FIRST AND SECOND LAW EVALUATION OF COMBINED BRAYTON-ORGANIC RANKINE POWER CYCLE

Year 2020, , 577 - 591, 01.07.2020

Önder Kaşka , Onur Bor , Nehir Tokgöz , Muhammed Aksoy

https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.764299

Cited By: 5

Abstract

In the present work, we have conducted thermodynamic analysis of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) using waste heat from intercooler and regenerator in Brayton cycle with intercooling, reheating, and regeneration (BCIRR). First of all, the first law analysis is used in this combined cycle. Several outputs are revealed in this study such as the cycle efficiencies in Brayton cycle which is dependent on turbine inlet temperature, intercooler pressure ratios, and pinch point temperature difference. For all cycles, produced net power is increased because of increasing turbine inlet temperature. Since heat input to the cycles takes place at high temperatures, the produced net power is increased because of increasing turbine inlet temperature for all cycles. The thermal efficiency of combined cycle is higher about 11.7% than thermal efficiency of Brayton cycle alone. Moreover, the net power produced by ORC has contributed nearly 28650 kW. The percentage losses of exergy for pump, turbine, condenser, preheater I, preheater II, and evaporator are 0.33%, 33%, 22%, 23%, 6%, and16% respectively. The differences of pinch point temperature on ORC net power and efficiencies of ORC are investigated. In addition, exergy efficiencies of components with respect to intercooling pressure ratio and evaporator effectiveness is presented. Exergy destructions are calculated for all the components in ORC.

Keywords

Brayton Cycle, Organic Rankine Cycle, Bottoming Cycle, Pinch Point Temperature, Waste Heat, Energy and Exergy Analysis

