Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2023, Volume: 9 Issue: 5, 1272 - 1290, 17.10.2023
https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.1376826

Abstract

References

  • REFERENCES
  • [1] Tsatsaronis G, Winhold M. Exergoeconomic analysis and evaluation of energy-conversion plants-I. A new general methodology. Energy 1985;10:6980. [CrossRef]
  • [2] Abusoglu A, Kanoglu M. Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of combined heat and power production: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2009;13:22952308. [CrossRef]
  • [3] Tsatsaronis G. Exergoeconomics: Is it only a new name?. Chem Eng Technol 1996;19:163169. [CrossRef]
  • [4] Gorji-Bandpy M, Ebrahimian V. Exergoeconomic analysis of gas turbine power plants. Int Energy J 2006;7:5767.
  • [5] Tsatsaronis G, Lin L, Pisa J. Exergy costing in exergoeconomics. J Energy Resour Technol 1993;115:916. [CrossRef]
  • [6] Zhang G, Hua B, Chen Q. Exergoeconomic methodology for analysis and optimization of process systems. Comput Chem Eng 2000;24:613618. [CrossRef]
  • [7] Ozdil NF, Tantekin A, Pekdur A. Thermodynamic, economic and environmental assessments in a cogeneration power plant. Energy Sources Part A: Recov Util Environ Eff 2020;42:149169.
  • [8] Balafkandeh S, Zare V, Gholamian E. Multi-objective optimization of a tri-generation system based on biomass gasification/digestion combined with S-CO2 cycle and absorption chiller. Energy Convers Manag 2019;200:112057. [CrossRef]
  • [9] Gholamian E, Habibollahzade A, Zare V. Development and multi-objective optimization of geothermal-based organic Rankine cycle integrated with thermoelectric generator and proton exchange membrane electrolyzer for power and hydrogen production. Energy Convers Manag 2018;174:112125. [CrossRef]
  • [10] Motamed MA, Nord LO. Assessment of organic rankine cycle part-load performance as gas turbine bottoming cycle with variable area nozzle turbine technology. Energies 2021;14:7916. [CrossRef]
  • [11] Ozdil NFT, Pekdur A. Energy and exergy assessment of a cogeneration system in food industry: a case study. Int J Exergy 2016;20:254268.
  • [12] Ozdil NFT, Tantekin A. Exergoeconomic analysis of a FBCC steam power plant. Therm Sci 2017;21:19751984. [CrossRef]
  • [13] Ozdil NF, Tantekin A, Pekdur A. Performance assessment of a cogeneration system in food industry. J Therm Eng 2018;4:18471854. [CrossRef]
  • [14] Tantekin A, Ozdil NF. Thermodynamic analysis of a fluidized bed coal combustor steam plant in textile industry. J Therm Eng 2017;3:16071614. [CrossRef]
  • [15] Fellah GM, Mghrebi FA, Aboghres SM. Exergoeconomic analysis for unit Gt14 of South Tripoli gas turbine power plant. Jordan J Mech Ind Eng 2010;4:507516.
  • [16] Yucer CT. Thermodynamic analysis of the part load performance for a small scale gas turbine jet engine by using exergy analysis method. Energy 2016;111:251259. [CrossRef]
  • [17] Li Y, Zhang G, Bai Z, Song X, Wang L, Yang Y. Backpressure adjustable gas turbine combined cycle: A method to improve part-load efficiency. Energy Convers Manag 2018;174:739754. [CrossRef]
  • [18] Liu T, Zhang G, Li Y, Yang Y. Performance analysis of partially recuperative gas turbine combined cycle under off-design conditions. Energy Convers Manag 2018;162:5565. [CrossRef]
  • [19] Bakhshmand SK, Saray RK, Bahlouli K, Eftekhari H, Ebrahimi A. Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a triple-pressure combined cycle plant using evolutionary algorithm. Energy 2015;93:555567. [CrossRef]
  • [20] Sahin AZ, Al-Sharafi A, Yilbas BS, Khaliq A. Overall performance assessment of a combined cycle power plant: an exergo-economic analysis. Energy Convers Manag 2016;116:91100. [CrossRef]
  • [21] Ameri M, Ahmadi P, Hamidi A. Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a steam power plant: A case study. Int J Energy Res 2009;33:499512. [CrossRef]
  • [22] Variny M, Mierka O. Improvement of part load efficiency of a combined cycle power plant provisioning ancillary services. Appl Energy 2009;86:888894. [CrossRef]
  • [23] Soltani S, Mahmoudi SMS, Yari M, Morosuk T, Rosen MA, Zare V. A comparative exergoeconomic analysis of two biomass and co-firing combined power plants. Energy Convers Manag 2013;76:8391. [CrossRef]
  • [24] Khanmohammadi S, Azimian AR. Exergoeconomic evaluation of a two-pressure level fired combined-cycle power plant. J Energy Eng 2015;141:04014014. [CrossRef]
