Critical State Response of Granular Soils: Probabilistic Predictive Models Incorporating Grain Size, Distribution and Shape Effects

Abstract

The critical state locus (CSL), expressed in the void ratio (e) – natural logarithmic mean effective stress (ln⁡p') space, is typically defined by slope (λ_e) and intercept parameters (Γ_1), the latter corresponding to the void ratio at a reference mean effective stress of unity. The angle of shearing resistance at the critical state (ϕ_cs^') relates the shear strength to effective normal stresses. These parameters are fundamentally governed by intrinsic properties of granular soils. This study examines their dependence on particle-scale descriptors, namely median grain size (D_50), coefficient of uniformity (C_u), particle roundness (R), and sphericity (S). A database containing critical state parameters (CSP), and grain size, gradation, and shape descriptors for over two hundred sandy and silty non-plastic soils was compiled from available literature, supplemented with laboratory tests performed on Cine, Sile, Tekirdag, and Iskenderun silica sands from Turkiye, and Sabratha silt from Libya. Their CSPs were evaluated following the procedures outlined by Santamarina and Cho [1], modified by benefiting from photogrammetric techniques for monitoring the specimen volume. Particle roundness and sphericity were quantified from microscopic imaging using the method defined by Cho et al. [2]. Semi-empirical probabilistic predictive models were developed using a maximum-likelihood estimation framework. They suggest that ϕ_cs^' decreases with increasing R, decreasing C_u, but log-linearly increases with increasing D_50. The intercept Γ_1 decreases linearly with increasing R and decreasing S and C_u, and exhibits a log-linear decrease with increasing D_50. The compressibility λ_e increases with increasing D_50, whereas it decreases with better grading. It exhibits a log-linear decrease with increasing R and S. The model performances, evaluated through analyses of residuals, indicate unbiased predictions with well-quantified levels of model precision. The resulting models provide quantitative insight into the relationships between micro-scale particle characteristics and macro-scale critical state behavior. They offer practical means for preliminary estimation of CSPs by explicitly incorporating variability in grain size, gradation, and shape metrics of granular soils.

Keywords

• Critical state parameters
• particle angularity
• particle sphericity
• angle of shearing resistance
• median grain size
• coefficient of uniformity

References

1. Santamarina, J., Cho, G., 2001. Determination of Critical State Parameters in Sandy Soils—Simple Procedure. Geotech. Test. J. 24, 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11338J
2. Cho, G.-C., Dodds, J., Santamarina, J.C., 2006. Particle Shape Effects on Packing Density, Stiffness, and Strength: Natural and Crushed Sands. J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. 132, 591–602. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:5(591)
3. Bareither, C.A., Edil, T.B., Benson, C.H., Mickelson, D.M., 2008. Geological and Physical Factors Affecting the Friction Angle of Compacted Sands. J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. 134, 1476–1489. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:10(1476)
4. Cavarretta, I., O’Sullivan, C., Coop, M.R., 2017. The relevance of roundness to the crushing strength of granular materials. Géotechnique 67, 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.226
5. He, H., Zheng, J., 2020. Simulations of realistic granular soils in oedometer tests using physics engine. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 44, 983–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3031
6. Koerner, R.M., 1969. Limiting density behavior of quartz powders. Powder Technol. 3, 208–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(69)80079-3
7. Mitchell, J.K., Soga, K., 2005. Fundamentals of Soil Behavior, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
8. Santamarina, C., Cascante, G., 1998. Effect of surface roughness on wave propagation parameters. Géotechnique 48, 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1998.48.1.129

