Tarihi Yığma Köprülerin Farklı Depremler Altında Dinamik Analizi: Murat Bey Köprüsü Örneği

Year 2022, Volume: 17 Issue: 2, 461 - 473, 30.09.2022

Elif Gözde Yılmaz , Erkut Sayın , Alper Özmen

https://doi.org/10.55525/tjst.1105998

Cited By: 9

Abstract

Dynamic Analysis of Historical Masonry Arch Bridges under Different Earthquakes: The Case of Murat Bey Bridge

Abstract

Historical structures, which constitute an important part of our cultural heritage, should be well protected and carried into the future. Masonry arch bridges are significant part of these structures. In this study, the single-span Murat Bey Bridge in the province of Kütahya, built in 1460, was studied as a numerical application. Firstly, three dimensional finite element model of the bridge was constituted with SAP2000 finite element program. Static analysis of the bridge under its own weight was carried out. The modal analysis method was used to obtain the dynamic characteristics of the bridge. Then, time-history analysis method was applied for seismic evaluation of the bridge. For this purpose, the acceleration records of the 1998 Adana, 2003 Bingöl, 2011 Van and 2020 Elazığ earthquakes were taken into consideration. As a result of the dynamic analyses carried out, the displacement and stress graphs occurring on the bridge were examined. The highest displacement and stress values on the historical bridge were obtained from the acceleration records of the 2011 Van earthquake.

Keywords

Historical masonry bridges, finite elements, dynamic analysis

References

• [1] Bell B. Sustainable Bridges – Assessment for Future Traffic Demands and Longer Lives. European Railway Bridge Demography. 2004.
• [2] Gönen S, Soyöz S. Seismic analysis of a masonry arch bridge using multiple methodologies. Engineering Structures 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111354.
• [3] Frunzio G, Monaco M, Gesualdo A. 3D F.E.M. analysis of a Roman arch bridge, Historical Constructions. P.B.Lourenço, P.Roca (Eds.), 591-598, Guimarães, 2001.
• [4] Milan G, Lourenço PB. 3D non-linear behaviour of masonry arch bridges. Computers and Structures 2012; 110–111: 133–150.
• [5] Sayın E, Calayır Y, Karaton M. Nonlinear seismic analysis of historical Uzunok Bridge. Seventh National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 30 May-3 June, Istanbul, Turkey, 2011 (in Turkish).
• [6] Altunışık, AC, Kanbur, B, Genç, AF. The effect of arch geometry on the structural behaviour of masonry bridges. Smart Structures and System 2015; 1: 1-20.
• [7] Güllü H, Jaf HS. Full 3D nonlinear time history analysis of dynamic soil–structure interaction for a historical masonry arch bridge. Environmental Earth Sciences 2016; 75(11): 1-17.
• [8] Özmen A, Sayın E. Seismic assessment of a historical masonry arch bridge. Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics 2018; 1(2): 95–104.
• [9] Sevim B, Bayraktar A, Altunışık AC, Atamtürktür S, Birinci F. Finite element model calibration effects on the earthquake response of masonry arch bridges. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 2011; 47: 621-634.
• [10] Hokelekli E., Yılmaz BN. Effect of cohesive contact of backfill with arch and spandrel walls of a historical masonry arch bridge on seismic response. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering 2019; 63(3): 926-937.
• [11] Sakcalı GB, Gönül A, Yüksel İ. Seismic behaviour of historical masonry bridges: The case study of Irgandi Bridge. International Journal of Architectural Engineering Technology 2019; 6: 24-32.
• [12] Şeker BŞ, Gökçe M. Tarihi Hundi Hatun (Kunç) köprüsünün artan trafik yükü altında davranışının incelenmesi. Uluslararası Mühendislik Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dergisi 2021; 13(2): 496-507.
• [13] Radnić J, Harapin A, Smilović M, Grgić N, Glibić M. Static and dynamic analysis of the old stone bridge in Mostar. Građevinar, 2012; 8: 655-665.
• [14] Gonen H, Dogan M, Karacasu M, Ozbasaran H, Gokdemir H. Structural failures in retrofit historical Murat masonry arch bridge. Eng. Fail. Anal., 2013; 35: 334-342.
• [15] Güllü H. Tarihi yığma yapılı Cendere köprüsünün deprem etkisinin incelenmesi. ÖHÜ Müh. Bilim. Derg. 2018; 7(1): 245-259.
• [16] Özodabaş A, Artan C. Determination of stress and deformation zones of historical Mus Murat Bridge. BSEU Journal of Science 2021; 8(1): 413-429.
• [17] Akın K, Sayın E, Özmen A. Farklı sönüm tipleri altında tarihi yığma köprülerin sismik tepkilerinin değerlendirilmesi. Fırat Üniversitesi Müh. Bil. Dergisi 2022; 34(1): 45-59.
• [18] Toker S, Ünay Aİ. Kemerli taş köprülerin matematiksel modellenmesi ve sonlu elemanlar yöntemiyle analizi. G.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 2004; 17(2): 129-139.
• [19] Lourenço, P. B., Computational strategies for masonry structures, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, 1996.
• [20] Usta, P, Bozdağ, Ö. Tarihi Başdurak camisinin deprem analizi. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences 2021; 27(3): 244–250.
• [21] Özmen A, Sayın E. Tarihi yığma bir köprünün deprem davranışının değerlendirilmesi. NÖHÜ Müh. Bilim. Derg. 2020; 9(2): 956-965.
• [22] Homaei F, Yazdani M. The probabilistic seismic assessment of aged concrete arch bridges: The role of soil-structure interaction. Structures 2020; 28: 894-904.
• [23] Ercan E, Nuhoglu A. Identification of historical Veziragasi aqueduct using the operational modal analysis, The Scientific World Journal, Article ID: 518608, 2014.
• [24] Bayraktar A, Altunışık AC, Türker T, Sevim B. Tarihi köprülerin deprem davranışına sonlu eleman model iyileştirilmesinin etkisi. Altıncı Ulusal Deprem Mühendisliği Konferansı, İstanbul, Türkiye, 2007.
• [25] Pela L, Aprile A, Benedetti A. Seismic assessment of masonry arch bridges. Engineering Structures 2009; 31: 1777- 1788.
• [26] Turer A, Boz B. Computer modelling and seismic performance assessment of historic Aspendos theatre in Antalya, Turkey. Engineering Structures 2008; 30(8): 2127-2139.
• [27] Sayın E. Nonlinear seismic response of a masonry arch bridge. Earthquakes and Structures 2016; 10(2): 483–494.
• [28] Özmen A, Sayın E. Seismic response of a historical masonry bridge under near and far-fault ground motions. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering 2021; 65(3): 946–958.
• [29] Altunışık AC, Genç AF. Earthquake response of heavily damaged historical masonry mosques after restoration. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 2017; 17(10): 1811–1821.
• [30] TBEC, 2018 Turkish Building Earthquake Code, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement.