Precision forestry in forest harvesting: Conceptual framework

Year 2015, Volume: 16 Issue: 2, 183 - 194, 09.11.2015

Mehmet Eker Davut Özer

https://doi.org/10.18182/tjf.69279

Cited By: 8

Abstract

The perception, expectations and attitudes of the public about forests and forestry vary over time. In this case people are led to new approaches in the planning and implementation process of forests and forest resources. In this context, one of the effects of the widespread use of technology and the resulting approach is based on the increasing environmental awareness are also precision forestry. In this study, it was aimed to disclosure of precision forestry terminology, to introduce of content and technology used, and to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages. Precision forestry, the term is expected to resettle in Turkish forestry literature, to avoid the potential confusion of concepts and a term related to elimination of differences of understanding in this regard was ensured. For this purpose, the studies relevant to precision forestry in planning and implementation were analyzed and best practices were examined. It was resulted that the concept of precision forestry was mainly focused on data accuracy, it was based on site specific spatial and attribute data, and it dictated to use of advanced technology for environmentally sound forest operations.
Keywords: Precision forestry, Timber harvesting, Best forestry practices, Technology, Environmental

Keywords

Precision forestry, Timber harvesting, Best forestry practices, Technology, Environmental protection

Üretim işlerinde hassas ormancılık yaklaşımı: Kavramsal çerçeve

Abstract

Ormanlar konusunda toplumların algıları, beklentileri ve tutumları zamanla değişim göstermekte ve bu durum; insanları, ormanların ve orman kaynaklarının yönetiminde yeni planlama ve uygulama yaklaşımlarına yöneltmektedir. Bu bağlamda, teknoloji kullanımının yaygın etkisine ve artan çevre koruma bilincine bağlı olarak ortaya çıkan olgulardan birisi de hassas ormancılıktır. Bu çalışmada hassas ormancılık terminolojisinin açıklanması, içeriğinin tanıtılması ve kullanılan teknolojilerin avantajlarının ve dezavantajlarının irdelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Böylece ormancılık literatürüne yerleşmesi beklenen hassas ormancılık (precision forestry) terimine ilişkin muhtemel kavram kargaşasının önlenmesi ve bu yöndeki anlayış farklılıklarının giderilmesine çalışılmıştır. Planlama ve uygulamada hassas ormancılık yaklaşımını konu edinen çalışmalar analiz edilmiş ve iyi uygulama örnekleri incelenmiştir. Hassas ormancılık kavramının ağırlıklı olarak veri hassasiyeti üzerine odaklandığı, olabildiğince uygulama alanına özgün konumsal ve öznitelik verilerin kullanılmasını esas aldığı ve bu ölçekte çevreye duyarlı ormancılık operasyonlarının uygulanabilmesi için ileri teknoloji kullanımını dikte ettiği sonucuna erişilmiştir.
Anahtar kelimeler: Hassas ormancılık, Odun üretim işleri, İyi ormancılık uygulamaları, Teknoloji, Çevre koruma

Keywords

Hassas ormancılık, Odun üretim işleri, İyi ormancılık uygulamaları, Teknoloji, Çevre koruma