  • [25] Mehrpooya M, Taromi M, Ghorbani B. Thermo-economic assessment and retrofitting of an existing electrical power plant with solar energy under different operational modes and part load conditions. Energy Rep 2019;5:11371150. [CrossRef]
  • [26] Najjar YS, Alalul OF, Abu-Shamleh A. Degradation analysis of a combined cycle heat recovery steam generator under full and part load conditions. Sustain Energy Technol Assess. 2020;37:100587. [CrossRef]
  • [27] Jonshagen K. Exhaust Gas Recirculation to Improve Part Load Performance on Combined Cycle Power Plants. In: ASME Turbo Expo 2016: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, 2016. p. V003T06A004. [CrossRef]
  • [28] Maheshwari M, Singh O. Exergy analysis of intercooled reheat combined cycle with ammonia water mixture based bottoming cycle. Appl Therm Eng 2017;121:820827. [CrossRef]
  • [29] Song TW, Sohn JL, Kim JH, Kim TS, Ro ST. Exergy-based performance analysis of the heavy-duty gas turbine in part-load operating conditions. Exergy Int J 2002;2:105112. [CrossRef]
  • [30] Ganjehkaviri A, Jaafar MM, Ahmadi P, Barzegaravval H. Modelling and optimization of combined cycle power plant based on exergoeconomic and environmental analyses. Appl Therm Eng 2014;67:566578. [CrossRef]
  • [31] Liu Z, Karimi IA. Simulation and optimization of a combined cycle gas turbine power plant for part-load operation. Chem Eng Res Des 2018;131:2940. [CrossRef]
  • [32] Baghernejad A, Yaghoubi M. Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of an Integrated Solar Combined Cycle System (ISCCS) using genetic algorithm. Energy Convers Manag 2011;52:21932203. [CrossRef]
  • [33] Lorencin I, Anđelić N, Mrzljak V, Car Z. Genetic algorithm approach to design of multi-layer perceptron for combined cycle power plant electrical power output estimation. Energies 2019;12:4352. [CrossRef]
  • [34] Dawo F, Wieland C, Spliethoff H. Kalina power plant part load modeling: Comparison of different approaches to model part load behavior and validation on real operating data. Energy 2019;174:625637. [CrossRef]
  • [35] Sanjay Y, Singh O, Prasad BN. Energy and exergy analysis of steam cooled reheat gas-steam combined cycle. Appl Therm Eng 2007;27:27792790. [CrossRef]
  • [36] Zare V, Mahmoudi SMS. A thermodynamic comparison between organic Rankine and Kalina cycles for waste heat recovery from the Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor. Energy 2015;79:398406. [CrossRef]
  • [37] Yari M, Mahmoudi SMS. Utilization of waste heat from GT-MHR for power generation in organic Rankine cycles. Appl Therm Eng 2010;30:366375. [CrossRef]
  • [38] Yari M, Mehr AS, Zare V, Mahmoudi SMS, Rosen MA. Exergoeconomic comparison of TLC (trilateral Rankine cycle), ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and Kalina cycle using a low grade heat source. Energy 2015;83:712722. [CrossRef]
  • [39] Bolz RE. CRC Handbook of Tables for Applied Engineering Science. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 1973.
  • [40] Cengel YA, Boles MA. Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2002.
  • [41] Maheshwari M, Singh O. Thermo-economic analysis of combined cycle configurations with intercooling and reheating. Energy 2020;25:118049. [CrossRef]
  • [42] Prakash D, Singh O. Thermo-economic study of combined cycle power plant with carbon capture and methanation. J Clean Product 2019;231:529542. [CrossRef]
  • [43] Singh R, Singh O. Comparative study of combined solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine-Organic Rankine cycle for different working fluid in bottoming cycle. Energy Convers Manag 2018;171:659670. [CrossRef]
  • [44] Owebor K, Oko COC, Diemuodeke EO, Ogorure OJ. Thermo-environmental and economic analysis of an integrated municipal waste-to-energy solid oxide fuel cell, gas-, steam-, organic fluid-and absorption refrigeration cycle thermal power plants. Appl Energy 2019;239:13851401. [CrossRef]
  • [45] Campbell JM. Gas Conditioning and Processing, Vol. 1, the Basic Principals. 8th ed. Norman, Oklahoma: Campbell Petroleum Series; 2001.
  • [46] Gulen SC. A more accurate way to calculate the cost of electricity. Power 2011;155:6265.
  • [47] Central Electricity Regulatory Commission New Delhi. Tariff (Regulation) norms 2014, order no. L-1/144/2013/CERC. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission New Delhi.

