Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2015, Volume: 20 Issue: 1, 43 - 48, 18.05.2015
https://doi.org/10.17557/.08197

Abstract

References

  • LITERATURE CITED
  • Buirchell, B.J. 1994. Domestication and potential of the rough-seeded lupins. In: Neves-Martins, Beirão da Costa ML editors. Proceedings of the 7th International Lupin Conference Advances in Lupin Research, 18-23 April 1993; Evora, Portugal: International Lupin Association, pp.19–24.
  • Clements, J., L. Prilyuk, J. Quealy and G. Francis. 2008. Interspecific crossing among the New World lupin species for Lupinus mutabilis crop improvement. In: Palta JA, Berger JD, editors. Proceedings of the 12th International Lupin Conference Lupin for Health and Wealth, 14-18 September 2008; Fremantle, Western Australia: International Lupin Association, pp. 324-327.
  • Di Giorgio, G., D. Graziano, P. Ruisi, G. Amato and D. Giambalvo. 2009. Pheno-morphological and agronomic diversity among Scorpiurus muricatus (Fabaceae) natural populations collected in Sicily. J Agric Science 147:411–422.
  • Evans, J., A.M., McNeill, M.J., Unkovich, N.A., Fettell and D.P. Heenan. 2001. Net nitrogen balances for cool-season grain legume crops and contributions to wheat nitrogen uptake: a review’ Australian J. of Experimental Agriculture 41:347–359.
  • Fychan, R., C.L, Marley., G.G., Lewis, D.R.W., Davies, V.J., Theobald, R., Jones and M.T. Abberton. 2008. Effects of feeding concentrate diets containing narrow-leaf lupin, yellow lupin or soya when compared with a control diet on the productivity of finishing lambs. In: Palta J.A., and Berger JD, editors. Proceedings of the 12th International Lupin Conference Lupin for Health and Wealth, 14-18 September 2008; Fremantle, Western Australia: International Lupin Association, pp.127-131.
  • Galek R. 2010. Studies on the variability of some morphological and functional characters of Lupinus with particular consideration intra and interspecific hybrids. Dissertation, University of Environmental and Life Sciences Poland
  • Ghafoor, A., and Z. Ahmad. 2003. Exploitation of Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper germplasm using multivariate analysis based on agronomic traits. Pak. J. Bot. 35(2):187–196.
  • Ghafoor, A., Z., Ahmad, A.S., Quereshi, and M. Bashir. 2002. Genetic relationship in Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper and V. variata (L.) R. Wilczek based on morphological traits and SDS-PAGE. Euphytica 123:367–378.
  • Ghafoor, A. and M. Arshad. 2008. Multivariate analysis for quantitative traits to determine genetic diversity of blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper germplasm. Pak. J. Bot. 40(6):2307–2313.
  • Gladstones, J.S., Atkins C.A., and J.Hamblin. 1998. Lupins as Crop Plants, Biology, Production and Utilization. 1 ed. Cambridge: CAB International
  • Grabiński, T. 1992. Basics quantification of the spatial variables. The study spatial market consumption. 1 ed. Warsaw, Poland, PWN
  • Heistinger, A. and K. Pistrick. 2007. ‘Altreier Kaffee’: Lupinus pilosus L. cultivated as coffe substitute in Northern Italy (Alto Adige/Südtirol). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 54:1623–1630.
  • Ilker, E., F., Aykut Tonk, O., Caylak, M., Tosun and I. Ozmen. 2009. Assessment of genotype x environment interactions for grain yield in maize hybrids using AMMI and GGE biplot analyses. Turkish J. of Field Crops 14(2):123-135.
  • Kaiser, H.F. 1960. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20:141-151.
  • Mitrović, B., D., Stanisavljevi, S., Treski, M., Stojaković, M. Ivanović, G., Bekevac and M. Rajković. 2012. Evaluation of experimental maize hybrids tested in multi-location trials using AMMI and GGE biplot analyses. Turkish J. of Field Crops 17(1):35-40.
  • Römer, P., P.D.S., Caligari, M.A., Rahim, C., Huyghe, A., Hardy, J., Neves-Martins, E. and Sawicka-Sienkiewicz. 1999. Breeding perspectives of Lupinus mutabilis in the Middle Europe. In: Hill GD, editor. Proceedings of the of the 8th International Lupin Conference Towards the 21st Century, 11-16 May 1996; Asilomar, California, USA: North American Lupin Associattion on behalf of the International Lupin Association, pp.353-356.
  • Sawicka-Sienkiewicz, E., R., Galek, J.C. Clements and J. Wilson. 2008. Difficulties with interspecific hybridisation in the genus Lupinus. In: Palta JA, Berger JD, Editors of the 12th International Lupin Conference Lupin for Health and Wealth, 14-18 September 2008; Fremantle, Western Australia: International Lupin Association, pp.135–142
  • Sipsas, S. 2008. Lupin products – concepts and reality. In: Palta JA, Berger JD, editors. Proceedings of the 12th International Lupin Conference Lupin for Health and Wealth, 14-18 September 2008; Fremantle, Western Australia: International Lupin Association, pp.506 – 513.
  • Sweetingham., M. and R., Kingwell. 2008. Lupin – reflections and future possibilities. In: Palta JA, Berger JD, editors. Proceedings of the 12th International Lupin Conference Lupin for Health and Wealth, 14-18 September 2008; Fremantle, Western Australia: International Lupin Association, pp.514- 525.

