Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2016, Volume: 21 Issue: 2, 269 - 275, 15.12.2016
https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.49191

Abstract

References

  • Açıkgöz, E. 2001. Forage crops. Foundation of Strengthen of Uludag University. No: 182. Bursa.
  • Altin, M. 1975. An investigation the effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium fertilizers on yield, crude protein and crude ash ratio and plant species composition of natural meadow and rangeland in Erzurum ecological condition.
  • Ataturk Univ. Yay No: 326, Agr. Fac. No: 159, Res. Series No: 95, Erzurum, 141 s.
  • Altin, M. A. Gokkus and A. Koc, 2005. Pasture-rangeland improvement. T. C. Ministry of Agriculture of Rural Affairs, General Directorate of Agricultural Production and Development, Ankara, 468 p.
  • Altin, M., A. Gokkus and A. Koc. 2011. Meadow-pasture management. T. C. Ministry of Agriculture of Rural Affairs, General Directorate of Agricultural Production and Development, Ankara.
  • Bakır, Ö. 1985. Meadow and Pasture Improvement. Ankara University, Agric. Fac. Pub. No. 947, Ankara.
  • Bakoglu, A. 1999. The comparison of some soil and plant characteristics of two different rangeland sites, grazed and ungrazed. Ataturk Univ. Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Field Crops (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis), Erzurum.
  • Bakoglu, A. A. Koc and A. Gokkus, 1999. Some characteristics of the common plants of range and meadows in Erzurum in relation to lifespan, beginning with the flowering and forage quality. Turkish J. Agric. and Forestry 23(4): 951-957.
  • Basbag, M., İ. Gül, and V. Saruhan. 1997. Investigation of yield and composition of protected rangeland in Diyarbakir. Turkey II. Field Crops Cong. 22-25 September 1997, Samsun, 499-503.
  • Beukes, P. C. and R. M. Cowling. 2003. Non-selective grazing impacts on soil properties of the Nama Karoo. J. Range Manage. 56: 547-552.
  • Canfield, R. H. 1941. Application of the line interception method in sampling range vegetation. J. For. 39: 388-394.
  • Comakli, B. M. Dasci and A. Koc. 2008. The effects of traditional grazing practices on upland rangeland vegetation and forage quality. Turkish J. Agric. and Forestry 32:259- 265.
  • Comakli, B. T. Oner and M. Dasci. 2012. Changing of the vegetation on rangeland sites with different using history. Iğdır Univ. J. Inst. Sci. & Tech.2(2):75-82.
  • Delpech, R. 1966. An agronomic application of experimental phytosociology: a contribution to the study of the effect of mineral fertilizer on permanent grasslands in the Seano Valley. Fr. C. R. hebd. Seano. Acad. Agr. Fr. 52(1): 50-60.
  • Gadzi, K. and N. Sayre, 2009. Rangeland health and planned grazing, Field Guide. The Quivira Coalition, Earth Works Institute, the New Ranch Network.
  • Gokkus, A. 1984. Investigations on dry yield, crude protein yield and botanical composition on natural rangelands of Erzurum, practiced different improvement practiced. (Ph.D. thesis). Ataturk Univ. Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Field Crops, Erzurum.
  • Gokkus, A. and A. Koc. 1996. Plant-soil relation in plowed rangeland. Mersin Univ. Engineering Fac. AgricultureEnvironment Relations Symposium Sustainable Using of Natural Sources Proceedings Book. 13-15 May 1996, Mersin, 336-344.
  • Greiner, R., I. Gordon and C. Cocklin. 2009. Ecosystem services from tropical savannas: economic opportunities through payments for environmental services. Rangeland Journal 31:51-59.