References

• Ackerman, P., 2014. Preface. Official Proceedings (Extended Abstracts) of the 6th Precision Forestry Symposium Held in Stellenbosch, 3-5 March 2014, South Africa.
• Akay, A.E., 2015. Hassas ormancılık. Bursa Orman Bölge Müdürlüğü Bilgilendirme Sunumu. BTÜ Orman Fakültesi, Haberler/Erişim: 17.03.2015. Anonim, 2015. Precision nedir? Sesli Sözlük, http://www.seslisozluk.net/, Erişim: 10.03.2015.
• Aruga, K. 2003. Precision forestry operations and equipment in Japan. Proceedings of the Second International Precision Forestry Symposium, 17-20 June 2003, University of Washington College of Forest Resources, Seattle-Washington, pp.31-35.
• Bare, B.B., 2001. Opening speech. Proceedings of the First International Symposium, Washington College of Forest Resources, USDA Forest Services, Seattle-Washington, p.1. Cooperative 17-20 June University of
• Becker, G., 2001. Precision forestry in central europe-new perspective for a classical management concept. Proceedings of the First International Precision Forestry Cooperative Symposium, 17-20 June 2001, University of Washington College of Forest Resources, USDA Forest Services, Seattle-Washington, pp.7-9.
• Brown, M., 2014. Precision forestry: a journey not a leap. Official Proceedings (Extended Abstracts) of the 6th Precision Forestry Symposium Held in Stellenbosch, 3-5 March 2014, South Africa, p. 2.
• Cavalli, R., 2015. Forest operations in steep terrain. Forest Engineering Conference - CROJFE 2015, 18-20 March 2015, Zagreb, Croatia.
• Chung, W., 2015. IUFRO Division-3 forest operations engineering and management: challenges in the future. Forest Engineering Conference - CROJFE 2015, 18-20 March 2015, Zagreb, Croatia.
• Dyck, B., 2003. Precision forestry-the path to increased profitability, Proceedings of the Second International Precision Forestry Symposium, 17-20 June 2003, University of Washington College of Forest Resources, Seattle-Washington, pp.3-8.
• Dykstra, D.P., 2002. Reduced impact logging: concepts and issues. International Conference. Proceedings on Applying Reduced Impact Logging to Advance Sustainable Forest Management Ed. By: Enters et al., FAO Asia-Pacific Forestry Commission, Bangkok.
• Dykstra, D.P., Heinrich, H.R., 1996. FAO Model Code of Forest Harvesting Practice. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome.
• Eker, M., 2004. Ormancılıkta odun hammaddesi üretiminde yıllık operasyonel planlama modelinin geliştirilmesi. Doktora Tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon.
• Eker, M., Özer, D., 2015. Üretim işlerinde hassas ormancılık ve iyi ormancılık uygulamaları: Kavramsal çerçeve. Sempozyumu, 4-6 Haziran 2015, Ilgaz-Kastamonu, Bildiri Özetleri Kitabı, s.26. Hassas Ormancılık
• FAO, 2004. Reduced impact logging in tropical forests- literature synthesis, Anaylsis and Prototype Statstical Framework, Working Paper No.1, Forestry Department, Rome.
• Farnum, P., 2001. Precision forestry-finding the context. Proceedings of the First International Precision Forestry Cooperative Symposium, 17-20 June 2001, University of Washington College of Forest Resources, USDA Forest Services, Seattle-Washington, p. 3.
• Folegatti, B.S., 2010. The application precision forestry technologies in logging operations. PhD Thesis, Auburn University, 139 p., Alabama, USA.
• Gallo, R., Mazzetto, F., 2013. A methodology study for the application of precision forestry approach in logging operation chains. EFITA-WCCA-CIGR Conference “Sustainable Agriculture Through ICT Innovation”, 24- 27 June 2013, Turin, Italy.
• Gülci, N., 2014. Üretim planlamasında hassas ormancılık üzerine araştırmalar. Doktora Tezi, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kahramanmaraş.
• Holmes, T., Blate, G., Zweede, J., Bauch, R., 2002. Financial and ecological indicators of reduced impact logging performance in the eastern amazon. Forest Ecology and Management, 163: 93-110.
