EVALUATION OF NITROGEN FERTILIZER AND ROW SPACING EFFECT ON YIELD AND PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MAIZE (Zea mays L.) UNDER IRRIGATED AND RAINFED CONDITIONS

Year 2023, , 183 - 193, 24.12.2023

Seyed Mehdi Shamsi Papkyadeh Naser Mohammadıyan Roshan1 , Seyed Mostafa Sadeghi Ebrahim Amiri Majid Ashouri

https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.1306868

Cited By: 1

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the yield and physiological traits of Hybrid 704 Single Cross maize under rainfed (without any irrigation) and irrigation based on plant needs as a split-plot experiment in a randomized complete block design with three replications during 2017-2018. It was carried out in Langrud, Gilan province, Iran. The total amount of precipitation during the plant growth period was 580.4 and 463.4 mm in 2017 and 2018 respectively, which happened to improper distribution during the plant growth. In experimental treatments, the first factor includes irrigation and rainfed in the main plots and the second factor is the combination of urea fertilizer levels (control, applying 100, 200, and 300 kg per hectare) with row spacing (10, 20, and 30 cm distance) were in sub-plots. The results showed that the effect of nitrogen source and row spacing under rainfed and irrigation conditions was significant on all investigated traits in this experiment. In the conditions of rainfed, the maximum grain yield was 11394.6 kg.h-1 for applying 300 kg of nitrogen fertilizer per hectare and 20 cm row spacing. In irrigation conditions, the highest grain yield was assigned to 200 and 300 kg of nitrogen fertilizer per hectare and of 20 cm row spacing, with an average of 14050.5 and 14993 kg per hectare, respectively. In addition, an increase in physiological traits, including relative water content, proline, antioxidant activity, and improvement of electrolyte leakage under rainfed conditions was observed by applying nitrogen fertilizer and increasing the row spacing. As a result, in rainfed conditions, using 200 to 300 kg of nitrogen fertilizer and increasing the row spacing should be used to obtain the highest maize yield in the experimental area.