9. Shin, H., Santamarina, J.C., 2013. Role of Particle Angularity on the Mechanical Behavior of Granular Mixtures. J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. 139, 353–355. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000768
10. Sladen, J.A., D’Hollander, R.D., Krahn, J., 1985. The liquefaction of sands, a collapse surface approach. Can. Geotech. J. 22, 564–578. https://doi.org/10.1139/t85-076
11. Sukumaran, B., Ashmawy, A.K., 2001. Quantitative characterisation of the geometry of discret particles. Géotechnique 51, 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2001.51.7.619
12. Sun, Q., Zheng, J., 2019. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional inherent fabric in cross-anisotropic granular soils. Comput. Geotech. 116, 103197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103197
13. Zheng, J., Hryciw, R.D., Ventola, A., 2017. Compressibility of Sands of Various Geologic Origins at Pre-crushing Stress Levels. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 35, 2037–2051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0225-9
14. Zheng, J., Hryciw, R.D., 2016. Roundness and Sphericity of Soil Particles in Assemblies by Computational Geometry. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 30, 04016021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000578
15. Guo, P., Su, X., 2007. Shear strength, interparticle locking, and dilatancy of granular materials. Can. Geotech. J. 44, 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1139/t07-010
16. Jefferies, M.G., 1993. Nor-Sand: a simple critical state model for sand. Geotechnique 43, 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.%201993.43.1.91
17. Zhao, J., Guo, N., 2013. Unique critical state characteristics in granular media considering fabric anisotropy. Géotechnique 63, 695–704. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.12.P.040
18. Barrett, P.J., 1980. The shape of rock particles, a critical review. Sedimentology 27, 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1980.tb01179.x
19. Zheng, J., Hryciw, R.D., 2015. Traditional soil particle sphericity, roundness and surface roughness by computational geometry. Géotechnique 65, 494–506. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.14.P.192
20. Casagrande, A., 1948. Classification and identification of soils. Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 113, 901–930.
21. Taylor, D.W., 1948. Fundamentals of Soil Mechanics.
22. Terzaghi, K., Peck, R.B., Mesri, G., Peck, R.B., 1996. Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 3. ed. ed. Wiley, New York.
23. Altuhafi, F.N., Coop, M.R., Georgiannou, V.N., 2016. Effect of Particle Shape on the Mechanical Behavior of Natural Sands. J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. 142, 04016071. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001569
24. Suh, H.S., Kim, K.Y., Lee, J., Yun, T.S., 2017. Quantification of bulk form and angularity of particle with correlation of shear strength and packing density in sands. Eng. Geol. 220, 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.02.015
25. Xiao, Y., Long, L., Matthew Evans, T., Zhou, H., Liu, H., Stuedlein, A.W., 2019. Effect of Particle Shape on Stress-Dilatancy Responses of Medium-Dense Sands. J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. 145, 04018105. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001994
26. Yang, J., Luo, X.D., 2015. Exploring the relationship between critical state and particle shape for granular materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 84, 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.08.001
27. Rouse, P.J., Fannin, R.J., Shuttle, D.A., 2008. Influence of roundness on the void ratio and strength of uniform sand. Geotechnique 58, 227–231. doi: 10.1680/geot.2008.58.3.227
28. Yang, J., Wei, L.M., 2012. Collapse of loose sand with the addition of fines: the role of particle shape. Geotechnique 62, 1111–1125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/geot.11.P.062
29. Jia, J., Zheng, J., Sun, X., 2021. The critical state parameters of sands from their image-based intrinsic properties. Acta Geotechnique 16, 4081–4092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01280-z
30. Arda, C., Cinicioglu, O., 2021. Influence of grain shape on stress-dilatancy parameters. Granular Matter 23:22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-021-01098-2
31. Cherif Taiba, A., Mahmoudi, Y., Azaiez, A., Belkhatir, M., 2023. Impact of the overall regularity and related granulometric characteristics on the critical state soil mechanics of natural sands: a state-of-the-art review. Geotechnics and Geoengineering 18, 299-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2022.2044076