  • Herbel, C. H. and R. D. Pieper. 1991. Grazing management. In semiarid lands and deserts: Soil resources and reclamation (Ed.J.Skujin), Marcel Dekker, 361-385, New York.
  • Holechek, J. L., R. D. Pieper and C. H. Herbel. 2011. Range management principles and practices. Sixth edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA. 444 p.
  • Jones, M. B. and S. S. Winans. 1967. Subterranean clover versus nitrogen fertilized annual grasslands: Botanical composition and protein content. Journal of Range Manag. 20(1): 8-12.
  • Junge, B., R. Abaidoo, D. Chikoye and K. Stahr. 2008. Soil conservation in Nigeria. Past and present on-station and onfarm initiatives. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, Iowa, USA. Available at: www.swcs.org
  • Khumalo, G., J. L. Holechek, M. Thomas and F. Molinar. 2007. Long-term vegetation productivity and trend under two stocking levels on Chihuahuan Desert Rangeland. Rangeland Ecol. Manage., 60:165-171.
  • Koc, A. 1995. Effects of topography, soil moisture and temperature on some properties of rangeland vegetation. (Ph.D. thesis) Ataturk Univ. Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Field Crops, Erzurum.
  • Lal, R. 1993. Soil erosion and conservation in West Africa. In World soil erosion and conservation, ed. D. Pimentel, 7-28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Livingstone, I. 1991. Livestock management and overgrazing among Pastoralists. Ambio 20:80-85.
  • National Research Council. 1994. Rangeland Health. New Methods to Classify, Inventory, and Monitor Rangelands. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 182 p.
  • Sanjari, G. 2011. Short-term intensive rotational grazing in the native pasture: I. Results of a plot scale experiment on runoff and soil loss in association with catchment scale's outcomes. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, World Congress on Conservation Agriculture. http://aciar.gov.au/files/node/13992/ short term intensive rotational grazing in native 16680.pdf. (Accessed May 25, 2016).
  • Shadkami, H. and Gh. H. Bibalani. 2011. Overground biomass characteristics of genera single Species Iran (Cnicus benedictus) in northwest Iran (till area of shape star). International Journal of Academic Research 3(1). January 2011, Part III
  • Stoddart, L. A. Smith and T. Box. 1975. Range Management. New York, USA, McGraw-Hill Book Co.
  • Snyman, H. A. 2005. Rangeland degradation in a semi-arid South Africa. I: influence on seasonal root distribution, root/shoot ratios, and water-use efficiency. Journal of Arid Environments 60:457–481.
  • SAS Inst. Inc 2002. SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. 528 p.
  • Tongway, D. J., A. D. Sparrow and M. H. Friedel. 2003. Degradation and recovery processes in arid grazing lands of central Australia. Part I: soil and land resources. Journal of Arid Environments 55:302–326.
  • Wall, G. and S. Omafra. 1987. Soil erosion causes and effects. Ontario factsheet, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. http://www.thegeographeronline.net/uploads/2/6/6/2/266293 56/soil_erosion_causes_and_effects.pdf (Accessed 25 May, 2016).
  • Wu, N. 1997. Indigenous Knowledge and Sustainable Approaches for the Maintenance of Biodiversity in Nomadic Society - Experience from Eastern Tibetan Plateau. Die Erde, 128: 67-80.
  • Zhang, Z. 1995. The effect and causes of grassland degeneration (In Chinese). Pratacultural Science 12 (6):1-5.

