Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2016, Volume: 21 Issue: 2, 305 - 312, 15.12.2016

Abstract

References

  • Carlier, J.D., A. Reis, M.F. Duval, G. Coppens D'Eeckenbrugge, J.M. Leitão. 2004. Genetic maps of RAPD, AFLP and ISSR markers in Ananas bracteatus and A. comosus using the pseudo-testcross strategy. Plant Breed 123: 186–192.
  • Clements, J., R. Galek, B. Kozak, D.J. Michalczyk, A.I. Piotrowicz-Cieślak, E. Sawicka-Sienkiewicz, S. Stawiński, D. Zalewski. 2014. Diversity of selected Lupinus angustifolius L. genotypes at the phenotypic and DNA level with respect to microscopic seed coat structure and thickness. PLoS One 9.8: e102874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102874
  • Clements, J.C., M. Dracup, N. Galwey. 2002. Effect of genotype and environment on proportion of seed hull and pod wall in lupin. Crop and Pasture Sci 53.10: 1147-1154.
  • Clements, J.C., M.S. Sweetingham, L. Smith, G. Francis, G. Thomas, S. Sipsas. 2008. Crop improvement in Lupinus mutabilis for Australian agriculture - progress and prospects. Proc of 12th Int Lupin Conf: 244-250.
  • Commission of the European Communities Directorate-General for Agriculture. Adaptation of Lupinus mutabilis to European soil and climate conditions. Final Consolidatet Report (November 1993 - January 1997). Contract No: AIR3-CT93-0865. DGVI FII.3
  • Cowling, W.A., B.J. Buirchell, M.E. Tapia. 1998. Lupin. Lupinus L. Promoting the Conservation and Use of Underutilized and Neglected Crops. 23 IPK Gatersleben, and IPGRI, Rome.
  • Doyle, J., and J. Doyle. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus (Madison) 12: 13–15.
  • Gross, R., E. von Baer, F. Koch, R. Marquard, L. Trugol, M. Wink. 1988. Chemical composition of a new variety of the Andean lupin (Lupinus mutabilis cv. Inti) with low-alkaloid content. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 1: 353– 361. doi: 10.1016/0889-1575(88)90035-X
  • Hodkinson, T.R., M.W. Chase, S.A. Renvoize. 2002. Characterization of a Genetic Resource Collection for Miscanthus (Saccharinae, Andropogoneae, Poaceae) using AFLP and ISSR PCR. Ann Bot 89: 627–636. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf091
  • Liu K. and S.V. Muse. 2005. PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21: 2128–9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti282
  • Martins, J.M.N., P.M.R. Silva, R.F.X.B. Sousa. 1992. Evaluation of Lupinus mutabilis accessions for protein and oil in Portugal. Lupinus mutabilis its Adapt. Prod. under Eur. pedoclimatic Cond. Agrimed Research Programme. European Commission, Luxemburg: 1–10.
  • Mera, M., C. Harcha, H. Miranda, J.L. Rouanet. 2004. Genotypic and environmental effects on pod wall proportion and pod wall specific weight in Lupinus angustifolius. Aust Journ of Agric Res 55(4): 397-406. doi: 10.1071/AR03129
  • Mut, H., A.Gulumser, I. Ayan, Z.Acar, U. Basaran, O. OnalAsci. 2012. Effects of cultivar, inoculation, and sowing date in seed yield and yield components of lupin. Journal of Plant Nutrition 35(9): 1290-1302. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2012.684122
  • Nei, M. and W.H. Li 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Nat Acad Scie 76: 5269–5273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.5269
  • Planchuelo, A.M. and P. Perisse, 2006. New findings in seed coat morphology in relation to Lupinus taxonomy and phylogeny. Mex. where old new world lupins meet. Proc of 11th Int Lupin Conf: 35–40.
  • Rinehart, T. 2004. AFLP analysis using GeneMapper® software and an Excel® macro that aligns and converts output to binary. Biotechniques 37: 186–188.
  • Rohlf, F. 2009. NTSYS-Pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system version 2.02e. Exeter Software. New York
  • Römer, P. 1994. A determined mutant of Lupinus mutabilis as a possible source of early maturity. Proc 7th Int Lupin Conf: 90–92 .
  • Römer, P., P.D.S. Caligari, M.A. Rahim, C. Huyghe, A. Hardy, J. Neves-Martins, E. Sawicka-Sienkiewicz. 1999. Breeding perspectives of Lupinus mutabilis in the Middle Europe. Proc of 8th Int Lupin Conf: 353–356.
  • Sarwat, M., S. Das, P.S. Srivastava. 2008. Analysis of genetic diversity through AFLP, SAMPL, ISSR and RAPD markers in Tribulus terrestris, a medicinal herb. Plant Cell Report 27: 519–528. doi: 10.1007/s00299-007-0478-5
  • Sawicka-Sienkiewicz, E., R. Galek, H. Kalińska, D. Zalewski, S. Stawiński. 2006. Proportion of pod wall and seed coat in mutants of cv Emir and in a collection of Lupinus angustufolius. Proc of 11th Int Lupin Conf: 20–22.
  • Sbabou, L., F. Brhada, I.T. Alami, A.F. Maltouf. 2010. Genetic diversity of Maroccan Lupinus germplasm investigated using ISSR and AFLP markers. Int Jourl of Agric and Biol 12: 26– 32.
  • Talhinhas, P., J. Neves-Martins, J. Leitao. 2003. AFLP, ISSR and RAPD markers reveal high levels of genetic diversity among Lupinus spp. Plant Breed 122: 507–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2003.00892.x
  • Van de Peer Y. and R. De Wachter. 1994. TREECON for Windows: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees for the Microsoft Windows environment. Bioinformatics 10: 569–570. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/10.5.569
  • Von Baer E. and D. Von Baer. 1988. Lupinus mutabilis: cultivation and breeding. Proc of 5th Int Lupin Conf: 237– 247.

