EFFECT OF SOWING METHODS ON SILAGE YIELD AND QUALITY OF SOME CORN CULTIVARS GROWN IN SECOND CROP SEASON UNDER IRRIGATED CONDITION OF CENTRAL ANATOLIA, TURKEY

Year 2018, , 72 - 79, 15.06.2018

Onur Ilerı , Emine Budaklı Carpıcı , Betul Erbeyı Suleyman Avcı Ali Koc

https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.424379

Cited By: 10

Abstract

Silage corn has an important potential as second crop under irrigated lands of semi-arid regions. This research was conducted to determine silage yield and quality of some corn cultivars (Ada, Cadiz, Donana, Sagunto and Sakarya) grown after barley harvest using different sowing methods (direct and conventional) in 2014 and 2015 years in Eskisehir Plain. Investigated parameters were significantly different between years except for leaf ratio and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) content. In the first year, plant height, fresh forage yield, and Fleig point were higher than the second year but dry matter, crude protein, acid detergent fiber (ADF) content, cob ratio and pH were contrarily higher in the second year. Sowing method significantly affected all parameters except leaf ratio. Using direct sowing method increased cob ratio (40.3 %), dry matter (22.93 %), crude protein content (7.56 %), pH (3,76) and Fleig score (85.82) compared to conventional sowing method. Cultivars significantly varied in terms of plant height, cob ratio, dry matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, pH, and Fleig point. Considering the total silage yield and quality the domestic cultivar Ada, which seeds are common in the market, could be suggested after barley harvest for second crop production as long as sown conventionally in irrigated lands of Central Anatolia.

