The Effects of Granting the Right of External Voting to the Diaspora Policies of AKP and CHP

Year 2023, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 24 - 41, 03.04.2023

Süleyman Furkan Çobankara

https://doi.org/10.52241/TJDS.2023.0052

Cited By: 1

Abstract

By granting the Turkish diaspora the right to vote in general elections in 2014, Turkish political parties’ diaspora policies have gained crucial importance, especially considering that votes from abroad constitute five percent of the total votes. In this study, I will try to answer the question of how granting of the right to vote to citizens abroad affected the main Turkish political parties’ (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, Justice and Development Party– AKP and Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi, Republican People’s Party - CHP) diaspora policies. First of all, I start by introducing the Turkish diaspora. Then, I review the history of the Turkish diaspora’s right to vote from abroad. Next, I analyze the parties’ election manifestos published before the general elections in 2011, 2015, and 2018. The reason for selecting these specific elections is to reveal the alteration of these two main parties’ diaspora policies since the 2011 elections were the last election before the granting to vote externally and 2015 and 2018 were the first two general elections afterward. Within the scope of this literature review and document analysis, the issue is analyzed using two perspectives within the framework of the concepts of external voting, election districts, foreign policy, diaspora institutions, culture and integration, political participation, and education. This study establishes that the provision of external voting rights had a substantial influence on the policies of Turkish political parties towards the diaspora, as evidenced by the significant increase in the number of election manifesto articles and the remarkably diverse promises.