PHENO-MORPHOLOGICAL AND AGRONOMIC DIVERSITY IN A COLLECTION OF WILD AND DOMESTICATED SPECIES OF THE GENUS LUPINUS

Year 2015, Volume: 20 Issue: 1, 43 - 48, 18.05.2015
https://doi.org/10.17557/.08197

Abstract

The aim of this study was evaluated variability in collection of 20 genotypes represented eight domesticated and wild species of genus Lupinus. Analyses were made using multi-dimensional assessment based on twenty simultaneously considered characters from three years fields experiment. The cluster analysis (CA) and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed for illustrated diversity among investigated genotypes. The first three principal components contributed for 75.8% of the overall multi-trait variability in the means of all analyzed characters. The first principal component was found to account for 38.4% of the variability. The phenological phases and the height of a plant had the greatest contribution to this particular component. The second principal component accounted for 23.3% of the diversity regarding the number of pods from a lateral stem and emergence. On the other hand, the number of pods from the main stem and 1000-seed weight constituted traits the strongest linked with the third principal component, which accounted for 14.1% of the diversity. The obtained results will be helpful to define a strategy in the future lupin breeding programs.

References

  • LITERATURE CITED
  • Buirchell, B.J. 1994. Domestication and potential of the rough-seeded lupins. In: Neves-Martins, Beirão da Costa ML editors. Proceedings of the 7th International Lupin Conference Advances in Lupin Research, 18-23 April 1993; Evora, Portugal: International Lupin Association, pp.19–24.
  • Clements, J., L. Prilyuk, J. Quealy and G. Francis. 2008. Interspecific crossing among the New World lupin species for Lupinus mutabilis crop improvement. In: Palta JA, Berger JD, editors. Proceedings of the 12th International Lupin Conference Lupin for Health and Wealth, 14-18 September 2008; Fremantle, Western Australia: International Lupin Association, pp. 324-327.
  • Di Giorgio, G., D. Graziano, P. Ruisi, G. Amato and D. Giambalvo. 2009. Pheno-morphological and agronomic diversity among Scorpiurus muricatus (Fabaceae) natural populations collected in Sicily. J Agric Science 147:411–422.
  • Evans, J., A.M., McNeill, M.J., Unkovich, N.A., Fettell and D.P. Heenan. 2001. Net nitrogen balances for cool-season grain legume crops and contributions to wheat nitrogen uptake: a review’ Australian J. of Experimental Agriculture 41:347–359.
  • Fychan, R., C.L, Marley., G.G., Lewis, D.R.W., Davies, V.J., Theobald, R., Jones and M.T. Abberton. 2008. Effects of feeding concentrate diets containing narrow-leaf lupin, yellow lupin or soya when compared with a control diet on the productivity of finishing lambs. In: Palta J.A., and Berger JD, editors. Proceedings of the 12th International Lupin Conference Lupin for Health and Wealth, 14-18 September 2008; Fremantle, Western Australia: International Lupin Association, pp.127-131.
  • Galek R. 2010. Studies on the variability of some morphological and functional characters of Lupinus with particular consideration intra and interspecific hybrids. Dissertation, University of Environmental and Life Sciences Poland
