A BREEDING STUDY TO DEVELOP EARLY MATURING SOYBEAN CROSSES SUITABLE FOR DOUBLE CROPPING

Year 2022, , 182 - 187, 23.12.2022

Aliye Yıldırım , Emre İlker , Doç. Dr. Sıdıka Ekren , İlkay Yavaş , Dünya Isayeva , Özer Hakan Bayraktar

https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.1146550

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The present research was undertaken to evaluate of soybean hybrids environmental interaction and adaptability on Mediterranean region conditions. Seven advanced (F7) soybean lines selected from the Kunitz x SS-201 and Kunitz x Bert cross populations based on earliness and yield characteristics in the preliminary trials and three soybean varieties (Bravo, Nova and Arisoy) were tested in the trial in four replications in 2017 and 2018 in accordance with the RCBD. The analysis of variance revealed significant variations for all characters. According to results, the yield of lines and varieties 2017 and 2018 varied from 2.87-4,47 t ha-1 and 2.61-3.90 t ha-1 respectively and KS-39 advanced soybean line had the highest grain yield in terms of two years average. The number of flowering days varied between 32.50 days and 36.75 days according to the two-year averages, and the KS-12 genotype was the earliest flowering genotype. The lines KS-10 (103.38) and KS-12 (103.50) came to the fore as the genotypes with the earliest maturation days. With this study, it has been concluded that promising genotypes can be obtained in regions dominated by the Mediterranean climate zone (especially the Aegean coastline), and soybean cultivation can be done in double crop agriculture within the cropping system.

Keywords

Double crop, Earliness, Mediterranean region, Soybean, Yield.