SEED COAT THICKNESS DIFFERENTIATION AND GENETIC POLYMORPHISM FOR Lupinus mutabilis SWEET BREEDING

Year 2016, Volume: 21 Issue: 2, 305 - 312, 15.12.2016

Abstract

The paper investigates seed coat characteristics in L. mutabilis, a potential forage crop. In the study twelve
genotypes, including three epigonal lines KW-5, KW-10, Pop.1 and lines with traditional type of growth XM.5,
Pop.15 LM.13, LM.34, ‘Potosi’, Mut-45, Mut-160, Mut-136, Mut-628 were evaluated. The highest seed coat
percentage was recorded in mutant line Mut-160 and the lowest was noted for mutant line Mut-45. The
statistical significance relationship between seed coat thickness and 1000 seeds weight was not notice. It’s gives
capabilities for selection of favorable genotypes in breeding process. In order to illustrate genetic diversity
among the genotypes tested, 24 ISSR primers and 6 pairs of AFLP primers were used. They generated a total
of 685 polymorphic amplification products in 12 evaluated Andean lupin genotypes. The products
characteristic only for the finest seed coat lines Mut-45 were detected as well as for the thickness seed coat line
Mut-160.

References

  • Carlier, J.D., A. Reis, M.F. Duval, G. Coppens D'Eeckenbrugge, J.M. Leitão. 2004. Genetic maps of RAPD, AFLP and ISSR markers in Ananas bracteatus and A. comosus using the pseudo-testcross strategy. Plant Breed 123: 186–192.
  • Clements, J., R. Galek, B. Kozak, D.J. Michalczyk, A.I. Piotrowicz-Cieślak, E. Sawicka-Sienkiewicz, S. Stawiński, D. Zalewski. 2014. Diversity of selected Lupinus angustifolius L. genotypes at the phenotypic and DNA level with respect to microscopic seed coat structure and thickness. PLoS One 9.8: e102874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102874
  • Clements, J.C., M. Dracup, N. Galwey. 2002. Effect of genotype and environment on proportion of seed hull and pod wall in lupin. Crop and Pasture Sci 53.10: 1147-1154.
  • Clements, J.C., M.S. Sweetingham, L. Smith, G. Francis, G. Thomas, S. Sipsas. 2008. Crop improvement in Lupinus mutabilis for Australian agriculture - progress and prospects. Proc of 12th Int Lupin Conf: 244-250.
  • Commission of the European Communities Directorate-General for Agriculture. Adaptation of Lupinus mutabilis to European soil and climate conditions. Final Consolidatet Report (November 1993 - January 1997). Contract No: AIR3-CT93-0865. DGVI FII.3
  • Cowling, W.A., B.J. Buirchell, M.E. Tapia. 1998. Lupin. Lupinus L. Promoting the Conservation and Use of Underutilized and Neglected Crops. 23 IPK Gatersleben, and IPGRI, Rome.
  • Doyle, J., and J. Doyle. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus (Madison) 12: 13–15.
  • Gross, R., E. von Baer, F. Koch, R. Marquard, L. Trugol, M. Wink. 1988. Chemical composition of a new variety of the Andean lupin (Lupinus mutabilis cv. Inti) with low-alkaloid content. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 1: 353– 361. doi: 10.1016/0889-1575(88)90035-X
  • Hodkinson, T.R., M.W. Chase, S.A. Renvoize. 2002. Characterization of a Genetic Resource Collection for Miscanthus (Saccharinae, Andropogoneae, Poaceae) using AFLP and ISSR PCR. Ann Bot 89: 627–636. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf091