  • Ghafoor, A., and Z. Ahmad. 2003. Exploitation of Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper germplasm using multivariate analysis based on agronomic traits. Pak. J. Bot. 35(2):187–196.
  • Ghafoor, A., Z., Ahmad, A.S., Quereshi, and M. Bashir. 2002. Genetic relationship in Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper and V. variata (L.) R. Wilczek based on morphological traits and SDS-PAGE. Euphytica 123:367–378.
  • Ghafoor, A. and M. Arshad. 2008. Multivariate analysis for quantitative traits to determine genetic diversity of blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper germplasm. Pak. J. Bot. 40(6):2307–2313.
  • Gladstones, J.S., Atkins C.A., and J.Hamblin. 1998. Lupins as Crop Plants, Biology, Production and Utilization. 1 ed. Cambridge: CAB International
  • Grabiński, T. 1992. Basics quantification of the spatial variables. The study spatial market consumption. 1 ed. Warsaw, Poland, PWN
  • Heistinger, A. and K. Pistrick. 2007. ‘Altreier Kaffee’: Lupinus pilosus L. cultivated as coffe substitute in Northern Italy (Alto Adige/Südtirol). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 54:1623–1630.
  • Ilker, E., F., Aykut Tonk, O., Caylak, M., Tosun and I. Ozmen. 2009. Assessment of genotype x environment interactions for grain yield in maize hybrids using AMMI and GGE biplot analyses. Turkish J. of Field Crops 14(2):123-135.
  • Kaiser, H.F. 1960. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20:141-151.
  • Mitrović, B., D., Stanisavljevi, S., Treski, M., Stojaković, M. Ivanović, G., Bekevac and M. Rajković. 2012. Evaluation of experimental maize hybrids tested in multi-location trials using AMMI and GGE biplot analyses. Turkish J. of Field Crops 17(1):35-40.
  • Römer, P., P.D.S., Caligari, M.A., Rahim, C., Huyghe, A., Hardy, J., Neves-Martins, E. and Sawicka-Sienkiewicz. 1999. Breeding perspectives of Lupinus mutabilis in the Middle Europe. In: Hill GD, editor. Proceedings of the of the 8th International Lupin Conference Towards the 21st Century, 11-16 May 1996; Asilomar, California, USA: North American Lupin Associattion on behalf of the International Lupin Association, pp.353-356.
  • Sawicka-Sienkiewicz, E., R., Galek, J.C. Clements and J. Wilson. 2008. Difficulties with interspecific hybridisation in the genus Lupinus. In: Palta JA, Berger JD, Editors of the 12th International Lupin Conference Lupin for Health and Wealth, 14-18 September 2008; Fremantle, Western Australia: International Lupin Association, pp.135–142
  • Sipsas, S. 2008. Lupin products – concepts and reality. In: Palta JA, Berger JD, editors. Proceedings of the 12th International Lupin Conference Lupin for Health and Wealth, 14-18 September 2008; Fremantle, Western Australia: International Lupin Association, pp.506 – 513.
  • Sweetingham., M. and R., Kingwell. 2008. Lupin – reflections and future possibilities. In: Palta JA, Berger JD, editors. Proceedings of the 12th International Lupin Conference Lupin for Health and Wealth, 14-18 September 2008; Fremantle, Western Australia: International Lupin Association, pp.514- 525.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Agronomy
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Renata GALEK Galek This is me