Exergoeconomic study of reheat combined cycle configurations using steam and ammonia-water mixture for bottoming cycle parameters

Year 2023, Volume: 9 Issue: 5, 1272 - 1290, 17.10.2023
https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.1376826

Abstract

The use of combined cycle power plants though had led the pathway to maximize the fuel en-ergy utilization but the part-load operation of these plants is of concern. In this work, an exer-goeconomic comparison of 11 different reheat combined cycle arrangements hasbeen carried out under their part-load operations for varying bottoming cycle parametersnamely steam-bleedfraction, deaerator pressure,separator temperature, absorber pressure, and condenser pressure.The results depict that the absorber has the highest exergy destruction with second law efficiency of 23.55% at thepart load of 25% for the combined cycle power plant having high pressure drum with steam as working fluid and low pressure drum with ammonia-wa-ter as working fluid. The comparison also shows the highest cost of electricity production as 0.1243USD/kWh for the combined cycle power plant having ammonia-water as working fluid in bottoming cycle and operating at part load of 25%. While the minimum price of electricity produced is 0.05USD/kWh at 25% part load for CCPP having double pressure HRVG’s at condenser pressure of 0.09 bar.

References

  • REFERENCES
  • [1] Tsatsaronis G, Winhold M. Exergoeconomic analysis and evaluation of energy-conversion plants-I. A new general methodology. Energy 1985;10:6980. [CrossRef]
  • [2] Abusoglu A, Kanoglu M. Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of combined heat and power production: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2009;13:22952308. [CrossRef]
  • [3] Tsatsaronis G. Exergoeconomics: Is it only a new name?. Chem Eng Technol 1996;19:163169. [CrossRef]
  • [4] Gorji-Bandpy M, Ebrahimian V. Exergoeconomic analysis of gas turbine power plants. Int Energy J 2006;7:5767.
  • [5] Tsatsaronis G, Lin L, Pisa J. Exergy costing in exergoeconomics. J Energy Resour Technol 1993;115:916. [CrossRef]
  • [6] Zhang G, Hua B, Chen Q. Exergoeconomic methodology for analysis and optimization of process systems. Comput Chem Eng 2000;24:613618. [CrossRef]
  • [7] Ozdil NF, Tantekin A, Pekdur A. Thermodynamic, economic and environmental assessments in a cogeneration power plant. Energy Sources Part A: Recov Util Environ Eff 2020;42:149169.
  • [8] Balafkandeh S, Zare V, Gholamian E. Multi-objective optimization of a tri-generation system based on biomass gasification/digestion combined with S-CO2 cycle and absorption chiller. Energy Convers Manag 2019;200:112057. [CrossRef]
  • [9] Gholamian E, Habibollahzade A, Zare V. Development and multi-objective optimization of geothermal-based organic Rankine cycle integrated with thermoelectric generator and proton exchange membrane electrolyzer for power and hydrogen production. Energy Convers Manag 2018;174:112125. [CrossRef]
  • [10] Motamed MA, Nord LO. Assessment of organic rankine cycle part-load performance as gas turbine bottoming cycle with variable area nozzle turbine technology. Energies 2021;14:7916. [CrossRef]
  • [11] Ozdil NFT, Pekdur A. Energy and exergy assessment of a cogeneration system in food industry: a case study. Int J Exergy 2016;20:254268.
  • [12] Ozdil NFT, Tantekin A. Exergoeconomic analysis of a FBCC steam power plant. Therm Sci 2017;21:19751984. [CrossRef]
  • [13] Ozdil NF, Tantekin A, Pekdur A. Performance assessment of a cogeneration system in food industry. J Therm Eng 2018;4:18471854. [CrossRef]
  • [14] Tantekin A, Ozdil NF. Thermodynamic analysis of a fluidized bed coal combustor steam plant in textile industry. J Therm Eng 2017;3:16071614. [CrossRef]
  • [15] Fellah GM, Mghrebi FA, Aboghres SM. Exergoeconomic analysis for unit Gt14 of South Tripoli gas turbine power plant. Jordan J Mech Ind Eng 2010;4:507516.
  • [16] Yucer CT. Thermodynamic analysis of the part load performance for a small scale gas turbine jet engine by using exergy analysis method. Energy 2016;111:251259. [CrossRef]
  • [17] Li Y, Zhang G, Bai Z, Song X, Wang L, Yang Y. Backpressure adjustable gas turbine combined cycle: A method to improve part-load efficiency. Energy Convers Manag 2018;174:739754. [CrossRef]
  • [18] Liu T, Zhang G, Li Y, Yang Y. Performance analysis of partially recuperative gas turbine combined cycle under off-design conditions. Energy Convers Manag 2018;162:5565. [CrossRef]
  • [19] Bakhshmand SK, Saray RK, Bahlouli K, Eftekhari H, Ebrahimi A. Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a triple-pressure combined cycle plant using evolutionary algorithm. Energy 2015;93:555567. [CrossRef]
  • [20] Sahin AZ, Al-Sharafi A, Yilbas BS, Khaliq A. Overall performance assessment of a combined cycle power plant: an exergo-economic analysis. Energy Convers Manag 2016;116:91100. [CrossRef]
  • [21] Ameri M, Ahmadi P, Hamidi A. Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a steam power plant: A case study. Int J Energy Res 2009;33:499512. [CrossRef]