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IMPROVEMENT TREATMENTS ON BOTANICAL COMPOSITION AND SEDIMENT MOVEMENT ON GRAZED AND ENCLOSED RANGE SITES

Year 2016, Volume: 21 Issue: 2, 269 - 275, 15.12.2016
https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.49191

Abstract

This study was carried out on heavily grazed rangelands in Erzurum, during the years 2006-2009, for 4 years
period. In this study, four treatments that included artificial pasture, oversowing, fertilization and control
were applied on grazed and enclosed rangeland sites. A mixture of Crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum),
alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and smooth brome (Bromus inermis) was used for rangeland seeding. Ammonium
sulfate and Triple Super Phosphate was applied on fertilization plots in sites grazed and enclosed site.
Botanical composition was determined by line intercept methods. After each erosive rain event, the amount of
soil (sediment) was determined in each plot. Across of four years, fertilization increased the grass proportion,
decreased other species proportion and sediment yield in both sites. Under grazing, over sowing increased the
grass proportion, and decreased other species proportion. Lower grass, higher legumes, higher other species
proportion and higher sediment yield determined in the third year compared to other years in both sites. The
enclosed site had higher grass, lower legumes, other species proportion and sediment yield than the grazed
one. Results of this study showed fertilization and oversowing treatment can be effective for soil protection in
enclosed and grazed rangelands, similar to this study area. Also, combined with short term enclosure
treatment the other improvement treatments can recommend for rangeland restoration and soil protection. 

