Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the memorial symptom assessment scale in children aged 7–12 with cancer

Year 2022, Volume: 5 Issue: 3, 222 - 229, 30.12.2022

Şule Çiftcioğlu , Emine Efe

https://doi.org/10.56150/tjhsl.1074721

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The aim of study was to evaluate of the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale in children aged 7–12 with cancer. The sample consisted of 70 children. Psychometric testing consisted of internal consistency reliability (item-total correlations and Cronbach alpha coefficient), test-retest reliability, and validity (exploratory factor analysis and Kendall's coefficient of concordance). In the exploratory factor analysis, Barlett’s chi-square test was (X2 =161.485; p = 0.000). Kendall's coefficient of concordance was found to be Wa = 0.75. The test-retest reliability of the scale was r =0.91, and the internal consistency Cronbach α value was 0.83. Correlations between all items were significantly higher (p <.01). According to the results, the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale 7-12 is a valid and reliable tool for Turkish children with cancer.

Keywords

Cancer, Children, Reliability and Validity

References

• 1. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer-in-children. (Accessed November 29, 2021).
• 2. Kutluk T (2021): Epidemiology of childhood cancers. 1-3. In E. Cabi Unal (Ed), Rare Tumors in Childhood. Turkey Clinics, Ankara.
• 3. Yağcı Küpeli B., & İlhan Yalaki A. Treatment-induced iron load in childhood cancers. Archive Resource Review Journal, (2018), 27(2), 223-240. https://doi.org/10.17827/aktd.362628
• 4. Cheng K. K. F. Prevention of gastrointestinal side effects in paediatric oncology: what are the guidelines? Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care, (2017), 11(2), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000264
• 5. Linder L. A., Al-Qaaydeh S., & Donaldson G. Symptom characteristics among hospitalised children and adolescents with cancer. Cancer Nursing, (2018), 41(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000469.
• 6. Torres V., Nunes M. D. R., Silva-Rodrigues F. M., Bravo L., Adlard K., Secola R., … & Jacob E. Frequency, severity, and distress associated with physical and psychosocial symptoms at home in children and adolescents with cancer. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, (2019), 33, 404–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2018.11.007
• 7. Withycombe J. S., Haugen M., Zupanec S., Macpherson C. F., & Landier W. Consensus recommendations from the children’s oncology group nursing discipline’s state of the science symposium: symptom assessment during childhood cancer treatment. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, (2019), 36, 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454219854983
• 8. Chung J., Ju G., Yang J., Jeong J., Jeong Y., Choi M. K., …& Han H. S. Prevalence of and factors associated with anxiety and depression in Korean patients with newly diagnosed advanced gastrointestinal cancer. The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, (2018), 3, 585 - 594. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2016.108
• 9. Schlegelmilch M., Punja S., Jou H., Mackie A. S., Conway J., Wilson B., … & Vohra S. Observational study of pediatric inpatient pain, nausea/vomiting and anxiety. Children, (2019), 6, 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/children6050065
• 10. Lazor T., Tigelaar L., Pole J. D., De Souza C., Tomlinson D., & Sung L. Instruments to measure anxiety in children, adolescents, and young adults with cancer: A systematic review. Support Care Cancer, (2017), 25, 2921–2931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3743-3
• 11. Linder L. A., Newman A. R., Stegenga K., Chiu Y. S., Wawrzynski S. E., Kramer H., … & Altizer R. Feasibility and acceptability of a game-based symptom-reporting app for children with cancer: perspectives of children and parents. Supportive Care in Cancer, (2021), 29, 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05495-w
• 12. Requena M. L., Orellana L., Cordeiro V., Luna F., Bevilacqua M. S., Gomez K., … & Dussel V. Spanish adaptation of the pediatric memorial symptom assessment scale for children, teens, and caregivers. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, (2021), 61(6), 1165-1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.10.022
• 13. Eiser C., Havermans T., Craft A., & Kernahan J. Validity of the Rotterdam symptom checklist in paediatric oncology. Medical and Pediatric Oncology, (1997), 28(6), 451–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-911x(199706)28:6<451::aid- mpo11>3.0.co;2-c