Keywords

Second crop, silage corn, silage quality, silage yield, sowing method

References

• Acikgoz, E. 2001. Forage Crops. VIPAS publication number 58, 584p. Bursa. (In Turkish)
• Akar, T., M. Kaplan, N. Sagir and A. Gelebur. 2014. Effects of different liquid-manure treatments on yield and quality parameters of second-crop silage corn under reduced tillage conditions. Rom. Agric. Res. 31: 1-11.
• Akdeniz, H., I. Yilmaz, N. Andic and S. Zorer. 2004. A Study on yield and forage values of some corn cultivars. YYU. J. Agr. Sci. 14: 47-51.
• Almaraz, J.J., F. Mabood, X. Zhou, E.G. Gregorich and D.L. Smith. 2008. Climate change, weather variability and corn yield at a higher latitude locale: Southwestern Quebec. Clim. Change. 88: 187-197.
• Barnes, R.F., D.A. Miller and C.J. Nelson. 1995. Forages, volume II: The science of grassland agriculture. 5th ed. Iowa State Univ. Press. Ames. 357p
• Barut, Z.B., C. Ertekin and H.A. Karaagac. 2011. Tillage effects on energy use for corn silage in Mediterranean Coastal of Turkey. Energy. 36: 5466-5475.
• Bayhan, Y., B. Kayisoglu, E. Gonulol, H. Yalcin and N. Sungur. 2006. Possibilities of direct drilling and reduced tillage in second crop silage corn. Soil Tillage Res. 88: 1-7.
• Baytekin, H. and I. Gul. 2009. Forage harvest, dry matter production, storage and silage. In: Forages, volume I (General Chapter), ed.
• Avcioglu, R., Hatipoglu, R. and Karadag, Y., 121-159, Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Areas of Republic of Turkey, Izmir. (In Turkish).
• Carpici, E.B. 2016. A study on forage yield and quality of some silage maize cultivars which can be cultivated as second crop in Bursa. Derim. 33: 299-308.
• Carter, M.R., J.B. Sanderson, J.A. Ivany and R.P. White. 2002. Influence of rotation and tillage on forage maize productivity, weed species, and soil quality of a fine sandy loam in the cool–humid climate of Atlantic Canada. Soil Tillage Res. 67: 85-98.
• Chaturvedi, A.K., R.N. Bahuguna, D. Shah, M. Pal and S.K. Jagadish. 2017. High temperature stress during flowering and grain filling offsets beneficial impact of elevated CO2 on assimilate partitioning and sink-strength in rice. Scientific Report. 7: 8227. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07464-6.
• Cherney, J.H. and D.J.R. Cherney. 2003. Assessing silage quality. In Silage Science and Technology, (ed. D.R. Buxton, R.E. Muck, J.H. Harrison). ASA, CSSA and SSSA, Madison, WI, 141-198p.
• Cikman, A., T. Monis, R. Saglam and A.S. Nacar. 2010. Application of reduced soil tillage and non-tillage agriculture techniques in Harran Plain (second crop maize and sesame growing). J. Agri. Mac. Sci. 6: 221-228.
• Cook C.W. and J. Stubbendieck. 1986. Range research: basic problems and techniques. Society for Range Management, Colorado. 317p.
• Cuomo, G.J., D.D. Redfearn and D.C. Blouin. 1998. Plant density effects on tropical corn forage mass, morphology, and nutritive value. Agron. J. 90: 93-96.
• Cecen, S., M. Oten and C. Erdurmus. 2005. Assesment of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.), sudangrass (Sorghum sudanense L.) and corn (Zea mays L.) as second crop in the Coastal Region of West Mediterranean Belt of Turkey. Mediterr. Agric. Sci. 18: 337-341.
• Delph, L.F., M.H. Johannsson and A.G. Stephenson. 1997. How environmental factors affect pollen performance: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Ecology. 78: 1632-1639.
• Edreira, J.I.R. and M.E. Otegui. 2012. Heat stress in temperate and tropical maize hybrids: differences in crop growth, biomass partitioning and reserves use. Field Crops Res. 130: 87-98.
• Garibay, S.V., P. Stamp, H.U. Ammon and B. Feil. 1997. Yield and quality components of silage maize in killed and live cover crop sods. Eur. J. Agron. 6: 179-190.
• Geren, H., R. Avcioglu, B. Kir, G. Demiroglu, M. Yilmaz and A.C. Cevheri. 2003. Effect of different sowing dates on the yield and quality characteristics of some maize cultivars grown as second crop for silage. J. Ege Uni. F. Agri. 40: 57-64.
• Geren, H., R. Avcioglu, H. Soya and B. Kir. 2008. Intercropping of corn with cowpea and bean: biomass yield and silage quality. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 7: 4100-4104.
• Geren, H. and Y.T. Kavut. 2009. An investigation on comparison of sorghum (Sorghum sp.) species with corn (Zea mays L.) grown under second crop production. J. Ege Uni. F. Agri. 46: 9-16.
• Givens, D.I. and E.R. Deaville. 2001. Comparison of major carbohydrate fractions and cell wall digestibility in silages made from older and newer maize genotypes grown in the UK. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 89: 69-82.
• Gunes, A. and A. Acar. 2006. The determination of growing possibilities of silage hybrid maize cultivars as second crop under Karaman ecological conditions. Selcuk J. Agri. Food Sci. 20: 84-92.
• Hegab, M.M., M.A. Gabr, S.A.M. Al-Wakeel and B.A. Hamed. 2016. Allelopathic potential of Eucalyptus rostrata leaf residue on some metabolic activities of Zea mays L. Univers. J. Plant Sci. 4: 11-21.
• Iptas, S. and A. Acar. 2006. Effects of hybrid and row spacing on maize forage yield and quality. Plant Soil Environ. 52: 515-522.
• Jones, D.I.H. 1981. Chemical composition and nutritive value. In: Handson J., R.D. Baker, A. Davies, A.S. Laidlows, J.D. Leawer, editors. Sward Measurement Handbook. Kenilworth, UK: The British Grassland Society Press. 243-265p.
• Karaagac, H.A. and Z.B. Barut. 2007. Comparing of different tillage and sowing systems in terms of technical and economical on the second crop corn production for silage. J. Agri. Mac. Sci. 3: 33-40.
• Karaagac, H.A., Z.B. Barut, B. Cakir, S. Aykanat, A. Bolat and C. Saglam. 2010.Comparing of different tillage and planting systems in the second crop corn silage in term of yield and economics. J. Agri. Mac. Sci. 6: 261-266.
• Karasu, A., M. Oz., G. Bayram and I. Turgut. 2009. The effect of nitrogen levels on forage yield and some attributes in some hybrid corn (Zea mays indentata Sturt.) cultivars sown as second crop for silage corn. Afr. J. Agr. Res. 4: 166-170.
• Kendir, H. and C.S. Sevimay. 1997. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on selected morphological characters\ hay and protein yield of Sudan grass (Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf) cultivars under rainfed conditions of Central Anatolia. J. Field Crops Central Res. Ins. 6: 35-42.
• Kilic, A. 1986. Silo Feed. Bilgehan Publications. Izmir, 327p.
• Kremer, R.J. and M. Ben-Hammouda. 2009. Allelopathic plants. 19. Barley (Hordeum vulgare L). Allelopathy J. 24: 225-242.
• Kruse, S., A. Hermann, A. Kornher and F. Taube. 2008. Evaluation of genotype and environmental variation in fibre content of silage maize using a model-assisted approach. Eur. J. Agron. 28: 210–223.
• Kusaksiz, T. 2010. Adaptability of some new maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars for silage production as main crop in Mediterranean environment. Turkish J. Field Crops. 15: 193-197.
• Larcher, W. 1995. Physiological Plant Ecology (Third ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 506p.
• Mut, H., M.C. Dogrusoz, E. Gulumser, U. Basaran and I. Ayan. 2017. Determination on quality traits different silage maize cultivars which can be cultivated as second crop. XII. Field Crops Cong. 12-15 September, Kahramanmaras, Turkey, 204-208.
• Mulayim, M., M.A. Avci, N. Beyoglu and S. Degerli. 1995. The effect of direct or tillage seeding on yield and yield components of second crop cereal + legume mix. J. Selcuk Uni. F. Agri. 7: 21-31.
• Nkosi, B.D., A.T. Kanengoni and R. Thomas. 2011. Effects of ensiling total mixed potato hash ration with or without bacterial ınoculation on silage fermentation and nutritive value for growing pigs. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 10: 1667-1672.
• Santos, J.A., A.F. da Fonseca, G. Barth and R.Z. Filho. 2018. Silage maize quality in different uses of Italian ryegrass and soil management methods after liming. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 64: 173-184. SAS Institute Inc. 2011. Base SAS® 9.3 Procedures Guide [computer program]. 536p.
• Toruk, F., E. Gonulol, B. Kayisioglu and F. Koc. 2010. Effects of compaction and maturity stages on sunflower silage quality. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 5: 55-59.
• Tugay, M. and R. Acar. 2013. The effects of tillage and non-tillage on yield and quality of sorghum as second crop. Turkey X. Field Crops Cong. 10 – 13 September, Konya. 422-425.
• Turan, N. and I. Yılmaz. 2000. Determination of green yield and some yield components of silage corn cultivars grown first and second crop in Van condition. J Ataturk Uni. F. Agri. 32:63-71.
• Van Soest, P.J., J.B. Robertson and B.A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74: 3583-3597.
• Yalcin, H. and E. Cakir. 2006. Tillage effects and energy efficiencies of subsoiling and direct seeding in light soil on yield of second crop corn for silage in Western Turkey. Soil Tillage Res. 90: 250–255.