References

  • Açıkgöz, E. 2001. Forage crops. Foundation of Strengthen of Uludag University. No: 182. Bursa.
  • Altin, M. 1975. An investigation the effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium fertilizers on yield, crude protein and crude ash ratio and plant species composition of natural meadow and rangeland in Erzurum ecological condition.
  • Ataturk Univ. Yay No: 326, Agr. Fac. No: 159, Res. Series No: 95, Erzurum, 141 s.
  • Altin, M. A. Gokkus and A. Koc, 2005. Pasture-rangeland improvement. T. C. Ministry of Agriculture of Rural Affairs, General Directorate of Agricultural Production and Development, Ankara, 468 p.
  • Altin, M., A. Gokkus and A. Koc. 2011. Meadow-pasture management. T. C. Ministry of Agriculture of Rural Affairs, General Directorate of Agricultural Production and Development, Ankara.
  • Bakır, Ö. 1985. Meadow and Pasture Improvement. Ankara University, Agric. Fac. Pub. No. 947, Ankara.
  • Bakoglu, A. 1999. The comparison of some soil and plant characteristics of two different rangeland sites, grazed and ungrazed. Ataturk Univ. Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Field Crops (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis), Erzurum.
  • Bakoglu, A. A. Koc and A. Gokkus, 1999. Some characteristics of the common plants of range and meadows in Erzurum in relation to lifespan, beginning with the flowering and forage quality. Turkish J. Agric. and Forestry 23(4): 951-957.
  • Basbag, M., İ. Gül, and V. Saruhan. 1997. Investigation of yield and composition of protected rangeland in Diyarbakir. Turkey II. Field Crops Cong. 22-25 September 1997, Samsun, 499-503.
  • Beukes, P. C. and R. M. Cowling. 2003. Non-selective grazing impacts on soil properties of the Nama Karoo. J. Range Manage. 56: 547-552.
  • Canfield, R. H. 1941. Application of the line interception method in sampling range vegetation. J. For. 39: 388-394.
  • Comakli, B. M. Dasci and A. Koc. 2008. The effects of traditional grazing practices on upland rangeland vegetation and forage quality. Turkish J. Agric. and Forestry 32:259- 265.
  • Comakli, B. T. Oner and M. Dasci. 2012. Changing of the vegetation on rangeland sites with different using history. Iğdır Univ. J. Inst. Sci. & Tech.2(2):75-82.
  • Delpech, R. 1966. An agronomic application of experimental phytosociology: a contribution to the study of the effect of mineral fertilizer on permanent grasslands in the Seano Valley. Fr. C. R. hebd. Seano. Acad. Agr. Fr. 52(1): 50-60.
  • Gadzi, K. and N. Sayre, 2009. Rangeland health and planned grazing, Field Guide. The Quivira Coalition, Earth Works Institute, the New Ranch Network.
  • Gokkus, A. 1984. Investigations on dry yield, crude protein yield and botanical composition on natural rangelands of Erzurum, practiced different improvement practiced. (Ph.D. thesis). Ataturk Univ. Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Field Crops, Erzurum.
  • Gokkus, A. and A. Koc. 1996. Plant-soil relation in plowed rangeland. Mersin Univ. Engineering Fac. AgricultureEnvironment Relations Symposium Sustainable Using of Natural Sources Proceedings Book. 13-15 May 1996, Mersin, 336-344.
  • Greiner, R., I. Gordon and C. Cocklin. 2009. Ecosystem services from tropical savannas: economic opportunities through payments for environmental services. Rangeland Journal 31:51-59.
  • Herbel, C. H. and R. D. Pieper. 1991. Grazing management. In semiarid lands and deserts: Soil resources and reclamation (Ed.J.Skujin), Marcel Dekker, 361-385, New York.
  • Holechek, J. L., R. D. Pieper and C. H. Herbel. 2011. Range management principles and practices. Sixth edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA. 444 p.
  • Jones, M. B. and S. S. Winans. 1967. Subterranean clover versus nitrogen fertilized annual grasslands: Botanical composition and protein content. Journal of Range Manag. 20(1): 8-12.
  • Junge, B., R. Abaidoo, D. Chikoye and K. Stahr. 2008. Soil conservation in Nigeria. Past and present on-station and onfarm initiatives. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, Iowa, USA. Available at: www.swcs.org
  • Khumalo, G., J. L. Holechek, M. Thomas and F. Molinar. 2007. Long-term vegetation productivity and trend under two stocking levels on Chihuahuan Desert Rangeland. Rangeland Ecol. Manage., 60:165-171.
  • Koc, A. 1995. Effects of topography, soil moisture and temperature on some properties of rangeland vegetation. (Ph.D. thesis) Ataturk Univ. Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Field Crops, Erzurum.
  • Lal, R. 1993. Soil erosion and conservation in West Africa. In World soil erosion and conservation, ed. D. Pimentel, 7-28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Livingstone, I. 1991. Livestock management and overgrazing among Pastoralists. Ambio 20:80-85.
  • National Research Council. 1994. Rangeland Health. New Methods to Classify, Inventory, and Monitor Rangelands. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 182 p.
  • Sanjari, G. 2011. Short-term intensive rotational grazing in the native pasture: I. Results of a plot scale experiment on runoff and soil loss in association with catchment scale's outcomes. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, World Congress on Conservation Agriculture. http://aciar.gov.au/files/node/13992/ short term intensive rotational grazing in native 16680.pdf. (Accessed May 25, 2016).
  • Shadkami, H. and Gh. H. Bibalani. 2011. Overground biomass characteristics of genera single Species Iran (Cnicus benedictus) in northwest Iran (till area of shape star). International Journal of Academic Research 3(1). January 2011, Part III
  • Stoddart, L. A. Smith and T. Box. 1975. Range Management. New York, USA, McGraw-Hill Book Co.
  • Snyman, H. A. 2005. Rangeland degradation in a semi-arid South Africa. I: influence on seasonal root distribution, root/shoot ratios, and water-use efficiency. Journal of Arid Environments 60:457–481.
  • SAS Inst. Inc 2002. SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. 528 p.
  • Tongway, D. J., A. D. Sparrow and M. H. Friedel. 2003. Degradation and recovery processes in arid grazing lands of central Australia. Part I: soil and land resources. Journal of Arid Environments 55:302–326.
  • Wall, G. and S. Omafra. 1987. Soil erosion causes and effects. Ontario factsheet, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. http://www.thegeographeronline.net/uploads/2/6/6/2/266293 56/soil_erosion_causes_and_effects.pdf (Accessed 25 May, 2016).
  • Wu, N. 1997. Indigenous Knowledge and Sustainable Approaches for the Maintenance of Biodiversity in Nomadic Society - Experience from Eastern Tibetan Plateau. Die Erde, 128: 67-80.
  • Zhang, Z. 1995. The effect and causes of grassland degeneration (In Chinese). Pratacultural Science 12 (6):1-5.
There are 36 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Tamer Coskun This is me

