THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT NITROGEN DOSES AND IRRIGATION LEVELS ON YIELD, NUTRITIVE VALUE, FERMENTATION AND GAS PRODUCTION OF CORN SILAGE

Year 2016, Volume: 21 Issue: 1, 101 - 109, 01.06.2016

Mahmut Kaplan , Ozkan Baran Ali Unlukara Hasan Kale Mustafa Arslan Kanber Kara Selma Buyukkilic Beyzı Yusuf Konca Abdullah Ulas

https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.82794

Cited By: 27

Abstract

The study was conducted to investigate the effects of different irrigation levels and nitrogen doses on yield, yield
parameters, silage characteristics, digestibility, gas and methane production of corn silage. Three different
irrigation levels (50%, 75% and 100% of depleted water) and 3 different nitrogen doses (100, 200 and 300 kg
ha-1 N) were applied to corn silage. Experiments were implemented in split-split plots design with three
replications during the growing seasons of 2013-2014. Plants were harvested at milk-dough stage and yield and
morphologic characteristics were determined. Then, harvested plants were silaged and chemical characteristics
were investigated. Irrigation level x nitrogen dose interaction was not found to be significant. Increasing nitrogen
doses increased plant height, plant diameter, green herbage yield, crude protein, metabolic energy, gas
production and organic matter digestibility and decreased pH levels, ADF and NDF ratios. Increased irrigation
levels positively affected green herbage yield, plant height, plant diameter and increased ADF and NDF ratios.
Gas production, metabolic energy and organic matter digestibility decreased with increasing irrigation levels.
Increasing irrigation levels improved corn yields, but reduced the quality. On the other hand, increasing
nitrogen doses had positive contributions both to yield and quality characteristics.

Keywords

Chemical composition, corn silage, gas production irrigation, nitrogen fertilization