  • [22] Variny M, Mierka O. Improvement of part load efficiency of a combined cycle power plant provisioning ancillary services. Appl Energy 2009;86:888894. [CrossRef]
  • [23] Soltani S, Mahmoudi SMS, Yari M, Morosuk T, Rosen MA, Zare V. A comparative exergoeconomic analysis of two biomass and co-firing combined power plants. Energy Convers Manag 2013;76:8391. [CrossRef]
  • [24] Khanmohammadi S, Azimian AR. Exergoeconomic evaluation of a two-pressure level fired combined-cycle power plant. J Energy Eng 2015;141:04014014. [CrossRef]
  • [25] Mehrpooya M, Taromi M, Ghorbani B. Thermo-economic assessment and retrofitting of an existing electrical power plant with solar energy under different operational modes and part load conditions. Energy Rep 2019;5:11371150. [CrossRef]
  • [26] Najjar YS, Alalul OF, Abu-Shamleh A. Degradation analysis of a combined cycle heat recovery steam generator under full and part load conditions. Sustain Energy Technol Assess. 2020;37:100587. [CrossRef]
  • [27] Jonshagen K. Exhaust Gas Recirculation to Improve Part Load Performance on Combined Cycle Power Plants. In: ASME Turbo Expo 2016: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, 2016. p. V003T06A004. [CrossRef]
  • [28] Maheshwari M, Singh O. Exergy analysis of intercooled reheat combined cycle with ammonia water mixture based bottoming cycle. Appl Therm Eng 2017;121:820827. [CrossRef]
  • [29] Song TW, Sohn JL, Kim JH, Kim TS, Ro ST. Exergy-based performance analysis of the heavy-duty gas turbine in part-load operating conditions. Exergy Int J 2002;2:105112. [CrossRef]
  • [30] Ganjehkaviri A, Jaafar MM, Ahmadi P, Barzegaravval H. Modelling and optimization of combined cycle power plant based on exergoeconomic and environmental analyses. Appl Therm Eng 2014;67:566578. [CrossRef]
  • [31] Liu Z, Karimi IA. Simulation and optimization of a combined cycle gas turbine power plant for part-load operation. Chem Eng Res Des 2018;131:2940. [CrossRef]
  • [32] Baghernejad A, Yaghoubi M. Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of an Integrated Solar Combined Cycle System (ISCCS) using genetic algorithm. Energy Convers Manag 2011;52:21932203. [CrossRef]
  • [33] Lorencin I, Anđelić N, Mrzljak V, Car Z. Genetic algorithm approach to design of multi-layer perceptron for combined cycle power plant electrical power output estimation. Energies 2019;12:4352. [CrossRef]
  • [34] Dawo F, Wieland C, Spliethoff H. Kalina power plant part load modeling: Comparison of different approaches to model part load behavior and validation on real operating data. Energy 2019;174:625637. [CrossRef]
  • [35] Sanjay Y, Singh O, Prasad BN. Energy and exergy analysis of steam cooled reheat gas-steam combined cycle. Appl Therm Eng 2007;27:27792790. [CrossRef]
  • [36] Zare V, Mahmoudi SMS. A thermodynamic comparison between organic Rankine and Kalina cycles for waste heat recovery from the Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor. Energy 2015;79:398406. [CrossRef]
  • [37] Yari M, Mahmoudi SMS. Utilization of waste heat from GT-MHR for power generation in organic Rankine cycles. Appl Therm Eng 2010;30:366375. [CrossRef]
  • [38] Yari M, Mehr AS, Zare V, Mahmoudi SMS, Rosen MA. Exergoeconomic comparison of TLC (trilateral Rankine cycle), ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and Kalina cycle using a low grade heat source. Energy 2015;83:712722. [CrossRef]
  • [39] Bolz RE. CRC Handbook of Tables for Applied Engineering Science. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 1973.
  • [40] Cengel YA, Boles MA. Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2002.
  • [41] Maheshwari M, Singh O. Thermo-economic analysis of combined cycle configurations with intercooling and reheating. Energy 2020;25:118049. [CrossRef]
  • [42] Prakash D, Singh O. Thermo-economic study of combined cycle power plant with carbon capture and methanation. J Clean Product 2019;231:529542. [CrossRef]
  • [43] Singh R, Singh O. Comparative study of combined solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine-Organic Rankine cycle for different working fluid in bottoming cycle. Energy Convers Manag 2018;171:659670. [CrossRef]
  • [44] Owebor K, Oko COC, Diemuodeke EO, Ogorure OJ. Thermo-environmental and economic analysis of an integrated municipal waste-to-energy solid oxide fuel cell, gas-, steam-, organic fluid-and absorption refrigeration cycle thermal power plants. Appl Energy 2019;239:13851401. [CrossRef]
  • [45] Campbell JM. Gas Conditioning and Processing, Vol. 1, the Basic Principals. 8th ed. Norman, Oklahoma: Campbell Petroleum Series; 2001.
  • [46] Gulen SC. A more accurate way to calculate the cost of electricity. Power 2011;155:6265.
  • [47] Central Electricity Regulatory Commission New Delhi. Tariff (Regulation) norms 2014, order no. L-1/144/2013/CERC. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission New Delhi.
There are 48 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Thermodynamics and Statistical Physics
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mayank Maheshwarı This is me 0000-0001-5364-8685