References

• Anonymous. 2016. The Meteorological Data for Bornova. Olive Research Institute Meteorological Station.
• Arioglu, H.H. 2014. The Oil Crops Growing and Breeding. The Publication of University of Cukurova. Faculty of Agriculture. Faculty number: 220. Book Number: A-70. 204 p. Adana-Turkey.
• Arslan. M., N. Isler and S. Caliskan. 2007. Effects of cultivar maturity on growth and yield of double cropped soybean. Acta Agric. Scan. Section B-Soil and Plant 56: 39-46.
• Bakal, H., L. Gulluoglu. B. Onat and H. Arioglu. 2017. The Effect of Growing Seasons on Some Agronomic and Quality Characteristics of Soybean Varieties in Mediterranean Region in Turkey. Turk J Field Crops. 22(2): 187-196.
• Baker, D.H. 2000. Nutritional constraints to use of soy products by animals. In: Drackley, J.K. Ed. Soy in Animal Nutrition. Federation of Animal Science Societies, Savoy. Pp. 1-12.
• Bellaloui, N., H.A. Bruns, H.K. Abbas, A. Mengistu, D.K. Fisher and K.N. Reddy. 2015. Agricultural practices altered soybean seed protein, oil, fatty acids, sugars and minerals in the Midsouth USA. Front. Plant Sci. 31 (6):1-14
• Bezerra, A.R.G., T., Sediyama, F.L.D., Silva, A., Borém, A.F.D., Silva and F.C.D.S., Silva. 2017. Agronomical aspects of the development of cultivars. In Soybean breeding. Springer, Cham.:395-411
• Board, J.E and W. Hall. 1984. Premature flowering in soybean yield reductions at non-optimal planting dates as influenced by temperature and photoperiod. Agron. J. 76: 700-704.
• Boerma, H.R. and D.A. Ashley. 1982. Irrigation row spacing and genotype effects on late and ultra-late planted soybeans. Agron. J. 78: 995-1002.
• Caliskan. S., M. Arslan. I. Uremis and M.E. Caliskan. 2007. The Effects of Row Spacing on Yield and Yield Components of Full Season and Double-Cropped Soybean. Turk J Agric For. 31:147-154
• Easter, R.A. and S.W. Kim. 1999. Routes of use of soybean products. In: Opportunities for Soy Products in Animal Nutrition. Federation of Animal Science Societies, Savoy. pp. 1-8.
• Gaffaroglu Yetkin, S. and H. Arioglu. 2009. Determination of Yield and Important Plant Characteristics of Some Soybean Varieties and Genotypes Grown as a Main Crop in the Cukurova Region. Cukurova University. E-Journal of Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences. 20(1):29-37 (in Turkish with English abstract).
• Gulluoglu L., H. Arioglu and C. Kurt. 2011. Adaptability and Stability of New Soybean Cultivars under Double Cropped Conditions of Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 6(14). pp. 3320-3325. DOI:10.5897/AJAR10.913
• Gulluoglu, L., H. Bakal and H. Arioglu. 2016. The Effects of Twin Row Planting Pattern and Plant Population on Seed Yield and Yield Components of Soybean at Late DoubleCropped Planting in Cukurova Region. Turk J. Field Crops. 21:59-65.
• Holshouser, D.L. 2010. Days to Soybean Physiological Maturity. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 3009-1459. Access date: 02.11.2018. Web address: https://pubs.ext.vt.edu/content/dam/pubs_ext_vt_edu/3009/3 009-1459/3009-1459_pdf.pdf
• Ilker. E. 2017. Performances of Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Advanced Lines Grown in Second Cropping under Mediterranean Climatical Conditions of Western Turkey. Turk J Field Crops. 22(1): 104-107.
• Ilker, E., M. Kocaturk, A. Kadiroglu, A. Yildirim, G. Ozturk, H. Yildiz, and I. Koken, 2018a. Adaptation Abilities and Quality Parameters of Selected Soybean Lines under Double Cropping in the Mediterranean Region. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 23 (1): 49-55. DOI: 10.17557/tjfc.421584
• Ilker, E., M. Kocaturk, A. Kadiroglu, M. Altinbas, A. Yildirim, G. Ozturk and H. Yildiz. 2018b. Stability Analyses for Double Cropping in Soybean [(Glycine max L.) Merrill]. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 23 (2): 80-84.
• Jegadeesa S. and Kangfu Y. 2020. Food Grade Soybean Breeding, Current Status and Future Directions. In: Legume CropsProspects, Production and Uses. Ed. M. Hasanuzzaman. IntechOpen, London. 10.5772/intechopen.92069.
• Kane. M.V., C.C. Steele and L.J. Grabau. 1997. Early maturing soybean cropping system: I. Yield response to planting date. Agron. J. 89: 454-458.
• Ozturk, G. and Z. Yildirim. 2020. New Potato Breeding Clones for Regional Testing in Western Turkey. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 25(2): 131-137.
• Ozturk, G. 2021. Field Performance of Different Seedling Types Used in Sweet Potato [Ipomea batatas (L.) Lam] Growing. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 26(1): 54-59.
• Pratap, A., S.K., Gupta, J., Kumar, S., Mehandi, V.R. Pandey. 2016. Chapter 12 - Soybean, Breeding Oilseed Crops for Sustainable Production. Academic Press: 293-315.
• Ramteke, R., V., Kumar, P., Murlidharan and D.K. Agarwal. 2010. Study on genetic variability and traits interrelationship among released soybean varieties of India [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 1(6): 1483-1487
• Silva, F.L.D., M.D.V.D., Resende, W.H., Ludke and T.V. Bueno. 2017. Quantitative Traits in Breeding. In Soybean Breeding (pp. 81-112). Springer, Cham.
• Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, pp. 20-90.
• Yigit, A., O., Erekul and N., Yarasir. 2021. The Effects of Deficit Irrigation and Sulphur Fertilization on Soybean Growth and Chlorophyll (SPAD) Content. COMU J. Agric. Fac. 9(1):105-117.
• Yildirim. A. 2017. Determination of Yield and Important Agronomic Traits of Some Soybean Varieties and Lines Grown under Second Crop Condition in the Aegean Region. MSc Thesis. Ege University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences. 69 pages.
• Yildirim. A., H. Yildiz, E. Ilker and S. Ekren. 2020. Determination of Yield and Agronomic Characteristics of Some Soybean Genotypes Suitable for Double Crop Agriculture in Mediterranean Climate Conditions. 30th Scientific-Experts Conference of Agriculture and Food Industry, 44-50.