Keywords

External Voting, Turkish Diaspora, Election Manifesto, CHP, AKP

References

• Abadan-Unat, N. (2017). Bitmeyen göç: Konuk işçilikten ulus-ötesi yurttaşlığa. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Adamson, F. B. (2019). Sending states and the making of intra-diasporic politics: Turkey and its diaspora (s). International Migration Review, 53(1), 210–236.
• AK PARTİ | Dosya Arşivi. (2011, 2015, 2018). https://www.akparti.org.tr/parti/dosya-arsivi/ Anaz, N., and Köse, M. (2020).
• Anaz, N., and Köse, M. (2021). An analysis of Turkish overseas electoral districts: Opportunities and challenges 1. Turkey’s Electoral Geography, 182–200.
• Anaz, N., and Köse, M. (2022). Understanding Turkey’s Long Debate on Extending Voting Rights to External Residents through Parliamentary Minutes. Diaspora Studies, 15(4), 356–379.
• Arkilic, A. (2021). Turkish populist nationalism in transnational space: Explaining diaspora voting behaviour in homeland elections. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 23(4), 586–605.
• Baubock, R. (2006). Stakeholder citizenship and transnational political participation: A normative evaluation of external voting. Fordham L. Rev., 75, 2393.
• Brand, L. A. (2010). Authoritarian states and voting from abroad: North African experiences. Comparative Politics, 43(1), 81–99.
• Brand, L. A. (2014). Arab uprisings and the changing frontiers of transnational citizenship: Voting from abroad in political transitions. Political Geography, 41, 54–63.
• Brubaker, R. (2000). Accidental Diasporas and External “Homelands” in Central and Eastern Europe: Past and Present. IHS Political Science Series 71, October 2000. [Working Paper]. http://www.ihs. ac.at/vienna/IHS-Departments-2/Political-Science-1/Publications-18/Political-Science-Series-2/ Publications-19/publication-page:6.htm
• Butler, K. D. (2001). Defining diaspora, refining a discourse. Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 10(2), 189–219.
• Caramani, D. (2012). The Europeanization of electoral politics: An analysis of converging voting distributions in 30 European party systems, 1970–2008. Party Politics, 18(6), 803–823.
• Collyer, M. (2014). A geography of extra-territorial citizenship: Explanations of external voting †. Migration Studies, 2(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mns008
• Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi. (2011, 2015, 2018). https://chp.org.tr/yayinlar/secim-bildirgeleri
• De Haas, H., Castles, S., and Miller, M. J. (2019). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world. Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Dufoix, S. (2008). Diasporas (W. Rodarmor, Trans.). London: University of California.
• Farmani, M., and Jafari, A. (2016). A comparative approach to study the electoral systems of selected countries. Int J Humanit Cult Stud, 2(4), 1913–1924.
• Gamlen, A. (2014). Diaspora institutions and diaspora governance. International Migration Review, 48, S180–S217.
• Gamlen, A. (2015). The impacts of extra-territorial voting: Swings, interregnums and feedback effects in New Zealand elections from 1914 to 2011. Political Geography, 44, 1–8.
• Gamlen, A., Cummings, M. E., and Vaaler, P. M. (2019). Explaining the rise of diaspora institutions. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(4), 492–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1409163
• Gitmez, A. S. (2019). Türkiye’nin Dış Göç Öyküsü. https://www.pandora.com.tr/kitap/turkiyenin-dis-goc-oykusu/675884
• Grace, J. (2007). Challenging the norms and standards of election administration: External and absentee voting (2007). Edited by IFES, Washington, DC: IFES, 35.
• Jaulin, T. (2015). The geography of external voting: The 2011 Tunisian election abroad. The Transnational Studies Initiative, 2015(1), 1–22.
• Kadirbeyoğlu, Z., and Okyay, A. (2015). Turkey: Voting from abroad in 2015 general elections. Global Governance Programme Report.
• Kaya, A., and Kentel, F. (2005). Euro-Türkler:Türkiye ile Avrupa Birliği arasında köprü mü, engel mi? İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları. http://dspace.sozlutarih.org.tr/handle/20.500.11834/548
• Köse, M. (2020). Türk Diasporasının Siyasal Katılımı Çerçevesinde Disaspora Politikalarının Gelişimi.
• Köse, M. (2021). Boundaries of the Turkish Diaspora. Turkish Journal of Diaspora Studies, 1(1), Article 1.
• Lafleur, J.-M. (2011). Why do states enfranchise citizens abroad? Comparative insights from Mexico, Italy and Belgium. Global Networks, 11(4), 481–501.
• Lafleur, J.-M. (2013). Transnational politics and the state: The external voting rights of diasporas. Routledge.
• Lafleur, J.-M. (2015). The enfranchisement of citizens abroad: Variations and explanations. Democratization, 22(5), 840–860.
• Laguerre, M. S. (2013). Parliament and Diaspora. In Parliament and Diaspora in Europe (pp. 1–14). Springer.
• López-Guerra, C. (2005). Should expatriates vote? Journal of Political Philosophy, 13(2), 216–234.
• Martin, P. L. (1991). BİTMEYEN ÖYKÜ BATI AVRUPA’YA TÜRK İŞÇİ GÖÇÜ Özellikle Federal Alman Cumhuriyeti’ne. https://www.nadirkitap.com/bitmeyen-oyku-bati-avrupa-ya-turk-isci-gocu-ozellikle-federal-alman-cumhuriyeti-ne-philip-l-martin-kitap9805068.html Milletvekilleri Seçim Kanunu, 5545 (1950).
• Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a Qualitative Document Analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044
• Newland, K., and Agunias, D. R. (2013). Developing a Road Map for Engaging Diasporas in Development: A Handbook for Policymakers and Practitioners in Home and Host Countries. Washington, DC: International Organization for Migration.
• Odmalm, P. (2011). Political parties and ‘the immigration issue’: Issue ownership in Swedish parliamentary elections 1991–2010. West European Politics, 34(5), 1070–1091.
• Østergaard-Nielsen, E., Ciornei, I., and Lafleur, J.-M. (2019). Why do parties support emigrant voting rights? European Political Science Review, 11(3), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773919000171
• Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
• Rhodes, S., and Harutyunyan, A. (2010). Extending citizenship to emigrants: Democratic contestation and a new global norm. International Political Science Review, 31(4), 470–493.
• Rojas, H. S. (2004). A comparative study of the overseas voting laws and systems of selected countries. Development Associates of Occasional Paper, 17.
• Şahin-Mencütek, Z., and Erdoğan, M. M. (2016). The implementation of voting from abroad: Evidence from the 2014 Turkish presidential election. International Migration, 54(3), 173–186.
• Sheffer, G. (2003). Diaspora politics: At home abroad. Cambridge University Press.
• Sirkeci, I., and Icduygu, A. (2001). 75 Years of Turkish Diaspora: A Republican Family on the Move. Siirtolaisuus-Migration, 28(2), 2–11.
• Turcu, A., and Urbatsch, R. (2015). Diffusion of diaspora enfranchisement norms: A multinational study. Comparative Political Studies, 48(4), 407–437.
• Vertovec, S. (1997). Three meanings of “diaspora,” exemplified among South Asian religions. Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 6(3), 277–299.
• Wellman, E. I., Allen, N. W., and Nyblade, B. (2022). The Extraterritorial Voting Rights and Restrictions Dataset (1950–2020). Comparative Political Studies, 00104140221115169. https://doi. org/10.1177/00104140221115169
• Yaldız, F. (2019). A Critical Approach to the Term Turkish Diaspora: Is there ‘the’Turkish Diaspora? Bilig, 91, 53–80.
• YSK Web Portal. (2018). https://ysk.gov.tr/tr/24-haziran-2018-secimleri/77536