of steam. Pak J Life Soc Sci. 2004;2:36-9.
34. [34] Ali ZM, Tunio MM, Laghari AJ, Laghari AQ. Cogeneration Technology: Cleaner and Environment Friendly. Quaid-E-Awam University Research Journal of Engineering, Science & Technology. 2016;14:54-6.
35. [35] Lori JA, Lawal AO, Ekanem EJ. Proximate and Ultimate Analyses of Bagasse, Sorghum and Millet Straws as Precursors for active carbons. Journal of Aplied Sciences. 2007;7(21):3249-55.
36. [36] Yadav J, Singh BR. Study on Comparison of Boiler Efficiency Using Husk and Coal as Fuel in Rice Mill. Samriddhi-JPSET. 2011;2(2):1-15.
37. [37] Efomah AN, Gbabo A. The physical, proximate and ultimate analysis of rice husk briquettes produced from a vibratory block mould briquetting machine. IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology. 2015;2(5):814-22.
38. [38] Abbas T, Ahmed Bazmi A, Waheed Bhutto A, Zahedi G. Greener energy: Issues and challenges for Pakistan-geothermal energy prospective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014;31:258-69.
39. [39] Munir A, Alvi JZ, Ashfaq S, Ghafoor A. Performance evaluation of a biomass boiler on the basis of heat loss method and total heat values of steam. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2014;51:209-15.
40. [40] Memon AG, Memon RA, Harijan K, Uqaili MA. Parametric based thermo-environmental and exergoeconomic analyses of a combined cycle power plant with regression analysis and optimization. Energy Conversion and Management. 2015;92:19-35.