AN EVALUATION OF BIOPHILIC DESIGN CRITERIAS IN PLACES

Year 2022, Volume: 21 Issue: 41, 95 - 116, 28.06.2022

Hazel İrem İrfanoğlu , Leyla Suri

https://doi.org/10.55071/ticaretfbd.1115254

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Today, living spaces with higher floors and smaller field of use are the interior places where people’s time is mostly spent. With the new understanding of normal life, this situation has become a necessity rather than a choice, and beneficial contact with nature has inevitably been prevented. Biophilic design is not only a functional and visual discipline, but also a design approach that provides mental well-being. From this point of view the importance of biophilic design was emphasized based on its effects on human life and body, importance of bringing places that are limited by the standards of nature together with nature for human and society, and necessity of applying biophilic design criteria in the environment and interior spaces which the building is in was highlighted.

Keywords

Biophilic Design, Biophilic Design for Indoor and Outdoor, Design In Modern Life, Natural Materials, Place and Nature.

BİYOFİLİK TASARIM KRİTERLERİNİN MEKANLAR ÜZERİNDEN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Abstract

Günümüzde kat yükseklikleri artan ve kullanım alanları küçülen yaşam alanları zamanın büyük çoğunluğunun geçirildiği iç mekanlardır. Yeni normal hayat anlayışı ile bu durum tercihten çok zorunluluk haline gelmiş ve doğa ile olan faydalı temas kaçınılmaz olarak engellenmiştir. Biyofilik tasarım yalnızca işlevsel ve görsel disiplin değil, aynı zamanda zihinsel refahı da sağlayan bir tasarım anlayışıdır. Buradan hareketle çalışmada insan hayatı ve insan bedeni üzerindeki etkilerinden yola çıkarak biyofilik tasarımın ne denli önemli olduğu vurgulanmış, günümüzün doğa açısından kısıtlanmış mekanlarını doğayla buluşturmanın insan ve toplum açısından önemine değinilmiş ve yapının içinde bulunduğu çevre ve iç mekânda biyofilik tasarım kriterlerinin uygulanmasının gerekliliği vurgulanmıştır.

Keywords

Biyofilik Tasarım, Doğal Malzeme, İç ve Dış Mekânda Biyofilik Tasarım, Mekân ve Doğa, Modern Yaşamda Tasarım.

References

• Balling, J.D. & Falk, J.H. (1982). Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment and Behavior, 14(1), 5-28.
• Bringslimark, T., Harting T. & Patil, G.G. (2007). Phychological benefits of ındoor plants in workplace: putting experimental results ınto context. American Society for Horticultural Science 42(3), 581-587.
• Coulthard, S. (2020). Biophilia: you, nature, home. Kyle Books. London.
• Çorakçi, R. E. (2016). İç mimarlıkta biyofilik tasarım ilkelerinin belirlenmesi[Doktora Tezi]. Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. İstanbul.
• Erwin, E.A., Custis, N. & Ronmark, E. (2005). Asthma and indoor air: contrasts in the dose response to cat and dust-mite. Indoor air. 15(10), 33-39.
• European Commission Science for Environment Policy. (2015). Thematic issue: noise impacts on health, Science for Environment Policy, 47.
• Fell, D.R. (2010). Wood In the human environment: restorative properties of wood ın the built ındoor environment [PhD thesis], The University of British Columbia. Columbia.
• Fromm, E. (1964). The heart of man. Harper & Row Publishers. New York.
• Gustafsson, E.U. (1992). The relevance of sleep, circadian rhythm and lifestyle as related to a holistic theory of health. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 6(1), 29-35.
• Kellert, S.R. (2014). Biophilia and biomimicry: Evolutionary adaptation of human versus nonhuman nature. Intelligent Buildings International, 8(2), 51-56.
• Kellert, S. & Calabrese, E. (2015). The practice of biophilic design. www.biophilic-design.com adresinden 01 Mayıs 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır.
• Kim, G.W., Jeong, G.W., Kim, T.H., Baek, H.S., Oh, S.K., Kang, H.K., Lee, S.G., Kim, Y.S. & Song, J.K. (2010). Functional neuroanatomy associated with natural and urban scenic views ın the human brain: 3.0T Functional MR imaging. Korean Journal of Radiology 11(5), 507-513.
• Lynn, C.D. (2013). The Psychophysiology of fireside relaxation. American Journal of Human Biology, 25 265-265.
• Nature and Forest Therapy. (2018). The Science. www.natureandforesttherapy.org/about/science adresinden 01 Mayıs 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır.
• NHS, (2022). Evidence of Benefits. nhsforest.org/Evidence-Benefits adresinden 01 Mayıs 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır.
• Nyrud, A. (2018) Is ınterior wood use psychologically beneficial? A review of psychological responses toward wood. Wood and Fiber Science, 42(2), 202.
• Praag, C.G.D., Garfinkel, S.N., Sparasci, O., Mees, A., et al. (2017). Mind-wandering and alterations to default mode network connectivity when listening to naturalistic versus artificial sounds. Scientific Reports, 7, 4527.
• Pollack, M. H. (2006). Telomere shortening and mood disorders: preliminary support for a chronic stress model of accelerated aging. Biological Psychiatry, 60(5), 432-435.
• Pornstein, M.H. & Krinsky, S.J. (1985). Perception of symmetry in infancy: The salience of vertical symmetry and the perception of pattern wholes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 39(1) 1-19.
• Sasaki, Y., Vanduffel, W., Knutsen, T., Tyler, C. & Tootell, C. (2005). Symmetry activates extrastriate visual cortex ın human and nonhuman primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 3159-3163.
• Suri, L. (2018). Planlamada doğal eşik değerlendirme kriterleri. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(34), 47-67.
• Şahin, F. & Satıcı, B. (2022). Biyofilik tasarım ve modern mimarlık kesişiminde bir değerlendirme: Carlo Scarpa Mimarlığı. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Teknoloji ve Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi, 4(2), 21-45.
• Taylor, R.P., Spehar, B., Donkelaar, P.V. & Hagerhall, C.M. (2011). Perceptual and physiological responses to jackson pollock's fractals. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 1-13.
• Ünal, N. (2021). Müstakil yapılarda iç mekân ve çevre ilişkisinin biyofilik tasarım bağlamında ele alınması. Türkiye Peyzaj Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 88-99.
• Wakefield-Rann, R. & Fam, D. (2018). Initiating a transdisciplinary conversation to improve indoor ecologies. Human Ecology Review, 24(2), 3-23.
• White, M., Smith, A., Humphryes, K., Pahl, S., Snelling, D. & Depledge, M. (2010). Blue space: the ımportance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 482-493.
• Wilson, E.O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press. Cambridge.
• Wolverton, B. C. (2021). Interior landscape plants for ındoor 1989 air pollution abatement. NASA Technical Report. Washington.
• Yadlapalli, S., Jiang, C., Bahle, A., Reddy, P., Meyhofer, E. & Shafer, O.T. (2021). Circadian clock neurons constantly monitor environmental temperature to set sleep timing. Nature. 555(7694), 98-102.