Keywords

Catalase, electrolyte leakage, Proline, Relative water content

Supporting Institution

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors

References

• Aebi, H. 1984. Catalase in vitro. In methods in enzymology, Academic press 105: 121-126.
• Aliarab, A., E.O. Vazifekhah and S.E. Sadati. 2020. Effect of soil moisture content and nitrogen fertilizer on survival, growth and some physiological characteristics of Platycladus orientalis seedlings. Journal of Forest Science 66 (12): 511- 523.
• Álvarez-Iglesias, L., R.A. Malvar, R. Garzón, C.M. Rosell and P. Revilla. 2021. Nutritional value of whole maize kernels from diverse endosperm types and effects on rheological quality. Agronomy 11(12): 2509.
• Amer Dahham, A. 2021. The effect of nitroxin application and drought stress on growth and yield of two Persian and Iraqi celery populations. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 735(1): 012046).
• Askari, E. and P. Ehsanzadeh. 2015. Drought stress mitigation by foliar application of salicylic acid and their interactive effects on physiological characteristics of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) genotypes. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 37: 1-14.
• Basal, O. and A. Szabó. 2020. The combined effect of drought stress and nitrogen fertilization on soybean. Agronomy 10: 1-18.
• Bates, L.S., R.A. Waldren and I.D. Teare. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil 39: 205-207.
• Ercoli, L., L. Lulli, M. Mariotti, A. Masoni and I. Arduini. 2008. Post-anthesis dry matter and nitrogen dynamics in durum wheat as affected by nitrogen supply and soil water availability. European Journal of Agronomy 28(2): 138-147.
• Gondim, F.A., E. Gomes-Filho, C.F. Lacerda, J.T. Prisco, A.D. Azevedo Neto and E.C. Marques. 2010. Pretreatment with H2O2 in maize seeds: effects on germination and seedling acclimation to salt stress. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 22: 103-112.
• Islam, M. A., K. G. Apostol, D. F. Jacobs and R. K. Dumroese. 2009. Fall fertilization of Pinus resinosa seedlings: nutrient uptake, cold hardiness, and morphological development. Annals of Forest Science 66(7): 1-9.
• Li, M., Z. Guo and W. Zhang. 2021. Balancing food security and environmental sustainability by optimizing seasonal-spatial crop production in Bangladesh. Environmental Research Letters 16(7): 074046.
• Liu, R. X., Z.G. Zhou. W.Q. Guo, B.L. Chen and D.M. Oosterhuis. 2008. Effects of N fertilization on root development and activity of water-stressed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants. Agricultural Water Management 95(11): 1261-1270.
• Malešević, M., Glamočlija, D., Pržulj, N., Popović, V., Stanković, S., Živanović, T., and Tapanarova, A. 2010. Production characteristics of different malting barley genotypes in intensive nitrogen fertilization. Genetika 42(2): 323-330.
• McCune, B. and M. J. Mefford. 1999. PC-ORD: multivariate analysis of ecological data; Version 4 for Windows (User's Guide). MjM software design.
• Moshki, A., E. Nouri and N. Soleyman Dehkordi. 2017. The pattern of soil carbon sequestration changes regarding physico-chemical soil properties (Case study: Semnan Sokan forest park). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research 25(2): 244-253.
• Movludi, A. 2015. Effect of nitrogen application on some characteristics of drought tolerance in spring barley. Journal of Crop Production 8(3): 95-114.
• Namvar, A., R. Sharifi, T. Khandan and M. Moghadam. 2013. Organic and inorganic nitrogen fertilization effects on some physiological and agronomical traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in irrigated condition. Journal of Central European Agriculture 14(3):28-40.
• Nouri, E., M. Matinizadeh. A. Moshki, A. Zolfaghari, S. Rajaei and M.Janoušková. 2020. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi benefit drought-stressed S alsola laricina. Plant Ecology 221: 683-694.
• Ozturk, G. and Z. Yildirim. 2013. Effect of bio-activators on the tuber yield and tuber size of potatoes. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 18(1): 82-86.
• Pandit, N.R., D. Choudhary, S. Maharjan, K. Dhakal, S. P. Vista and Y. K. Gaihre. 2022. Optimum Rate and Deep Placement of Nitrogen Fertilizer Improves Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Tomato Yield in Nepal. Soil Systems 6(3): 72.
• SAS Institute Inc. 1997. SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary.
• Shahadha, S.S., O. Wendroth and D. Ding. 2021. Nitrogen and rainfall effects on crop growth-experimental results and scenario analyses. Water 13(16): 2219.
• Shrestha, J., D.N. Yadav, L.P. Amgain and J. P. Sharma. 2018. Effects of nitrogen and plant density on maize (Zea mays L.) phenology and grain yield. Current Agriculture Research Journal 6(2): 175.
• Shukla, S.S. and S.K. Panda. 2023. Nitrogen Use Efficiency Regulates Drought Stress in Pearl Millet Genotypes: Morpho-Physiological Evaluation. Agriculture 13(3): 680.
• Sullivan, C.Y. 1979. Slecting for drought and heat resistance in grain sorghum. Stress Physiology In Crop Plants 263-281.
• Yang, B., S. Wu and Z. Yan. 2022. Effects of Climate Change on Corn Yields: Spatiotemporal Evidence from Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression Model. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 11(8): 433.
• Zafari, M., A. Ebadi, S. Jahanbakhsh and M. Sedghi. 2020. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) biochemical properties, yield, and oil content affected by 24-epibrassinosteroid and genotype under drought stress. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 68(22): 6040-6047.
• Zhai, J., Y. Zhang, G. Zhang, W. Xu, R. Xie, B. Ming, P. Hou, K. Wang, J. Xue and S. Li .2022. Nitrogen application and dense planting to obtain high yields from maize. Agronomy 12(6): 1308.
• Zhang, G., D. Shen, B. Ming, R. Xie, P. Hou, J. Xue, K. Wang and S. Li. 2020. Optimizing planting density to improve nitrogen use of super highyield maize. Agronomy Journal 112(5): 4147-4158.
• Zhang, G., D. Shen, B. Ming, R. Xie, P. Hou, J. Xue, K. Wang and S. Li. 2022. Optimizing Planting Density to Increase Maize Yield and Water Use Efficiency and Economic Return in the Arid Region of Northwest China. Agriculture 12(9): 1322.