References

• [1] He C, Liu C, Gao H, Xie H, Li Y, Wu S, et al. The optimal evaporation temperature and working fluids for subcritical organic Rankine cycle. Energy. 2012;38(1):136-43.
• [2] Carcasci C, Ferraro R, Miliotti E. Thermodynamic analysis of an organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery from gas turbines. Energy. 2014;65:91-100.
• [3] Yari M, Mahmoudi S. Utilization of waste heat from GT-MHR for power generation in organic Rankine cycles. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2010;30(4):366-75.
• [4] Clemente S, Micheli D, Reini M, Taccani R. Bottoming organic Rankine cycle for a small scale gas turbine: A comparison of different solutions. Applied energy. 2013;106:355-64.
• [5] Roy J, Misra A. Parametric optimization and performance analysis of a regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle using R-123 for waste heat recovery. Energy. 2012;39(1):227-35.
• [6] Wang Z, Zhou N, Guo J, Wang X. Fluid selection and parametric optimization of organic Rankine cycle using low temperature waste heat. Energy. 2012;40(1):107-15.
• [7] Sun J, Li W. Operation optimization of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) heat recovery power plant. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2011;31(11-12):2032-41.
• [8] Wei D, Lu X, Lu Z, Gu J. Performance analysis and optimization of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for waste heat recovery. Energy conversion and Management. 2007;48(4):1113-9.
• [9] Ahmadi P, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Exergo-environmental analysis of an integrated organic Rankine cycle for trigeneration. Energy Conversion and Management. 2012;64:447-53.
• [10] Chacartegui R, Sánchez D, Muñoz J, Sánchez T. Alternative ORC bottoming cycles for combined cycle power plants. Applied Energy. 2009;86(10):2162-70.
• [11] Roy J, Mishra M, Misra A. Performance analysis of an Organic Rankine Cycle with superheating under different heat source temperature conditions. Applied Energy. 2011;88(9):2995-3004.
• [12] Liu B-T, Chien K-H, Wang C-C. Effect of working fluids on organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery. Energy. 2004;29(8):1207-17.
• [13] Meinel D, Wieland C, Spliethoff H. Effect and comparison of different working fluids on a two-stage organic rankine cycle (ORC) concept. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2014;63(1):246-53.
• [14] Cao Y, Gao Y, Zheng Y, Dai Y. Optimum design and thermodynamic analysis of a gas turbine and ORC combined cycle with recuperators. Energy Conversion and Management. 2016;116:32-41.
• [15] Eveloy V, Karunkeyoon W, Rodgers P, Al Alili A. Energy, exergy and economic analysis of an integrated solid oxide fuel cell–gas turbine–organic Rankine power generation system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2016;41(31):13843-58.
• [16] Kaşka Ö. Energy and exergy analysis of an organic Rankine for power generation from waste heat recovery in steel industry. Energy Conversion and Management. 2014;77:108-17.
• [17] Camporeale SM, Pantaleo AM, Ciliberti PD, Fortunato B. Cycle configuration analysis and techno-economic sensitivity of biomass externally fired gas turbine with bottoming ORC. Energy conversion and management. 2015;105:1239-50.
• [18] Maraver D, Royo J, Lemort V, Quoilin S. Systematic optimization of subcritical and transcritical organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) constrained by technical parameters in multiple applications. Applied energy. 2014;117:11-29.
• [19] Li Y-R, Wang J-N, Du M-T. Influence of coupled pinch point temperature difference and evaporation temperature on performance of organic Rankine cycle. Energy. 2012;42(1):503-9.
• [20] Tian H, Shu G, Wei H, Liang X, Liu L. Fluids and parameters optimization for the organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) used in exhaust heat recovery of Internal Combustion Engine (ICE). Energy. 2012;47(1):125-36.
• [21] Karellas S, Leontaritis A-D, Panousis G, Bellos E, Kakaras E. Energetic and exergetic analysis of waste heat recovery systems in the cement industry. Energy. 2013;58:147-56.
• [22] Hajabdollahi Z, Hajabdollahi F, Tehrani M, Hajabdollahi H. Thermo-economic environmental optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle for diesel waste heat recovery. Energy. 2013;63:142-51.
• [23] Astolfi M, Romano MC, Bombarda P, Macchi E. Binary ORC (Organic Rankine Cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources–Part B: Techno-economic optimization. Energy. 2014;66:435-46.
• [24] Guo C, Du X, Yang L, Yang Y. Performance analysis of organic Rankine cycle based on location of heat transfer pinch point in evaporator. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2014;62(1):176-86.
• [25] Tuo H. Energy and exergy‐based working fluid selection for organic Rankine cycle recovering waste heat from high temperature solid oxide fuel cell and gas turbine hybrid systems. International Journal of Energy Research. 2013;37(14):1831-41.
• [26] Bademlioglu AH. Exergy analysis of the organic rankine cycle based on the pinch point temperature difference. Journal of Thermal Engineering. 2019;5(3):157-65.
• [27] Özdemir E. THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF BASIC AND REGENERATIVE ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLES USING DRY FLUIDS FROM WASTE HEAT RECOVERY. Journal of Thermal Engineering. 2018;4(5):2381-93.
• [28] Koroglu T. Advanced exergy analysis of an organic Rankine cycle waste heat recovery system of a marine power plant. Journal of Thermal Engineering. 2017;3(2):1136-48.
• [29] Kerme E, Orfi J. Exergy-based thermodynamic analysis of solar driven organic Rankine cycle. Journal of Thermal Engineering. 2015;1(5):192-202.
• [30] Klein SA. Engineering Equation Solver (EES) for Microsoft Windows Operating System: Academic Professional Version. F-Chart Software, Madison, WI. 2012.
• [31] Cangel Y, Boles MA. Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach 4th Edition in SI Units. Singapore (SI): McGraw-Hill. 2002.
• [32] Wu C, Chen L, Sun F. Performance of a regenerative Brayton heat engine. Energy. 1996;21(2):71-6.
• [33] Kaushik S, Tyagi S, Singhal M. Parametric study of an irreversible regenerative Brayton cycle with isothermal heat addition. Energy Conversion and Management. 2003;44(12):2013-25.
• [34] Al-Sulaiman FA, Dincer I, Hamdullahpur F. Exergy modeling of a new solar driven trigeneration system. Solar Energy. 2011;85(9):2228-43.