• Heinimann, H.R., 2007. Forest operations engineering and management – the ways behind and ahead of a scientific discipline. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 28:107-121.
• IUFRO, 2015. Collection of definition or related elements precision forestry, SILVAVOC Terminology Project, http://www.iufro.org/download/file/966/3531/scic-def- precision-forestry_doc/, Accessed:18.04.2015
• Katsch, C., 2006. Precision forestry and information. In Ackerman, P.A., D.W. Längin, and M.C. Antonides (Eds.), Precision forestry in plantations, semi-natural and natural forests, Proceedings of the International Precision Forestry Symposium, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
• Khali A.H., 2001. Remote sensing, GIS and GPS as a tool to support precision forestry practices in Malaysia, 22nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, 5-9 November 2001, Singapore.
• Kovacsova, P., Antalova, M, 2010. Precision forestry – definition and technologies. Šumarski list br. 11-12, CXXXIV (2010): 603-611. Long, A.J., 2006.
• Environmentally Sound Resources and Harvesting.
• Conservation, Florida Cooperative Extension Service,
• Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Extension,
• University of Florida, 11 p. Forest
• OİTTP, 2015. Duyurular. Orman İnşaatı-Transportu ve Teknolojileri sportu.org/duyurular.html, Erişim: 22.01.2015 Ilgaz, http://ormantran
• Pelletier, G., Labelle, E. R., Girouard, M., Lussier, J.M., Pascual, J., 2014. A case for a decision support system (DSS) and precision forestry to improve hardwood management. Northern Hardwoods Research Institute, Edmundston, New Brunswick, Canada.
• PFS, 2001. Preface. Proceedings of the First International Precision Forestry Cooperative Symposium, 17-20 June 2001, University of Washington College of Forest Resources, USDA Forest Services, Seattle-Washington, 193 p.
• Renkliyıldırım, Ö., 1995. İngilizce-Türkçe sözlük. Metro Essential Collins Matbaacılık, İstanbul. Dictionary. Meydan
• Shaffer, R.M., Haney H.L., Worrell, E.G., Aust, W.M., 1998. Forestry BMP implementation costs for Virginia. Forest Products Journal 48 (9): 27-29.
• Sood, A.M., 2006. Precision forestry-a new concept for forestry application. Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia (JPSM), 13 July 2006, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (NRE), Malaysia, 9 p.
• Sowa, J.M., 2012. Precision forestry in Poland. Learning Initiative 2012 “Precision Forestry”, IUFRO Task Force Education in Forest Science, 5-15 August 2012, Warsaw-Poland.
• Taylor, S.E., McDonald, T.P., Veal, M.W., Grift. T.E., 2001. Using GPS to evaluate productivity and performance of forest machine systems. The First International Precision Forestry Symposium, 17-19 June 2001, Seattle, Washington, pp. 151-157.
• Taylor, S.E., McConald, T.P., Veal, M.W., Rummer, R.B.,, 2002, Precision forestry: technologies to revolutionize forest http://www.eng.auburn.edu/programs/bsen/research/prec and isionforestry.Html, Accessed: 13.03.2015 production, M.C., semi-natural and natural forests,
• TDK, 2015. Büyük Türkçe Sözlük. Türk Dil Kurumu, www.tdk.gov.tr, Erişim: 10.03.2015.
• Tuček , J., Ligoš , J., 2002. Forest canopy influence on the precision of location with GPS receivers. Journal of Forest Science , 48(9): 399–407.
• Veal, M.W, Taylor, S.E., McDonald, T.P., McLemore, D.K., Dunn. M.R., 2001. Accuracy of tracking forest machines with GPS. Transactions of the ASAE 44 (6):1903-1911.
• Weaver, S.A., 2014. Precision forestry studies: laser calipers and GPS receivers, MSc Thesis, The University of Georgia.
• Zhang, H., Zheng, J., Dorr G., Zhou, H., Ge, Y. 2014. Testing of GPS accuracy for precision forestry applications. Arab J Sci Eng, (39):237–245.
• Ziesak, M., 2006. Precision forestry - an overview on the current status of precision forestry. A literature review. In: “Precision forestry in plantations, semi-natural and natural forests” IUFRO Precision Forestry Conference. 5-10 March 2006, Technical University, Munich, Stellenbosch forestry/, Accessed:08.02. 2015.
• http://academic.sun.ac.za/