OPTIMIZATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF VAPOUR COMPRESSION CYCLE USING LIQUID SUCTION LINE HEAT EXCHANGER

Year 2020, Volume: 6 Issue: 2 - Issue Name: Special Issue 11: 10th Eureca Conference Taylor's University Malaysia, Subangiaya, Malaysia, 201 - 210, 30.03.2020

Abdulkareem Shafiq Mahdi Al-obaidi Ali Naif Thabit Khalifa Al- Harthi

https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.730765

Cited By: 1

Abstract

One of the most commonly used refrigeration systems is vapour compression refrigeration system. As saving
energy remains a challenge, researchers are putting a lot of efforts into finding efficient solution to improve the performance
of vapour compression refrigeration systems. Mechanical subcooling and Liquid Suction Line Heat Exchanger (LSLHX)
are approaches that have shown to improve the performance of Vapour Compression Cycle (VCC) systems. This
experimental study is conducted to achieve two objectives. First objective is to optimize the heat source and heat sink water
volumetric flow rate combination that results in the best performance. In order to evaluate the effect of using subcooling
cycle and LSLHX cycle, different flow rate combinations are studied and analysed. Then, to optimize the heat source and
heat sink water volumetric flow rate combination that outcome in the optimum performance. Second objective is to
optimize the system performance through implementing subcooling and LSLHX. At the optimum water flow rates, the
basic VCC performance of the designed system showed better performance compared to the published data. The system
performance was improved by 10% at the optimum flow rate when solely subcooling was used while deteriorated by 47.5%
at full LSLHX.

Keywords

Coefficient of Performance, Liquid Suction Line Heat Exchanger, Subcooling, Vapour Compression Cycle

References

• [1] Kubota T, Jeong S, Toe DHC, Ossen DR. Energy consumption and air-conditioning usage in residential buildings of Malaysia. J Int Dev Coop, 2011;17(3):61-9.
• [2] Naif A, Al-Obaidi ASM, Nassir MH. Effect of evaporator heater power input and refrigerant flow rate on the performance of a refrigerator - Developing empirical models. J Mech Eng Autom, 2015; 5(1):20-8. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.jmea.20150501.03.
• [3] Park C, Lee H, Hwang Y, Radermacher R. Recent advances in vapor compression cycle technologies. Int J Refrig, 2015;60:118-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2015.08.005.
• [4] Qureshi BA, Zubair SM. Mechanical sub-cooling vapor compression systems: Current status and future directions. Int J Refrig, 2013; 36(8):2097-2110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2013.07.026.
• [5] Pottker G, Hrnjak P. Effect of the condenser subcooling on the performance of vapor compression systems. Int J Refrig, 2015;50:156-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2014.11.003.
• [6] Aprea C, Ascani M, de Rossi F. A criterion for predicting the possible advantage of adopting a suction / liquid heat exchanger in refrigerating system. Appl Therm Eng, 1999;19(4):329-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359- 4311(98)00070-2.
• [7] Domanski PA, Didion D.A, Doyle JP. Evaluation of suction-line/liquid -line heat exchange in the refrigeration cycle. Int J Refrig, 1994;17(7):487-93.
• [8] Klein SA, Reindl DT, Brownell K. Refrigeration system performance using liquid-suction heat exchangers. Int J Refrig, 2000;23(8):588-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-7007(00)00008-6.
• [9] Navarro-esbrí J, Molés F, Barragán-cervera Á. Experimental analysis of the internal heat exchanger influence on a vapour compression system performance working with R1234yf as a drop-in replacement for R134a. Appl Therm Eng, 2013;59(1-2):153-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.05.028.
• [10] Pottker G, Hrnjak P. Experimental investigation of the effect of condenser subcooling in R134a and R1234yf air-conditioning systems with and without internal heat exchanger. Int J Refrig, 2015;50:104-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2014.10.023.
• [11] Devecioğlu AG, Oruç V. The influence of plate-type heat exchanger on energy efficiency and environmental effects of the air-conditioners using R453A as a substitute for R22. Appl Therm Eng, 2017;112: 1364-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.10.180.
• [12] Zhang J, Desideri A, Kærn MR, Ommen TS, Wronski J, Haglind F. Flow boiling heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of R134a , R1234yf and R1234ze in a plate heat exchanger with conditions prevailing in the evaporator of organic Rankine cycle units. Int J Heat Mass Transf, 2017;108(Part B): 1787-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.01.026.
• [13] Imran M, Usman M, Yang Y, Park B-S. Flow boiling of R245fa in the brazed plate heat exchanger: Thermal and hydraulic performance assessment. Int J Heat Mass Transf, 2017;110:657-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.03.070.
• [14] Longo GA, Gasparella A. Refrigerant R134a vaporisation heat transfer and pressure drop inside a small brazed plate heat exchanger. Int J Refrig, 2007;30(5):821-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2006.11.011.
• [15] Yan Y-Y, Lin T-F. Evaporation heat transfer and pressure drop of refrigerant R-134a in a plate heat exchanger. J Heat Transf, 1999;121(1):118-27. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2825924.
• [16] Jassim EW, Newell TA, Chato JC. Refrigerant pressure drop in chevron and bumpy style flat plate heat exchangers. Exp Therm Fluid Sci, 2006;30(3):213-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2005.05.008.
• [17] Huang J, Sheer TJ, Bailey-Mcewan M. Heat transfer and pressure drop in plate heat exchanger refrigerant evaporators. Int J Refrig, 2012;35(2):325-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2011.11.002.
• [18] Rahman MM, Rahman HY. Hydrocarbon as refrigerant for domestic air conditioner : a comparative study between R22 and R290. Therm Eng, 2012;53:11976-79.