32. Kuncar, C., Escribano, D., Montalva, G., 2024. Obtaining critical state parameters through particle shape characteristics of sands. Presented at the Proceedings of the 17th Pan-American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (XVII PCSMGE), and 2nd Latin-American Regional Conference of the International Association for Engineering Geology and the Environment (IAEG), La Serena, Chile.
33. Xie, Y.H., Yang, Z.X., Barreto, D., Jiang, M.D., 2017. The influence of particle geometry and the intermediate stress ratio on the shear behavior of granular materials. Granular Matter 19:35. doi: 10.1007/s10035-017-0723-8
34. Nguyen, H.B.K., Rahman, M., Fourie, A.B., 2021. How particle shape affects the critical state, triggering of instability and dilatancy of granular materials– results from a DEM study. Geotechnique 71, 749-764. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.18.P.211
35. Nie, J., Zhao, J., Cui, Y., Li, D., 2022. Correlation between grain shape and critical state characteristics of uniformly graded sands: A 3D DEM study. Granular Matter 19:35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01362-y
36. Adesina, P., O’Sullivan, C., Wang, T., 2024. DEM study on the effect of particle shape on the shear behaviour of granular materials. Computational Particle Mechanics 11, 447-466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-023-00632-8
37. ASTM, 2017. Test Methods for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1520/D6913_D6913M-17
38. Krumbein, W.C., Sloss, L.L., 1963. Stratigraphy and Sedimentation. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, California, USA.
39. Altuhafi, F., O’Sullivan, C., Cavarretta, I., 2013. Analysis of an Image-Based Method to Quantify the Size and Shape of Sand Particles. J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. 139, 1290–1307. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000855
40. Santamarina, J.C., Cho, G.C., 2004. Soil behaviour: The role of particle shape. Presented at the Advances in Geotechnical Engineering: The Skempton Conference.
41. Tickell, F.G., 1931. The Examination of Fragmental Rocks. Stanford University Press H. Milford, Oxford University Press.
42. Wadell, H., 1935. Volume, Shape, and Roundness of Quartz Particles. J. Geol. 43, 250–280. https://doi.org/10.1086/624298
43. Wadell, H., 1933. Sphericity and Roundness of Rock Particles. J. Geol. 41, 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1086/624040
44. Cabalar, A.F., Dulundu, K., Tuncay, K., 2013. Strength of various sands in triaxial and cyclic direct shear tests. Eng. Geol. 156, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.01.011
45. Chapuis, R.P., 2012. Estimating the in situ porosity of sandy soils sampled in boreholes. Eng. Geol. 141–142, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.04.015
46. Krumbein, 1941. Measurement and Geological Significance of Shape and Roundness of Sedimentary Particles. SEPM J. Sediment. Res. Vol. 11. https://doi.org/10.1306/D42690F3-2B26-11D7-8648000102C1865D
47. Powers, 1953. A New Roundness Scale for Sedimentary Particles. SEPM J. Sediment. Res. Vol. 23. https://doi.org/10.1306/D4269567-2B26-11D7-8648000102C1865D
48. Negussey, D., Wijewickreme, W.K.D., Vaid, Y.P., 1988. Constant-volume friction angle of granular materials. Can. Geotech. J. 25, 50–55.
49. Oyenuga, D.A., Tisot, J.P., 1989. Looking for an intrinsic key for sands. Powders Grains 171–175.
50. Chu, J., 1995. An experimental examination of the critical state and other similar concepts for granular soils. Can. Geotech. J. 32, 1065–1075.
51. Been, K., Jefferies, M.G., Hachey, J., 1991. The critical state of sands. Géotechnique 41, 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1991.41.3.365
52. Lee, C.-J., 1995. Static Shear and Liquefaction Potential of Sand, in: Third International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering & Soil Dynamics. Presented at the Third International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering & Soil Dynamics, St. Louis, Missouri.
53. Aksoy, A.S., 2024. The effects of grain sphericity and roundness on critical state parameters. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkiye.
54. Cetin, K.O., 2000. Reliability-Based Assessment of Seismic Soil Liquefaction Initiation Hazard (PhD). University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
55. Mesri, G., Vardhanabhuti, B., 2009. Compression of granular materials. Can. Geotech. J. 46, 369–392. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-123
56. Nakata, Y., Hyodo, M., Hyde, A.F.L., Kato, Y., Murata, H., 2001. Microscopic Particle Crushing of Sand Subjected to High Pressure One-Dimensional Compression. Soils Found. 41, 69–82. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.41.69
57. Oldecop, L.A., Alonso, E.E., 2001. A model for rockfill compressibility. Geotechnique 51, 127–139.
58. Coop, M.R., Lee, I.K., 1993. The behaviour of granular soils at elevated stresses, in: Predictive Soil Mechanics. Presented at the Wroth Memorial Symposium, Thomas Telford, London.