ADAPTATION ABILITIES AND QUALITY PARAMETERS OF SELECTED SOYBEAN LINES UNDER DOUBLE CROPPING IN THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION

Year 2018, , 49 - 55, 15.06.2018

Emre Ilker , Mehmet Kocaturk Abdullah Kadıroglu Aliye Yıldırım , Gulsum Ozturk , Hakan Yıldız , İbrahim Koken

https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.421584

Cited By: 11

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the adaptation abilities and quality parameters of selected advanced soybean breeding lines at the double cropped growing conditions. 20 advanced Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] breeding lines (F7) and four soybean varieties having maturity group III and IV (ARISOY, ATAEM-7, BRAVO and NOVA) were used. The differences between the lines and varieties were significant for the grain yield. The mean grain yield of breeding lines and varieties ranged from 2460 to 3488 kg ha-1 and from 2933 to 3440 kg ha-1, respectively. Also KA-07-05-13 advanced soybean line had the highest grain yield in terms of two years’ average. The highest plant height was obtained from KA-07-08-15 (82.2 cm) and the lowest pod height from KA-07-08-15 (12.2 cm) and BDNA-19 (12.1 cm) lines. Significant differences were determined for pod number per plant among the 24 soybean genotypes. The pod number per plant was the higher in BDNA-12 and BDNA-13 lines than the varieties. In this research, the number of day for flowering varied between 33.0-42.1 days and the number of days for maturating ranged from 102.4 to 113.6 days. The earliest flowering time was detected from KA-07-08-14 line and the earliest maturating time was observed from BDNE-14 line. In a two-year average, 100-seed weight ranged between 14.2 -20.8 g in breeding lines. The highest 100-seed weight was obtained from KA-07-03-5 (20.8 g) and KA-07-03-9 lines (20.1 g). While the highest oil percentage was obtained from ARISOY, the highest and statistically same oil percentage was recorded from KA-07-05-9 (21,6%), KA-07-08-12 (21,2%) and KA-07-05-5 (21,2%). The average protein content of soybean lines and cultivars varied from 41.6% to 49.3%. The higher protein percentage value was obtained from the BDAF-4 (49.3%) breeding line.