References

• Akar, T., M. Kaplan, N. Sagir, A. Gelebur. 2014. Effects of different liquid-manure treatments on yield and quality parameters of second-crop silage corn under reduced tillage conditions. Romanian Agricultural Research. 31: 1–11.
• Andrade, F.H., L. Encharte, R. Rizzalli, A.D. Maggiiora, M. Casanovas. 2002. Kernel Predtion in Maize under Nitrogen or Water Stress. Crop Sci. 42: 1173–1179.
• AOAC, 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.US.
• Ball, D.M., C.S. Hoveland, G.D. Lacefield. 1996. Forage Quality. In. Southern Forages (2nd edition). 124-132. Potash & Phosphate Institute and Foundation for Agronomic Research, Norcross, GA.
• Barker, S.B., W.H. Summerson. 1941. The colorimetric determination of lactic acid in biological material. J. Biol. Chem. 138: 535–554.
• Bates, G. 2009. Corn Silage. Agricultural Extension Service. The University of Tennessee. 1-8.
• http.//utbfc.utk.edu/Content%20Folders/Forages/Hay%20an d%20Silage/Publications /sp434d.pdf
• Blümmel, M., Makkar, H.P.S., Chisanga, G., Mtimuni, J., Becker, K. 1997. The prediction of dry matter intake of temperate and tropical roughages from in vitro digestibility/gas-production data, and the dry matter intake and in vitro digestibility of African roughages in relation to ruminant liveweight gain. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 69: 131–141.
• Christensen, L.E., F.E. Below, R.H. Hageman. 1981. The effects of ear removal on senescence and metabolism of maize. Plant Physiol. 68: 1180–1185.
• Cox, W.J., D.J.R. Charney. 2005. Row spacing, plant density, and nitrogen effects on corn silage. Agron. J. 93: 597–602.
• Cox, W.J., S. Kalonge, D.J.R. W.S. CherneyReid. 1993. Growth, yield and quality of forage maize under different nitrogen management practices. Agron. J. 85: 843–347.
• Ferrer, F., J.M. Villar, C.O. Stockle, P. Villar, M. Aran. 1997. Impacto del nitrógeno presente en el agua de riego en la zona regable del Canal d’Urgell (Nitrogen impact in irrigation water in the irrigated area of the Urgell’s Channel). XV Congreso de Riegos y Drenajes, Lleida. 241–248.
• Foyer, C.H., M.H. Valadier, A. Migge, T.W. Becker. 1998. Draught-induced effects on nitrate reductase activity and mRNA and on the coordination of nitrogen and carbon metabolism in maize leaves. Plant Physiol. 117: 283–292.
• Galdamez-Cabrera, N.W., K.P. Coffey, W.K. Coblentz, J.E. Turner, D.A. Scarbrough, Z.B. Johnson. 2002. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on effective ruminal disappearance of dry matter, fiber and selected macro-minerals from common bermudagrass harvested on two different dates. Arkansas Animal Science Department Report Series. 499: 41–44.
• Goel, G., H.P.S. Makkar, K. Becker. 2008. Effect of Sesbania sesban and Carduus pycnocephalus leaves and Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seeds and their extract on partitioning of nutrients from roughage-and concentratebased feeds to methane. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 147: 72–89.
• Gul, I., M. Yildirim, C. Akinci, I. Doran, H. Kilic. 2008. Response of Silage Maize (Zea mays L.) to Nitrogen Fertilizer after Different Crops in a Semi Arid Environment. Turk. J. Agric. For. 32: 513–520.
• Hargreaves, A., J. Hill, J.D. Leaver. 2009. Effect of stage of growth on the chemical composition and nutritive value and ensilability of whole-crop barley. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 152: 50–61.
• Islam, M.R., S.C. Garcia, A. Horadagoda. 2012. Effects of irrigation and rates and timing of nitrogen fertilizer on dry matter yield, proportions of plant fractions of maize and nutritive value and in vitro gas production characteristics of whole crop maize silage. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 172: 125– 135.
• Islam, M.R., S.M.E. Rahman, M. Md. Rahman, D.H. Oh, C.S. Ra. 2010. The effects of biogas slurry on the production and quality of maize fodder. Turk. J. Agric. For. 34: 91–99.
• Istanbulluoglu, A., I. Kocaman, F. Konukcu. 2002. Water use– production relationship of maize under Tekirdag conditions in Turkey. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 5: 287–291.
• Kaiser, W.M. 1987. Effect of water deficit on photosynthetic capacity. Physiol. Plant. 71: 142–149.
• Kamalak, A., A.I. Atalay, C.O. Ozkan, E. Kaya, A. Tatliyer. 2011. Determination of potential nutritive value of Trigonella kotschi fenzl hay harvested at three different maturity stages. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 17: 635–640.
• Kamalak, A., Canbolat, O. 2010. Determination of nutritive value of wild narrow-leaved clover (Trifolium angustifolium) hay harvested at three maturity stages using chemical composition and in vitro gas production. Trop. Grassland, 44: 128–133.
• Kang, J.H., H.J. Lee, B.H. Park. 1986. Effect of nitrogen level and plant population on agronomic characteristics and yield of silage maize. Soil and Fertilizers. 52: 95.
• Kaplan, M. 2005. Effects of different intra and inter row spacing on yield and yield components of second crop silage maize (Zea mays L.) under Kahramanmaras conditions. Univercity of Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam Enstitute of Natural and Applied Science Department of Field Crops. MSc Thesis.
• Keady, T.W.J. 2005. Ensiled maize and whole crop; wheat forages for beef and dairy cattle. Effects on animal performance. Silage production and utilization. In. Park, R.S.,
• Stronge, M.D. (Eds.), Proc. XIV International Silage Conference. Wageningen Academic Publishers, 65–82.
• Khelil, M.N., S. Rejeb, B. Henchi, J.P. Destain. 2013. Effects of irrigation water quality and nitrogen rate on the recovery of 15N fertilizer by sorghum in field study. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 44: 2647–2655.
• Kim, K., D.E. Clay, C.G. Carlson, S.A. Clay, T. Trooien. 2008. Do synergistic relationships between nitrogen and water influence the ability of corn to use nitrogen derived from fertilizer and soil? Agron. J. 100: 551–556.
• Kirtok, Y. 1998. The production and use of corn (Mısır üretimi ve kullanımı). Kocaoluk Yayınevi, Istanbul.