Mahmut Dascı

M. Kerim Gullap This is me

Binali Comaklı This is me

N.zeynep Yıldırım This is me

Hulya Bakır This is me

Hikmet Bırhan This is me

Publication Date December 15, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 21 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Coskun, T., Dascı, M., Gullap, M. K., Comaklı, B., et al. (2016). EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IMPROVEMENT TREATMENTS ON BOTANICAL COMPOSITION AND SEDIMENT MOVEMENT ON GRAZED AND ENCLOSED RANGE SITES. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, 21(2), 269-275. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.49191
AMA Coskun T, Dascı M, Gullap MK, Comaklı B, Yıldırım N, Bakır H, Bırhan H. EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IMPROVEMENT TREATMENTS ON BOTANICAL COMPOSITION AND SEDIMENT MOVEMENT ON GRAZED AND ENCLOSED RANGE SITES. TJFC. December 2016;21(2):269-275. doi:10.17557/tjfc.49191
Chicago Coskun, Tamer, Mahmut Dascı, M. Kerim Gullap, Binali Comaklı, N.zeynep Yıldırım, Hulya Bakır, and Hikmet Bırhan. “EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IMPROVEMENT TREATMENTS ON BOTANICAL COMPOSITION AND SEDIMENT MOVEMENT ON GRAZED AND ENCLOSED RANGE SITES”. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 21, no. 2 (December 2016): 269-75. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.49191.
EndNote Coskun T, Dascı M, Gullap MK, Comaklı B, Yıldırım N, Bakır H, Bırhan H (December 1, 2016) EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IMPROVEMENT TREATMENTS ON BOTANICAL COMPOSITION AND SEDIMENT MOVEMENT ON GRAZED AND ENCLOSED RANGE SITES. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 21 2 269–275.
IEEE T. Coskun, M. Dascı, M. K. Gullap, B. Comaklı, N. Yıldırım, H. Bakır, and H. Bırhan, “EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IMPROVEMENT TREATMENTS ON BOTANICAL COMPOSITION AND SEDIMENT MOVEMENT ON GRAZED AND ENCLOSED RANGE SITES”, TJFC, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 269–275, 2016, doi: 10.17557/tjfc.49191.
ISNAD Coskun, Tamer et al. “EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IMPROVEMENT TREATMENTS ON BOTANICAL COMPOSITION AND SEDIMENT MOVEMENT ON GRAZED AND ENCLOSED RANGE SITES”. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 21/2 (December 2016), 269-275. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.49191.
JAMA Coskun T, Dascı M, Gullap MK, Comaklı B, Yıldırım N, Bakır H, Bırhan H. EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IMPROVEMENT TREATMENTS ON BOTANICAL COMPOSITION AND SEDIMENT MOVEMENT ON GRAZED AND ENCLOSED RANGE SITES. TJFC. 2016;21:269–275.
MLA Coskun, Tamer et al. “EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IMPROVEMENT TREATMENTS ON BOTANICAL COMPOSITION AND SEDIMENT MOVEMENT ON GRAZED AND ENCLOSED RANGE SITES”. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, vol. 21, no. 2, 2016, pp. 269-75, doi:10.17557/tjfc.49191.
Vancouver Coskun T, Dascı M, Gullap MK, Comaklı B, Yıldırım N, Bakır H, Bırhan H. EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IMPROVEMENT TREATMENTS ON BOTANICAL COMPOSITION AND SEDIMENT MOVEMENT ON GRAZED AND ENCLOSED RANGE SITES. TJFC. 2016;21(2):269-75.

Turkish Journal of Field Crops is published by the Society of Field Crops Science and issued twice a year.
Owner : Prof. Dr. Behçet KIR
Ege University, Faculty of Agriculture,Department of Field Crops
Editor in Chief : Prof. Dr. Emre ILKER
Address : 848 sok. 2. Beyler İşhanı No:72, Kat:3 D.313 35000 Konak-Izmir, TURKEY
Email :  turkishjournaloffieldcrops@gmail.com contact@field-crops.org
Tel : +90 232 3112679
Tel/Fax : : +90 232 3432474