Dariusz Zalewskı This is me

Bartosz Kozak This is me

Ewa Sawıcka-sıenkıewıcz This is me

Publication Date May 18, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 20 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Galek, R. G., Zalewskı, D., Kozak, B., Sawıcka-sıenkıewıcz, E. (2015). PHENO-MORPHOLOGICAL AND AGRONOMIC DIVERSITY IN A COLLECTION OF WILD AND DOMESTICATED SPECIES OF THE GENUS LUPINUS. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, 20(1), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.17557/.08197
AMA Galek RG, Zalewskı D, Kozak B, Sawıcka-sıenkıewıcz E. PHENO-MORPHOLOGICAL AND AGRONOMIC DIVERSITY IN A COLLECTION OF WILD AND DOMESTICATED SPECIES OF THE GENUS LUPINUS. TJFC. May 2015;20(1):43-48. doi:10.17557/.08197
Chicago Galek, Renata GALEK, Dariusz Zalewskı, Bartosz Kozak, and Ewa Sawıcka-sıenkıewıcz. “PHENO-MORPHOLOGICAL AND AGRONOMIC DIVERSITY IN A COLLECTION OF WILD AND DOMESTICATED SPECIES OF THE GENUS LUPINUS”. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 20, no. 1 (May 2015): 43-48. https://doi.org/10.17557/.08197.
EndNote Galek RG, Zalewskı D, Kozak B, Sawıcka-sıenkıewıcz E (May 1, 2015) PHENO-MORPHOLOGICAL AND AGRONOMIC DIVERSITY IN A COLLECTION OF WILD AND DOMESTICATED SPECIES OF THE GENUS LUPINUS. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 20 1 43–48.
IEEE R. G. Galek, D. Zalewskı, B. Kozak, and E. Sawıcka-sıenkıewıcz, “PHENO-MORPHOLOGICAL AND AGRONOMIC DIVERSITY IN A COLLECTION OF WILD AND DOMESTICATED SPECIES OF THE GENUS LUPINUS”, TJFC, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 43–48, 2015, doi: 10.17557/.08197.
ISNAD Galek, Renata GALEK et al. “PHENO-MORPHOLOGICAL AND AGRONOMIC DIVERSITY IN A COLLECTION OF WILD AND DOMESTICATED SPECIES OF THE GENUS LUPINUS”. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 20/1 (May 2015), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.17557/.08197.
JAMA Galek RG, Zalewskı D, Kozak B, Sawıcka-sıenkıewıcz E. PHENO-MORPHOLOGICAL AND AGRONOMIC DIVERSITY IN A COLLECTION OF WILD AND DOMESTICATED SPECIES OF THE GENUS LUPINUS. TJFC. 2015;20:43–48.
MLA Galek, Renata GALEK et al. “PHENO-MORPHOLOGICAL AND AGRONOMIC DIVERSITY IN A COLLECTION OF WILD AND DOMESTICATED SPECIES OF THE GENUS LUPINUS”. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, vol. 20, no. 1, 2015, pp. 43-48, doi:10.17557/.08197.
Vancouver Galek RG, Zalewskı D, Kozak B, Sawıcka-sıenkıewıcz E. PHENO-MORPHOLOGICAL AND AGRONOMIC DIVERSITY IN A COLLECTION OF WILD AND DOMESTICATED SPECIES OF THE GENUS LUPINUS. TJFC. 2015;20(1):43-8.

Turkish Journal of Field Crops is published by the Society of Field Crops Science and issued twice a year.
Owner : Prof. Dr. Behçet KIR
Ege University, Faculty of Agriculture,Department of Field Crops
Editor in Chief : Prof. Dr. Emre ILKER
Address : 848 sok. 2. Beyler İşhanı No:72, Kat:3 D.313 35000 Konak-Izmir, TURKEY
Email :  turkishjournaloffieldcrops@gmail.com contact@field-crops.org
Tel : +90 232 3112679
Tel/Fax : : +90 232 3432474