  • Liu K. and S.V. Muse. 2005. PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21: 2128–9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti282
  • Martins, J.M.N., P.M.R. Silva, R.F.X.B. Sousa. 1992. Evaluation of Lupinus mutabilis accessions for protein and oil in Portugal. Lupinus mutabilis its Adapt. Prod. under Eur. pedoclimatic Cond. Agrimed Research Programme. European Commission, Luxemburg: 1–10.
  • Mera, M., C. Harcha, H. Miranda, J.L. Rouanet. 2004. Genotypic and environmental effects on pod wall proportion and pod wall specific weight in Lupinus angustifolius. Aust Journ of Agric Res 55(4): 397-406. doi: 10.1071/AR03129
  • Mut, H., A.Gulumser, I. Ayan, Z.Acar, U. Basaran, O. OnalAsci. 2012. Effects of cultivar, inoculation, and sowing date in seed yield and yield components of lupin. Journal of Plant Nutrition 35(9): 1290-1302. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2012.684122
  • Nei, M. and W.H. Li 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Nat Acad Scie 76: 5269–5273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.5269
  • Planchuelo, A.M. and P. Perisse, 2006. New findings in seed coat morphology in relation to Lupinus taxonomy and phylogeny. Mex. where old new world lupins meet. Proc of 11th Int Lupin Conf: 35–40.
  • Rinehart, T. 2004. AFLP analysis using GeneMapper® software and an Excel® macro that aligns and converts output to binary. Biotechniques 37: 186–188.
  • Rohlf, F. 2009. NTSYS-Pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system version 2.02e. Exeter Software. New York
  • Römer, P. 1994. A determined mutant of Lupinus mutabilis as a possible source of early maturity. Proc 7th Int Lupin Conf: 90–92 .
  • Römer, P., P.D.S. Caligari, M.A. Rahim, C. Huyghe, A. Hardy, J. Neves-Martins, E. Sawicka-Sienkiewicz. 1999. Breeding perspectives of Lupinus mutabilis in the Middle Europe. Proc of 8th Int Lupin Conf: 353–356.
  • Sarwat, M., S. Das, P.S. Srivastava. 2008. Analysis of genetic diversity through AFLP, SAMPL, ISSR and RAPD markers in Tribulus terrestris, a medicinal herb. Plant Cell Report 27: 519–528. doi: 10.1007/s00299-007-0478-5
  • Sawicka-Sienkiewicz, E., R. Galek, H. Kalińska, D. Zalewski, S. Stawiński. 2006. Proportion of pod wall and seed coat in mutants of cv Emir and in a collection of Lupinus angustufolius. Proc of 11th Int Lupin Conf: 20–22.
  • Sbabou, L., F. Brhada, I.T. Alami, A.F. Maltouf. 2010. Genetic diversity of Maroccan Lupinus germplasm investigated using ISSR and AFLP markers. Int Jourl of Agric and Biol 12: 26– 32.
  • Talhinhas, P., J. Neves-Martins, J. Leitao. 2003. AFLP, ISSR and RAPD markers reveal high levels of genetic diversity among Lupinus spp. Plant Breed 122: 507–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2003.00892.x
  • Van de Peer Y. and R. De Wachter. 1994. TREECON for Windows: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees for the Microsoft Windows environment. Bioinformatics 10: 569–570. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/10.5.569
  • Von Baer E. and D. Von Baer. 1988. Lupinus mutabilis: cultivation and breeding. Proc of 5th Int Lupin Conf: 237– 247.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Renata Anna Galek This is me