• Kiziloglu, F.M., U. Sahin, Y. Kuslu, T. Tunc. 2009. Determining water–yield relationship, water use efficiency, crop and pan coefficients for silage maize in a semiarid region. Irrig. Sci. 27: 129–137.
• Kruse, S., A. Hermann, A. Kornher, F. Taube. 2008. Evaluation of genotype and environmental variation in fiber content of silage maize using a model-assisted approach. Eur. J. Agron. 28: 210–223.
• Kumar, A., R.S. Jaiswal, M.L. Verma, Y.P. Joshi, 2001. Effect of nitrogen level and cutting management on yield and quality of different varieties of oat fodder. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition. 18: 262–266.
• Kusvuran, A., M. Kaplan, R.I. Nazlı, V. Saruhan, Y. Karadag. 2015. Determination of possibilities to grow some corn (Zea mays L.) cultivars for silage production under Middle Kizilirmak Basin ecological conditions. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 32: 57– 67.
• Lassey, K.R. 2007. Livestock methane emission: from the individual grazing animal through national inventories to the global methane cycle. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 142: 120–132.
• Lopez, S., H.P.S. Makkar, C.R. Soliva. 2010. Screening plants and plant products for methane inhibitors. In “In vitro screening of plant resources for extra nutritional attributes in ruminants. Nuclear and related methodologies”, Ed; Vercoe PE, Makkar HPS, Schlink A, London, New York, USA.
• Mahajan, S., N. Tuteja. 2005. Cold, salinity and drought stresses. An overview. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 444: 139–158.
• McDonald, P., A.R. Henderson, S.J.E. Heron. 1991. The Biochemistry of Silage. Second Edition. p. 340, Chalcombe Publication.
• Meeske, R., G. Ashbell, Z.G. Weinberg, T. Kipnis. 1993. Ensiling forage sorghum at two stages of maturity with the addition of lactic acid bacterial inoculants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 43: 165–175.
• Menke, K.H., Raab, L., Salewski, A., Steingass, H., Fritz, D., Schneider, W. 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J. Agr. Sci. 93: 217–222.
• Menke, K.H., Steingass, H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Dev. 28: 7–55.
• Mould, F.L., E.R. Ørskov, S.O. Mann. 1983. Associative effects of mixed feeds. I. Effects of type and level of supplementation and the influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis, in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 10: 15–30.
• Neylon, J.M., L. Kung. 2003. Effects of cutting height and maturity on the nutritive value of corn silage for lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 86: 2163–2169.
• Otegui, M.E., F.H. Andrade, E.E. Suero. 1995. Growth, water use, and kernel abortion of maize subjected to drought at silking. Field Crop Res. 40: 87–94
• Pelleschi, S., J.P. Rocher, J.L. Prioul. 1997. Effect of water restriction on carbohydrate metabolism and photosynthesis in mature maize leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 20: 493–503.
• Ping, W.U., Q. Dai, Q. Tao. 1993. Effect of fertilizer rates on the growth, yield and kernel composition of sweet corn. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 24: 237–253.
• SAS, 1999. SAS User’s Guide. Statistic. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
• Setter, T.L., R. Parra. 2010. Relationship of carbohydrate and abscisic acid levels to kernel set in maize under postpollination water deficit. Crop Sci. 50: 980–988.
• Sezer, I., S. Yanbeyi. 1997. The effects of plant density and nitrogen fertilization on corn yield, yield components and some plant characteristics of popcorn grown in the Carsamba Valley. Turkish Second Field Crop Congress, 22-25 September 1997, Samsun, pp 128–133 (in Turkish).
• Sharp, R.E., W.J. Davies. 1979. Solute regulation and growth by roots and shoots of water-stressed plants. Planta. 147: 43–49.
• Song, Y., C. Birch, S. Qu, J. Hanan. 2010. Maize canopy production under contrasted water regimes. Ann. Appl. Biol. 157: 111–123.
• Spielbauer, G., L. Margl, L.C. Hannah, W. Romisch, C. Ettenhuber, A. Bacher, A. Gierl, W. Eisenreich, U. Genschel. 2006. Robustness of central carbohydrate metabolism in developing maize kernels. Phytochemistry. 67: 1460–1475.
• Subedi K.D. B.L. Ma. 2005. Nitrogen uptake and partitioning in stay-green and leafy maize hybrids. Crop Sci. 45: 740–747. 109
• Swank, J.C., F.E. Below, R.J. Lamber, R.H. Hageman. 1982. Interaction of carbon and nitrogen metabolism in productivity of maize. Plant Physiol. 70: 185–190.
• Tukel, T., R. Hatipoglu. 1997. “Grass Land Management”, Cukurova University, Faculty of Agriculture, Text book Publication Number A-59, Adana, 152pp (in Turkish).
• Tumer, S. 2001. Silo and Silage Techniques, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Livestock, General Directorate of Organization and Support. Publication Department, Ankara (in Turkish).
• Uribelarrea, M., F.E. Below, S.P. Moose. 2004. Grain composition and productivity of maize hybrids derived from the Illinois protein strains in response to variable nitrogen supply. Crop Sci. 44: 1593–1600.
• Van Soest, P.J. 1963. The use of detergents in the analysis of fibre feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fibre and lignin. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 46: 829–835.
• Van Soest, P.J., and R.H. Wine. 1967. The use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell wall constituents. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 50: 50–55.
• World Water Assessment Program, 2009. The United Nations World Water Development Report 3. Water in a Changing World. UNESCO, Paris, and Earthscan, London.
• Yilmaz, M. 2005. The effects of nitrogen fertilization on yield and some agronomical traits of some corn (Zea mays L.) varieties grown as silage. MSc Thesis, Gaziosmanpasha University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences (in Turkish).
• Yosef, E., A. Carmi, M. Nikbachat, A. Zenou, N. Umiel, J. Miron. 2009. Characteristics of tall versus short-type varieties of forage sorghum grown under two irrigation levels, for summer and subsequent fall harvests, and digestibility by sheep of their silages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 152: 1–11.