Onkar Sıngh This is me 0000-0003-2294-8487

Publication Date October 17, 2023
Submission Date January 8, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 9 Issue: 5

Cite

APA Maheshwarı, M., & Sıngh, O. (2023). Exergoeconomic study of reheat combined cycle configurations using steam and ammonia-water mixture for bottoming cycle parameters. Journal of Thermal Engineering, 9(5), 1272-1290. https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.1376826
AMA Maheshwarı M, Sıngh O. Exergoeconomic study of reheat combined cycle configurations using steam and ammonia-water mixture for bottoming cycle parameters. Journal of Thermal Engineering. October 2023;9(5):1272-1290. doi:10.18186/thermal.1376826
Chicago Maheshwarı, Mayank, and Onkar Sıngh. “Exergoeconomic Study of Reheat Combined Cycle Configurations Using Steam and Ammonia-Water Mixture for Bottoming Cycle Parameters”. Journal of Thermal Engineering 9, no. 5 (October 2023): 1272-90. https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.1376826.
EndNote Maheshwarı M, Sıngh O (October 1, 2023) Exergoeconomic study of reheat combined cycle configurations using steam and ammonia-water mixture for bottoming cycle parameters. Journal of Thermal Engineering 9 5 1272–1290.
IEEE M. Maheshwarı and O. Sıngh, “Exergoeconomic study of reheat combined cycle configurations using steam and ammonia-water mixture for bottoming cycle parameters”, Journal of Thermal Engineering, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1272–1290, 2023, doi: 10.18186/thermal.1376826.
ISNAD Maheshwarı, Mayank - Sıngh, Onkar. “Exergoeconomic Study of Reheat Combined Cycle Configurations Using Steam and Ammonia-Water Mixture for Bottoming Cycle Parameters”. Journal of Thermal Engineering 9/5 (October 2023), 1272-1290. https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.1376826.
JAMA Maheshwarı M, Sıngh O. Exergoeconomic study of reheat combined cycle configurations using steam and ammonia-water mixture for bottoming cycle parameters. Journal of Thermal Engineering. 2023;9:1272–1290.
MLA Maheshwarı, Mayank and Onkar Sıngh. “Exergoeconomic Study of Reheat Combined Cycle Configurations Using Steam and Ammonia-Water Mixture for Bottoming Cycle Parameters”. Journal of Thermal Engineering, vol. 9, no. 5, 2023, pp. 1272-90, doi:10.18186/thermal.1376826.
Vancouver Maheshwarı M, Sıngh O. Exergoeconomic study of reheat combined cycle configurations using steam and ammonia-water mixture for bottoming cycle parameters. Journal of Thermal Engineering. 2023;9(5):1272-90.

IMPORTANT NOTE: JOURNAL SUBMISSION LINK http://eds.yildiz.edu.tr/journal-of-thermal-engineering