Keywords

Agronomical characters, Oil percentage, Protein percentage, Soybean lines

References

• Anonymous, 2016. The Meteorological Data for Bornova. Olive Research Institute Meteorological Station.
• Arioglu, H.H. 2014. The Oil Crops Growing and Breeding. The Publication of University of Cukurova, Faculty of Agriculture, Faculty number: 220, Book Number: A-70, 204 p. Adana-Turkey.
• Arslan, M., N. Isler and S. Caliskan. 2006. Effects of cultivar maturity on growth and yield of double cropped soybean. Acta Agric. Scan. Section B-Soil and Plant 56: 39-46.
• Bakal, H., L. Gulluoglu, B. Onat and H. Arioglu. 2017. The Effect of Growing Seasons on Some Agronomic and Quality Characteristics of Soybean Varieties in Mediterranean Region in Turkey. Turk J Field Crops 22(2): 187-196.
• Bellaloui, N., H.A. Bruns, H.K. Abbas, A. Mengistu, D.K. Fisher and K.N. Reddy. 2015. Agricultural practices altered soybean seed protein, oil, fatty acids, sugars, and minerals in the Midsouth USA. Front. Plant Sci. V. 6, 31:1-14
• Board, J.E. and W. Hall. 1984. Premature flowering in soybean yield reductions at non-optimal planting dates as influenced by temperature and photoperiod. Agron. J. 76: 700-704.
• Boerma, H.R. and D.A. Ashley. 1982. Irrigation, row spacing, and genotype effects on late and ultra-late planted soybeans. Agron. J. 78: 995-1002.
• Caliskan, S., M. Arslan, I. Uremis and M.E. Caliskan. 2007. The Effects of Row Spacing on Yield and Yield Components of Full Season and Double-Cropped Soybean. Turk J Agric For. 31:147-154
• Gaffaroglu Yetkin, S. and H. Arioglu. 2009. Determination of Yield and Important Plant Characteristics of Some Soybean Varieties and Genotypes Grown as a Main Crop in the Cukurova Region. Cukurova University, e-Journal of Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, 20(1):29-37 (in Turkish with English abstract).
• Gulluoglu L., H. Arioglu and C. Kurt. 2011. Adaptability and Stability of New Soybean Cultivars under Double Cropped Conditions of Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 6(14), pp. 3320-3325. DOI: 10.5897/AJAR10.913
• Gulluoglu, L., H. Bakal and H. Arioglu. 2016. The Effects of Twin Row Planting Pattern and Plant Population on Seed Yield and Yield Components of Soybean at Late Double-Cropped Planting in Cukurova Region. Turk J. Field Crops 21:59-65.
• Holshouser, D.L. 2010. Days to Soybean Physiological Maturity. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 3009-1459. Access date: 02.11.2018. Web address: https://pubs.ext.vt.edu/content/dam/pubs_ext_vt_edu/3009/3009-1459/3009-1459_pdf.pdf
• Ilker, E. 2017. Performances of Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Advanced Lines Grown in Second Cropping under Mediterranean Climatical Conditions of Western Turkey. Turk J Field Crops 22(1): 104-107.
• Kane, M.V., C.C. Steele and L.J. Grabau. 1997. Early maturing soybean cropping system: I. Yield response to planting date. Agron. J. 89, 454-458.
• Kang, B-K., H-T. Kim, M-S. Choi, S-C. Koo, J-H. Seo, H-S. Kim, S-O. Shin, H-T. Yun, I-S. Oh, K.P. Kulkarni and J.D. Lee. 2017. Genetic and Environmental Variation of First Pod Height in Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Plant Breed. Biotech. 5(1):36~44. https://doi.org/10.9787/PBB.2017.5.1.36.
• Karaaslan, D. 2011. Determination of Some Soybean Lines Yield and Quality Components Grown As Second Crop in Diyarbakir Conditions. J. Agric. Fac. HR.U., 2011, 15(3): 37- 44
• Mariani, F., S.F. Ren, L. Vargas, H.P. Santos and R.O.B.S. Fontaneli. 2012. Perennial tropical forage grasses establishment simultaneously with soybean and maize in northern of RS state, Brazil. Ciência Rural, v.42, p.1471-1476
• Onat, B., H. Bakal, L. Gulluoglu and H. Arioglu. 2017. The Effects of High Temperature at The Growing Period on Yield and Yield Components of Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] Varieties. Turk J Field Crops 22(2): 178-186.
• Oz, M. and A. Karasu. 2007. Investigation of Some Traits of Soybean Seeds Harvested at the Different Growth Stages. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University. 21(1):81-91Research Vol. 6(14), pp. 3320-3325. DOI: 10.5897/AJAR10.913
• Sincik, M, H.S. Oral, A.T. Goksoy and Z.M. Turan. 2008. Determination of Some Yield and Quality Characters of Different Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) Lines under Bursa Ecological Conditions. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University. 22(1):55-62
• Sogut, T., F. Ozturk and M.G. Temiz. 2005. Comparison of Performance of Soybean (Glycine Max Merr.) Cultivars from Different Maturity Groups Under Main and Second Cropping Systems. 6th Congress of Field Crops of Turkey. 1:393-398.
• Sousa, L.B., O.T. Hamawaki, C.D. Santos Junior, V.M. Oliveira, A.P.O. Nogueira, F.M. Mundim, R.L. Hamawaki and C.D.L. Hamawaki. 2015. Correlation Between Yield Components in F6 Soybean Progenies Derived from Seven Biparental Crosses. Biosci. J., Uberlândia, 31 (6):1692-1699.
• Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A biometrical approach. 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, pp. 20-90.
• Tugay, E. and N. Atikyilmaz. 2009. Research on Yield, Yield Components and Quality of Some Soybean Genotypes in Aegean Region as Main Crop. Anadolu, J. Of Aari 19 (1) 2009, 34 – 46.
• Unal, I. and M. Onder. 2008. Determination of Some Agricultural Characteristics of The Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) Lines Developed by Hybridization Method. Journal of Selcuk university, Faculty of Agriculture. 22 (45):52-57 (in Turkish).
• Whigham, D.K and H.C. Minor. 1978. Agronomic Characteristics and Environmental Stress. Soybean Agronomy, Physiology and Utilization. Geoffrey Norman, A. (Ed.), Academic Press, London. pp. 78-116, 247p.
• Yildirim, A. 2017. Determination of Yield and Important Agronomic Traits of Some Soybean Varieties and Lines Grown under Second Crop Condition in The Aegean Region. MSc Thesis. Ege University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences. 69 pages.
• Yilmaz, A. H. and L. Efe. 1998. Possibilities of growing of some soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merill] cultivars as a double crop under Kahramanmaras conditions. Tr. J. of Agriculture and Forestry. 22:135-142