• 14. Collins J. J., Byrnes M. E., Dunkel I. J., Lapin J., Nadel T., Thaler H. T., … & Portenoy R. K. The measurement of symptoms in children with cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, (2000), 19(5), 363 - 377. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0885-3924(00)00127-5
• 15. Collins J. J., Devine T. D., Johnson E. A., Kilham H. A., Pinkerton C. R., Thaler H. T., … & Portenoy R. K. The measurement of symptoms in young children with cancer: the validation of the memorial symptom assessment scale in children aged 7– 12. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, (2002), 23(1), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00375-x
• 16. Wu M., Hsu L., Zhang B., Shen N., Lu H., & Li S. The experiences of cancer-related fatigue among chinese children with leukaemia: A phenomenological study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, (2010), 47, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.05.026
• 17. Williams P. D., Williams A. R., Kelly K. P., Dobos C., Gieseking A., Connor R., … & Del Favero D. A symptom checklist for children with cancer: the therapy related symptom checklist children. Cancer Nursing, (2012), 35, 89‑98. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e31821a51f6
• 18. Atay Turan, S., Conk, Z., Bahar, Z., Kantar, M., & Bolışık, Z. B. Turkish validity and reliability study of the memorial symptom assessment scale (MSAS 10-18). Aegean Bulletin of Pediatrics, (2007), 14(2), 93-99.
• 19. Esin MN (2014): Data collection methods and tools & reliability and validity of data collection tools. 195-232. In: S Erdoğan, N Nahcivan, & MN Esin (Eds), Research in nursing: process, practice and critique. Nobel Medicine Publications, İstanbul.
• 20. Brown AT (2015): Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 380-381. In: AT Brown (Ed), Statistical power and sample size, 2nd ed., A Division of Guilford Publications, New York.
• 21. Altay N., Kılıçarslan Törüner E., & Sarı Ç. The effect of drawing and writing technique on the anxiety level of children undergoing cancer treatment. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, (2017). 28, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2017.02.007
• 22. Çiftcioğlu Ş., & Efe E. Validity and reliability of the oral assessment guide for children and young people receiving chemotherapy. Turkish Journal Of Oncology, (2017), 32(4), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.5505/tjo.2017.1671
• 23. Nilsson S., Holstensson J., Johansson C., & Thunberg G. Children's perceptions of pictures intended to measure anxiety during hospitalization, Journal of Pediatric Nursing, (2019), 44, 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2018.10.015
• 24. Özdamar K (2016): Scale and test development structural equation modeling. Nisan Bookstore Publishing, Ankara.
• 25. Kartal M, & Bardakçı S (2018): Reliability and validity analyzes with SPSS and AMOS applied examples. Akademisyen Publishing, Turkey.
• 26. Seçer I (2018): Psychological test development and adaptation process; SPSS and Lisrel applications, 2nd ed., Anı Publishing, Ankara.
• 27. Tavşancıl E (2010): Measuring Attitudes and Data Analysis with SPSS., 4th ed., 3-58, Nobel Publication Distribution, Ankara.
• 28. Hjermstad M. J., Fossa S. D., Bjordal K., & Kaasa S. Test/retest study of the european organization for research and treatment of cancer core quality-of-life questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Oncology, (1995), 13(5), 1249-1254. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1995.13.5.1249
• 29. Chang V. T., Hwang S. S., Feuerman M., Kasimis B. S., & Thaler H. T. The memorial symptom assessment scale short form (MSAS-SF) validity and reliability. Cancer, (2000), 89, 1162-1171. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20000901)89:5<1162::AID-CNCR26>3.0.CO;2-Y
• 30. Tekindal S (2017): Measurement and evaluation in education, 1-325. Pegem Academy Publishing, Ankara.
• 31. Bayram N. (2010): Introduction to structural equation modeling amos applications, 118-125. Ezgi Bookstore Publications, Ankara.
• 32. Tavakol M., & Dennick R. Making sense of cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, (2011), 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
• 33. Hinds P. S., Schum L., & Srivastava D. K. Is clinical relevance sometimes lost in summative scores? Western Journal of Nursing Research, (2002), 24(4), 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/01945902024004004
• 34. Johnson B & Christensen L (2014): Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches, 3rd ed., SAGE Publication Inc, California.
• 35. Erkuş A (2016): Measurement and scale development in psychology- I, 3rd ed., Pegem Akademi Publishing, Ankara.
• 36. DeVellis RF & Thorpe CT (2021): Scale development: theory and applications, 5th ed, Sage Publications, India.
• 37. Karagöz Y (2016): SPSS 23 and AMOS 23 applied statistical analysis, Nobel Akademi Publishing, Ankara.