Application of an Aggregation Technique to Facility Layout Design Selection

Year 2017, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 1078 - 1088, 12.12.2016

Serkan Altuntas

https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.290266

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Facility layout in manufacturing and service systems affects the productivity and efficiency of the systems.
Generally, more than one appropriate location is available based on associations among facilities. This leads to
alternative facility layout designs. It is not an easy activity to select the best facility layout design among
alternatives for facility engineers and decision makers. Many number of ranking of alternative facility layout
designs can be generated by the use of different approaches. However, rankings obtained from these approaches
do not suggest unique ranking. In this study, an aggregation technique is conducted to sort facility layout design
alternatives generated by multiple conventional approaches. It is mainly based on a linear programming
model. The results of this study show that alternative facility layout designs can be easily ranked in descending
order by the aggregation technique. 

Keywords

Facility layout, Facility design, Facility location

References

• [1] Altuntas, S., Selim, H. (2012). “Facility layout using weighted association rule-based data mining algorithms:
• Evaluation with simulation”. Expert Systems with Applications, 39: 3–13.
• [2] Altuntas S., Selim H., Dereli T. (2014). “A fuzzy DEMATEL based solution approach for facility layout
• problem: A case study”. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 73, 749-771.
• [3] Ulutas, B., Islier, A.A. (2015). “Dynamic facility layout problem in footwear industry”. Journal of
• Manufacturing Systems, 36, 55–61.
• [4] Ertay, T., Ruan, D., Tuzkaya, U.R. (2006). “Integrating data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy for
• the facility layout design in manufacturing systems”. Information Sciences, 176:237–262.
• [5] Rajasekharan, M., Peters, B.A., Yang, T. (1998). “A genetic algorithm for facility layout design in flexible
• manufacturing systems”. International Journal of Production Research, 36: 1998.