Bartosz Kozak This is me

Ada Bıela This is me

Dariusz Zalewskı This is me

Ewa Sawıcka Sıenkıewıcz This is me

Krystyna Spychała This is me

Stanisław Stawıńskı This is me

Publication Date December 15, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 21 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Galek, R. A., Kozak, B., Bıela, A., Zalewskı, D., et al. (2016). SEED COAT THICKNESS DIFFERENTIATION AND GENETIC POLYMORPHISM FOR Lupinus mutabilis SWEET BREEDING. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, 21(2), 305-312.
AMA Galek RA, Kozak B, Bıela A, Zalewskı D, Sawıcka Sıenkıewıcz E, Spychała K, Stawıńskı S. SEED COAT THICKNESS DIFFERENTIATION AND GENETIC POLYMORPHISM FOR Lupinus mutabilis SWEET BREEDING. TJFC. December 2016;21(2):305-312.
Chicago Galek, Renata Anna, Bartosz Kozak, Ada Bıela, Dariusz Zalewskı, Ewa Sawıcka Sıenkıewıcz, Krystyna Spychała, and Stanisław Stawıńskı. “SEED COAT THICKNESS DIFFERENTIATION AND GENETIC POLYMORPHISM FOR Lupinus Mutabilis SWEET BREEDING”. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 21, no. 2 (December 2016): 305-12.
EndNote Galek RA, Kozak B, Bıela A, Zalewskı D, Sawıcka Sıenkıewıcz E, Spychała K, Stawıńskı S (December 1, 2016) SEED COAT THICKNESS DIFFERENTIATION AND GENETIC POLYMORPHISM FOR Lupinus mutabilis SWEET BREEDING. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 21 2 305–312.
IEEE R. A. Galek, B. Kozak, A. Bıela, D. Zalewskı, E. Sawıcka Sıenkıewıcz, K. Spychała, and S. Stawıńskı, “SEED COAT THICKNESS DIFFERENTIATION AND GENETIC POLYMORPHISM FOR Lupinus mutabilis SWEET BREEDING”, TJFC, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 305–312, 2016.
ISNAD Galek, Renata Anna et al. “SEED COAT THICKNESS DIFFERENTIATION AND GENETIC POLYMORPHISM FOR Lupinus Mutabilis SWEET BREEDING”. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 21/2 (December 2016), 305-312.
JAMA Galek RA, Kozak B, Bıela A, Zalewskı D, Sawıcka Sıenkıewıcz E, Spychała K, Stawıńskı S. SEED COAT THICKNESS DIFFERENTIATION AND GENETIC POLYMORPHISM FOR Lupinus mutabilis SWEET BREEDING. TJFC. 2016;21:305–312.
MLA Galek, Renata Anna et al. “SEED COAT THICKNESS DIFFERENTIATION AND GENETIC POLYMORPHISM FOR Lupinus Mutabilis SWEET BREEDING”. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, vol. 21, no. 2, 2016, pp. 305-12.
Vancouver Galek RA, Kozak B, Bıela A, Zalewskı D, Sawıcka Sıenkıewıcz E, Spychała K, Stawıńskı S. SEED COAT THICKNESS DIFFERENTIATION AND GENETIC POLYMORPHISM FOR Lupinus mutabilis SWEET BREEDING. TJFC. 2016;21(2):305-12.

Turkish Journal of Field Crops is published by the Society of Field Crops Science and issued twice a year.
Owner : Prof. Dr. Behçet KIR
Ege University, Faculty of Agriculture,Department of Field Crops
Editor in Chief : Prof. Dr. Emre ILKER
Address : 848 sok. 2. Beyler İşhanı No:72, Kat:3 D.313 35000 Konak-Izmir, TURKEY
Email :  turkishjournaloffieldcrops@gmail.com contact@field-crops.org
Tel : +90 232 3112679
Tel/Fax : : +90 232 3432474